Hi Patrick, Are the solr components of that demo in the repository as well? I couldn't find them there.
Best, Doug patrick o'leary wrote: > > As far as I'm concerned nothings going to beat PG's GIS calculations, > but it's tsearch was > a lot slower than myisam. > > My goal was a single solution to reduce our complexity, but am > interested to know if combining > both an rdbms & lucene works for you. Definitely let me know how it goes ! > > P > > Guillaume Smet wrote: >> Hi Patrick, >> >> On 9/27/07, patrick o'leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> p.s after a little tidy up I'll be adding this to both lucene and >>> solr's repositories if folks feel that it's a useful addition. >>> >> >> It's definitely very interesting. Did you compare performances of >> Lucene with a database allowing you to perform real GIS queries? >> I'm more a PostgreSQL guy and I must admit we usually use cube contrib >> or PostGIS for this sort of thing and with both, we are capable to use >> indexes for proximity queries and they can be pretty fast. Using the >> method you used with MySQL is definitely too slow and not used as soon >> as you have a certain amount of data in your table. >> >> Regards, >> >> > > -- > > Patrick O'Leary > > > You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his > tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. > Do you understand this? > And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they > receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. > - Albert Einstein > > View Patrick O Leary's LinkedIn profileView Patrick O Leary's profile > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/pjaol> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Geographical-distance-searching-tf4524338.html#a13277230 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
