That page seems to be saying that the 'distributed' APIs take place on
the leader, and the ordinary prepare/process APIs out at the leaves.
I'll set out to prove or disprove that tomorrow.


On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> Those of you insomniacs who have read my messages here over the last
>> few weeks might recall that I've been working on a request handler
>> that wraps the SearchHandler to rewrite queries and then reorder
>> results.
>>
>> (I haven't quite worked out how to apply Grant's alternative
>> suggestions without losing the performance advantages I was looking
>> for in the first place.)
>>
>> Today, I realized that the RequestHandler approach, as opposed to
>> search components, wasn't going to be viable. I was growing too much
>> dependency on internal Solr quirks.
>>
>> So I refactored it into a pair of SearchComponents -- one to go first
>> and rewrite the query, and one to go after "query" and rescore.
>>
>> And it works just fine ----- until I configure it into a SolrCloud
>> cluster. At which point it started coming up with very wrong answers.
>>
>> I think that the reason is that I don't have an implementation of the
>> distributedProcess method, or, more generally, that I don't understand
>> the protocol on a SearchComponent when distributed processing is
>> happening. Has anyone written anything yet about these considerations?
>> I can put multiple processes in the debugging and see who gets called
>> with what, but I was hoping for some sort of short cut.
>
>
>
> Grant started something on this once: 
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/WritingDistributedSearchComponents
> It's only a start though.
>
> Unfortunately, to this point, adventurous souls have had to debug and study 
> there way to understanding the distrib process solo mostly.
>
> Perhaps we can encourage anyone that has written a distributed component to 
> help jump in on that wiki page. Any takers?
>
> - Mark Miller
> lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to