Hi Mozzam,
I finally got it working
Thanks a ton guys :)
Regards
Raakhi
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Moazzam Khan wrote:
> Hi Rakhi,
>
> Sorry, I didn't see this email until just now. Did you get it working?
>
>
> If not here's some things that might help.
>
>
> - Downloa
Hi Rakhi,
Sorry, I didn't see this email until just now. Did you get it working?
If not here's some things that might help.
- Download the patch first.
- Check the date on which the patch was released.
- Download the version of the trunk that existed at that date.
- Apply the patch using the p
Hi,
But these is almost no settings in my config
heres a snapshot of what i have in my solrconfig.xml
*:*
Am i goin wrong anywhere?
Regards,
Raakhi
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Govind Kanshi wrote:
> fieldType:analyzer without class or tokenizer & filter list seems to p
fieldType:analyzer without class or tokenizer & filter list seems to point
to the config - you may want to correct.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
> Hi,
>I checked out modules & lucene from the trunk.
> Performed a build using the following commands
> ant clean
>
Hi,
I checked out modules & lucene from the trunk.
Performed a build using the following commands
ant clean
ant compile
ant example
Which compiled successfully.
I then put my existing index(using schema.xml from solr1.4.0/conf/solr/) in
the multicore folder, configured solr.xml and start
Oops this is probably i didn't checkout the modules file from the trunk.
doing that right now :)
Regards
Raakhi
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
> Hi,
>Patching did work. but when i build the trunk, i get the following
> exception:
>
> [SolrTrunk]# ant compile
> Bu
Hi,
Patching did work. but when i build the trunk, i get the following
exception:
[SolrTrunk]# ant compile
Buildfile: /testWorkspace/SolrTrunk/build.xml
init-forrest-entities:
[mkdir] Created dir: /testWorkspace/SolrTrunk/build
[mkdir] Created dir: /testWorkspace/SolrTrunk/build/web
c
What exactly did not work? Patching, compiling or running it?
On 22 June 2010 16:06, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried checking out the latest code (rev 956715) the patch did not
> work on it.
> Infact i even tried hunting for the revision mentioned earlier in this
> thread (i.e. rev 955
Hi,
I tried checking out the latest code (rev 956715) the patch did not
work on it.
Infact i even tried hunting for the revision mentioned earlier in this
thread (i.e. rev 955615) but cannot find it in the repository. (it has
revision 955569 followed by revision 955785).
Any pointers??
Regar
Oh in that case is the code stable enough to use it for production?
- Well this feature is a patch and I think that says it all.
Although bugs are fixed it is deferentially an experimental feature
and people should keep that in mind when using one of the patches.
Does it support features which
Hi,
Oh in that case is the code stable enough to use it for production?
Does it support features which solr 1.4 normally supports?
I am using facets as a workaround but then i am not able to sort on any
other field. is there any workaround to support this feature??
Regards,
Raakhi
On Fri, Ju
Hi Rakhi,
The patch is not compatible with 1.4. If you want to work with the
trunk. I'll need to get the src from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/
Martijn
On 18 June 2010 13:46, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
> Hi Moazzam,
>
> Where did u get the src code from??
>
> I
Hi Moazzam,
Where did u get the src code from??
I am downloading it from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4
and the latest revision in this location is 955469.
so applying the latest patch(dated 17th june 2010) on it still generates
errors.
Any P
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:44 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
when I saw what was done with the "templating" of the Maven pom
work that was originally donated to solr, I just cringed at it.
Most of us Solr committers are fairly anti-Maven or ambivalent about
it at best, so it hasn't gotten much TLC, ad
Erik,
I try not to be exclusionary of others development tool choices in the
selection of my own. However, just to surely stir up a nest of hornets in true
Apache fashion... when I saw what was done with the "templating" of the Maven
pom work that was originally donated to solr, I just cringed
I knew it wasn't me! :)
I found the patch just before I read this and applied it to the trunk
and it works!
Thanks Mark and martijn for all your help!
- Moazzam
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Martijn v Groningen
wrote:
> I've added a new patch to the issue, so building the trunk (rev
> 95561
I've added a new patch to the issue, so building the trunk (rev
955615) with the latest patch should not be a problem. Due to recent
changes in the Lucene trunk the patch was not compatible.
On 17 June 2010 20:20, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
>>
>> p.s.
On Jun 16, 2010, at 7:31 PM, Mark Diggory wrote:
p.s. I'd be glad to contribute our Maven build re-organization back
to the community to get Solr properly Mavenized so that it can be
distributed and released more often. For us the benefit of this
structure is that we will be able to overla
gt;>>>>> comments
>>>>>>>> below left me confused.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i tried applyin the patch file on 1.4.0 release but ended up with
>>> many
>>>>>>>> compile errors.
>>>>&
;>> >> Hi,
>> >>> >> I wanted to try out field collapsing for a requirement. i went
>> >>> through
>> >>> >> the wiki and solr-236. but there are lot of patch files. and the
>> >>> comments
>> >>> >
> >>> >> compile errors.
> >>> >> i even downloaded the latest code from the repository and applied
> the
> >>> >> patch(solr-trunk-236 dtd 16th May 2010). but ended up with build
> errors.
> >>> >>
> >&
or
>> production use? I really need this feature so I don't think I have much of a
>> choice. Can you also explain the performance implications you are seeing AND
>> what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> From: ma
wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What do you mean you had to revert to Trunk 1.5. Do you mean upgrade?
>>> Which
>>> >>> version were you using before hand?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Can you please list the exa
the exact version of 1.5 and the patch # you used.
>> I
>> >>> downloaded the latest nightly build and tried patching using the 2/1
>> patch.
>> >>> Everything went ok but I am getting 1 failing test.
>> >>>
>> >>> Would you
> downloaded the latest nightly build and tried patching using the 2/1
> patch.
> >>> Everything went ok but I am getting 1 failing test.
> >>>
> >>> Would you recommend using the latest nightly 1.5 build or 1.4 for
> >>> production use? I really
so I don't think I have much of a
>>> choice. Can you also explain the performance implications you are seeing AND
>>> what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> > From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
&
to Trunk (1.5) to get
>> the patch to apply.
>> >
>> > It does certainly have some performance implications, but tweaking
>> configuration can help here.
>> >
>> > Overall the benefits very much outweigh the costs for us :)
>> >
>> >
weaks you've used that helped.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +
> > Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
> >
> > Yeah got it working fine - but I neede
hat helped.
Thanks!
> From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +0000
> Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
>
> Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5) to get the
> patch to apply.
>
> It
Thanks Ill give field-collapse-5 a try although I heard it has some bad memory
bugs in it.
> From: martijn.is.h...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:29:30 +0100
> Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> Hi Blargy,
>
> The lates
: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it heavily.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To
Hi Blargy,
The latest path is not compatible with 1.4, I believe that the latest
field-collapse-5.patch file is compatible with 1.4. The file should at
least compile with 1.4 trunk. I'm not sure how the performance is.
Martijn
On 25 March 2010 01:49, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> Boy, I hope that fiel
Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it heavily.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, blargy wrote:
> From: blargy
if only i could magic all these damn pdfs I have into some code :)
+1
I want some of that magic too!
gurudev wrote:
One thing that you can go with is using "adjacent" field collapsing rather
than simple collapsing. As internally SOLR would first sort on the collapse
field to use simple collapsing, which is not the case with "adjacent"
collapsing.
This something that I think could be improved
We are about to release Field collapsing in our production site, but the
index size is not as big as yours.
Definitely collapsing is an added overhead. You can do some load testing and
bench mark on some dataset as you would expect on your production project as
SOLR-236 is currently available only
36 matches
Mail list logo
