On 01/25/2011 12:17 PM, Fulvio wrote:
Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs?
It will be easier to me to send new patches.
The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-)
1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp
The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding some million calls
2) pboo
On 01/25/2011 12:17 PM, Fulvio wrote:
Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs?
It will be easier to me to send new patches.
The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-)
1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp
The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding some million calls
2) pboo
Looks convincing indeed!
Joost.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Steven wrote:
>
>> > 3) stored.cpp
>> > Solves a bug that leaves storedLineMatches_[line]
>> > uninitializated in some
>> > lines.
>>
>> I will check this; tomorrow probably.
>
> I was looking at some nasty tree anomalies today.
> (
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Fulvio wrote:
> Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs?
> It will be easier to me to send new patches.
> The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-)
>
> 1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp
> The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding so
Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs?
It will be easier to me to send new patches.
The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-)
1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp
The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding some million calls
2) pbook.cpp
When you start scid (even without