I think he's asking if all the nodes (same machine or not) return a
response. Presumably you have different ports for each node since they
are on the same machine.

On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:44 -0400, Matthew Parker wrote:
> The cluster is running on one machine.
> 
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From every node in your cluster you can hit http://MACHINE1:8084/solr in
> > your browser and get a response?
> >
> > On Mar 18, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Matthew Parker wrote:
> >
> > > My cloud instance finally tried to sync. It looks like it's having
> > connection issues, but I can bring the SOLR instance up in the browser so
> > I'm not sure why it cannot connect to it. I got the following condensed log
> > output:
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector executeWithRetry
> > > I/O exception (java.net.ConnectException) caught when processing
> > request: Connection refused: connect
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector executeWithRetry
> > > I/O exception (java.net.ConnectException) caught when processing
> > request: Connection refused: connect
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpMethodDirector executeWithRetry
> > > I/O exception (java.net.ConnectException) caught when processing
> > request: Connection refused: connect
> > >
> > > Retrying request
> > >
> > > shard update error StdNode:
> > http://MACHINE1:8084/solr/:org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
> > http://MACHINE1:8084/solr
> > >    at
> > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer.request(CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:
> > 483)
> > >     ..
> > >     ..
> > >     ..
> > >  Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
> > >    at java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.connect0(Native Method)
> > >     ..
> > >     ..
> > >     ..
> > >
> > > try and ask http://MACHINE1:8084/solr to recover
> > >
> > > Could not tell a replica to recover
> > >
> > > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException:
> > http://MACHINE1:8084/solr
> > >   at
> > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CommonsHttpSolrServer.request(CommonsHttpSolrServer.java:483)
> > >   ...
> > >   ...
> > >   ...
> > > Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
> > >    at java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.waitForConnect(Native method)
> > >    ..
> > >    ..
> > >    ..
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Nodes talk to ZooKeeper as well as to each other. You can see the
> > addresses they are trying to use to communicate with each other in the
> > 'cloud' view of the Solr Admin UI. Sometimes you have to override these, as
> > the detected default may not be an address that other nodes can reach. As a
> > limited example: for some reason my mac cannot talk to my linux box with
> > its default detected host address of halfmetal:8983/solr - but the mac can
> > reach my linux box if I use halfmetal.Local - so I have to override the
> > published address of my linux box using the host attribute if I want to
> > setup a cluster between my macbook and linux box.
> > >
> > > Each nodes talks to ZooKeeper to learn about the other nodes, including
> > their addresses. Recovery is then done node to node using the appropriate
> > addresses.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Mark Miller
> > > lucidimagination.com
> > >
> > > On Mar 16, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Matthew Parker wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm still having issues replicating in my work environment. Can anyone
> > > > explain how the replication mechanism works? Is it communicating across
> > > > ports or through zookeeper to manager the process?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Matthew Parker <
> > > > mpar...@apogeeintegration.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> All,
> > > >>
> > > >> I recreated the cluster on my machine at home (Windows 7, Java
> > 1.6.0.23,
> > > >> apache-solr-4.0-2012-02-29_09-07-30) , sent some document through
> > Manifold
> > > >> using its crawler, and it looks like it's replicating fine once the
> > > >> documents are committed.
> > > >>
> > > >> This must be related to my environment somehow. Thanks for your help.
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >>
> > > >> Matt
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Erick Erickson <
> > erickerick...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Matt:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Just for paranoia's sake, when I was playing around with this (the
> > > >>> _version_ thing was one of my problems too) I removed the entire data
> > > >>> directory as well as the zoo_data directory between experiments (and
> > > >>> recreated just the data dir). This included various index.2012....
> > > >>> files and the tlog directory on the theory that *maybe* there was
> > some
> > > >>> confusion happening on startup with an already-wonky index.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If you have the energy and tried that it might be helpful
> > information,
> > > >>> but it may also be a total red-herring....
> > > >>>
> > > >>> FWIW
> > > >>> Erick
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>> I assuming the windows configuration looked correct?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Yeah, so far I can not spot any smoking gun...I'm confounded at the
> > > >>> moment. I'll re read through everything once more...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> - Mark
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary.
> >  Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
> > those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Apogee
> > Integration.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > - Mark Miller
> > lucidimagination.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ------------------------------
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary.  Please 
> note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of 
> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Apogee Integration.


Reply via email to