What tokenizer are you using? I think, but I'm not entirely sure, that
this would require a bug in a tokenizer.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Ryan, Michael F. (LNG-DAY)
wrote:
> I'm using Solr 4.9.0. I'm trying to figure out what would cause an error like
> this to occur a rare, non-determin
Why do you think that this is a good idea? Hanja are used for special
purposes; they are not trivally convertable to Hanjul due to ambiguity, and
it's not at all clear that a typical search user wants to treat them as
equivalent.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:52 AM, Eyal Naamati <
eyal.naam...@exlibri
> mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Giving
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201301.mbox/%3c711daae5-c366-4349-b644-8e29e80e2...@gmail.com%3E
>> you can add qt.shards into handler defaults/invariants.
A query I posted yesterday amounted to me forgetting that I have to
set qt.shards when I use a URL other than plain old '/select' with
SolrCloud. Is there any way to configure a query handler to automate
this, so that all queries addressed to '/RNI' get that added in?
We have a pair of customized search components which we used
successfully with SolrCloud some releases back (4.x). In 4.10.3, I am
trying to find the point of departure in debugging why we get no
results back when querying to them with a sharded index.
If I query the regular /select, all is swell.
.10.3 -Duser.timezone=UTC -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
-DzkRun -jar start.jar &
and then:
curl
'http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=rni&numShards=8&replicationFactor=1&collection.configName=rni&maxSh\
ardsPerNode=8'
On Wed, Feb
erverCnxn.java:228)
at
org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.run(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:208)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/25/2015 8:35 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Do I need a zkcli bootstrap or do I start with upconfig? W
Do I need a zkcli bootstrap or do I start with upconfig? What port does
zkRun put zookeeper on?
On Feb 25, 2015 10:15 AM, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
> On 2/25/2015 7:44 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > Shawn, I _am_ starting from clean. However, I didn't find a recipe for
&
org.apache.solr.update.processor.UpdateRequestProcessor.processDelete(UpdateRequestProcessor.java:55)
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> On 2/25/2015 5:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> So, found the following line in the guid
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:04 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/25/2015 5:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> So, found the following line in the guide:
>>
>>java -DzkRun -DnumShards=2
>> -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/collection1/conf
>> -Dcollection.configName=my
com.basistech.rni.index.internal.SolrCloudEvaluationNameIndex.(SolrCloudEvaluationNameIndex.java:53)
with corresponding log traffic in the solr log.
The cloud page in the Solr admin app shows the IP address in green.
It's a bit hard to read in general, it's all squished up to the top.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Benson Margul
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Unfortunately, this is all 5.1 and instructs me to run the 'start from
> : scratch' process.
>
> a) checkout the left nav of any ref guide page webpage which has a link to
> "Older Versions of this Guide (PDF)"
>
> b) i'm not entirely s
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Michael Della Bitta
wrote:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/SolrCloud
Unfortunately, this is all 5.1 and instructs me to run the 'start from
scratch' process.
I wish that I could take my existing one-core no-cloud config and
convert it into a cl
le.com/u/0/b/112002776285509593336/112002776285509593336/posts>
> w: appinions.com <http://www.appinions.com/>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> With so much of the site shifted to 5.0, I'm having a bit of trouble
>> finding wh
With so much of the site shifted to 5.0, I'm having a bit of trouble
finding what I need, and so I'm hoping that someone can give me a push
in the right direction.
On a big multi-core machine, I want to set up a configuration with 8
(or perhaps more) nodes treated as shards. I have some very parti
So, I had set up a solr core modelled on the 'multicore' example in 4.10.3,
which has no /browse.
Upon request, I went to set up /browse.
I copied in a minimal version. When I go there, I just get some XML back:
0
4
What else does /browse depend upon?
I think perhaps there is a minor doc drought, or perhaps just I'm
having an SEO bad hair day.
I'm trying to understand the relationship of codecFactory and postingFormat.
Experiment 1: I just want to use my own codec. So, I make a
CodecFactory, declare it in solrconfig.xml, and stand back? If so,
OK, I see, I forgot to include the core name in the URL.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6302 but I don't see
> what I am supposed to do about it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Benson Margulies
Running bin/start with a command like:
/data/solr-4.10.3/bin/solr start -s $PWD/solr_home -a
"-Djava.library.path=$libdir -Dbt.root=$bt_root\
" "$@"
I note that the logs are ending up in the solr install
dir/examples/logs. Can I move them?
4.10.3: Customized solrconfig.xml.
My log shows:
2/9/2015, 8:14:44 PMWARNRequestHandlersMultiple requestHandler
registered to the same name: /update ignoring:
org.apache.solr.handler.UpdateRequestHandler
But there is only one:
RNI
And all attempts to post with the simple
I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6302 but I don't see
what I am supposed to do about it.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> 4.10.3: Customized solrconfig.xml.
>
> My log shows:
>
> 2/9/2015, 8:14:44 PMWARNRequestHandlersMultiple request
Basis Technology's toolset includes sentence boundary detectors. Please
contact me for more details.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Sandeep B A
wrote:
> Hi All,
> Sorry for the delayed response.
> I was out of office for last few days and was not able to reply.
> Thanks for the information.
>
Trying to shoehorn business name resolution or correction purely into
Solr tokenization and spell checking is not, in my opinion, a viable
approach. It seems to me that you need a query parser that does
something very different from pure tokenization, and you might also
need a more complex approach
Your problem has nothing to do with Japanese. Perhaps a content-type
for CSV would work better?
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Bala Iyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am new to Solr japanese.
> I added the support for japanese on schema.xml
> How can i insert Japanese text into that field either by solr
Some months ago, I talked to some people at LR about this, but I can't
find my notes.
Imagine a function of some fields that produces a score between 0 and 1.
Imagine that you want to combine this score with relevance over some
more or less complex ordinary query.
What are the options, given the
is the comment, but when I put a completely missing path in there -- no
error. Should I file a JIRA?
Say that I have 10 fieldTypes for 10 languages. Is there a way to associate
a naming convention from field names to field types so that I can avoid
bothering with all those dynamic fields?
MT is not nearly good enough to allow approach 1 to work.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> It Depends (tm). Approach (2) will give you better, more specific
> search results. (1) is simpler to implement and might be "good
> enough"...
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:21 A
I think that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5623 should be
ready to go. Would someone please commit from the PR? If there's a
preference, I can attach a patch as well.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Thanks, that's the recipe that I need.
>
benson
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> Using lucene analyzer in schema.xlm should be last resort. For very specific
> reasons : if you have an existing analyzer, etc.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 11:52 PM, Benso
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters never
mentions an Analyzer class.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins talks about subclasses of
SolrAnalyzer as ways of delivering an entire analysis chain and still
'minding the gap'.
Anyone care to offer a comparison of the viewpoi
Thanks, that's the recipe that I need.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Is there a neighborhood of existing tests I should be visiting here?
>
> You'll need a custom schema that refers to your new
> MockFailOnCertainTokensFilterFactory, so i would create a completley
Is there a neighborhood of existing tests I should be visiting here?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> OK, patch forthcoming.
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chris Hostetter
> wrote:
>>
>> : The problem manifests as this sort of thing:
&g
OK, patch forthcoming.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : The problem manifests as this sort of thing:
> :
> : Jan 3, 2014 6:05:33 PM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
> : SEVERE: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: startOffset must be
> : non-negative, and endO
text in the logs?
>
> -Mike
>
>
> On 01/03/2014 03:33 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Robert,
>>
>> Yes, if the problem was not data-dependent, indeed I wouldn't need to
>> index anything. However, I've run a small mountain of data throug
be able to detect
> this as well...
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Using Solr Cloud with 4.3.1.
>>
>> We've got a problem with a tokenizer that manifests as calling
>> OffsetAtt.setOffsets() with invalid inputs. OK, so, we want
Using Solr Cloud with 4.3.1.
We've got a problem with a tokenizer that manifests as calling
OffsetAtt.setOffsets() with invalid inputs. OK, so, we want to figure out
what input provokes our code into getting into this pickle.
The problem happens on SolrCloud nodes.
The problem manifests as this
TokenizerFactory changed, incompatibly with subclasses, from 4.2.0 to
4.3.0. Subclasses must now implement a different overload of create, and
may not implement the old one.
Has anyone got any devious strategies other than multiple copies of code to
deal with this when supporting multiple versions
I am not a lawyer.
The Apache Software Foundation cannot 'protect Solr developers.'
Patent infringement is a claim made against someone who derived economic
benefit from an invention, not someone who writes code.
The patent clause in the Apache License requires people who contribute code
to gran
Could I have some help on the combination of these two? Right now, it
appears that I'm stuck with a finalizer to chase after native
resources in a Tokenizer. Am I missing something?
s 1/2-full.
If the idea is that we want to pile up 'a lot' (1/2-of-a-q) of work
before sending any of it, why start that first runner?
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Ah. So now I have to find some other explanation of why it never
> creates more than on
Ah. So now I have to find some other explanation of why it never
creates more than one thread, even when I make a very deep queue and
specify 6 threads.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>&
The comment here is clearly wrong, since there is no division by two.
I think that the code is wrong, because this results in not starting
runners when it should start runners. Am I misanalyzing?
if (runners.isEmpty() || (queue.remainingCapacity() < queue.size() // queue
// is
// ha
I am currently testing some things with Solr 4.0.0. I tried to make a
tokenizer CoreAware, and was rewarded with:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Invalid 'Aware'
object: com.basistech.rlp.solr.RLPTokenizerFactory@19336006 --
org.apache.solr.util.plugin.SolrCoreAware must be an ins
I can't quite apply SolrMeter to my problem, so I did something of my
own. The brains of the operation are the function here.
This feeds a ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer about 95 documents, each about
10mb, and 'threads' is six. Yet Solr just barely uses more than one
core.
private long doIterati
I'd like to run a repeatable test of having Solr ingest a corpus of
docs on disk, to measure the speed of some alternative things plugged
in.
Anyone have some advice to share? One approach would be a quick SolrJ
program that pushed the entire stack as one giant collection with a
commit at the end.
mpletely correct,
> mind you) is that the presence of a tag defines which checks
> are performed. Errors are thrown on old-style constructs when no
> tag is present and vice-versa.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
One point of confusion: Is the compatibility code I hit trying to
prohibit the 'str' form when it sees old-fangled cores? Or when the
current running version pre-5.0? I hope it's the former.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 4:38 PM, Bens
Shawn, thanks. need any more jiras on this?
On May 19, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 11:27 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Starting with the shipped solr.xml, I added a new-style child to
>> configure a shared lib, and i was rewarded with:
on a fork between 4791 and this.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> OK, I found the successor.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
>> it doesn&#x
OK, I found the successor.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
> it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
I found http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr.xml%204.3%20and%20beyond, but
it doesn't mention the successor to sharedLib.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
>
> does not point to any information on solr.xml.
&
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ConfiguringSolr
does not point to any information on solr.xml.
Given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4791, I'm a bit
confused, and I need to set up a sharedLib directory for 4.3.0.
I would do some writing or linking if I had some raw material ...
tanks.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 2:21 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/**Solr3.1<http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1>claims
>> that Solr3.1 is available in a
>> place where it is not, and I
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr3.1 claims that Solr3.1 is available in a
place where it is not, and I can't find a link on the front page to the
archive for old releases.
I am thinking about trying to structure a problem as a Solr plugin. The
nature of the plugin is that it would need to read and write the lucene
index to do its work. It could not be cleanly split into URP 'over here'
and a Search Component 'over there'.
Are there invariants of Solr that would prec
We've got a tokenizer which is quite explicitly coded on the
assumption that it will only be called from one thread at a time.
After all, what would it mean for two threads to make interleaved
calls to the hasNext() function()?
Yet, a customer of ours with a gigantic instance of Solr 1.4 reports
i
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> So, I've got some code that stores the same documents in a Lucene
>> 3.5.0 index and a Solr 3.5.0 instance. It's only five documents.
>>
>> For a particular field, the Solr norm is always 0.625, while th
So, I've got some code that stores the same documents in a Lucene
3.5.0 index and a Solr 3.5.0 instance. It's only five documents.
For a particular field, the Solr norm is always 0.625, while the
Lucene norm is .5.
I've watched the code in NormsWriterPerField in both cases.
In Solr we've got .57
395)
>> at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.load(CoreContainer.java:355)
>> at
>> org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:304)
>> at
>> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:101)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue
logging as a by product.
>
> Don't remember the issue # offhand. I think there was a dispute about what
> should be done with it.
>
> On May 1, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> CoreContainer.java, in the method 'load', finds itself calling
>&
CoreContainer.java, in the method 'load', finds itself calling
loader.NewInstance with an 'fname' of Log4j of the slf4j backend is
'Log4j'.
e.g.:
2012-05-01 10:40:32,367 org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer - Unable
to load LogWatcher
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class 'Log4
There is no such thing as a 'solr forum' or a 'solr forum account.'
If you are subscribed to this list, an email to the unsubscribe
address will unsubscribe you. If some intermediary or third party is
forwarding email from this list to you, no one here can help you.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:09
2012/4/24 Mindaugas Žakšauskas :
> Hi,
>
> I maintain a distributed system which Solr is part of. The data which
> is kept is Solr is "permissioned" and permissions are currently
> implemented by taking the original user query, adding certain bits to
> it which would make it return less data in the
I found myself wanting to write ...
OR _query_:{!lucene fq=\"a:b\"}c:d
And then I started looking at query trees in the debugger, and found
myself thinking that there's no possible representation for this -- a
subquery with a filter, since the filters are part of the
RequestBuilder, no
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
>>
>> It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery shou
So, I've been experimenting to learn how the _val_ participates in scores.
It seems to me that http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery should
explain the *effect* of including an _val_ term in an ordinary query,
starting with a constant.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_can_I_ch
Since I ended up with 'fund' instead of 'func' we're even. I made the
edit. I'd make some more if you answered more of my questions :-)
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>>> _val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
>>> (e)dismay's bf, or disma
is clear?
Yup.
>
> _val_ would work too, or of course using that function as a parameter to
> (e)dismay's bf, or dismay's boost params.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> On Apr 15, 2012, at 08:43 , Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> I've been pestering you
I've been pestering you all with a series of questions about
disassembling and partially rescoring queries. Every helpful response
(thanks) has led me to further reading, and this leads to more
questions. If I haven't before, I'll apologize now for the high level
of ignorance at which I'm starting.
just our query, to
retrieve the scores, should be pretty speedy for a mere 200 items.
Maybe I'm missing some even easier way, given a DocList and a query,
to obtain scores for those docs for that query?
>
> paul
>
> Le 14 avr. 2012 à 15:34, Benson Margulies a écrit :
>
can dig.
> Paul
> --
> Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
>
>
> Benson Margulies a écrit :
>
> Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
> that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
> : that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
>
> You have to just execute the subquery itself ... doc collection
> and score calculation doesn't kee
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:43 PM, John Chee wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Given a query including a subquery, is there any way for me to learn
>> that subquery's contribution to the overall document score?
I need this numb
A discussion over on the dev list led me to expect that the by-if
field retrievals in a SolrCloud query would come through the get
handler. In fact, I've seen them turn up in my search component in the
search handler that is configured with my custom QT. (I have a
'prepare' method that sets ShardPa
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> google must not have found it - i put that in a month or so ago I believe -
> at least weeks. As you can see, there is still a bit to fill in, but it
> covers the high level. I'd like to add example snippets for the rest soon.
Mark, is it all
I'm probably confused, but it seems to me that the case I hit does not
meet any of Yonik's criteria.
I have no replicas. I'm running SolrCloud in the simple mode where
each doc ends up in exactly one place.
I think that it's just a bug that the code refuses to do the local
deletion when there's n
urable
just like the uniqueKey in the schema.
>
> schema.xml
>
> You must have a _version_ field defined:
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> I didn't have a _version_ field, since nothing in the schema says that
>> it&#x
t;query" which presumably you've defined in solrconfig.xml...
>
> What does &debugQuery=on show?
It turned out that I had left an extra(eous) declaration for /query
with my custom RT, and when I removed it all was well.
thanks,benson
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, A
it
> works again.
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> In my cloud configuration, if I push
>>
>>
>> *:*
>>
>>
>> followed by:
>>
>>
>>
>> I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but t
ere or back out your configs and plugins until it
> works again.
>
> On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 17:15 -0400, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> In my cloud configuration, if I push
>>
>>
>> *:*
>>
>>
>> followed by:
>>
>>
>>
>> I ge
In my cloud configuration, if I push
*:*
followed by:
I get no errors, the log looks happy enough, but the documents remain
in the index, visible to /query.
Here's what seems my relevant bit of solrconfig.xml. My URP only
implements processAdd.
After I load documents into my cloud instance, a URL like:
http://localhost:PORT/solr/query?q=*:*
finds nothing.
http://localhost:PORT/solr/query?q=*:*&qt=standard
finds everything.
My custom request handlers have 'default="false"'.
What have I done?
hat seems to imply that 'before' processors run both on the leader
and on the shards. Where do the afters run? Just on the leader or just
on the shards?
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:43:36 -0400, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>>
>> How are URP's managed with respec
How are URP's managed with respect to cloud deployment? Given some
solrconfig.xml like the below, do I expect it to be in the chain on
the leader, the shards, or both?
RNI
I've updated the doc with my findings. Thanks for the pointer.
Another thought: currently I'm using qt=ME to indicate this process. I
could, in theory, use some ME=true and make my components check for it
to avoid this process, but it seems kind of peculiar from an end-user
standpoint.
as well.
Thanks.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:26 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Um, maybe I've hit a quirk?
>>
>> In my solrconfig.xml, my special SearchComponents are installed only
>> for a specific QT. So, it looks to me as if
Um, maybe I've hit a quirk?
In my solrconfig.xml, my special SearchComponents are installed only
for a specific QT. So, it looks to me as if that QT is not propagated
into the request out to the shards, and so they run the ordinary
request handler without my components in it.
Is this intended beh
That page seems to be saying that the 'distributed' APIs take place on
the leader, and the ordinary prepare/process APIs out at the leaves.
I'll set out to prove or disprove that tomorrow.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 7:34 PM, B
Those of you insomniacs who have read my messages here over the last
few weeks might recall that I've been working on a request handler
that wraps the SearchHandler to rewrite queries and then reorder
results.
(I haven't quite worked out how to apply Grant's alternative
suggestions without losing
If you would be so kind as to look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3342, you will see that I
tried to use a working configuration for a URP of mine with SolrCloud,
and received in return an NPE.
Somehow or another, by default, the XmlUpdateRequestHandler ends up
using (I think) the P
; do you have to re-write the query for each shard? Seems unnecessary.
For reasons described in previous email that I won't repeat here.
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On 4/9/2012 08:45 AM Benson Margulies wrote: Jan Høydahl,
>
> My problem is intimately connect
I specify -Dcollection.configName=rnicloud, but the admin gui tells me
that I have a collection named 'collection1'.
And, as reported in a prior email, the admin UI URL in there seems wrong.
ook at Hadoop or another
> framework for distributed computation, see e.g.
> http://java.dzone.com/articles/comparison-gridcloud-computing
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> On 9. apr. 2012,
Starting the leader with:
java -Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/conf -Dcollection.configName=rnicloud
-DzkRun -DnumShards=3 -Djetty.port=9167 -jar start.jar
and browsing to
http://localhost:9167/solr/rnicloud/admin/zookeeper.jsp
I get:
HTTP ERROR 500
Problem accessing /solr/rnicloud/admin/zookeep
I'm working on a prototype of a scheme that uses SolrCloud to, in
effect, distribute a computation by running it inside of a request
processor.
If there are N shards and M operations, I want each node to perform
M/N operations. That, of course, implies that I know N.
Is that fact available anypla
Grant, let me see if I can expand this, as it were:
{!benson f1:v1 f2:v2 f3:v3} (or do I mean {!query defType='benson' ...}?)
I see how that could expand to be anything else I like.
However, the Function side has me a little more puzzled.
The information from the fields inside my {! ... } gets
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:43 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> I've made a RequestHandler class that acts as follows:
>>
>> 1. At its initialization, it creates a StandardRequestHandler and hangs onto
>>
I've made a RequestHandler class that acts as follows:
1. At its initialization, it creates a StandardRequestHandler and hangs onto it.
2. When a query comes to it (I configure it to a custom qt value), it:
a. creates a new query based on the query that arrived
b. creates a LocalSolrQueryReque
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
