I did the same thing. And, the code compiles without the patch but
when I apply the patch I get these errors:
[javac] C:\svn\solr\src\java\org\apache\solr\search\fieldcollapse\collector\
FieldValueCountCollapseCollectorFactory.java:127: class, interface, or enum expe
cted
[javac] import java.util.HashMap;
[javac] ^
[javac] C:\svn\solr\src\java\org\apache\solr\search\fieldcollapse\collector\
FieldValueCountCollapseCollectorFactory.java:128: class, interface, or enum expe
cted
[javac] import java.util.Map;
[javac] ^
[javac] C:\svn\solr\src\java\org\apache\solr\search\fieldcollapse\collector\
aggregate\AggregateFunction.java:70: class, interface, or enum expected
[javac] package org.apache.solr.search.fieldcollapse.collector.aggregate;
[javac] ^
[javac] C:\svn\solr\src\java\org\apache\solr\search\fieldcollapse\collector\
aggregate\AggregateFunction.java:72: class, interface, or enum expected
[javac] import org.apache.solr.search.fieldcollapse.CollapseGroup;
[javac] ^
[javac] 52 errors
I got the source from :
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk
and got the patch from :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12440108/SOLR-236-trunk.patch
Any ideas what's going wrong?
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Eric Caron <eric.ca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had the best luck checking out the newest Solr/Lucene (so the 1.5-line)
> from SVN, then just doing "patch -p0 < SOLR-236-trunk.patch" from inside the
> trunk directory. I just did it against the newest checkout and it works fine
> still.
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Moazzam Khan <moazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Actually I take that back. I am just as lost as you. I wish there was
>> a tutorial on how to do this (although I get the feeling that once I
>> know how to do it I will go "ohh... I can't believe I couldn't figure
>> that out")
>>
>> - Moazzam
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Moazzam Khan <moazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Rakhi,
>> >
>> > You are supposed to get the code for solr 1.4 from SVN here:
>> > http:/svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/tags/
>> >
>> > Then apply the path to it and comppile. It should work.
>> >
>> >
>> > However, you will probably get an error at run time saying some java
>> > class is missing. I haven't been able to figure out what to do after
>> > that.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > - moazzam
>> > http://moazzam-khan.com
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Rakhi Khatwani <rkhatw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I wanted to try out field collapsing for a requirement. i went
>> through
>> >> the wiki and solr-236. but there are lot of patch files. and the
>> comments
>> >> below left me confused.
>> >>
>> >> i tried applyin the patch file on 1.4.0 release but ended up with many
>> >> compile errors.
>> >> i even downloaded the latest code from the repository and applied the
>> >> patch(solr-trunk-236 dtd 16th May 2010). but ended up with build errors.
>> >>
>> >> Can someone tell me which patch file to apply on which build? so that i
>> can
>> >> get collapsing working?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Raakhi.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Rob Z <zman...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> What do you mean you had to revert to Trunk 1.5. Do you mean upgrade?
>> Which
>> >>> version were you using before hand?
>> >>>
>> >>> Can you please list the exact version of 1.5 and the patch # you used.
>> I
>> >>> downloaded the latest nightly build and tried patching using the 2/1
>> patch.
>> >>> Everything went ok but I am getting 1 failing test.
>> >>>
>> >>> Would you recommend using the latest nightly 1.5 build or 1.4 for
>> >>> production use? I really need this feature so I don't think I have much
>> of a
>> >>> choice. Can you also explain the performance implications you are
>> seeing AND
>> >>> what configuration tweaks you've used that helped.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> > From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com
>> >>> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +0000
>> >>> > Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5) to
>> get
>> >>> the patch to apply.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > It does certainly have some performance implications, but tweaking
>> >>> configuration can help here.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Overall the benefits very much outweigh the costs for us :)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Mark.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -----Original Message-----
>> >>> > From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
>> >>> > Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49
>> >>> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> > Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it
>> >>> heavily.
>> >>> > Dennis Gearon
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Signature Warning
>> >>> > ----------------
>> >>> > EARTH has a Right To Life,
>> >>> > otherwise we all die.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
>> >>> > Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --- On Wed, 3/24/10, blargy <zman...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > From: blargy <zman...@hotmail.com>
>> >>> > > Subject: Field Collapsing SOLR-236
>> >>> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> >>> > > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 12:17 PM
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Has anyone had any luck with the field collapsing patch
>> >>> > > (SOLR-236) with Solr
>> >>> > > 1.4? I tried patching my version of 1.4 with no such luck.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Thanks
>> >>> > > --
>> >>> > > View this message in context:
>> >>>
>> http://old.nabble.com/Field-Collapsing-SOLR-236-tp28019949p28019949.html
>> >>> > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
>> >>> > > Nabble.com.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>>
>> >>> _________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
>> >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850552/direct/01/
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
