ncies in your requirements, we won't
> be able to make much progress.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: vsl
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:45 AM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
>
>
sufficient.
But until you clarify the inconsistencies in your requirements, we won't be
able to make much progress.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
Thanks for your reply but this solution does not fullfil my requirment
because other documents (not exact matched) will be returned as well.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058929.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi Pawel,
If you are searching on any field of type "text_general" as defined in your
schema, you are stuck with the porter stemmer. In fact in your setting solr
is not aware of a term like "cats", but "cat". Thus no way to do exact
match with "cats" in this case.
What you can do is creating a new
Exact matching is just one of my cases. Currently I perform search on field
with given definition:
This field definition fullfils all other requirmen
e-
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
I will explain my case in the example below:
We have three documents with given content:
First document:
london cats glenvilet
Second document
london cat glenvilet le
I will explain my case in the example below:
We have three documents with given content:
First document:
london cats glenvilet
Second document
london cat glenvilet leeds
Third document
london cat glenvilet
Search term: "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
Expected result: First document
Current resu
I think in that case, making a field String type is your option, however
remember that it'd be case sensitive.
Another approach is to create a case insensitive field type and doing
searches on those fields only.
Can you provide your fie
you are trying
to solve some problem, you will need to clearly state your problem rather
than asking some general, abstract question.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exact matching in Solr
Thanks for your reply. I am using edismax as well. What I want to get is the
exact match without other results that could be close to the given term.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058876.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi Pawel,
Not sure which parser you are using, I am using edismax and tried using the
bq parameter to boost the results having exact matches at the top.
You may try something like:
q="cats" AND London NOT Leeds&bq="cats"^50
In edismax, pf and pf2 parameters also need some tuning to get the result
Hi,
is it possible to get exact matched result if the search term is combined
e.g. "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
In the previus threads I have read that it is possible to create new field
of String type and perform phrase search on it but nowhere the above
mentioned combined search term had been t
12 matches
Mail list logo
