I am just trying to understand the difference between the two options to know which one to choose .. it sounds like I probably should just merge all data in the content field to maximize search results
Erick Erickson wrote: > > The obvious answer is that you won't get any hits for terms > in titles when you search the content field. > > But that's not very informative. What are you trying to accomplish? > That is, what's the high-level issue you're trying to address with > a change like that? > > Best > Erick > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:02 PM, adeelmahmood > <adeelmahm...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> if this is my schema >> >> <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" >> required="true" >> /> >> <field name="title" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> >> <field name="owner" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> >> <field name="status" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> >> <field name="category" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" /> >> >> with this one being the catch all field >> <field name="content" type="text" indexed="true" stored="false" >> multiValued="true"/> >> >> and I am copying all fields into the content field >> >> my question is .. what if instead of that I change the title field to be >> text as well and dont copy that into content field but still copy >> everything >> else (all string fields) to content field .. exactly what difference will >> that make .. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/schema-design---catch-all-field-question-tp27588936p27588936.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/schema-design---catch-all-field-question-tp27588936p27594836.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
