Hey IT-Crowd!
I'm dealing with some performance issues during warmup the
queryResultCache. Normally it tooks about 11 Minutes (~700.000 ms), but
now it tooks about 4 MILLION and more ms. All I can see in the solr.log
ist that the number of cumulative_inserts ascends from from ~250.000 to
~670.0
Hey Dipti,
Basically query optimizations + setting cache sizes to a very high level.
Other than that, the config is about the same as the out-of-the-box config
that comes with the Solr download.
I haven't found a magic switch to get very fast query responses + facet
counts with the frequency of c
Yes, the old data will show until there has been a commit executed. 50
docs isn't many so you should be fine
-Nick
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:41 AM, adeelmahmood wrote:
>
> thank you .. that helps .. actually its not that many updates .. close to 10
> fields probably and may be 50 doc updates per
Hi,
I was trying to get the detailed "explain" info in (java) code using the
APIs, see codes below,
-
ResponseBuilder rb (from some inherited process function)
SolrIndexSearcher searcher = rb.req.getSearcher();
Query query = rb.getQuery();
Explanation epl = searcher.explain(quer
Is there a way to 'discover' slaves using ReplicationHandler? I'm writing a
quick dashboard, and don't have access to a list of slaves, but would like
to show some stats about their health.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Discovering-Slaves-tp27601334p27601334.html
Sent fr
Has anyone encountered the following issue?
I wanted to understand the statscomponent better, so I setup a simple test
index with a few thousand docs. In my schema I have:
- an indexed multivalue sint field (StatsFacetField) that can contain
values
0 thru 5 that I want to use as my stats.
> 1) Does Solr (Lucene) consider exact match to be something
> more important ? I mean if the query is
> "description:organisation", then
> which one of the following would be returned?
> Document A, consiting
> just "description:organisation" , where
> as Document B consisting "descriptio
Hi Tim,
Due to our performance needs we optimize the index early in the morning and
then run the cache-warming queries once we mount the optimized index on our
servers. If you are indexing and serving using the same Solr instance, you
shouldn't have to re-run the cache warming queries when you a
A little more info.
Doing some more digging it appears that result.getDocList().size() is
returning 0 which would explain why I'm not getting any documents in my
result.
I'm not quite sure how/why that would be returning 0 while
result.getDocList().matches() is returning > 0?
It also looks li
This link will answer many of your questions:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrInstall
About JSON: See SOLR-1690 (Jira) at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1690
WARNING: I have no clue what the condition of this patch is,
and have never used it. But at least someone else is
thinking
Caveats:
<1> I don't know either.
<2> I think you can just fire off auto-warming queries at each SOLR
instance.
the main caching is on the server machine as far as SOLR search speed
is concerned.
But I'd really recommend thinking about just replicating the indexes, disk
space is very cheap. Probab
<>
Well, It Depends (tm). What do you want to accomplish? Do you want
searches to get results from both the database import AND the imported
documents? Or are these orthogonal data sets? If they are orthogonal,
then putting them in their own core if probably conceptually easiest
(there's no require
no but you can set a default for the qf parameter with the same value
On 02/15/2010 01:50 AM, Steve Radhouani wrote:
Hi there,
Can the option be used by the DisMaxRequestHandler?
Thanks,
-Steve
I'm attempting to write a custom SearchComponent that utilizes some custom
filters but i'm obviously missing something key. I extend SearchComponent
and override the prepare and process methods and then set the results on the
result builder a la:
SolrIndexSearcher.QueryCommand cmd = rb.getQueryCo
Hey All,
I have gone through the tutorial and ran Solrj example code. It worked fine.
I want to now implement my own full text search engine for my documents. I
am not sure how should i start about doing this, since in example code I ran
start.jar and post.jar?
do I have to run start.jar even
Hello All,
I know that in most of the cases there is no need to edit
the ranking formula and I hope for the same in our case. So to make
sure that there is no need, I have following queries.
1) Does Solr (Lucene) consider exact match to be something more
important ? I mean if the query
What you say makes perfect sense.
However i can offset the risk of disk i/o and latency by having good amount
of RAM say 64 GB and 64 bit OS.
2 caveats being that
1. I have no clue if J2EE servers can use this much RAM (64 bit OS and JVM).
2. I have no idea on how can cache be auto-warmed. s
Hey All,
Hope someone can advise me and a way to go.
I have a my Solr setup and working well. I am using DIH to handle all my data
input.
Now I need to add content from word docs pdf's meta data etc and looking to use
Solar Cell
A few questions regarding this. Would it be best to add these to
when posting documents to solr using curl, I get the following error:
Posting file File.xml to http://localhost:8983/solr/update/
Error 500
HTTP ERROR: 500Lock obtain timed out:
nativefsl...@./solr/data/index/lucene-bd553072dd77e805bcb4e83a6d8ca389-write.lock:
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
.
I am just trying to understand the difference between the two options to know
which one to choose ..
it sounds like I probably should just merge all data in the content field to
maximize search results
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> The obvious answer is that you won't get any hits for terms
> in ti
> Now, I want to create an extra rule:
> If the query contains on 9 words, I want to make sure, that
> 6 of them have
> to occur within a document or else it would not be
> responsed to the user.
>
I think you are asking DisMaxRequestHandler's mm (Minimum 'Should' Match)
parameter.
http://wi
Sure, you can do that. But you're making a change that kind of defeats
the purpose. The underlying Lucene engine can be very disk intensive,
and any network latency will adversely affect the search speed. Which
is the point of replicating the indexes, to get them local to the SOLR/
Lucene instance
Hi all,
Google didn't come up with any helpful hits, so I'm wondering whether
this is either too simple for me to grok, or I've got some obvious
mistake in my code.
Problem:
Images that I want to load in the velocity templates (including those
referenced in CSS/JS files) for the VelocityRespon
The obvious answer is that you won't get any hits for terms
in titles when you search the content field.
But that's not very informative. What are you trying to accomplish?
That is, what's the high-level issue you're trying to address with
a change like that?
Best
Erick
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9
Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote:
>
> Fredouille91 wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a field (named "countries") containing a list of values separated
>> with comma to wich belongs each document.
>> This field looks like this : france,germany,italy
>> It means that tjhis document is related to France, German
Fredouille91 wrote:
Hello,
I have a field (named "countries") containing a list of values separated
with comma to wich belongs each document.
This field looks like this : france,germany,italy
It means that tjhis document is related to France, Germany and Italy.
If you can have country field
Hi Eric, Raju
Thanks for reply..
It means I need to index separate table data (news, article and blog),
currently I am joining the table and making a single rows for all three
table.
One other thing I want to know that, in this case (if i indexing table data
separately then) some column of the t
Hi,
there is an indexed field in my Solr's schema, in which one phrase is
stored per document.
I have to implement a feature that will allow users to have "more like
this" results, based on the contents of this field.
I think that the Solr's built in "more like this" feature requires too
many
Hey Janne
Can you please let me know what other optimizations are you talking about
here. Because in our application we are committing in about 5 mins but still
the response time is very low and at times there are some connection time
outs also.
Just wanted to confirm if you have done some major
Hi all,
After analysing the highlighting inconsistency [Highlighting Inconsistency
email tree] I was wondering if I should open a jira issue? Can you advise me if
that's a sensible thing to do?
So the issue is:
* A query is done on a certain field (i.e. title) which is unstemmed,
Hello community,
with the help of the sloppy pharse query [1] I can say, that queried words
have to occur within a special number of words.
Now, I want to create an extra rule:
If the query contains on 9 words, I want to make sure, that 6 of them have
to occur within a document or else it would
From: Tim Terlegård [tim.terleg...@gmail.com]
> If the index size is more than you can have in RAM, do you recommend
> to split the index to several servers so it can all be in RAM?
>
> I do expect phrase queries. Total index size is 107 GB. *prx files are
> total 65GB and *frq files 38GB. It's pro
Hi solr community!
Is it recommended to replace the data directory of a heavy used solr
instance?
(I am aware of the http queries, but that will be too slow)
I need a fast way to push development data to production servers.
I tried the following with success even under load of the index:
mv da
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : never keep a 0.
> :
> : It is better to leave not mention the deletionPolicy at all. The
> : defaults are usually fine.
>
> if setting the "keep" values to 0 results in NPEs we should do one (if not
> both) of the following...
>
> 1) ch
Hi there,
Can the option be used by the DisMaxRequestHandler?
Thanks,
-Steve
Hi,
you should have a new field in your index say 'type' which will have values
'news','article' and 'blog' for documents news,article and blog respectively.
when searching with facet's elabled make use of this 'type' field then you will
get what you wanted.
Regards,
P.N.Raju,
___
Hi Tom,
1600 warming queries, that's quite many. Do you run them every time a
document is added to the index? Do you have any tips on warming?
If the index size is more than you can have in RAM, do you recommend
to split the index to several servers so it can all be in RAM?
I do expect phrase qu
Hello,
I have a field (named "countries") containing a list of values separated
with comma to wich belongs each document.
This field looks like this : france,germany,italy
It means that tjhis document is related to France, Germany and Italy.
I 'm trying to add a filter to list, for example, all
I have a little problem with spellcheck! I get suggestions all time even the
word is correct! I use dictionary from file! Here my configuration:
explicit
true
file
false
false
1
false
query
spellcheck
39 matches
Mail list logo
