On 2/1/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
> Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> So, no, the current information provided by this handler does not
> contain frequency information.  I'd be happy to consider patches that
> allow it to provide more information, though I'd like to keep the
> basic index information request as succinct as possible, using
> additional parameters to output more details if requested.
>
>  Erik and Chris!
>
> Thanks again for the clarification. It helps a lot. I am still
> trying to get my head around Solr and Solrb. Lot of
> new ..cool..things! It would me greatly if any of you could beef up
> at least the solrb RDOC i.e. beside stubbs with examples etc. I
> know its a bit early in the development but
> its difficult to get into API's without docs. I would love to
> contribute once  we have some basics there plus when I get a bit
> more comfortable in Solr.

solrb rdoc... indeed we'll beef it up.  If you have specific
questions, please ask and that'll help prioritize what needs to be
covered sooner rather than later.

Cool. Please see below.

However, even better than documentation is real-world working example
code.  You'll find that in the README file and in the quite robust
test case (100% code coverage, still!).  The unit test cases are
sometimes contrived to exercise an edge case in the code and may not
be useful for copy/paste, but the functional tests are end-to-end
tests that hit a real Solr instance.

I think trying to tackle two problem (Learning Solr as well as
solrb/flare) at the
same time is giving the problem. While I was writing the i18n unit test I found
out the 100% test cov. thats really cool. Now in terms of docs.. I
think it would
be great if I have a

- TODO file under client/ruby/solrb. What I mean is that - lot of times
I find information in wiki which applies to Solr but I don't know if it applies
to solr-ruby-api. So it would be nice to have a TODO file (Things that is
not available in solr-ruby yet. Makes my life easier.
- I am completely lost in terms of facets.. I would love to have some more info
about it. I couldn't follow the facet's part of the code when i was
looking at the test/unit/standard_request.rb and standard_response.rb,
It would be nice if
there were some explanation regarding facets in the .rb files.

If you prefer, what I could do is comment the code as I see it based
on the functional
test and then you can edit it this way we could beef up the doc rather
quick. Its not that
many files so I could give it a shot by end day tomorrow. Off course
except Facets :-)

Cheers
Zaheed

Reply via email to