Hi Patrick, Was mainly interested in seeing how you did the RequestHandler. Thanks for sending the link!
Best, Doug patrick o'leary wrote: > > Hi Doug > > What exactly are you looking for? > The code for localsolr is still in dev state, but I've left my work open > and available for download > at http://www.nsshutdown.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/localsolr/ > > Once I'm happy with it, I'll donate it back in the form of patches until > / unless it's accepted > as a contribution, depending on how folks feel. > > If your talking about the demo ui, it's a little piece of html & JS, you > can pull directly from the jar. > I've not included that in the repository. > > HTH > P > > Doug Daniels wrote: >> Hi Patrick, >> >> Are the solr components of that demo in the repository as well? I >> couldn't >> find them there. >> >> Best, >> Doug >> >> >> patrick o'leary wrote: >> >>> As far as I'm concerned nothings going to beat PG's GIS calculations, >>> but it's tsearch was >>> a lot slower than myisam. >>> >>> My goal was a single solution to reduce our complexity, but am >>> interested to know if combining >>> both an rdbms & lucene works for you. Definitely let me know how it goes >>> ! >>> >>> P >>> >>> Guillaume Smet wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Patrick, >>>> >>>> On 9/27/07, patrick o'leary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> p.s after a little tidy up I'll be adding this to both lucene and >>>>> solr's repositories if folks feel that it's a useful addition. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> It's definitely very interesting. Did you compare performances of >>>> Lucene with a database allowing you to perform real GIS queries? >>>> I'm more a PostgreSQL guy and I must admit we usually use cube contrib >>>> or PostGIS for this sort of thing and with both, we are capable to use >>>> indexes for proximity queries and they can be pretty fast. Using the >>>> method you used with MySQL is definitely too slow and not used as soon >>>> as you have a certain amount of data in your table. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> Patrick O'Leary >>> >>> >>> You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his >>> tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. >>> Do you understand this? >>> And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they >>> receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. >>> - Albert Einstein >>> >>> View Patrick O Leary's LinkedIn profileView Patrick O Leary's profile >>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/pjaol> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > > Patrick O'Leary > > > You see, wire telegraph is a kind of a very, very long cat. You pull his > tail in New York and his head is meowing in Los Angeles. > Do you understand this? > And radio operates exactly the same way: you send signals here, they > receive them there. The only difference is that there is no cat. > - Albert Einstein > > View Patrick O Leary's LinkedIn profileView Patrick O Leary's profile > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/pjaol> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Geographical-distance-searching-tf4524338.html#a13296862 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
