Actually I take that back. I am just as lost as you. I wish there was a tutorial on how to do this (although I get the feeling that once I know how to do it I will go "ohh... I can't believe I couldn't figure that out")
- Moazzam On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Moazzam Khan <moazz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rakhi, > > You are supposed to get the code for solr 1.4 from SVN here: > http:/svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/tags/ > > Then apply the path to it and comppile. It should work. > > > However, you will probably get an error at run time saying some java > class is missing. I haven't been able to figure out what to do after > that. > > > > - moazzam > http://moazzam-khan.com > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Rakhi Khatwani <rkhatw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> I wanted to try out field collapsing for a requirement. i went through >> the wiki and solr-236. but there are lot of patch files. and the comments >> below left me confused. >> >> i tried applyin the patch file on 1.4.0 release but ended up with many >> compile errors. >> i even downloaded the latest code from the repository and applied the >> patch(solr-trunk-236 dtd 16th May 2010). but ended up with build errors. >> >> Can someone tell me which patch file to apply on which build? so that i can >> get collapsing working? >> >> Regards, >> Raakhi. >> >> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Rob Z <zman...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> What do you mean you had to revert to Trunk 1.5. Do you mean upgrade? Which >>> version were you using before hand? >>> >>> Can you please list the exact version of 1.5 and the patch # you used. I >>> downloaded the latest nightly build and tried patching using the 2/1 patch. >>> Everything went ok but I am getting 1 failing test. >>> >>> Would you recommend using the latest nightly 1.5 build or 1.4 for >>> production use? I really need this feature so I don't think I have much of a >>> choice. Can you also explain the performance implications you are seeing AND >>> what configuration tweaks you've used that helped. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> > From: mark.robe...@red-gate.com >>> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:21:54 +0000 >>> > Subject: RE: Field Collapsing SOLR-236 >>> > >>> > Yeah got it working fine - but I needed to revert to Trunk (1.5) to get >>> the patch to apply. >>> > >>> > It does certainly have some performance implications, but tweaking >>> configuration can help here. >>> > >>> > Overall the benefits very much outweigh the costs for us :) >>> > >>> > Mark. >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net] >>> > Sent: 25 March 2010 00:49 >>> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> > Subject: Re: Field Collapsing SOLR-236 >>> > >>> > Boy, I hope that field collapsing works! I'm planning on using it >>> heavily. >>> > Dennis Gearon >>> > >>> > Signature Warning >>> > ---------------- >>> > EARTH has a Right To Life, >>> > otherwise we all die. >>> > >>> > Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded' >>> > Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php >>> > >>> > >>> > --- On Wed, 3/24/10, blargy <zman...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > From: blargy <zman...@hotmail.com> >>> > > Subject: Field Collapsing SOLR-236 >>> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> > > Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 12:17 PM >>> > > >>> > > Has anyone had any luck with the field collapsing patch >>> > > (SOLR-236) with Solr >>> > > 1.4? I tried patching my version of 1.4 with no such luck. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks >>> > > -- >>> > > View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/Field-Collapsing-SOLR-236-tp28019949p28019949.html >>> > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at >>> > > Nabble.com. >>> > > >>> > > >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/210850552/direct/01/ >>> >> >
