* Rhys Ulerich had this to say on [10 Dec 2009, 08:55:23 -0600]: > Hi Sadrul, > > Did you see this note from me come across the GNU screen mailing list? > It hasn't appeared yet in the archives, and I wonder if it's gotten > swallowed somewhere. I wanted to make sure the reported issue wasn't > lost.
I didn't get the mail. I am not sure where/why it got zapped. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rhys Ulerich <rhys.uler...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:09 PM > Subject: Re: screen vertical split speed vs dvtm > To: screen-users@gnu.org > > > >> I have checked in a fix for this (revision e8d36bf1) [1]. It'd be great > >> if you test it out and let me know if the performance is good. Also, > >> testing for possible regression would be great. > > I'm also seeing great vertical split performance with the the savannah > version (acd9b12b446f8baa673d928b4421948e07b7265e). Thank you. > > However, when vertically split, 'focus up' and 'focus down' do nothing > when issued, either from a binding or from the prompt via > "Control-A:focus up^M". All of 'focus', 'focus top', and 'focus > bottom' do work as expected. I am leaning towards saying 'not a bug' on this. With a horizontal split, 'focus left' or 'focus right' doesn't do anything either, and I think that makes sense (note here that 'up/down/left/right' works as you would expect it to with a complex grid-like layout). Cheers, Sadrul _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list screen-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
