Yes. In that case, core should best be described as a logical solr
entity with various "managed" attributes
and qualities above the physical layer (sorry, not trying to perpetuate
this thread so much).
On 01/04/2013 01:55 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Currently a SolrCore is 1:1 with a low level Lucene index. There is no reason
that needs to alway be that way. It's possible that we may at some point add
built in micro sharding support that means a SolrCore could have multiple
underlying Lucene indexes. Or we may not.
- Mark
On Jan 4, 2013, at 1:49 PM, darren <dar...@ontrenet.com> wrote:
Good point. Agree.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk>
Date:
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
Using your terminology, I'd say core is a physical solr term, and index
is a pysical lucene term. A collection or a shard is a logical solr
term.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013, at 06:28 PM, darren wrote:
My understanding is core is a logical solr term. Index is a physical
lucene term. A solr core is backed by a physical lucene index. One index
per core. Solr team can correct me if its not accurate. :)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
Date:
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
Can I just start by saying that this was AMAZING. :-) When I asked the
question, I certainly did not expect this level of details.
And I vote on the cake diagram for WIKI as well. Perhaps, two with the
first one showing the trivial collapsed state of single
collection/shard/replica/core. The trivial one will also help to explain
why the example is now called 'collection1'.
I think I followed everything, except for just added term of 'index'.
Isn't
that the same as 'core'? Or can we have several indexes in one core?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, darren <dar...@ontrenet.com> wrote:
This is the containment hierarchy i understand but includes both physical
and logical.
-------- Original message --------
From: darren <dar...@ontrenet.com>
Date:
To: dar...@ontrenet.com,yo...@lucidworks.com,solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
Actually. Node/collection/shard/replica/core/index
-------- Original message --------
From: darren <dar...@ontrenet.com>
Date:
To: yo...@lucidworks.com,solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Terminology question: Core vs. Collection vs...
Agreed. But for completeness can it be node/collection/shard/replica/core?
