I don't think there is a way to do this now. Maybe we should separate the logic of creating the SolrIndexSearcher to a factory. Moving this logic away from SolrCore is already a win, plus it will make it easier to unit test and extend for advanced use cases.
Tomás On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry to poke this again but I'm not following the last comment of how I > could go about extending the solr index searcher and have the extension > used. Is there an example of this? Again thanks > > Jamie > On Aug 25, 2015 7:18 AM, "Jamie Johnson" <jej2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I had seen this as well, if I over wrote this by extending > > SolrIndexSearcher how do I have my extension used? I didn't see a way > that > > could be plugged in. > > On Aug 25, 2015 7:15 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev" <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Thanks Mikhail. If I'm reading the SimpleFacets class correctly, out > >> > delegates to DocValuesFacets when facet method is FC, what used to be > >> > FieldCache I believe. DocValuesFacets either uses DocValues or builds > >> then > >> > using the UninvertingReader. > >> > > >> > >> Ah.. got it. Thanks for reminding this details.It seems like even > >> docValues=true doesn't help with your custom implementation. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > I am not seeing a clean extension point to add a custom > >> UninvertingReader > >> > to Solr, would the only way be to copy the FacetComponent and > >> SimpleFacets > >> > and modify as needed? > >> > > >> Sadly, yes. There is no proper extension point. Also, consider > overriding > >> SolrIndexSearcher.wrapReader(SolrCore, DirectoryReader) where the > >> particular UninvertingReader is created, there you can pass the own one, > >> which refers to custom FieldCache. > >> > >> > >> > On Aug 25, 2015 12:42 AM, "Mikhail Khludnev" < > >> mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hello Jamie, > >> > > I don't understand how it could choose DocValuesFacets (it occurs on > >> > > docValues=true) field, but then switches to > >> UninvertingReader/FieldCache > >> > > which means docValues=false. If you can provide more details it > would > >> be > >> > > great. > >> > > Beside of that, I suppose you can only implement and inject your own > >> > > UninvertingReader, I don't think there is an extension point for > this. > >> > It's > >> > > too specific requirement. > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > as mentioned in a previous email I have a need to provide security > >> > > controls > >> > > > at the term level. I know that Lucene/Solr doesn't support this > so > >> I > >> > had > >> > > > baked something onto a 4.x baseline that was sufficient for my use > >> > cases. > >> > > > I am now looking to move that implementation to 5.x and am running > >> into > >> > > an > >> > > > issue around faceting. Previously we were able to provide a > custom > >> > cache > >> > > > implementation that would create separate cache entries given a > >> > > particular > >> > > > set of security controls, but in Solr 5 some faceting is delegated > >> to > >> > > > DocValuesFacets which delegates to UninvertingReader in my case > (we > >> are > >> > > not > >> > > > storing DocValues). The issue I am running into is that before > 5.x > >> I > >> > had > >> > > > the ability to influence the FieldCache that was used at the Solr > >> level > >> > > to > >> > > > also include a security token into the key so each cache entry was > >> > scoped > >> > > > to a particular level. With the current implementation the > >> FieldCache > >> > > > seems to be an internal detail that I can't influence in anyway. > Is > >> > this > >> > > > correct? I had noticed this Jira ticket > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5427, is there any > >> > movement > >> > > > on > >> > > > this? Is there another way to influence the information that is > put > >> > into > >> > > > these caches? As always thanks in advance for any suggestions. > >> > > > > >> > > > -Jamie > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Sincerely yours > >> > > Mikhail Khludnev > >> > > Principal Engineer, > >> > > Grid Dynamics > >> > > > >> > > <http://www.griddynamics.com> > >> > > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sincerely yours > >> Mikhail Khludnev > >> Principal Engineer, > >> Grid Dynamics > >> > >> <http://www.griddynamics.com> > >> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > >> > > >
