: aaah -- Just to be clear, if you could augment the doc list with a calculated
: field ('distance') you would not need to extend XMLWritter - correct?
:
: And then it would also work with the JSON/pyton/php etc writers.
i don't think i ever looked at the patch in question (is it in Jira?) but
patrick o'leary wrote:
Actually misspoke it's the XMLWritter that's final that was a little
annoying rather than a handler.
Would have been nice to just extend that, and cut down on the code.
aaah -- Just to be clear, if you could augment the doc list with a
calculated field ('distance') you
Actually misspoke it's the XMLWritter that's final that was a little
annoying rather than a handler.
Would have been nice to just extend that, and cut down on the code.
P
Ryan McKinley wrote:
SOLR-281 looks like it will solve one of my frustrations, another being
that the handlers were f
SOLR-281 looks like it will solve one of my frustrations, another being
that the handlers were final ;-)
What handlers are final that you found annoying?
Is it close to being committed to the trunk?
I hope so ;) Since this patch reworks the *core* query handlers
(dismax/standard) I real
Hi Ryan
Thanks for looking at it, yes definitely I'd like to contribute back.
I'm currently working out some of the logistics to make it easier to
maintain.
I think I'd need a centralized project to do the releases from, it will
have 2 sets
of patches in 2 different trunks (lucene & solr), un
This looks good!
Are you interested in contributing it to solr core?
One major thing in the solr pipeline you may want to be aware of is the
search component interface (SOLR-281).
This would let you make simple component that adds the:
DistanceQuery dq = new DistanceQuery(dlat,dlng,dradius)
Hi Patrick,
Was mainly interested in seeing how you did the RequestHandler. Thanks for
sending the link!
Best,
Doug
patrick o'leary wrote:
>
> Hi Doug
>
> What exactly are you looking for?
> The code for localsolr is still in dev state, but I've left my work open
> and available for downloa
Hi Doug
What exactly are you looking for?
The code for localsolr is still in dev state, but I've left my work
open and available for download
at http://www.nsshutdown.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/localsolr/
Once I'm happy with it, I'll donate it back in the form of patches
until / unless it's acce
Hi Patrick,
Are the solr components of that demo in the repository as well? I couldn't
find them there.
Best,
Doug
patrick o'leary wrote:
>
> As far as I'm concerned nothings going to beat PG's GIS calculations,
> but it's tsearch was
> a lot slower than myisam.
>
> My goal was a single sol
As far as I'm concerned nothings going to beat PG's GIS calculations,
but it's tsearch was
a lot slower than myisam.
My goal was a single solution to reduce our complexity, but am
interested to know if combining
both an rdbms & lucene works for you. Definitely let me know how it
goes !
P
Gu
Hi Patrick,
On 9/27/07, patrick o'leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> p.s after a little tidy up I'll be adding this to both lucene and solr's
> repositories if folks feel that it's a useful addition.
It's definitely very interesting. Did you compare performances of
Lucene with a database allowi
Might want to remove the *'s around that url
http://www.nsshutdown.com/projects/lucene/whitepaper/locallucene.htm
There's actually a download-able demo
http://www.nsshutdown.com/solr-example_s1.3_ls0.2.tgz
start it up as you would a normal solr example
$ cd solr-example/apache-solr*/example
$
Have you guys seen Local Lucene ?
http://www.nsshutdown.com/projects/lucene/whitepaper/*locallucene*.htm
no need for mysql if you don't want too.
rgrds
Ian
Will Johnson wrote:
With the new/improved value source functions it should be pretty easy to
develop a new best practice. You should be a
With the new/improved value source functions it should be pretty easy to
develop a new best practice. You should be able to pull in the lat/lon
values from valuesource fields and then do your greater circle calculation.
- will
-Original Message-
From: Lance Norskog [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
14 matches
Mail list logo
