On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
So, no, the current information provided by this handler does not
contain frequency information. I'd be happy to consider patches that
allow it to provide more information, though I'd like to keep the
basic index information request as succinct as possible, using
additional parameters to output more details if requested.
Erik and Chris!
Thanks again for the clarification. It helps a lot. I am still
trying to get my head around Solr and Solrb. Lot of
new ..cool..things! It would me greatly if any of you could beef up
at least the solrb RDOC i.e. beside stubbs with examples etc. I
know its a bit early in the development but
its difficult to get into API's without docs. I would love to
contribute once we have some basics there plus when I get a bit
more comfortable in Solr.
solrb rdoc... indeed we'll beef it up. If you have specific
questions, please ask and that'll help prioritize what needs to be
covered sooner rather than later.
However, even better than documentation is real-world working example
code. You'll find that in the README file and in the quite robust
test case (100% code coverage, still!). The unit test cases are
sometimes contrived to exercise an edge case in the code and may not
be useful for copy/paste, but the functional tests are end-to-end
tests that hit a real Solr instance.
Erik
