Hi,
I'm trying to mount Windows 2000 shared directories onto Red Hat 7.2 and
8.0 machines using smbmount. One of the Linux machines is called
ripley. There are two lines in ripley's /etc/fstab to mount the Windows
directories:
//192.168.230.10/public /ash/kim/emerald/ku
Hi,
I'm using samba-client-2.0.10-2 on a Red Hat 7.1 box
I got a shell script to mount the hard drive from a Windows NT Server, where
I pass the username and password. Despite the fact that the password is
given, a prompt asks for it.
I'm using the following sentence:
# smbmount :
decided to share this (tiny) piece
of information with other newbies.
In order for
smbmount "W98Server\\Public" -c 'mount /mnt/W98/Public' -U guest -N (you
might want to specify uid & guid as well)
to work, smbfs module should be loaded during the install. To check whet
I decided to share
this (tiny) piece of information with other newbies.
In order for
smbmount "W98Server\\Public" -c
'mount /mnt/W98/Public' -U guest -N (you might want to specify uid & guid as
well)
to work, smbfs module should be loaded during the
install. To
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, fam. Willemen wrote:
> I can access my smb-share (on a remote machine) through " smbclient
> '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' ", but when doing " smbmount
> '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' -c 'mount /home/samba/dir' " it gives a &qu
I can access my smb-share (on a remote machine) through " smbclient
'\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' ", but when doing " smbmount
'\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' -c 'mount /home/samba/dir' " it gives a "mount
I can access my smb-share (on a remote machine)
through " smbclient '\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' ", but when doing " smbmount
'\\HOSTNAME\SHARENAME' -c 'mount /home/samba/dir' " it gives a "mount error: No
such device".
Anybody got a clue?!
Gr. Rob
i have a NT machine and
linux machine.
What are some of the few
steps to get this machine
mounted on a linux machine.
can't seem to get it to work?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-l
%-> Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the following command?
%->
%-> # smbmount //peacedog/c /mnt/stephen -d 777
%->
%-> This command results in the following error message:
Try it like this:
mount -t smbfs -o username=,password=
//peacedog/c /mnt/s
Can anyone tell me what's wrong with the following command?
# smbmount //peacedog/c /mnt/stephen -d 777
This command results in the following error message:
mount error: Invalid argument
Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons
I've looked at the man page fo
--On 09/28/00 05:57:46 PM -0500 Jeff Hogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:49 AM
> Subject: Re: smbmount problem(
-Original Message-
From: Rob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 28, 2000 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: smbmount problem(selim)
>If memory serves, user/password syntax is wrong. Check the manpage
>since I'm g
If memory serves, user/password syntax is wrong. Check the manpage
since I'm going from memory, but I believe the command should be:
smbmount //w2kp/shared_dir /mnt -o -U selim%selim
The -o flags everything past it as options to the smbmount command, and
-U identifies selim%selim as
smb.conf
encrypted passwd = yes
d o u think it sould be no
Reply pl.
Thanks
selim
- Original Message -
From: "David Rhodes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: smbmount problem(selim)
> Ha
L PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 28 September 2000 11:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: smbmount problem(selim)
>
>
> Dear All
> I am in a problem with Samba. Whem i am going to mount a
> shared directory in
> win2k prof from linux box I am getting the following problem.
>
Dear All
I am in a problem with Samba. Whem i am going to mount a shared directory in
win2k prof from linux box I am getting the following problem.
I used the command
smbmount " //w2kp/shared_dir /mnt selim%selim" here w2kp is win 2k PC ,
/mnt is mount point in Linux ans selim%se
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> My guess would be he isn't happy with NFS because it can be used to
> comprimise a system. Of course I would have to say "Don't export your
> home directory" ::grinz::
Well, I have never were impressed with NFS security at all these days
with all
etBios encapsulated in IP if I remember
right. More overhead can't be faster :D
Just my two cents
Frank
>
> >On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Robert Burton wrote:
> >
> >> I have a Snap Server 4000 (rack mount) that I need to backup. I can
> >> connect to the S
>At 14:39 4/04/00, you wrote:
>>On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Jason Bradley Nance wrote:
>>
>> > > I am not a fan of NFS, but don't you lose ALL security permissions of
>> > > files and directories if you use smbmount to backup your computer?
>> &g
>On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Robert Burton wrote:
>
>> I have a Snap Server 4000 (rack mount) that I need to backup. I can
>> connect to the Snap via smbmount (which I've already done) and by NFS.
>> But I haven't used NFS before. Is using one better then the other?
At 14:39 4/04/00, you wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Jason Bradley Nance wrote:
>
> > > I am not a fan of NFS, but don't you lose ALL security permissions of
> > > files and directories if you use smbmount to backup your computer?
> >
> > No. You can con
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Jason Bradley Nance wrote:
> > I am not a fan of NFS, but don't you lose ALL security permissions of
> > files and directories if you use smbmount to backup your computer?
>
> No. You can configure Samba to preserve file permissions, etc.
Coul
> I am not a fan of NFS, but don't you lose ALL security permissions of
> files and directories if you use smbmount to backup your computer?
No. You can configure Samba to preserve file permissions, etc.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Robert Burton wrote:
> I have a Snap Server 4000 (rack mount) that I need to backup. I can
> connect to the Snap via smbmount (which I've already done) and by NFS.
> But I haven't used NFS before. Is using one better then the other? Any
> opinions on
Hello all..
I have a Snap Server 4000 (rack mount) that I need to backup. I can
connect to the Snap via smbmount (which I've already done) and by NFS.
But I haven't used NFS before. Is using one better then the other? Any
opinions on which would be better to connect with to do t
> RH6.1
> samba 2.0.5a
> how can I supply a non interactive password to smbmount ?
> or how can I mount a smb share otherwise ?
>
> TIA
> Claudiu
>
smbmount file://server/share /mount/point -U user%pass
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
RH6.1
samba 2.0.5a
how can I supply a non interactive password to smbmount ?
or how can I mount a smb share otherwise ?
TIA
Claudiu
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
using 6.1 i have an NT share mounted (over our companies LAN) with
smbmoutn. however, after a certain time (not sure what the exact time is)
i end up with an input/output error when try to do anything in the
directory the share is mounted into.
what would cause this time out?
Jack Wallen, J
I have this problem also (although I'm running 106). I haven't found
sources for a newer smbmount, but have contacted people re: it.
Chris
<- Visit Me At http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost ->
<-- For My Public PGP Key Visit http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost/pgp_key.txt -->
--
I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.0.34 (redhat 5.0) to 2.1.105 in an
attempt to pick up a fix in the smbfs which corrects bogus modification
dates on NTFS client files when viewed and manipulated via smbmount.
Now, the smbmount command which previously worked
smbmount //server/share
I'm trying to solve a known problem where NT 4.0 shares which are mounted
under linux 2.0.31 using "smbmount" (version 2.0.1) produce random incorrect
modification times for files.
I saw a patch for kernel-2.0.33 which fixes linux/fs/smbfs/proc.c to perform
mtime computations di
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, Michael Jinks wrote:
> Well, I tried it with -d and -f options (similar to the way I was using
> -g and -u before), still no difference. I think the sharing on NT
> should work more or less the way it does in 95, especially since the
> permissions on the NT side are wide op
Well, I tried it with -d and -f options (similar to the way I was using
-g and -u before), still no difference. I think the sharing on NT
should work more or less the way it does in 95, especially since the
permissions on the NT side are wide open, so I doubt that's the problem.
Rick, are your 9
to see the share names.
Created several directories in the /home/httpd/html/cd/cd1 , etc..
and then used:
smbmount //machine/SHARE_CD /home/httpd/html/cd/cd1 -f 555 -d 555
That gets me around the "Permission Denied" msg on the Browsers..
Plugged the smbmount commands in /etc/rc.d/rc.l
To recap an earlier post, I'm using smbmount to mount a shared NT drive
on a RedHat5 box. I need to give access to that drive to
non-superusers, but I can't get the file permissions to change.
I've been websurfing looking for more info on this, but the HOWTO only
covers smbclien
35 matches
Mail list logo
