Hi,
I compose a mlt query in a URL and get the queried result back and a
list of documents in the "moreLikeThis" section in my browser.
When I try to execute the same query in SolrJ setting the same params, I
only get the queried result document back and no MLT docs.
What's the trick here?
th
On 02/24/2013 08:32 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
You either have to specifically upload a config set or use one of the bootstrap
sys props.
Are you doing either?
- Mark
On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Thanks Michael.
I went ahead and just started an external zookeeper, but my
York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying the latest solrcloud 4.1. Is there a button(or url) I can't
find that shows me the zookeeper config XML,
so I can check what other nodes are connected? Can&#
Hi,
I'm trying the latest solrcloud 4.1. Is there a button(or url) I
can't find that shows me the zookeeper config XML,
so I can check what other nodes are connected? Can't seem to find it.
I deploy my solrcloud war into glassfish and set jetty.port (among other
properties) to the GF domain
SimpleDateFormat df= new SimpleDateFormat("-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss.S'Z'");
Date dateObj = df.parse("2009-10-29T00:00:009Z");
--- Original Message ---
On 1/8/2013 09:34 AM uwe72 wrote:A Lucene 4.0 document returns for a Date
field now a string value, instead of
a Date object.
Solr4.0 --
This should be clarified some. In the "client" API, SolrServer is represents a
connection to a single server backend/endpoint and should be re-used where possible.
The approach being discussed is to have one "client" connection (represented by SolrServer class) per solr core, all residing in a "
Yes. In that case, core should best be described as a logical solr
entity with various "managed" attributes
and qualities above the physical layer (sorry, not trying to perpetuate
this thread so much).
On 01/04/2013 01:55 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Currently a SolrCore is 1:1 with a low level Luce
, put more of them on a single node and
then migrate them to their own nodes as the data outgrows the smaller
number of nodes. In other words, add nodes incrementally without
having to reindex all the data.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, Janua
And based on the previous explanation there is never a "copy of a shard". A
shard represents and contains only replicas for itself, replicas being copies of cores
within the shard.
--- Original Message ---
On 1/3/2013 11:58 AM Walter Underwood wrote:A "factor" is multiplied, so
multip
Great point.
--- Original Message ---
On 1/3/2013 10:42 AM Per Steffensen wrote:On 1/3/13 4:33 PM, Mark Miller
wrote:
> This has pretty much become the standard across other distributed systems
and in the literat…err…books.
Hmmm Im not sure you are right about that. Maybe more than one
---
On 1/3/2013 09:19 AM Jack Krupansky wrote:A single shard MAY exist on a single core, but only if it is not replicated.
Generally, a single shard will exist on multiple cores, each a replica of
the source data as it comes into the update handler.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message--
ctual Solr cores. Replicas are instances of the data for
a shard.
Sometimes people may loosely speak of a replica as being "a shard", but
that's just loose use of the terminology.
So, we're not "sharding shards", but we are "replicating shards".
-- Jack Kru
he terminology.
So, we're not "sharding shards", but we are "replicating shards".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Coll
of the terminology.
So, we're not "sharding shards", but we are "replicating shards".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:51 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re: Terminology question: Core
ferent shards on the
same node/box for a partial improvement of performance and fault tolerance.
A Solr "cloud' is really a cluster.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re:
Good write up.
And what about "node"?
I think there needs to be an official glossary of terms that is sanctioned by the solr
team and some terms still ni use may need to be labeled "deprecated". After so
many years, its still confusing.
--- Original Message ---
On 1/3/2013 08:07 AM
There is a ticket for that with some recent activity (sorry I don't have it
handy right now), but I'm not sure if that work made it into the trunk, so
probably solrcloud does not support MLT...yet. Would love an update from the
dev team though!
--- Original Message ---
On 11/5/2012 10
It certainly seems to be a rogue project, but I can't understand the
meaning of "realtime near realtime (NRT)" either. At best, its oxymoronic.
On 10/29/2012 10:30 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Could any of the committers here confirm whether this is a legitimate
effort? I mean, how could anything
I agree it needs updating and I've always gotten confused at some point
by
the use (misuse) of terms.
For example, the term 'node' is thrown around a lot too. What is it??!
Hehe.
On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 22:26 -0700, JesseBuesking wrote:
> It's been a while since the terminology at
> http://wiki.ap
r real time search queries and analytics on it.
> No need to export data around.
>
> Solr4 is becoming a very interesting solution to many web scale problems.
> Just missing the map/reduce component. :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > Of co
Of course you can do it, but the question is whether this will produce
the performance results you expect.
I've seen talk about this in other forums, so you might find some prior
work here.
Solr and HDFS serve somewhat different purposes. The key issue would be
if your map and reduce code
overload
What exactly is "Realtime NRT" (Near Real Time)?
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 14:07 -0700, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 4.0-ALPHA with
> RankingAlgorithm 1.4.4 with Realtime NRT. The Realtime NRT
> implementation now supports both Rankin
You'll have to query the index for the fields and sift out the _s ones
and cache them or something.
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 16:52 +0530, Rajani Maski wrote:
> Yes, This feature will solve the below problem very neatly.
>
> All,
>
> Is there any approach to achieve this for now?
>
>
> --Rajani
I don't think it comes at any added cost for solr to return that facet
so you can filter it
out in your business logic.
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 15:18 +0530, Shanu Jha wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am generating facet for a field which has one of the value "NA" and I
> want solr should not create facet
ithm in detail? why it's better than
> > google site(better than lucene is not very interested because lucene
> > is not originally designed to provide search function like google)?
> >
> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> >> I think people o
become available with Solr 3.6 soon.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nagendra Nagarajayya
> http://solr-ra.tgels.org
> http://rankingalgorithm.tgels.org
>
>
>
> On 5/27/2012 7:32 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> >Have you tested this with a billion docu
Hi,
Have you tested this with a billion documents?
Darren
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 07:24 -0700, Nagendra Nagarajayya wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am very excited to announce the availability of Solr 3.6 with
> RankingAlgorithm 1.4.2.
>
> This NRT supports now works with both RankingAlgorithm and Lucene.
> Why not using multicore?
>
>
> Marcelo Carvalho Fernandes
> +55 21 8272-7970
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
> > context
Hi,
I am running my solrcloud nodes in an app server deployed into the
context path 'solr' and zookeeper sees all of them. I want to deploy a
second solrcloud war into the same app server (thus same IP:port) in a
different context like 'solrrep' with the same config (cloned).
Will this work? Or d
any collections solr cloud could support. Which way is better
in terms of flexibility/scalability? (suppose there are tens of thousands
customers).
Regards,
Yandong
2012/5/22 Darren Govoni
> Why do you want to control what gets indexed into a core and then
> knowing what core to search? That&#
Why do you want to control what gets indexed into a core and then
knowing what core to search? That's the kind of "knowing" that SolrCloud
solves. In SolrCloud, it handles the distribution of documents across
shards and retrieves them regardless of which node is searched from.
That is the point of
The thought here is to distribute a search between two different
solrcloud clusters and get ordered ranked results between them.
It's possible?
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:47 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi,
> Would distributed search (the old way where you provide the solr host
Hi,
Would distributed search (the old way where you provide the solr host
IP's etc.) still work between different solrclouds?
thanks,
Darren
Was there a response to this?
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 10:27 -0400, Keswani, Nitin - BLS CTR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My data model consist of different types of data. Each data type has its own
> characteristics
>
> If I include the unique characteristics of each type of data, my single Solr
> Document
I'm also interested in this. Same situation.
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 10:27 -0400, Keswani, Nitin - BLS CTR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My data model consist of different types of data. Each data type has its own
> characteristics
>
> If I include the unique characteristics of each type of data, my single So
You could run the MLT for the document in question, then gather all
those doc id's in the MLT results and negate those in a subsequent
query. Not sure how robust that would work with very large result sets,
but something to try.
Another approach would be to gather the "interesting terms" from the
he other replicas.
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just wanted to make sure I understand how distributed indexing works
> > in solrcloud.
> >
> > Can I index locally at each shard to avoid throttling a central port? Or
Hi,
I just wanted to make sure I understand how distributed indexing works
in solrcloud.
Can I index locally at each shard to avoid throttling a central port? Or
all the indexing has to go through a single shard leader?
thanks
exactly what PathHierarchyTokenizer does.
> > > positionIncrementGap="100">
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think I have a query time tokenizer that tokenizes at /
> >
> > ?q=colors:red
> > ==&
Put the parent term in all the child documents at index time
and the re-issue the facet query when you expand the parent using the
parent's term. works perfect.
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:56 -0400, sam ” wrote:
> I have hierarchical colors:
> stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
> text_path is TextFi
Can you be more specific about "health"?
On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 00:03 -0400, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> How do people currently monitor the health of a solr cluster? Are
> there any good tools which can show the health across the entire
> cluster? Is this something which is planned for the new admin
Yes
--- Original Message ---
On 4/13/2012 06:25 AM Benson Margulies wrote:A discussion over on the dev
list led me to expect that the by-if
field retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
handler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in the
search hand
el that
using SolrCloud would be redundant, and a step in the opposite
direction, which is what I'm trying to avoid in the first place. Or am I
mistaken?
Thanks,
Safdar
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> You could use SolrCloud (for the automatic scaling) and just m
You could use SolrCloud (for the automatic scaling) and just mount a
fuse[1] HDFS directory and configure solr to use that directory for its
data.
[1] https://ccp.cloudera.com/display/CDHDOC/Mountable+HDFS
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 16:04 +0300, Ali S Kureishy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to setup a
Hard to say why its not working for you. Start with a fresh Solr and
work forward from there or back out your configs and plugins until it
works again.
On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
> In my cloud configuration, if I push
>
>
> *:*
>
>
> followed by:
>
>
>
> I
My first reaction to your question is why are you running thousands of queries
in a loop? Immediately, I think this will not scale well and the design
probably needs to be re-visited.
Second, if you need that many requests, then you need to seriously consider an
architecture that supports it.
Your handler for that field should be looked at.
Try not using a handler that tokenizes or stems the field.
You want to leave the text as is. I forget the handler setting for that,
but its documented in there somewhere.
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 13:02 -0700, Thiago wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've
"...it is a distributed real-time query scheme..."
SolrCloud does this already. It treats all the shards like one-big-index, and you can
query it normally to get "subset" results from each shard. Why do you have to
re-write the query for each shard? Seems unnecessary.
--- Original Message
In my opinion, its never a good idea to overwrite files of a previous
version with a new version.
The easiest thing would be to just deploy the solr war file into tomcat
and let tomcat manage the webapp, files, etc.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 22:39 -0400, Dan Foley wrote:
> I have download the nightl
Now, it comes up. Not sure why its acting weird. Will continue to look
at it.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 10:23 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> K. There is a solr.war in the webapps directory. But still get the 404.
>
> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:19 +0200, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> > Hello!
>
K. There is a solr.war in the webapps directory. But still get the 404.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:19 +0200, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> start.jar shouldn't contain any webapp. If you look at the 'example'
> directory, you'll notice that there is a 'webapps' directory which
> should contain solr.
Yep. I did all kinds of ant clean, ant dist, ant example, etc.
My trunk rev.
At revision 1310773.
Example start.jar is broken. No webapp inside. :(
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 16:11 +0200, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Did you run 'ant example' ?
>
start.jar has no apps in it at all.
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 09:47 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> HTTP ERROR: 404
> Problem accessing /solr. Reason:
>
> Not Found
>
>
>
> Powered by Jetty://
>
&g
;
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Just updated solr trunk and tried the java -jar start.jar and
> > localhost:8983/solr/admin.not found.
> >
> > Where did it go?
> >
> > thanks.
> >
>
Hi,
Just updated solr trunk and tried the java -jar start.jar and
localhost:8983/solr/admin.not found.
Where did it go?
thanks.
Try using Luke to look at your index and see if there are multiple
similar TFV's. You can browse them easily in Luke.
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 23:35 -0400, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am currently indexing some information and am wondering why I am
> getting duplicates in facets. From what I can tell t
No one knows. But if you ask the devs, they will say 'when its done'.
One clue might be to monitor the bugs/issues scheduled for 4.0. When
they are all resolved, then its ready.
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 09:41 -0700, srinivas konchada wrote:
> Hello every one
> Does any one know when Solr 4.0 will be
nd what to do with it.
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:29 -0300, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Can't you simply calculate that at index time and assign the result to a
> field, then sort by that field.
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > I
I'm going to try index time per-field boosting and do the boost
computation at index time and see if that helps.
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 10:08 -0400, Darren Govoni wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance.
>
> Let's say I have two fields:
>
Hi,
I have a situation I want to re-score document relevance.
Let's say I have two fields:
text: The quick brown fox jumped over the white fence.
terms: fox fence
Now my queries come in as:
terms:[* TO *]
and Solr scores them on that field.
What I want is to rank them according to the distr
Ok, I'll do what I can to help!
As always, appreciate the hard work Mark.
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 17:31 -0400, Mark Miller wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > It was mentioned before that SolrCloud has all the capability of
>
Hi,
It was mentioned before that SolrCloud has all the capability of
regular solr (including handlers) with the exception of the MLT handler.
As this is a key capability for Solr, is there work planned to include
the MLT in SolrCloud? If so when? Our efforts greatly depend on it. As
such, I'm hap
at doesn't really make sense to do at the Solr/Lucene level. All
you're saying is that you want that field highlighted. Wouldn't it be much
easier to just do this at the app level whenever your field had anything
returned in it?
Best
Erick
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Darren Govoni
I think he's asking if all the nodes (same machine or not) return a
response. Presumably you have different ports for each node since they
are on the same machine.
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:44 -0400, Matthew Parker wrote:
> The cluster is running on one machine.
>
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Thanks for the tip Hoss.
I notice that it appears sometimes and was varying because my index runs
would sometimes have different amount of docs, etc.
So all I want to do is a simple "all docs with something in this field,
and to highlight the field".
Is the query expansion to "all possible term
As a rule of thumb, many will say not to go to production with a pre-release baseline. So until
Solr4 goes "final" and "stable", it's best not to assume too much about it.
Second suggestion is to properly stage new technologies in your product such
that they go through their own validation. And
What I think was mentioned on this a bit ago is that the index stops
working if one of the "nodes" goes down unless its a replica.
You have 2 "nodes" running with numShards=2? Thus if one goes down the
entire index is inoperable. In the future I'm hoping this changes such
that the index cluster co
Hi,
I am getting numerous errors preventing a build of solrcloud trunk.
[licenses] MISSING LICENSE for the following file:
Any tips to get a clean build working?
thanks
Hi,
I am suddenly getting a maxClauseCount exception for no reason. I am
using Solr 3.5. I have only 206 documents in my index.
Any ideas? This is wierd.
QUERY PARAMS: [hl, hl.snippets, hl.simple.pre, hl.simple.post, fl,
hl.mergeContiguous, hl.usePhraseHighlighter, hl.requireFieldMatch,
echoPar
Hi,
I am suddenly getting a maxclause count error and don't know why. I am
using Solr 3.5
Thanks Mark. Is there any plan to make all the Solr search handlers work
with SolrCloud, like MLT? That missing feature would prohibit us from
using SolrCloud at the moment. :(
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 18:24 -0500, Mark Miller wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
Hi,
Do all the normal facilities of Solr work with SolrCloud from SolrJ?
Things like /mlt, /cluster, facets , tvf's, etc.
Darren
Double check your default operator for a faceted search vs. regular
search. I caught this difference in my work that explained this
difference.
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 07:45 -0800, Yuhao wrote:
> Jay,
>
> Was the curly closing bracket "}" intentional? I'm using 3.4, which also
> supports "fq=pric
jetty.port. You probably want to explicitly pass -DhostPort= if you
are not going to use jetty.port.
- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com
On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get the SolrCloud2 examples to work using a war deployed solr
into glassfish.
The startu
Thanks for the reply Mark.
I did example A. One of the instances had zookeeper. If I shut down the
other instance, all searches on the other (running) instance produced an
error in the browser.
I don't have the error handy but it was one line. Something like missing
shard in collection IIRC.
in an app server?
Any tips appreciated!
Darren
On 01/30/2012 06:58 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi,
Is there any issue with running the new SolrCloud deployed as a war
in another app server?
Has anyone tried this yet?
thanks.
Hi,
Is there any issue with running the new SolrCloud deployed as a war
in another app server?
Has anyone tried this yet?
thanks.
Yuhao,
Ok, let me think about this. A term can have multiple parents. Each of
those parents would be 'different', yes?
In this case, use a multivalued field for the parent and add all the parent
names or id's to it. The relations should be unique.
Your UI will associate the correct parent i
Agree. There's probably some unwritten etiquette there.
On 01/19/2012 05:52 AM, Patrick Plaatje wrote:
Partially agree. If just the facts are given, and not a complete sales talk
instead, it'll be fine. Don't overdo it like this though.
Cheers,
Patrick
2012/1/19 Darren Govon
h, I agree.
On 01/18/2012 11:08 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
Hi Darren,
I think it's rare because it's rare: if this were found to be a useful
advertising space, rare would cease to be descriptive of it. But I could be
wrong.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Darren Govoni [mailto
And to be honest, many people on this list are professionals who not
only build their own solutions, but also buy tools and tech.
I don't see what the big deal is if some clever company has something of
imminent value here to share it. Considering that its a rare event.
On 01/18/2012 08:28 PM
Try changing the URI/HTTP/GET size limitation on your app server.
On 01/18/2012 05:59 PM, Daniel Bruegge wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering how I can 'grow' a distributed Solr setup to an index
size of a couple of terabytes, when one of the distributed Solr limitations
is max. 4000 characters in UR
r it.
If there are no query term matches for the df, then getting ALL the
field terms highlighted (as it does now) is rather perplexing feature.
Darren
On 01/02/2012 06:28 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi Juan,
Setting that parameter produces the same extraneous results. Here is
my query:
{!l
:54 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me if this is correct behavior from Solr.
I search on a dynamic field:
field_t:[* TO *]
I set highlight fields to "field_t,text_t" but I am not searching
specifically inside text_t field.
The highlights for text_t come back with
Hi,
Can someone tell me if this is correct behavior from Solr.
I search on a dynamic field:
field_t:[* TO *]
I set highlight fields to "field_t,text_t" but I am not searching
specifically inside text_t field.
The highlights for text_t come back with EVERY WORD. Maybe because of
the [* TO
I see what you are asking. This is an interesting question. It seems
inefficient for Solr to apply the
requested rows to all shards only to discard most of the results on merge.
That would consume lots of resources not used in the final result set.
On 12/19/2011 04:32 PM, ku3ia wrote:
Uhm, eith
Yes. That's what I would expect. I guess I didn't understand when you said
"The facet counts are the counts of the *values* in that field"
Because it seems its the count of the number of matching documents
irrespective
if one document has 20 values for that field and another 10, the facet
coun
Monitoring this thread make me ask the question of whether there are
standardized performance benchmarks for Solr.
Such that they are run and published with each new release. This would
affirm its performance under known circumstances,
with which people can try in their own environments and compa
Any suspicous activity in the logs? what about disk activity?
On 11/29/2011 05:22 PM, Pawel Rog wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
Let's back up a minute and cover some basics...
1) You said that you built a brand new index on a brand new master server,
using Solr
Hi,
I am running Solr 3.4 in a glassfish domain for itself. I have about
12,500 documents with a 100 or so fields with the works (stored,
termv's, etc).
In my webtier code, I use SolrJ and execute a query as such:
long querystart = new Date().getTime();
System.out.pr
My interpretation of your results are that your FQ found 1281 documents
with 1213206 value in sou_codeMetier field. Of those results, 476 also
had 1212104 as a value...and so on. Since ALL the results will have
the field value in your FQ, then I would expect the "other" values to
be equal or less
Interesting Yury. Thanks.
On 10/20/2011 11:00 AM, Yury Kats wrote:
On 10/19/2011 5:15 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi Otis,
Yeah, I saw page, but it says for merging cores, which I presume
must reside locally to the solr instance doing the merging?
What I'm interested in doing is me
uster?
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
From: Darren Govoni
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: Merging Remote Solr Indexes
Hi Otis,
Yeah, I saw page, but it says for merging cores, which I presume
must reside locally to the solr instance doing the merging?
What I'm interested in doing is merging across solr instances running on
different machines into a single solr running on
another machine (programmatically). I
Great! Thank you. I'm eager to test it on EC2 whenever its near beta ready.
On 10/13/2011 11:51 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, wrote:
Hi,
I have some questions about the 4.0 solr cloud implementation.
1. I want to have a large cloud of machines on a network. each m
Hi,
Can and EmbeddedSolrServer in one app and an HttpSolrServer (deployed
as war) in another share the same solr home, data, config etc?
I want to use the Http server for indexing against and the embedded one
for searching. Is there a reason why this is bad?
thanks,
Darren
Thanks Markus. I should have caught that, but I skipped a couple
releases. ;)
On 10/07/2011 06:31 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
Here's the snippet from the changelog of 3.1.0.
571 * In previous releases, sorting or evaluating function queries on
572 fields that were "multiValued" (either by
Hi,
I could be wrong here but my app worked fine with sorting on
multivalued date fields
before 3.4. But now it is giving an error.
*HTTP Status 400 - can not sort on multivalued field: creation_date_dm
*Is this a regression/bug?
thanks,
Darren
Agree. Thanks also for clarifying. It helps.
On 09/29/2011 08:50 AM, Yury Kats wrote:
On 9/29/2011 7:22 AM, Darren Govoni wrote:
That was kinda my point. The "new" cloud implementation
is not about replication, nor should it be. But rather about
horizontal scalability where &quo
tand the pieces involved for replication rather than sharding
... perhaps this link would be of help in taking you through it:
http://pulkitsinghal.blogspot.com/2011/09/setup-solr-master-slave-replication.html
- Pulkit
2011/9/27 Yury Kats:
On 9/27/2011 5:16 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
On 09/
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
