Dustin Kirkland 2011-05-24 22:40:
Hi Sadrul,
I'm hitting a few of these (v-split related bugs), as well as a
handful of other problems stemming from cherry picking individual
patches from git (and neglecting later ones).
Is there any chance of rolling a candidate screen release any time soon?
t;>
>> I'm looking for the famous vertical split patch. I see the version linked
>> from http://fungi.yuggoth.org/vsp4s/, but that version seems to be
>> outdated. I tried it in Cygwin, and among other problems, it doesn't show
>> a vertical divider on the sc
> I would highly encourage using as much from the git repository on
> savannah.gnu.org as possible. There have been various fixes related to
> vertical splits, especially related to scrolling performance with
> vertical splits. Unfortunately, it is difficult to isolate the commits
> that deal with
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Andrew Schulman
wrote:
> Hi all. I'm the maintainer of screen in Cygwin. We currently have version
> 4.0.3, with some Cygwin-specific patches and 256-color support.
>
> I'm looking for the famous vertical split patch. I see the vers
> I'm looking for the famous vertical split patch. I see the version linked
> from http://fungi.yuggoth.org/vsp4s/, but that version seems to be
> outdated. I tried it in Cygwin, and among other problems, it doesn't show
> a vertical divider on the screen, and has no documenta
Hi all. I'm the maintainer of screen in Cygwin. We currently have version
4.0.3, with some Cygwin-specific patches and 256-color support.
I'm looking for the famous vertical split patch. I see the version linked
from http://fungi.yuggoth.org/vsp4s/, but that version seems to be
ou
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:27:15PM EST, Christian Ebert wrote:
> * Chris Jones on Sunday, January 10, 2010 at 15:02:43 -0500
[..]
> > This is debian lenny, so it came pre-compiled but definitely
> > configured for 256 colors. Per dpkg, it's elinks 0.11.4-3.
> See http://elinks.or.cz/faq.html#dro
* Chris Jones on Sunday, January 10, 2010 at 15:02:43 -0500
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:20:21PM EST, Christian Ebert wrote:
>> I've played around with elinks a bit by now, and, with bce unset
>> (fro mutt), cannot reproduce it with git HEAD from elinks. I had
>> some flickering with older versions
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:20:21PM EST, Christian Ebert wrote:
Hello Christian,
> I've played around with elinks a bit by now, and, with bce unset
> (fro mutt), cannot reproduce it with git HEAD from elinks. I had
> some flickering with older versions, although no need to refresh.
>
> What is yo
Hi Chris,
* Chris Jones on Sunday, January 10, 2010 at 11:19:32 -0500
> It's been over a couple of weeks, and here's what I observe with the
> version of GNU/screen that I downloaded from the git repository:
>
> 1. the mutt help/status lines at the top & bottom of the screen are not
> redrawn c
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:37:04PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
[..]
> Yes! I could reproduce the problem as well!
>
> I have checked in a fix (a6eea7b4d). Please try it and let me know how
> it works. Thanks for the report.
Hello Sadrul,
It's been over a couple of weeks, and here's wha
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:37:04PM -0500, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> * Chris Jones had this to say on [24 Dec 2009, 10:42:38 -0500]:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:33:30AM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > > * Chris Jones had this to say on [08 Dec 2009, 03:40:31 -0500]:
> > > > On Mon, D
> As an aside, with the proliferation of version control & source
> management software, it's becoming difficult to keep up.
>
> I spent over an hour playing with git and not getting anywhere, and less
> than ten minutes building & testing the new version.
OT, but no kidding, what a pain in the
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 12:35:22PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
[..]
> Nah, a 'git pull' from the source tree should be enough.
Never got 'git pull' or 'git-pull' to work, complaining I'm not telling
him which branch I want to merge with, etc.
As an aside, with the proliferation of versio
* Chris Jones had this to say on [25 Dec 2009, 10:58:52 -0500]:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:37:04PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > * Chris Jones had this to say on [24 Dec 2009, 10:42:38 -0500]:
>
> [..]
>
> > Yes! I could reproduce the problem as well!
>
> Yes sorry for this, er.. Xmas
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 03:37:04PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> * Chris Jones had this to say on [24 Dec 2009, 10:42:38 -0500]:
[..]
> Yes! I could reproduce the problem as well!
Yes sorry for this, er.. Xmas present.. all I could afford :-)
It made Vim all but unusable, looked like I h
* Chris Jones had this to say on [24 Dec 2009, 10:42:38 -0500]:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:33:30AM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > * Chris Jones had this to say on [08 Dec 2009, 03:40:31 -0500]:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:08:02PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> > >
> > > > I ha
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:33:30AM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> * Chris Jones had this to say on [08 Dec 2009, 03:40:31 -0500]:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:08:02PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> >
> > > I have checked in a fix for this (revision e8d36bf1) [1]. It'd be
> > > great
x27;m using screen from the ubuntu repositories which has the
> > vertical-screen
> > > patch. I just noticed that when I've got the screen in vertical-split
> > mode,
> > > the search function (/ and ?) doesn't work properly. The searches find
> > > n
ed that when I've got the screen in vertical-split
> mode,
> > the search function (/ and ?) doesn't work properly. The searches find
> > nothing even though matches are there [snip]
>
> Does screen tell you that 'Pattern not found' even when there are
> ma
t noticed that when I've got the screen in vertical-split mode,
> > the search function (/ and ?) doesn't work properly. The searches find
> > nothing even though matches are there [snip]
>
> Does screen tell you that 'Pattern not found' even when there are
>
* Jacob Alexandersson had this to say on [15 Dec 2009, 10:02:18 +0100]:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using screen from the ubuntu repositories which has the vertical-screen
> patch. I just noticed that when I've got the screen in vertical-split mode,
> the search function (/ and
Hello all,
I'm using screen from the ubuntu repositories which has the vertical-screen
patch. I just noticed that when I've got the screen in vertical-split mode,
the search function (/ and ?) doesn't work properly. The searches find
nothing even though matches are there. When
>> I have checked in a fix for this (revision e8d36bf1) [1]. It'd be great
>> if you test it out and let me know if the performance is good. Also,
>> testing for possible regression would be great.
I'm also seeing great vertical split performance w
>
> Now I am totally confused. dvtm running INSIDE screen's vertical split
> does not exhibit any slowdown.
>
I can confirm both the lack of slowdown for dvtm-inside-vertical-split and
being confused as to how this is possible.
- Rhys
___
the reported issue wasn't
> lost.
I didn't get the mail. I am not sure where/why it got zapped.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Rhys Ulerich
> Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM
> Subject: Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm
> To: screen-u
* Sadrul Habib Chowdhury on Monday, December 07, 2009 at 23:08:02 -0500
> * Sadrul Habib Chowdhury had this to say on [07 Dec 2009, 15:53:02 -0500]:
>> It's because screen tries to refresh the display an aweful lot of time. I
>> have a sort of a hacky fix for this at the moment. A nicer fix looks t
ix makes a huge difference. The vertical split feature is
now usable.
CJ
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
* Chris Jones had this to say on [08 Dec 2009, 03:40:31 -0500]:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:08:02PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
>
> > I have checked in a fix for this (revision e8d36bf1) [1]. It'd be
> > great if you test it out and let me know if the performance is good.
> > Also, testing
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:08:02PM EST, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury wrote:
> I have checked in a fix for this (revision e8d36bf1) [1]. It'd be
> great if you test it out and let me know if the performance is good.
> Also, testing for possible regression would be great. Let me know if
> you (or anyone e
* Nicholas Marriott had this to say on [10 Aug 2009, 08:17:00 +0100]:
> Hi
>
> I haven't tested but I suspect this is probably the reason tmux is faster
> (from
> tty_redraw_region in tty.c):
>
> /*
> * If region is >= 50% of the screen, just schedule a window redraw.
> In
>
* Thomas Adam had this to say on [24 Oct 2008, 14:26:30 +0100]:
> Hello --
>
> 2008/10/24 Robin Lee Powell :
> >
> > I'm playing around with vertical split. I'm using Screen version
> > 4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 on Debian.
> >
> > When I have ver
* Sadrul Habib Chowdhury had this to say on [07 Dec 2009, 15:53:02 -0500]:
> * A S had this to say on [05 Dec 2009, 19:41:53 +0100]:
> > Hi,
> > I do wonder why gnu screen is so slow in vertical split while dvtm
> > http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/ does not exhibit any
* A S had this to say on [05 Dec 2009, 19:41:53 +0100]:
> Hi,
> I do wonder why gnu screen is so slow in vertical split while dvtm
> http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/ does not exhibit any visible
> slowdown?
> Is it because screen emulates vt100 only?
It's because scr
2009/12/5, A S <>:
> Hi,
> I do wonder why gnu screen is so slow in vertical split while dvtm
> http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/ does not exhibit any visible
> slowdown?
> Is it because screen emulates vt100 only?
>
> Regards
> Arthur Skonecki
>
Now I
Hi,
I do wonder why gnu screen is so slow in vertical split while dvtm
http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/ does not exhibit any visible
slowdown?
Is it because screen emulates vt100 only?
Regards
Arthur Skonecki
___
screen-users mailing list
ry from the latest tip and
compile it. You can probably look at the change-sets to determine when vertical
split support was added to the source code. The official vanilla source
tarballs do not include the vertical split.
--
Sincerely,
Antony Jepson / / GPG Key: 0xFA10ED80
pg
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
wrote:
>
> Hi. The patch for vertical split has been in the official git repository
> (http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/screen.git) for a while. Some distros
> (e.g. debian) include this patch (or some version of it) in s
* Jeenu V had this to say on [11 Nov 2009, 21:06:22 +0530]:
> Hi,
>
> I was Googling on vertical split on GNU screen. And I see patches flying
> around, but I'm yet to see the real functionality or any mention to the same
> in the man pages. So I wanted to know if this is an
Hi,
I was Googling on vertical split on GNU screen. And I see patches flying
around, but I'm yet to see the real functionality or any mention to the same
in the man pages. So I wanted to know if this is an officially supported
feature; if not yet, when it's going to be.
Th
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:58:58AM EDT, Micah Cowan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
[..]
I believe I forgot to mention that the "slowness" and "flickering" does
not occur in the rightmost pane. In other words, if I split the screen
down the middle, start a shell, and issu
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:58:58AM EDT, Micah Cowan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
[..]
> I haven't looked at the tmux code. But I was speaking with Nicholas
> Mariott, tmux's author, about the (very recently merged) vertical split
> co
'm not prepared to
> > switch any time soon, I couldn't help but notice that tmux's scrolling
> > in vertical split screen mode is both very fast and devoid of the
> > annoying artifacts & flickering that I see in gnu/screen.
> >
> > I fact, with tm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Jones wrote:
> I was evaluating tmux over the weekend and though I'm not prepared to
> switch any time soon, I couldn't help but notice that tmux's scrolling
> in vertical split screen mode is both very fast and
I was evaluating tmux over the weekend and though I'm not prepared to
switch any time soon, I couldn't help but notice that tmux's scrolling
in vertical split screen mode is both very fast and devoid of the
annoying artifacts & flickering that I see in gnu/screen.
I fact, with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Terry wrote:
> I'm confused. I read online that vertically splitting a window was
> available as of 4.00.03, which is what my screen version claims to be,
> yet when I type ctrl-a | (which means hold down ctrl and a, then
> release and press sh
Oh. That sucks. Yeah, I read it multiple places, the last one being
the comment at the bottom of this page. Apparently, not authoritative.
;)
http://scie.nti.st/2008/8/22/gnu-screen-with-vertical-split-support
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Micah Cowan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS
I'm confused. I read online that vertically splitting a window was
available as of 4.00.03, which is what my screen version claims to be,
yet when I type ctrl-a | (which means hold down ctrl and a, then
release and press shift and \ simultaneously), nothing happens. I also
tried ctrl-A |, but no di
"Tom Scogland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually I use vim for that these days. I have an alias that starts
> vim and runs ":Man " whenever I run man.
For Emacs' M-x shell, I have this in .bashrc:
if test -z "$EMACS$INSIDE_EMACS"
then
: [...]
else
PS1='$ '
Robin Lee Powell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> And then I realized that when you page down in vim, it redraws its
> display area once. When you page down in less, it redraws line by
> line.
Please report this bug to the less maintain
t
> I'm not sure.
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Robin Lee Powell <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > > Hello --
> > >
> > > 2008/10/24 Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PRO
; >
> > 2008/10/24 Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > I'm playing around with vertical split. I'm using Screen
> > > version 4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 on Debian.
> > >
> > > When I have vertical split on, less is slow. *Re
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> Hello --
>
> 2008/10/24 Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I'm playing around with vertical split. I'm using Screen
> > version 4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 on Debian.
> >
Hello --
2008/10/24 Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm playing around with vertical split. I'm using Screen version
> 4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 on Debian.
>
> When I have vertical split on, less is slow. *Really* slow. So is
> more. vim is OK. Whe
I'm playing around with vertical split. I'm using Screen version
4.00.03jw4 (FAU) 2-May-06 on Debian.
When I have vertical split on, less is slow. *Really* slow. So is
more. vim is OK. When I say "slow", I mean that when I say "less
file", it takes ~20 s
* Jean-Yves Levesque had this to say on [05 Aug 2008, 11:40:03 -0400]:
> I do not know if this is an issue with my config
> but when I run the vertical split with layouts and
> I try to use the windowlist command (Ctrl-a ") I
> get the following message:
>
> Window size to
I do not know if this is an issue with my config
but when I run the vertical split with layouts and
I try to use the windowlist command (Ctrl-a ") I
get the following message:
Window size too small for window list page
then
Width 2 chars too small
Am i missing something?
jy
--
Je ne
Hello Curtis, everybody,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:07:55AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you have the libncurses5-dev package installed?
No, I didn't. I have installed it and everything has worked out fine.
I have a vertical split now. Thank you very much!
Regard
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:32:12AM +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 04:41:17PM +0100, Angel Martin Alganza wrote:
> > Are there debian packages of more recent versions available
> > somewhere or should I compile my own binary? If so, which version
> > should I download
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:01:11AM +0100, Angel Martin Alganza wrote:
> > No released versions implement it; you need the development version.
>
> Where can I find it, please?
http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=screen
> > I could create a .deb of a daily snapshot and post it on
> > mentors.debia
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 04:41:17PM +0100, Angel Martin Alganza wrote:
> I would like to start using the vertical split feature of screen.
> Which version is the first one which implements it?
No released versions implement it; you need the development version.
> Are there debian package
Hello,
I would like to start using the vertical split feature of screen.
Which version is the first one which implements it? I am running
Screen version 4.00.03 (FAU) 23-Oct-06, the one which comes with
Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (aka Etch).
Are there debian packages of more recent versions available
occupied by the caption
bar can be used by programs in other much more useful ways (for me
personally).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hard-status-line-in-vertical-split-mode.-tf4419973.html#a12887597
Sent from the Gnu - Screen mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 07:12:11PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> But do you mean that I would just need to build an xterm with the
> "enable rectangles" feature enabled to benefit from faster scrolling ..
>
> Surely there must be more to it than that?
Well, screen must be patched to use those sequences
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:11:53PM EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On 9/19/07, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > To copy a 10x5 cells rectangle starting at col. 20 somewhere near the
> > middle of your screen try:
> >
> > C-A [ M 20l c 10l 5j C
>
> Copying into the buffe
Greetings,
On 9/19/07, cga2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To copy a 10x5 cells rectangle starting at col. 20 somewhere near the
> middle of your screen try:
>
> C-A [ M 20l c 10l 5j C
Copying into the buffer isn't too much of a problem. It is pasting
that is throwing me. I need to take the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:08:52AM EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 9/19/07, Michael Schroeder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you compile xterm with '--enable-rectangles', it'll understand
> > some extra commands:
> >
> > DECCRA Copy rectangular area
> > DECERA Erase rectangula
Hello,
On 9/19/07, Michael Schroeder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you compile xterm with '--enable-rectangles', it'll understand
> some extra commands:
>
> DECCRA Copy rectangular area
> DECERA Erase rectangular area
> DECFRA Fill rectangular area
> DECSERA Selective erase rectangular area
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:01:04PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:31:58PM EDT, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:22:24PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > > I had a couple more questions about vertical split & caption/status
> > > li
> > 3. Since I've managed to squeeze everything I need into the hardstatus
> >:-) line, I would be in favor of having a "caption never" option
> >added. I defined a "caption splitonly "%{+d kk} " so as to have an
> >empty and mostly invisible line but it does waste a bit of space and
>
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:31:58PM EDT, Michael Schroeder wrote:
[..]
> > 5. Is it possible to split the screen and display the contents of
> >another window in a single action? Right now I'm on window #2 and I
> >would like to see what is in window #5 next to what I have in window
> >
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 12:31:58PM EDT, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:22:24PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> > I had a couple more questions about vertical split & caption/status
> > lines:
> >
> > 1. After I do a vertical split, paging
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 11:22:24PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> I had a couple more questions about vertical split & caption/status
> lines:
>
> 1. After I do a vertical split, paging or searching is very slow on my
>machine. Is this something to do with my configuration
ad.
Sorry for the mixup.
I had a couple more questions about vertical split & caption/status
lines:
1. After I do a vertical split, paging or searching is very slow on my
machine. Is this something to do with my configuration?
2. Now that we have vertical split, shouldn't we have &
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:05:10PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
> Is there any way I can configure screen so as to have a single hard
> status line covering the entire width of the display.
>
> What I'm seeing is the left-most part of the hard-status line repeated
> in each "window" and the right-most pa
Is there any way I can configure screen so as to have a single hard
status line covering the entire width of the display.
What I'm seeing is the left-most part of the hard-status line repeated
in each "window" and the right-most part of it is truncated.
Thank you.
__
nted the
resize function in a stateful way--if a region is created via a vertical
split, resize will work on the width rather than the height. If a region
is created via a vertical split and subsequent regions are deleted so that
it is full width, resize is not guaranteed to do anything. This implem
Where can I get hold of the v0.3 Bill?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Vertical-Split-Slowdown-t1379254.html#a3705892
Sent from the Gnu - Screen forum at Nabble.com.
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http
Komodo wrote:
I love Bill Pursell's vertical split patch, but have found that it really
struggles with scrolling; if I have 2 vertical panes, with the rightmost one
the height of the screen, and the left one split horizontally twice, then
scrolling in Vim in the right pane has a very notic
I love Bill Pursell's vertical split patch, but have found that it really
struggles with scrolling; if I have 2 vertical panes, with the rightmost one
the height of the screen, and the left one split horizontally twice, then
scrolling in Vim in the right pane has a very noticeable 'lag
Michael Garriss wrote:
this is good stuff. i love to see active development in screen, an
very important part of my human-machine interaction. my hat (a warm
winter type) is off to you bill.
mike
Thanks. I'm enjoying working on it quite a bit. I think screen is an
amazing tool, and
this is good stuff. i love to see active development in screen, an
very important part of my human-machine interaction. my hat (a warm
winter type) is off to you bill.
mike
On Jan 2, 2006, at 4:36 AM, bill wrote:
Here's another patch for the vertical split. The last 2 patches
Here's another patch for the vertical split. The last 2 patches I've posted
to the list have gone to a moderator due to size, so I split this into
2 seperate patches...this is the second. I'll post the first next.
This implements resize, remove, and only. It is stateful,
This is the first half of the patch...
wrp_vertical_split_0.3a_4.0.2.diff.bz2
Description: application/bzip
___
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
This is what I mean:
bash: no job control in this shell
I would like to see a normal bash in each window..
jy.
2005/12/19, Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not entirely true:
>
> multitail -s 2 -l "/bin/bash" -l "/bin/bash" -l "/bin/bash"
> would start multitail with 3 bash-terminal
Not entirely true:
multitail -s 2 -l "/bin/bash" -l "/bin/bash" -l "/bin/bash"
would start multitail with 3 bash-terminals, splitted vertically in 2
better use the development-release as it lets you specify better how many
columns you want and how many windows per column and such
> Would it be po
Would it be possible to have a simple implementation of this, like splitvt but
vertical? I would like sometimes to have two windows side by side.
Multitail is close but does
not have any bash-like functionality.
2005/12/19, Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>No, it's not very difficult.
>>No, it's not very difficult. It's just a bit of work. How does your
>>patch deal with multiple horizontal/vertical Combinations, e.g. when
>>your screen looks like:
>>+--+
>>+ | +
>>+ | +
>>+
Michael Schroeder wrote:
No, it's not very difficult. It's just a bit of work. How does your
patch deal with multiple horizontal/vertical Combinations, e.g. when
your screen looks like:
+--+
+ | +
+ | +
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:31:06PM +, bill wrote:
> Here's a patch against 4.0.2 that includes resizing for 'Q'. That's
> the easiest resize
> of course, but I don't yet see that the others will be that difficult to
> do.
No, it's not very difficult. It's just a bit of work. How does your
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:31:06PM +, bill wrote:
> The more I get into this code, the more I like it. It's a very nice
> design.
And it works great! Vertical split is very nice in my wide fbconsole; I
have wanted this for quite some time now, but I never got time to dig into
t
Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:28:07PM +, bill wrote:
Here's a patch that does the vertical split. It doesn't put any delimiter
between the windows, which can be disconcerting, since when you
first create the new region (^A V), absolutely nothing noticeab
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 05:28:07PM +, bill wrote:
> Here's a patch that does the vertical split. It doesn't put any delimiter
> between the windows, which can be disconcerting, since when you
> first create the new region (^A V), absolutely nothing noticeable
> happe
Here's a patch that does the vertical split. It doesn't put any delimiter
between the windows, which can be disconcerting, since when you
first create the new region (^A V), absolutely nothing noticeable
happens. But if you ^A-tab you'll be in the new region, and a
next will make
94 matches
Mail list logo
