Re: [Scid-users] Please commit this simple patch

2011-01-25 Thread Joost 't Hart
On 01/25/2011 12:17 PM, Fulvio wrote: Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs? It will be easier to me to send new patches. The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-) 1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding some million calls 2) pboo

Re: [Scid-users] Please commit this simple patch

2011-01-25 Thread Joost 't Hart
On 01/25/2011 12:17 PM, Fulvio wrote: Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs? It will be easier to me to send new patches. The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-) 1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding some million calls 2) pboo

Re: [Scid-users] Please commit this simple patch

2011-01-25 Thread Joost 't Hart
Looks convincing indeed! Joost. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Steven wrote: > >> > 3) stored.cpp >> > Solves a bug that leaves storedLineMatches_[line] >> > uninitializated in some >> > lines. >> >> I will check this; tomorrow probably. > > I was looking at some nasty tree anomalies today. > (

Re: [Scid-users] Please commit this simple patch

2011-01-25 Thread Joost 't Hart
Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Fulvio wrote: > Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs? > It will be easier to me to send new patches. > The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-) > > 1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp > The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding so

[Scid-users] Please commit this simple patch

2011-01-25 Thread Fulvio
Can someone please commit this patch to current cvs? It will be easier to me to send new patches. The code is perfectly safe, it basically do nothing :-) 1) mfile.h and mfile.cpp The patch inlines the Read*Bytes functions avoiding some million calls 2) pbook.cpp When you start scid (even without