Hi,
Thanks for your reply. But I need one clarification. When you say it will
contain the data you requested for, do you mean the data as requested in fl
parameter of the query?
Thanks.
Aman
-Original Message-
From: noble.p...@gmail.com [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Noble
The contents of SolrDocument is fixed. It will only contain the data
that you requested for
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Kartik1 wrote:
>
> A named list contains a key value pair. At the very basic level, if we want
> to access the data that is contained in named list
>
> NamedList foo = t
A named list contains a key value pair. At the very basic level, if we want
to access the data that is contained in named list
NamedList foo = thisIsSolrQueryResponseObject.getValues();
Entry bar = null;
// Creating a iterator to iterate through the response
Iterator> It =foo.iterator();
while (
I think you can just tell the spellchecker to only supply "more
popular" suggestions, which would naturally omit these rare
misspellings:
true
-Peter
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Jay Hill wrote:
> We had the same thing to deal with recently, and a great solution was posted
> to the lis
AWS provides some standard data sets, including an extract of all
wikipedia content:
http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/entry.jspa?externalID=2345&categoryID=249
Looks like it's not being updated often, so this or another AWS data
set could be a consistent basis for benchmarking?
-Pe
Thanks for the bug report... this looks like an escaping bug.
But, it looks like it stems from a really weird field name?
facet.field=authorname:
Shouldn't that be
facet.field=authorname
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:14 PM, zehua wrote:
>
> I use two shards i
Hi,
every solr document I have a creation date which is the default time stamp
"NOW". What I like to know how can I have facets like the following:
Past 24 Hours (3)
Past 7 days (23)
Past 15 days (33)
Past 30 days (59)
Is this possible? i.e. range query as facet?
Regards
Anton
_
I use two shards in two different machines. Here is my URL
http://machine1:8900/solr/select/?shards=machine1:8900/solr,machine2:8900/solr&q=body\::dell&start=0&rows=10&facet=true&facet.field=authorname
This works great for 1.3.0 I just download the Solr 1.4 from trunk and it
breaks. If I run the
This is relaly odd.
Just to clarify...
1) you are running a normal solr installation (in a servlet
container) and using SolrJ to send updates to Solr from another
application, correct?
2) Do you have any special custom plugins running
3) do you have any other apps that might be attemptin
Hey Hoss thanks for answering to this so concrete question. I actually
realized that maybe I was not clear enough in my explanation so I just post
it again in another thread trying to give more detail and writing the code
of my hack in getDocListAndSetNC:
http://www.nabble.com/Custom-funcionality-
: Thanks for the reply Asif. We have already tried removing the optimization
: step. Unfortunately the commit command alone is also causing an identical
: behaviour . Is there any thing else that we are missing ?
the hardlinking behavior of snapshots is based on the files in the index
directory,
: I have a need to boost MoreLikeThis results. So far the only boost that I
: have come across is boosting query field by using mlt.qf. But what I really
: need is to use boost query and boost function like those in the
: DisMaxRequestHandler. Is that possible at all either out-of-the-box or by
: Does anyone know if Solr supports sorting by internal document ids,
: i.e, like Sort.INDEXORDER in Lucene? If so, how?
It does not. in Solr the decisison to make "score desc" the default
search ment there is no way to request simple docId ordering.
: Also, if anyone have any insight on if
: For testing, what I have done is do some hacks to SolrIndexSearcher's
: getDocListAndSetNC funcion. I fill the ids array in my own order or I just
: don't add some docs id's (and so change this id's array size). I have been
: testing it and the performance is dramatically better that using the p
An interesting analogy for this feature is that you're doing a count(*) on a
group by in SQL. While it's true that you can pre-compute these if you have a
small set of combination you know you want to show a-priori, if you want to
present a more dynamic customer experience, you need to be able t
: Subject: posting binary file and metadata in two separate documents
there was some discussion a while back about that fact that you can push
multiple "ContentStreams" to SOlr in a single request, and while the
existing handelrs all just iterate over and process them seperately, it
would be *
: At least in trunk, if you request for:
: http://localhost:8084/solr/core_A/mlt?q=id:7468365&fq=price[100 TO 200]
: It will filter the MoreLikeThis results
I think a big part of the confusion people have about this is the
distinction between the MLT RequestHandler, and the MLT SearchComponent.
Actually, it's obvious that the second case wouldn't work after looking at
SimpleHttpConnectionManager. So my question boils down to being able to use
a single CommonsHttpSolrServer in a multithreaded fashion.
danben wrote:
>
> I have a running Solr (1.3) server that I want to query with SolrJ
I have a running Solr (1.3) server that I want to query with SolrJ, and I'm
running a benchmark that uses a pool of 10 threads to issue 1000 random
queries to the server. Each query executes 7 searches in parallel.
My first attempt was to use a single instance of CommonsHttpSolrServer,
using the
Interesting, many sites don't store text in Lucene/Solr and so
need a way to highlight text stored in a database (or some
equivalent), they have two options, re-analyze the doc for the
term positions or access the term vectors from Solr and hand
them to the client who then performs the highlighting
I am going to do some (large scale) indexing tests using Lucene & will
post to both this and the Lucene list.
More info on compressed pointers:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/HotSpotInternals/CompressedOops
-Glen Newton
http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/search?q=lucene
2009/7/16 Kevin Peterson :
> I not
I noticed that Ubuntu pushed java 6 update 14 as an update to 9.04 today.
This update includes compressed object pointers which are designed to reduce
memory requirements with 64bit JVMs.
Has anyone experimented with this to see if it provides any benefit to Solr?
If not, can anyone comment on wh
Agreed! We are pushing towards it - one of the holds up is that Lucene 2.9
is about to release, so we are waiting for that. We really need to prune
down the JIRA list though. A few have been tackling it, but many of the
issues are still up in the air. I think once Lucene 2.9 releases though,
Solr 1
Assuming that you know the unique ID when constructing the query
(which it sounds like you do) why not try a boost query with a high
boost for 2 and a lower boost for 1 - then the default sort by score
should match your desired ordering, and this order can be further
tweaked with other bf or bq ar
I haven't researched old versions of Lucene, but I think it has always been
a vector space, tf.idf engine. I don't see any hint of probabilistic
scoring.
A bit of background about stop words and idf. They are two versions of the
same thing.
Stop words are a manual, on/off decision about what word
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Erik Hatcher
wrote:
>
> On Jul 15, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Mani Kumar wrote:
>
>> @mark, @otis:
>>
>
> Can I answer too? :)
>
your welcome :) ... thanks
>
>
> yeah copying all the fields to one text field will work but what if i want
>> to assign specific weightage
Come on it's time to cut this release, folks! I'm just waiting for that
since it was forecasted for early summer. :)
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 15 July 2009 02:18
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 1.4 Release
Hi
Are you ever going to search for earlier revisions or only the latest?
If in your use cases you need the latest, just replace earlier revisions
with the latest on your index
Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Reza Safari [mailto:r.saf...@lukkien.com]
Sent: 15 July 2009 12
Hey Grant,
It's a middleman, not a backup. We don't have any issues in the current
setup, just trying to make sure we have a solution in case this becomes an
issue. I'm concerned about a situation with dozens of searchers. The i/o and
network load on the indexer might become significant at that p
Hi Walter,
Has it always been there? Which version of Lucene are we talking about?
Regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wunderw...@netflix.com]
Sent: 16 July 2009 15:04
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Word frequency count in the index
Lucene us
Plus there is a single class that you can run from the command line in Lucene's
contrib. I think it's called HighFreqTerms or something close to that.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> To: solr-user@lucen
On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Anders Melchiorsen
wrote:
What we want to do is to have an extra text highlighted by the Solr
highlighter. That text should never be stored in the Solr index,
but rather
be provided in an HTTP reque
Hi,
I've got the same problem: searching using wildcards and umlaut -> no
results.
Just as you descriped it:
"if i type complete word (such as "übersicht").
But there are no hits, if i use wildcards (such as "über*")
Searching with wildcards and without umlauts works as well."
Anyone found the
Lucene uses a tf.idf relevance formula, so it automatically finds common
words (stop words) in your documents and gives them lower weight. I
recommend not removing stop words at all and letting Lucene handle
the weighting.
wunder
On 7/16/09 3:29 AM, "Pooja Verlani" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there an
The first number is a unique ID that points to a particular customer,
the second is a value. It basically tells us whether or not a customer
already has that product or not. The main use of it is to be able to
search our product listing for products the customer does not already
have.
The alter
On Jul 16, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
ashokcz wrote:
Hi all,
i have a scenario where i need to get facet count for combination
of fields.
Say i have two fields Manufacturer and Year of manufacture.
I search for something and it gives me 15 results and my facet
count as like
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Anders Melchiorsen
wrote:
>
> What we want to do is to have an extra text highlighted by the Solr
> highlighter. That text should never be stored in the Solr index, but rather
> be provided in an HTTP request along with the search query.
>
> Is this possible?
>
I
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:54:22 +0200, Anders Melchiorsen
wrote:
> Is it possible to have Solr highlight an arbitrary text that is posted at
> request time?
Hi again.
I wonder whether my question was too terse to be well understood.
What we want to do is to have an extra text highlighted by the S
Hi Wojtek,
Is this a backup or is it a middleman? I can't say that I have seen
the middleman approach before, but that doesn't mean it won't work.
Are you actually having an issue with the current setup or just trying
to make sure you don't in the future?
-Grant
On Jul 15, 2009, at 1:3
In the trunk version, the TermsComponent should give you this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/TermsComponent
. Also, you can use the LukeRequestHandler to get the top words in
each field.
Alternatively, you may just want to point Luke at your index.
On Jul 16, 2009, at 6:29 AM, Pooja Verlani w
Hi,
Is there any way in SOLR to know the count of each word indexed in the solr
?
I want to find out the different word frequencies to figure out '
application specific stop words'.
Please let me know if its possible.
Thank you,
Regards,
Pooja
hmmm but in my case it will be dynamic . they may choose different fields at
run time and accordingly i need to populate the values ...
Avlesh Singh wrote:
>
> If you create a field called "brand_year_of_manufacturing" and populate it
> with the "brandName - YOM" data while indexing, you can ach
hmmm thanks Koji :handshake: will trymy hands on 1.4 version and see my luck
=^D
Koji Sekiguchi-2 wrote:
>
> ashokcz wrote:
>> Hi thanks "Koji Sekiguchi-2" for your reply .
>> Ya i was looking something like that .
>> So when doing the solrrequest is should have extra config parameters
>> facet.
If you create a field called "brand_year_of_manufacturing" and populate it
with the "brandName - YOM" data while indexing, you can achieve the desired
with a simple facet on this field.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:19 PM, ashokcz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> i have a scenario where i need to
ashokcz wrote:
Hi thanks "Koji Sekiguchi-2" for your reply .
Ya i was looking something like that .
So when doing the solrrequest is should have extra config parameters
facet.tree and i shud give the fields csv to specify the hierarchy will
try and see if its giving me desired results .
But
Hi thanks "Koji Sekiguchi-2" for your reply .
Ya i was looking something like that .
So when doing the solrrequest is should have extra config parameters
facet.tree and i shud give the fields csv to specify the hierarchy will
try and see if its giving me desired results .
But just one doubt i
ashokcz wrote:
Hi all,
i have a scenario where i need to get facet count for combination of fields.
Say i have two fields Manufacturer and Year of manufacture.
I search for something and it gives me 15 results and my facet count as like
this :
Manufacturer : Nokia(5);Motorola(7);iphone(
Hi all,
i have a scenario where i need to get facet count for combination of fields.
Say i have two fields Manufacturer and Year of manufacture.
I search for something and it gives me 15 results and my facet count as like
this :
Manufacturer : Nokia(5);Motorola(7);iphone(3)
Year of manuf
48 matches
Mail list logo
