Re: RE : RE : resolution problem

2003-10-16 Thread Michael
I joined the list late after this message was stripped. So excuse this if this wasn't what your talking about regaurding resolution problems. (it sorta sounded like your conversation) Dell 845 series laptops; http://www.chzsoft.com.ar/845patch.html http://www.chzsoft.com.ar/845patch.tar.gz Dell

Re: RE : RE : resolution problem

2003-10-15 Thread Edward Dekkers
Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote: Ed, Are you talking about the bios cacheable video memory (If it's that I've just 8M)? Whereas in Xfree86 conf I put the real memory size of the chipset (64M). Regards Now I'm confused. I'm sure the D845 Intel Express Video does not have dedicated memory. I

RE : RE : resolution problem

2003-10-15 Thread Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
re 2003 02:52 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: RE : resolution problem Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote: > Hi ed, > > Yes I tried that but they support their driver until RH8.0 and they answered that > the driver is include in Xfree86 4.3.0 which is in RH9.0 system > > regard

RE : resolution problem

2003-10-15 Thread Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 14 octobre 2003 19:06 À : Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) Objet : RE: resolution problem I actually had to get the drivers from Intel. http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df/filter_results.asp?strOSs=39&strT ypes=DRV%2CARC&ProductID=865&

Re: RE : resolution problem

2003-10-14 Thread Edward Dekkers
Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote: Hi ed, Yes I tried that but they support their driver until RH8.0 and they answered that the driver is include in Xfree86 4.3.0 which is in RH9.0 system regards Yes, you are correct, sorry about that. What amount of system memory have you dedicated to the

RE : resolution problem

2003-10-14 Thread Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
ECTED] Objet : Re: resolution problem Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote: > Hi all, > > I use a RH9 with 2.4.20-20.9 kernel and XFree86 4.3.0 and i've got problem with my > i845 video chipset (Intel), the Linux box use the i810 driver and I can't have a > high resolutio

Re: resolution problem

2003-10-13 Thread Edward Dekkers
Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL) wrote: Hi all, I use a RH9 with 2.4.20-20.9 kernel and XFree86 4.3.0 and i've got problem with my i845 video chipset (Intel), the Linux box use the i810 driver and I can't have a high resolution (I would like to have a 1152*864 resolution but the system use 1024*768

resolution problem

2003-10-13 Thread Yohann DESQUERRE (DSI NOISIEL)
Hi all, I use a RH9 with 2.4.20-20.9 kernel and XFree86 4.3.0 and i've got problem with my i845 video chipset (Intel), the Linux box use the i810 driver and I can't have a high resolution (I would like to have a 1152*864 resolution but the system use 1024*768 max). Is anyone got an idea??? th

Client DNS resolution problem

2002-07-30 Thread George Raptis
Dear Sirs,I face a very annoying problem with client dns queries. I have manually configured a nameserver (retec.linux.bogus - 192.168.10.1)for the domain linux.bogus on RedHat 7.2.The corresponding critical sections in named.conf, linux.bogus, 192.168.10,nsswitch.conf, resolv.conf, /etc/hos

RH 7.2 Client DNS Resolution Problem

2002-07-27 Thread George Raptis
Dear Sirs, I face a very annoying problem with client dns queries. I have manually configured a nameserver (retec.linux.bogus - 192.168.10.1) for the domain linux.bogus on RedHat 7.2. The corresponding critical sections in named.conf, linux.bogus, 192.168.10, nsswitch.conf, resolv.conf, /etc/hos

Re: help please! - resolution problem

2002-04-14 Thread Bill Crawford
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Julian Opificius wrote: > Cheers, Bill. > I have it back now. But is it the XF86Config-4 or the XF86Config file > that's important here? They both changed when I ran X configurator. If you managed to get in and reconfigure it, then it's moot :o) If you're using XFree86 4

Re: help please! - resolution problem

2002-04-14 Thread Julian Opificius
Cheers, Bill. I have it back now. But is it the XF86Config-4 or the XF86Config file that's important here? They both changed when I ran X configurator. j. == At 03:30 AM 4/14/02, you wrote: >On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Julian Opificius wrote: > > > I can telnet in from another m

Re: help please! - resolution problem

2002-04-14 Thread Julian Opificius
Got it, thanks! It seems I'd only set up one res configuration, so ctr-alt + didn't do anything. j. === At 03:26 AM 4/14/02, you wrote: > >How can I either:- > >a) "key combo" through valid screen resolutions till I find one that > works, or > >b) change an (XF86 ?) conf

Re: help please! - resolution problem

2002-04-14 Thread Bill Crawford
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Julian Opificius wrote: > I can telnet in from another machine on my lan if I need to. Or just boot with "linux 3" to avoid going into graphical login, then follow the second step below from the console. > How can I either:- > a) "key combo" through valid screen resolution

Re: help please! - resolution problem

2002-04-14 Thread Vidiot
>How can I either:- >a) "key combo" through valid screen resolutions till I find one that works, or >b) change an (XF86 ?) config file via a telnet login to restart KDE with a >lower screen refresh , so I can get my graphics back > >julian. Boot single user and turn off automatically starting X

help please! - resolution problem

2002-04-14 Thread Julian Opificius
Hi all, For reasons I won't bore you with, I temporarily have a different (less capable) monitor on my RH7.2 system. Foolishly, I swapped the monitor without checking it still worked, and now I can't get a raster because the temporary monitor can't handle the refresh frequency. (Running as a s

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-13 Thread Peter Peltonen
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:03:06PM +0100, Massimo Alonzo wrote: > What do you think about the Beta Drivers for Linux from Matrox, I mean do > they works ( I cannot loose my data)? I tried them a few weeks ago. I did not notice any difference in the quality of picture. The strange thing was that

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-13 Thread Hidong Kim
OK, Good to know. Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Did you install Red Hat 7.2 fresh on this machine? If so, XFree86 4 was > > installed, and the configuration file you're using is > > /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. You really don't need 32 bpp color

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-13 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you install Red Hat 7.2 fresh on this machine? If so, XFree86 4 was > installed, and the configuration file you're using is > /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. You really don't need 32 bpp color depth. 24 > bpp will give you 16 million colors which should be f

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-13 Thread Hidong Kim
Hi, I don't have any experience with the G400. But I thought Matrox cards worked really well with Linux. We have several machines here with Millennium IIs and G200s, and they work great. In fact, I remember a few years ago when the G400 came out, I read an article on the Internet about how goo

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-13 Thread Massimo Alonzo
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Hidong Kim wrote: > Did you install Red Hat 7.2 fresh on this machine? Yes! > If so, XFree86 4 was installed, and the configuration file you're > using is /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. You really don't need 32 bpp color > depth. 24 bpp will give you 16 million colors wh

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-12 Thread Hidong Kim
Did you install Red Hat 7.2 fresh on this machine? If so, XFree86 4 was installed, and the configuration file you're using is /etc/X11/XF86Config-4. You really don't need 32 bpp color depth. 24 bpp will give you 16 million colors which should be fine for most applications. The only thing I see

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-12 Thread Massimo Alonzo
In /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 I found: Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Matrox Millennium G400" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth24 Subsection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1024x768" E

Re: Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-12 Thread Hidong Kim
Have you checked the mode lines in your /etc/X11/XF86Config or /etc/X11/XF86Config-4? In the "Screen" section (near the bottom), you should see stanzas like this: Subsection "Display" Depth 8 Modes "640x480" "800x600" "1024x768" "1280x1024" ViewPort0 0

Matrox G400 resolution problem

2002-01-12 Thread Massimo Alonzo
Hi, My Matrox G400 makes images in my monitor not stable (slightly flickering) and this happens only when I use Linux. I tryed to check its configuration using xvidtune and I found the same settings used by Windows :-( > xvidtune Num hsync: 1, Num vsync: 1 hsync range 0: 30.00 - 70.00

Graphic resolution problem

2001-12-17 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi All People, My AGP TNT graphic card has 16MB memory and my monitor supports upto 1600 x 1400 resolution (17") My newly installed RH7.2 can only allow me to select 1024 x 768 resolution max. Kindly advise how to reset Xwindow by using graphic mode in stead of modifying XF86config file ? T

Re:sendmail & name resolution problem

2001-01-19 Thread Bubulac Angela Tatiana
Dynamic IP Hack I have an RH7 Linux box into a large WinNT LAN. All that WinNT servers gives me is a dynamic IP address. Before you can do anything else please save your original /etc/hosts file. This is how you can hack that IP and put it in your /etc/hosts file. The testip.c p

Re: sendmail & name resolution problem

2001-01-19 Thread RaghuNath L
can you send me the script you have written. RaghuNath L wrote: > Try fetchmail. > > Bubulac Angela Tatiana wrote: > > > Hello, > > I finally setup my RH7 linux box onto > > a large WinNT LAN. They just give me a dynamic IP > > address. > > Now I can ping and connect by name the WinNT computers

Re: sendmail & name resolution problem

2001-01-19 Thread RaghuNath L
Try fetchmail. Bubulac Angela Tatiana wrote: > Hello, > I finally setup my RH7 linux box onto > a large WinNT LAN. They just give me a dynamic IP > address. > Now I can ping and connect by name the WinNT computers > and they can also do the same thing to my computer > (samba & nss_wins). > I wr

sendmail & name resolution problem

2001-01-19 Thread Bubulac Angela Tatiana
Hello, I finally setup my RH7 linux box onto a large WinNT LAN. They just give me a dynamic IP address. Now I can ping and connect by name the WinNT computers and they can also do the same thing to my computer (samba & nss_wins). I wrote a simple C program that hack the IP address and put it into