Hey Hoss thanks for answering to this so concrete question. I actually realized that maybe I was not clear enough in my explanation so I just post it again in another thread trying to give more detail and writing the code of my hack in getDocListAndSetNC: http://www.nabble.com/Custom-funcionality-in-SolrIndexSearcher-td24475706.html
Any comment or advice is more than welcome Thanks in advance : For testing, what I have done is do some hacks to SolrIndexSearcher's : getDocListAndSetNC funcion. I fill the ids array in my own order or I just : don't add some docs id's (and so change this id's array size). I have been : testing it and the performance is dramatically better that using the patch. : Can anyone tell me witch is the best way to hack DocListAndSetNC? I mean, I : know this change can make me go mad in the future, when I decide to update : trunk version or update to new releases. : My hack provably is too specific for my use case but could upload the source : in case someone can advice me what to do. : Thanks in advance, If you can post the changes you found useful for your specific case, it might help people spot possible ways to refactor SolrIndexSearcher code so similar types of extension like that would be simpler (without custom patching) -Hoss -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Change-in-DocListAndSetNC-not-messing-everything-tp24387830p24525598.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
