Hi,
another way is to use facets for the tagcloud as we did it in jetwick.
Every document then needs a tag field (multivalued).
See:
https://github.com/karussell/Jetwick/blob/master/src/main/java/de/jetwick/ui/TagCloudPanel.java
for an example with wicket and SolrJ. With that you could also
Okay, sry and thx for reply.
I Know the Links that you post and i Know the Most dih Settings from Wiki.
Im Not New in solr ... Dih says To me After a Delta that Some documenty
changed, but He Dong want to Commit. The auery is nö Broken, i check this,
changed the query and expert with. But with n
Thanks Erick.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/copyField-is-not-tokenizing-the-values-at-index-time-tp1952756p1958946.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
If you go to http://search-lucene.com and start typing Tagcl , the AutoComplete
functionality will point you to one way of doing this:
http://search-lucene.com/m/xqRF4Pd6ec1 . That's at the Lucene level. At Solr
level, you can use TermsComponent - http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponen
Hi James,
Most of our customers use Tomcat or Jetty. We use Jetty for
http://search-lucene.com/ . Both containers have commercial support available.
We are very happy with Jetty and never needed tech support (jinx!). Some of
our
customers use JBoss for reasons similar to yours (company al
Hi Nick,
You can also have a look at
http://sematext.com/products/dym-researcher/index.html , which will help.
That particular piece doesn't do *exactly* what you are describing, but it also
includes a component that does pretty much what you are after (even though it
is
not described at the a
Hi
Is there a way out in SOLR/lucene to generate a tag cloud?
--
Thanks,
Pawan Darira
Hello,
Another common and good thing to do with data like hostnames, email addresses,
URLs, etc. is to reverse them on separators (e.g. www.foo.com becomes
com.foo.www) and then tokenize them so you end up with multiple tokens indexed:
com com.foo com.foo.www . You can see how that can be bene
The field names in the xml and schema.xml should be matched
-Original Message-
From: "McGibbney, Lewis John [via Lucene]"
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 4:01pm
To: "sivaprasad"
Subject: unknown field 'name'
Good Evening List,
I have been working with Nutch and due to numerous int
I think, the query it self is wrong,
The query should be
select id_bread,buttertype from bread,butter where a.id_bread=b.id_bread
-Original Message-
From: "snowyeoghan [via Lucene]"
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 4:22pm
To: "sivaprasad"
Subject: DIH - index Multiple tables in
You're welcome.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Ofer Fort wrote:
> ok, we ran some tests and doing the commit for the "slave" as a post commit
> event of the "master" reloaded the index and allowed us to achieve a master
> slave configuration, without replication
> This is useful only if your ma
Why not add an extra column for 'site created synonym tags' and fill it at
index
time using server side code? Then just include the tag field in the search.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea
One way synonym at index time.
java, python, php => programming
No synonyms at query time. So the terms "java", "python" and "php" all get
indexed as both their original word and the token "programming". Then a query
including the token "programming" will match those.
Oops, wait, except I
I gather that your solr documents are the "Title Information" units. Have you
considered making your Solr document collection be the "book information" units
instead? Each "book information" document will have (yes, de-normalized) the
same "title" information as all the other book documents be
> When making a query these fields should be required. Is it possible to
configure handlers on the solr server so that these field are required whith
each type of query? So for adding documents, deleting and querying?
have a look at 'invariants' (and 'appends') in the example solrconfig.
They can
Hi,
Long post - sorry...
I have a relatively special case of a Parent / Child relationship that I'm
trying to model.
I'm currently using Solr 1.4.1 and Lucene 2.9.3
For example, my Parent documents represent "Title Information" (e.g.
bibliographic information), and each Parent document can co
Solr basically does ONE thing (and related things) very well. Doing all the
error messaging that yuou want would be fighting all the specialization builit
into Solr/Lucene code.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is us
ok, we ran some tests and doing the commit for the "slave" as a post commit
event of the "master" reloaded the index and allowed us to achieve a master
slave configuration, without replication
This is useful only if your master and slave are on the same machine, and it
helps reducing the resources
Does this help? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins
See especially "How to load plugins"...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Stefanie Scherzinger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to define a custom FieldType for SOLR 1.4.1.
>
> To this end, I created the JAR file TestType.jar, I add
Yes, you can do that. Please see the wiki for specifics and good examples:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
> a better example might be this:
>
> When someone searches on "programming" i want it to return results with
> java OR python OR php b
a better example might be this:
When someone searches on "programming" i want it to return results with java
OR python OR php but I don't want a search for "java" to return documents
with php
programming,java,php,python
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/own
Hi,
I am trying to define a custom FieldType for SOLR 1.4.1.
To this end, I created the JAR file TestType.jar, I added a lib path in
solrconfig.xml so that this JAR file
as well as apache-solr-core-1.4.1.jar and lucene-core-2.9.3.jar are
included.
I then edited schema.xml and defined my new typ
Even without expanding the synonym definitions, word1 and word2 will match
THISKEYWORD. Although word1 != word2, both will still match THISKEYWORD and in
a sense be... well, synonyms, different word/tone but same meaning.
What are you trying to achieve here? Using synomyms for what they are not
I think you can do this by THISKEYWORD => word1,word2,word3,word4
you can try it and then see if it work by analysing it on the analyzer tab on
the admin page.
From: solruser2010
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 1:44:20 PM
Subject:
Dennis,
We will we serving the content to de indexed websites. As i wrote we will be
looking into setting up different cores, 1 core for each website. This wil
make sure the content is sperated for each individual indexed website.
The so called "error" handling is only needed, in case of bad pro
Hi,
Is it possible to set up synonyms to work like this
THISKEYWORD = word1,word2,word3,word4
but have it so word1 != word2 != word3
in this theoretical example a search for fishing would be set up like this.
fishing,sport,water,boat,bait
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http:/
I see i missed the `name`-part. Did you really start the example with java -
jar start.jar in the example directory? Name is a defined field in the shipped
schema.
> Hi,
>
> Strange, the example schema should work with the example documents. Anyway,
> see your Solr output as it will show you whi
Hi,
Strange, the example schema should work with the example documents. Anyway,
see your Solr output as it will show you which field it complains about.
Cheers,
> Good Evening List,
>
> I have been working with Nutch and due to numerous integration advantages I
> decided to get to grips with t
Hey,
Is it possible to read the timestamp that the DataImportHandler uses for a
delta-import from a location other than "conf/dataimport.properties".
Thanks,
Sid
Good Evening List,
I have been working with Nutch and due to numerous integration advantages I
decided to get to grips with the Solr code base.
Solr dist - 1.4.1
java version 1.6.0_22
Windows Vista Home Premium
Command Prompt to execute commands
I encountered the following problem very early on
Solr basically does ONE thing (and related things) very well. Doing all the
error messaging that yuou want would be fighting all the specialization builit
into Solr/Lucene code.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is us
I can see no reason to keep separate web sites information in the same index.
If
it's not being served to a website at all, why have data from another website
in
'accidental' proximity to it? Someday, a coder WILL make a mistake, or a
library
upgrade will allow access.
Best at least sort dat
Nope. But it's quite affordable if search is important to you.
For an open sourced middleware, check out www.sesat.no
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
On 23. nov. 2010, at 16.28, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is the twigkit open sourced? Looks interes
Hello,
is the twigkit open sourced? Looks interesting.
Regards,
Lukas
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent <
jan@cominvent.com> wrote:
> Check out for instance www.twigkit.com which is a light-weight middleware
> (as well as GUI framework) for Solr. It could speed up dev
Patience, my friend. It's still early in the morning and people are thinking
about Thanksgiving ...
We need more details. My first guess is that "only the sql statement
changed"
means that something's wrong with the new SQL. There's a little-known
debug console for DIH you might want to investigat
I think you got fooled by what's returned as a field value. When you store a
field and
later return that field as part of a document, your exact input is returned
*regardless* of what analysis has been done. So your *query* of spellword:[*
to *]
returns the stored value, not the indexed tokens.
I
The setup of multiple cores is a good option, thanks for the advice.
I agree the "required" field should be in the application layer, but i also
think some "error" handling should come from the Solr server to prevent
incorrect usage. If i only knew how to do this for each request.
Regards,
Jos
hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:39:00PM +0100, Peter Blokland wrote:
> i'm using solr and am trying to limit my resultset to documents
> that either have a publication date in the range * to now, or
> have no publication date set at all (field is not present).
> however, using this :
>
> (pubdat
Sounds like a good plan. I'd probably also set multiple cores for each
website. This could give you more accurate results scoring.
Good question about the "required" configuration option.. any input?
Although on the other hand, this is a rule which seems to better fit in your
application's Validat
=( anyone a idea ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/commit-true-has-no-effect-tp1952567p1953391.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have integrated solr and nutch using
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/ this
As the tutorial says, the Schema.xml & SolrConfig.xml of Solr has to be
modified. I also did the same. I am using Solr-1.3.
But my problem is that i am not able to implement Spellcheck in thi
Check out for instance www.twigkit.com which is a light-weight middleware (as
well as GUI framework) for Solr. It could speed up development time
considerably for your project. It has hooks to transform queries before they
are sent to Solr and process responses before displaying, if needed.
--
Hi everyone,
This is how we think we should set it up.
Situation:
- Multiple websites indexed on 1 solr server
- Results should be seperated for each website
- Search results should be filtered on group access
Solution i think is possible with solr:
- Solr server should only be accesed through
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Peter Sturge wrote:
> Document-level access control can be a real 'can of worms', and it can
> be worthwhile spending a bit of time defining exactly what you need.
I agree, "document-level access control" is an anti-feature.
You can't just give someone access to
I will be out of the office starting 23/11/2010 and will not return until
24/11/2010.
Please email to itsta...@actionimages.com for any urgent issues.
Action Images are proud to be an Official Supplier to England 2018 -
www.england2018bid.com
Action Images is a division of Reuters Limited a
Yes, as mentioned in the above link, there's SOLR-1872 for maintaing
your own document-level access control. Also, if you have access to
the file system documents and want to use their existing ACL, have a
look at SOLR-1834.
Document-level access control can be a real 'can of worms', and it can
be
Hello.
some of my cores absolutely dont want to commit the delta-import changes.
the query are all okay but i have no idea what ist wrong
Solr version: Solr Specification Version: 4.0.0.2010.10.26.08.43.14
dih found the deltas, and changed it but no commit is performed !? the
config files are t
Hi guys
I'm kind of new to solr and I'm wondering how to configure solr to best
fulfills my requirements.
Requirements are as follow:
I have 2 data sources: database and file system documents. Every document in
the file system has related information stored in the database. Both the
file conten
Dear list,
solr/lucene has a strange problem.
I'm currently using apache-solr-4.0-2010-10-12_08-05-48
I have written a MessageDigest for fields which generally works.
Part of my schema.xml is:
...
...
...
...
...
I have a field type "text_md" which uses the KeywordTokenizerF
49 matches
Mail list logo
