Thank you.
Dominique
Le mar. 9 juin 2020 à 15:18, Ilan Ginzburg a écrit :
> See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14521
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:17 PM Ilan Ginzburg wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raab13cabe321d12b6cda7dc6e529176f51ece31d30f0099
See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14521
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:17 PM Ilan Ginzburg wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raab13cabe321d12b6cda7dc6e529176f51ece31d30f00997dd36570a%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
>
> Ilan
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Domi
Yes.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/raab13cabe321d12b6cda7dc6e529176f51ece31d30f00997dd36570a%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E
Ilan
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Dominique Bejean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my clients claims that the Lucene-Solr project will split into two
> separate projects
Also note that the OpenJDK devs regularly get to test very early
(unreleased) Java versions, which flushes out a lot of issues long
before a general release of Java
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 5:25 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/14/2018 8:07 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote:
>>
>> I am looking for Lu
On 8/14/2018 8:07 PM, Yasufumi Mizoguchi wrote:
I am looking for Lucene/Solr's bug list caused by JVM's implementations.
And I found the following, but it seems not to be updated.
https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/JavaBugs
Where can I check the latest one?
That is the only such list that I'm
I added a comment on the INFRA issue.
I don't understand why it periodically "gets stuck".
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Kevin Risden
wrote:
> It looks like both Apache Git mirror (git://git.apache.org/lucene-solr.git)
> and GitHub mirror (ht
Tracking not teaching... Auto complete is fun...
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, 6:34 AM Jamie Johnson wrote:
> No worries, thanks again I'll begin teaching this
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015, 5:16 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry Jamie, I totally missed this email. There was no Jira that I could
>
No worries, thanks again I'll begin teaching this
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015, 5:16 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> Sorry Jamie, I totally missed this email. There was no Jira that I could
> find. I created SOLR-7996
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>
> > This sounds like a
Sorry Jamie, I totally missed this email. There was no Jira that I could
find. I created SOLR-7996
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> This sounds like a good idea, I'm assuming I'd need to make my own
> UnInvertingReader (or subclass) to do this right? Is there a way to do
Also since DocValues seems to be the future of faceting, is there another
mechanism that I should be looking at to do authorization based filtering
like this? I know that I can do this filtering at a document level and get
the desired result, but am wondering about at the Term level. As always
th
This sounds like a good idea, I'm assuming I'd need to make my own
UnInvertingReader (or subclass) to do this right? Is there a way to do
this on the 5.x codebase or would I still need the solrindexer factory work
that Tomás mentioned previously?
Tomás, is there a ticket for the SolrIndexer facto
UnInvertingReader makes indexed fields look like docvalues fields.
The caching itself is still done in FieldCache/FieldCacheImpl
but you could perhaps wrap what is cached there to either screen out
stuff or construct a new entry based on the user.
-Yonik
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jamie J
I think a custom UnInvertingReader would work as I could skip the process
of putting things in the cache. Right now in Solr 4.x though I am caching
based but including the users authorities in the key of the cache so we're
not rebuilding the UnivertedField on every request. Where in 5.x is the
ob
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> I don't think there is a way to do this now. Maybe we should separate the
> logic of creating the SolrIndexSearcher to a factory.
That should probably be extended down to where lucene creates
searchers as well (delete-by-query).
Rig
The FieldCache has become implementation rather than interface, so I
don't think you're going to see plugins at that level (it's all
package protected now).
One could either subclass or re-implement UnInvertingReader though.
-Yonik
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Also
Also in this vein I think that Lucene should support factories for the
cache creation as described @
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2394. I'm not endorsing the
patch that is provided (I haven't even looked at it) just the concept in
general.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Jamie J
That makes sense, then I could extend the SolrIndexSearcher by creating a
different factory class that did whatever magic I needed. If you create a
Jira ticket for this please link it here so I can track it! Again thanks
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <
tomasflo...@gmail
I don't think there is a way to do this now. Maybe we should separate the
logic of creating the SolrIndexSearcher to a factory. Moving this logic
away from SolrCore is already a win, plus it will make it easier to unit
test and extend for advanced use cases.
Tomás
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:10 PM,
Sorry to poke this again but I'm not following the last comment of how I
could go about extending the solr index searcher and have the extension
used. Is there an example of this? Again thanks
Jamie
On Aug 25, 2015 7:18 AM, "Jamie Johnson" wrote:
> I had seen this as well, if I over wrote this
I had seen this as well, if I over wrote this by extending
SolrIndexSearcher how do I have my extension used? I didn't see a way that
could be plugged in.
On Aug 25, 2015 7:15 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev"
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mikhail. If I'm rea
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Thanks Mikhail. If I'm reading the SimpleFacets class correctly, out
> delegates to DocValuesFacets when facet method is FC, what used to be
> FieldCache I believe. DocValuesFacets either uses DocValues or builds then
> using the Uninverti
Thanks Mikhail. If I'm reading the SimpleFacets class correctly, out
delegates to DocValuesFacets when facet method is FC, what used to be
FieldCache I believe. DocValuesFacets either uses DocValues or builds then
using the UninvertingReader.
I am not seeing a clean extension point to add a cust
Hello Jamie,
I don't understand how it could choose DocValuesFacets (it occurs on
docValues=true) field, but then switches to UninvertingReader/FieldCache
which means docValues=false. If you can provide more details it would be
great.
Beside of that, I suppose you can only implement and inject your
I had created it in a ‘retired’ location. The tag should be in the correction
spot now.
Thanks!
- Mark
On Oct 25, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I’ll look into it. I ran the command to create the tag, but perhaps it did
> not ‘take’ :)
>
> - Mark
>
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:56 PM, An
I’ll look into it. I ran the command to create the tag, but perhaps it did not
‘take’ :)
- Mark
On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:56 PM, André Widhani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> shouldn't there be a tag for the 4.5.1 release under
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/tags/ ?
>
> Or am I looking at the wr
Just to add to the pile...use the Deadline or NOOP I/O scheduler.
-Z
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Turning swappiness down to 0 can have some decent performance impact.
>
> - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swappiness
>
> In the past, I've seen better performance with ext3
Turning swappiness down to 0 can have some decent performance impact.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swappiness
In the past, I've seen better performance with ext3 over ext4 around
commits/fsync. Test were actually enough slower (lots of these operations),
that I made a special ext3 partition w
I figured as much for atime, thanks Otis!
I haven't ran benchmarks just yet, but I'll be sure to share whatever I
find. I plan to try ext4 vs xfs.
I am also curious what effect disabling journaling (ext2) would have,
relying on SolrCloud to manage 'consistency' over many instances vs FS
journalin
Hi,
You can use noatime, nodiratime, nothing in Solr depends on that as
far as I know. We tend to use ext4. Some people love xfs. Want to
run some benchmarks and publish the results? :)
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Tim Vaillanco
Have you completed the Solr tutorial yet? If so, please ask a more specific
question so we can understand what your problem is.
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rider Carrion Cleger
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:43 AM
To: solr-us
If you're not using Drupal, understand that Solr is an *engine*, not a full
application. You download solr from the website and install it, which is
just basically unpacking it and executing "ant -jar start.jar". From there
you send documents to Solr (there are a number of ways to accomplish
this).
Assuming you are using Drupal for the website, you can have Solr set
up and integrated with Drupal in < 5 minutes for local development
purposes.
See: https://drupal.org/node/1358710 for a pre-configured download.
-Peter
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Achebe, Ike, JCL
wrote:
> Hi,
> My name i
OK. Thanks for all of the suggestions.
Cheers
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene->SOLR transition
On Sep 18, 2011, at 19:43 , Michael Sokolov wr
On 9/19/2011 5:27 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 19:43 , Michael Sokolov wrote:
On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is "correct", then is there an easy way
to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries, etc.) and g
On Sep 18, 2011, at 19:43 , Michael Sokolov wrote:
> On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>>
>> 2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is "correct", then is there an easy
>> way to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries,
>> etc.) and generate a SOLR query string w
On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is "correct", then is there an easy way
to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries, etc.) and generate a
SOLR query string with q and fq components?
I believe that Query.toString() will p
Hi Scott, now your queries are going to be created by a QueryParser. you
have a couple of options here, most common are LuceneQueryParser,
DismaxQueryParser and ExtendedDismaxQueryParser, but there are others. The
QueryParser will be creating all those queries you mentiones, for example,
if you are
Hi
Scott Smith, il 16/09/2011 02:30, ha scritto:
I've been using lucene for a number of years. We've now decided to move to
SOLR. I have a couple of questions.
1. I'm used to creating Boolean queries, filter queries, term queries,
etc. for lucene. Am I right in thinking that for SOL
It depends. Okay, the source contains "4 harv. l. rev. 45" .
Do you want a user entered "harv." to ALSO match "harv" (without the
period) in source, and vice versa? Or do you require it NOT match? Or do
you not care?
The default filter analysis chain will index "4 harv. l. rev. 45"
essential
I have decided to use solr for indexing as well.
the types of searches im doing are professional/academic.
so for example, i need to match:
all over the following exactly from my source data:
"3.56",
"4 harv. l. rev. 45",
"187-532",
"3 llm 56",
"5 unts 8",
"6 u.n.t.s.
I predict you'll spend a lot of time on the admin/analysis page
understanding what the various combinations of tokenizers and filters do.
Because, you see, you already have differences, to whit: your Solr schema
has LowercaseFilter and removeDuplicates.
Have you determined *why* Solr indexing is s
In your solr schema.xml, are the fields you are using defined as text
fields with analyzers? It sounds like you want no analysis at all, which
probably means you don't want text fields either, you just want string
fields. That will make it impossible to search for individual tokens
though, sear
dhastings,
my recommendation for the approaches from both sides ...
Lucene:
try on a whitespace analyzer for size
Analyzer an = new WhitespaceAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_31);
Solr:
in your /index/solr/conf/schema.xml
...
-craig
-Original Message
Thx Koji, I tried 2.9.3 and it works :-)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (10/08/24 10:02), ANurag wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am using lucene 3.0 jars and built a lucene index with 200
>> documents. The index files were then copied over to my solr 1.4.1
>> installation. I get
(10/08/24 10:02), ANurag wrote:
Hi,
I am using lucene 3.0 jars and built a lucene index with 200
documents. The index files were then copied over to my solr 1.4.1
installation. I get the following error every time I start SOLR:
What could I be doing wrong?
Solr 1.4 can read Lucene 2.9 index or
Dear Erik,
It would be great if you can upload the presentation online. It would help
all of us. And if possible video too.
Warm Regards,
Allahbaksh
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
> Hello,any plans to upload these presentations on the web (or even better
> release video reco
Hello,any plans to upload these presentations on the web (or even better
release video recordings)?
Lukas
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Lucene/Solr Meetup / May 20th, Reston VA, 6-8:30 pm
> http://www.meetup.com/NOVA-Lucene-Solr-Meetup/
>
> Join us for an evening of presen
On 1/5/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the latest Lucene nightly build compatible with the Solr ? If not, is
there any file in the download,
which lists the lucene build that is bundled with Solr ?
CHANGES.txt lists Lucene version updates (the current is Lucene 2.0
nightly build 200
48 matches
Mail list logo
