> If it's not free,
> then I might as well buy Windows in place of buying this
> since it would be able to run all the windoze apps. (doesn't
> mean that I'll buy Windows!)
>
What a stupid logic. You don't seem to have understood what the idea behind
the GPL is all about, have you?
> I like Li
ourse).
Oh and this is still a nice mailing list. We simply have a few people who
are socially challenged. It happens ;-)
---
Outlook can be replaced by Ximian evolution and some nicely configured
pine. Word by LaTeX or if you prefer you can use open office. Same goes
for powerpoint.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, August 21, 2003, 1:16:28 AM, Didier wrote:
> [Jason] called me an idiot.
You're right. He used the wrong word. He should have used "naive". We
don't really have any evidence as to your intelligence.
Ron.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, August 21, 2003, 1:56:51 AM, Didier wrote:
> software I would not buy for Linux because the initial spirit of Linux
> was to be an OPEN SOURCE system. This is MY CHOICE. I know this is not
> yours
That's fine. Very nice. I would rather see
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:16:28PM +0800, Didier Casse wrote:
[Snip]
> If you can't be nice to me, why should I be too you?
[Snip]
If my dog shits in the middle of tiliving he room should I do likewise? :)
Cheers,
--
Javier Gostling D.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscri
> Codeweavers Crossover Office is not synonymous with Microsoft Office.
> Crossover Office is a highly customized implementation of wine and some
> of us (a lot of us, as a matter of fact) are still required by our
> employers to be able to run MS applications (i.e. Outlook, Word,
&g
On 21 Aug 2003, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:45, Didier Casse wrote:
>
> > Up to now, I've use 100% free software on Linux (Even my Linux was given
> > to me freely!) and I do not have any complains to make. I've also
> > contributed to code on Linux for various stuff and have of
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:45, Didier Casse wrote:
> Excuse my french, but you're an idiot. It's attitudes like this that
> keep companies from releasing software for the Linux platform. Like it
> or not, there is a place for both free and proprietary software (unless
> you're RMS). Never for
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:45, Didier Casse wrote:
> Up to now, I've use 100% free software on Linux (Even my Linux was given
> to me freely!) and I do not have any complains to make. I've also
> contributed to code on Linux for various stuff and have offered it FREELY
> for the benefit of the commu
Thanks for the remark Bret. But he's the one who started it. Jason Dixon
can't disagree politely! At least Peter Kiem does. :-)
Didier
PhD student
Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS)
5 Research Link,
Singapore 117603
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://ssls.nus.
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 22:45, Didier Casse wrote:
>
> You're hooked to MS products and your plugin that you bought is another
> way of showing that you can't use real pure LINUX software and that you
> still really on those weak software.
Calm down guys. If you want to resort to name calling
> Excuse my french, but you're an idiot. It's attitudes like this that
> keep companies from releasing software for the Linux platform. Like it
> or not, there is a place for both free and proprietary software (unless
> you're RMS). Never forget, the GPL is all about "free as in speech, not
> as
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 23:14, Didier Casse wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Ben Russo wrote:
>
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way to connect to a Microsoft Exchange Server.
> >
> > To connect directly using MAPI you have to use Outlook,
> > and you have to get "Codeweavers Crossover Office" t
> when it comes to Linux stuff. My idea of Linux is that it is free software
> developed by the community. Those who make me pay for Linux software
> should be trashed!
Well I sincerely hope YOUR idea of Linux dies and dies quickly. Linux is
about free speech and not free beer.
There is no reaso
ware
should be trashed!
>
> If your exchange server is running "OWA" (Outlook web access)
> Then you can purchase a Ximian Connector license. Ximian
> Evolution with connector works well under most circumstances,
> but I find it to be a little slow.
I used Ximian ev
found a fix but the world seems to have problems writing back to my MX server or finding it that is.
BenBenjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Send a message from pine I received a 'Connection failed to (my IP)x.x.x.x,25 connection refused'
I can use regular mailer just f
Send a message from pine I received a 'Connection failed to (my IP)x.x.x.x,25 connection refused'
I can use regular mailer just fine and setup of pine uses the same smtp any suggestions?
Benjamin
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
Two quick question if anyone can answer.
When starting pine I get cannot connect to mail.myhost.com right after I
enter the To address and hit return. I type the message as normal and it
is sent. So why the cannot connect?
I seem to have found a terminal or grep problem. I ran
/usr/bin
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:37:28 -0400 (EDT)
Gordon Charrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the version of pine supplied by RedHat support imap? If so, I've
> never been able to find how to configure it from the setup menus.
>
Go to Main > Setup > Configure Then
Does the version of pine supplied by RedHat support imap? If so, I've
never been able to find how to configure it from the setup menus.
--
Gordon Charrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ - 70211608
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ge the mail servers, tell me it is an all or nothing
> situation. Since I don't have access or know how to configure them, I
> have to take there word for it.
>
> david
>
> On 16 May 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 07:10, dbrett wrote:
>
Hi Gordon
The people who manage the mail servers, tell me it is an all or nothing
situation. Since I don't have access or know how to configure them, I
have to take there word for it.
david
On 16 May 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 07:10, dbrett wrote:
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-May-2002/23:52 -0400, Paul M Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:17:35PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 07:10, dbrett wrote:
>> > What does Pine use for sending email
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:17:35PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 07:10, dbrett wrote:
> > What does Pine use for sending email?
Unlike programs like mutt, Pine does not use a mail transfer agent (MTA)
like sendmail to send mail. It negotiates its own connec
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 07:10, dbrett wrote:
> What does Pine use for sending email? The reason for the question, is I
> use linux as my desktop. I was able to configure the companies email
> server (exchange) as the smtp-server. Once the exchange server was
> configured to stop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-May-2002/10:10 -0400, dbrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What does Pine use for sending email?
If you do not configure an SMTP server in pine, then it will call sendmail
to deliver the message.
If your sendmail is masquerading to a r
What i do is to leave the smtp address blank.
Pine then use the sendmail on the Linux desktop.
As long as the firewalls allow it, the mail will go out to
the other smtp server directly.
use h to see where this mail has travled.
That is turn full header display on in pine.
hth Willem
On Thu, 16
What does Pine use for sending email? The reason for the question, is I
use linux as my desktop. I was able to configure the companies email
server (exchange) as the smtp-server. Once the exchange server was
configured to stop relaying, I could no longer have a smtp-server
configured. This
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 12:51, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On 03-May-2002/15:52 -0700, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Is there a way in pine to make mail from a
> >> specific user stand out?
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03-May-2002/15:52 -0700, Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is there a way in pine to make mail from a
>> specific user stand out?
>
>Setup -> Rules
On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 14:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a way in pine to make mail from a
> specific user stand out?
Setup -> Rules -> Indexcolor -> Add
Add a rule to color messages based on the From or Sender pattern.
On 03-May-2002/16:36 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is there a way in pine to make mail from a
>specific user stand out?
No, but there is in mutt.
Tony
--
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AO
Is there a way in pine to make mail from a
specific user stand out?
Thanks
Linda
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-Apr-2002/14:51 -0400, Jeff Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On this note, how could you edit an existing Reply-To tag instead of
>appending one using a formail/procmail recipe?
There are several options in formail for appending or replacing h
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony E. Greene
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to configure pine to reply to mailing lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:52:32PM
assle the mailing list admin about, since i see no
> > easy fix on my end.
>
> If, by 'this mailing list', you mean this redhat list - it does indeed have
> a reply-to field set. Pine just prompted me to use it.
no, i wasn't referring to an
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, rpjday wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, rpjday wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > i'm embarrassed to admit that i can't figure out how to get pine
> > > to "properly" respo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:52:32PM -0400, rpjday wrote:
> i'm embarrassed to admit that i can't figure out how to get pine
>to "properly" respond to mailing lists.
That is a limitation of pine, not you. My workaround is
my end.
If, by 'this mailing list', you mean this redhat list - it does indeed have
a reply-to field set. Pine just prompted me to use it.
--
Sapere aude
My mind not only wanders, it sometimes leaves completely.
Never attribute to malice that which can be a
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, rpjday wrote:
>
> >
> > i'm embarrassed to admit that i can't figure out how to get pine
> > to "properly" respond to mailing lists.
> >
> > on more than one mai
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, rpjday wrote:
>
> i'm embarrassed to admit that i can't figure out how to get pine
> to "properly" respond to mailing lists.
>
> on more than one mailing list that i'm on, postings have the
> header info:
>
> From:
i'm embarrassed to admit that i can't figure out how to get pine
to "properly" respond to mailing lists.
on more than one mailing list that i'm on, postings have the
header info:
From:
To:
all i want to do is, when i reply, i want the reply to go only
to
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
->>>>
Try: xterm -e ssh -t MeSvr pine
->>>>
Yes that one worked...
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 11:46:23AM -0700, Patrick Nelson wrote:
>Cameron Simpson wrote:
>->>>>
>I prefer "xterm -e ssh mailhost pine", which should get you a tty, but
>doesn't burden the mail
Cameron Simpson wrote:
->>>>
I prefer "xterm -e ssh mailhost pine", which should get you a tty, but
doesn't burden the mailhost with an xterm (indeed, sometimes a server
box won't have X installed anyway). Also, running this way just has
to sh
Gordon Messmer wrote:
->>>>
How about:
ssh mailhost -t pine
No cheats involved. Just be clear that you want a tty.
->>>>
Bingo that's the ticket. Thank you. I saw the -t but it never clicked in
me head that it was my so
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 07:58:09AM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> If only I could tear a term off into another window
Hmmm...interesting idea. Write Cristiano and see what he says (or use
SF feature requests). Not sure if the gtk widget he uses for tabs will
do that, but he generally has an o
I DLed the binary rpm installed it and viola it works on my redhat 7.2
laptop. All my terms up in one window without filling up my screen.
Still the occational need to see both at the same time but I can live
with two windows instead of the 6 or seven I seem to always have up.
If only I could te
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:49:33PM -0700, Keith Morse wrote:
> >
> > Do you normally have some kind of term opened? This isn't a direct
> > answer, but maybe another way to skin the same cat. Check out
> > multi-gnome-terminal (sourceforge or freshmeat). You can define
> > commands that appear on
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Keith Morse wrote:
> > >
> > > How about:
> > > ssh mailhost -t pine
> > >
> > > No cheats involved. Just be clear that you want a tty.
> >
> >
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 13:45, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Do you normally have some kind of term opened? This isn't a direct
> answer, but maybe another way to skin the same cat. Check out
> multi-gnome-terminal (sourceforge or freshmeat). You can define
> commands that appear on a pop-up menu that launc
t; > ssh mailhost "/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -e pine "
| > >
| >
| > How about:
| > ssh mailhost -t pine
| >
| > No cheats involved. Just be clear that you want a tty.
|
| Somewhere in there I still need an xterm as I start this from an icon on
| the gnom
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 11:24, Keith Morse wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> > How about:
> > ssh mailhost -t pine
> >
> > No cheats involved. Just be clear that you want a tty.
>
>
> Somewhere in there I still need an xterm as
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Keith Morse wrote:
> >
> > How about:
> > ssh mailhost -t pine
> >
> > No cheats involved. Just be clear that you want a tty.
>
>
> Somewhere in there I still need an xterm as I start this from an
> i
On 20 Apr 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 22:14, Keith Morse wrote:
> >
> > I suppose this might be construed as cheating, but here's how I did it.
> >
> >
> > ssh mailhost "/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -e pine "
> >
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 22:14, Keith Morse wrote:
>
> I suppose this might be construed as cheating, but here's how I did it.
>
>
> ssh mailhost "/usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -e pine "
>
How about:
ssh mailhost -t pine
No cheats involved.
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:57:42PM -0700, Patrick Nelson wrote:
> >RH 72 (with latest updates)
> >
> >I use ssh to run commands on remotes systems and while this works great for
> >my X apps, the pine app doesn't sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:57:42PM -0700, Patrick Nelson wrote:
>RH 72 (with latest updates)
>
>I use ssh to run commands on remotes systems and while this works great for
>my X apps, the pine app doesn't support this. When I run a
RH 72 (with latest updates)
I use ssh to run commands on remotes systems and while this works great for
my X apps, the pine app doesn't support this. When I run a command line ssh
pine it responds that you can not redirect output to a file. While
that is not what I'm doing, I can n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Keithan wrote:
>>I have qmail working great. My problem is Pine will not get the mail.
>>The mail is put in the /home/user/Maildir/new/ I can see the mail but I
>>can't figure out how to get it into Pine by default.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Keithan wrote:
>I have qmail working great. My problem is Pine will not get the mail.
>The mail is put in the /home/user/Maildir/new/
>I can see the mail but I can't figure out how to get it into Pine by
>default.
Pine
Did that and I get [Can't open /home/admin/Maildir/new/: not a
selectable folder
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Anthony E. Greene
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pine and Qmail
On Tue, A
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:05:11PM -0400, Kevin Keithan wrote:
>I have qmail working great. My problem is Pine will not get the mail.
>The mail is put in the /home/user/Maildir/new/
>I can see the mail but I can't figure out how to get it into Pine by
>default.
In your pine s
Title: Message
I have qmail working
great. My problem is Pine will not get the mail. The mail is
put in the /home/user/Maildir/new/
I can see the mail
but I can't figure out how to get it into Pine by default.
Thanks,
Kevin
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, David Talkington wrote:
>Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>
>>I use pine 4.33 on RH72, and I'd like to be able to view HTML message parts
>>by launching an external viewer, much like what is done for images. The
>>/etc/mailcap entry correctly calls Galeon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>I use pine 4.33 on RH72, and I'd like to be able to view HTML message parts
>by launching an external viewer, much like what is done for images. The
>/etc/mailcap entry correctly calls Galeon, but the targe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I use pine 4.33 on RH72, and I'd like to be able to view HTML message parts
by launching an external viewer, much like what is done for images. The
/etc/mailcap entry correctly calls Galeon, but the target temp file is not
created, so Galeon c
.
Now, however, whenever I send a message, on the local system, using Pine,
I get the following message:
"[Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 Error: queue file write error]
Of course, it's not true...the message does get sent.
What doesn't seem to be happening (now that I'v
saw on the redhat watch list that there is a vulnerability in pine that
> needs to be fixed. I'm running a redhat 6.2 system, so I downloaded the
> appropriate rpm, tried to install it
>
> #rpm -Fvh pine-4.44*
>
> and got these errors about failed dependenci
Mike, thanks for the answer... My mail server was OK... It was sending
emails correctly to the /var/spool/mail/$USER. But pine was moving the
messages from there up to the mbox file at user's home directory.. I took a
look at the .pinerc and the inbox directory was not defined. Then I force
I'm not sure what you mean...on my RH 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2 boxes, mail is
delivered to /var/spool/mail/$USER, and pine reads the INBOX folder right
from there. Pine leaves the mail there unless I tell it to save it
elsewhere.
Elm, on the other hand, moves things around unless you tell it n
Hello all
My question may be simple...
Well, I'm not so sure about that, but I remember in my old RH6, when
reading remotely my e-mails with pine, they weren't moved from the spool, once I
could read them after with the netscape locally... Today, with RH7X, they are
moved to a
Hi again,
After my previous problem, I downloaded openssl and openldap from redhat, installed
them and then installed th pine update. Now I can't use pine!!! Here's the error I
get:
: error in loading shared libraries:
/usr/kerberos/lib/libkrb5.so.2: undefined symbol: stat
Mark Neidorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi All,
> I saw on the redhat watch list that there is a vulnerability in pine that
> needs to be fixed. I'm running a redhat 6.2 system, so I downloaded the
> appropriate rpm, tried to install it
>
> #rpm -Fvh pine-4.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:16:24PM -0500, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> I saw on the redhat watch list that there is a vulnerability in pine
> that needs to be fixed. I'm running a redhat 6.2 system, so I
> downloaded the appropriate rpm, tried to install it
>
> #rpm -Fvh pin
Hi All,
I saw on the redhat watch list that there is a vulnerability in pine that
needs to be fixed. I'm running a redhat 6.2 system, so I downloaded the
appropriate rpm, tried to install it
#rpm -Fvh pine-4.44*
and got these errors about failed dependencies.
error: failed depende
Thanks, I had the Pine site but the other link has lots of good info and
plenty of other links that look real promising. Thanks to everone who
replied, you guys rock.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com
ubject: Task Status Report: $_";
$flg = 1;
}
and this part works okay. Messages passed through the filter have
their Subject: lines prefixed with "Task Status Report" and all the Re's
removed. Horray!
So now I setup my outgoing filter in pine
sending-filters=/home/matt
On Nov 7, 2001, 15:53 (-0500) Dale Kosan wrote:
> YES, that did it, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOUCan anyone recommend a
> good site for getting the most out of Pine, I am a newbie so something simple
> would be best.
http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/index.html
(you *perhaps*
Thanks for the tip Statux, but if you've read my original carefully enough,
you've spotted that I was complaining that a bunch of those mirrors that I
tried did not work or required authentication.
This is not how I expect the world's biggest Linux vendor's download links to
work when I'm tryin
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [RHSA-2001:042-02] Updated pine packages available
>
>
> >
> > How am I supposed to get this update?
> >
> > The link announced in this posting requires a username and p
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:32:02PM +0300, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> So, anyone know a working mirror out there?
ftp://download.xs4all.nl/pub/mirror/redhat-updates
BTW: There was absolutely no reason to send the *whole* advisory to the list
- PLEASE trim your quotes when sending to the list. THANK
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:32:02PM +0300, Peter Peltonen a ecrit:
>
> So, anyone know a working mirror out there?
ftp://ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/linux/updates/6.2/en/os/i386/
Emmanuel Seyman
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PR
et updates.
BTW, did you check redhat's update dir?
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Peltonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RH List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [RHSA-2001:042-02] Updated pine packages avail
- does not work
ftp://ftp.pspt.fi/pub/linux/redhat/updates.redhat.com/6.2/i386/
- does not have the newest pine package for rh6.2
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/updates
- requires an username and password
ftp://ftp.wcfauna.ee/pub/RedHat/updates/6.2/i386/
- does not have the
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, at 20:51 (GMT -0500), Chuck Mead wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Silviu Cojocaru blurted out:
>
> SC>
> SC>I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
> SC>Hey Mike what gives ?!
>
> Well I just looked and there is...
.29...> 16-Mar-2001 10:12 9.2M
pine/ 16-Feb-2001 09:30 -
xfree86/18-Mar-2001 11:47 -
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:39:17 +0200 (EET), Silviu Cojocaru wrote:
>
>I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
>Hey
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Silviu Cojocaru blurted out:
SC>
SC>I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
SC>Hey Mike what gives ?!
Well I just looked and there is... 4.33-6 was there and I nabbed it...
:-)
--
Chuck Mead, csm -AT- moongroup.com, Owner, Moon
I just took a look at people.redhat.com/mharris and there is no Pine dir.
Hey Mike what gives ?!
--
If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
..., Oh wait, he already does.
___
Redhat-list mailing
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Thank you, Mikkel,
> so at least I do not have to worry anymore about my possible brain-damage
> or so :) ... I already thought whether this was the real problem behind
> the one I thought I'd have with Pine ... :)
>
Thank you, Mikkel,
so at least I do not have to worry anymore about my possible brain-damage
or so :) ... I already thought whether this was the real problem behind
the one I thought I'd have with Pine ... :)
Regards.
Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Pfeiffer
http://www.geocities.com/wolfgangpfe
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> MY COMMENT:
> I think my Pine is unable to save the news-stuff it loads down on my
> machine, and this perhaps results to the problems from above ...
>
> My questions:
> --- Are there others with similar Pine probl
First my apologies for this long message ... I didn't see another way to
explain as precisely as I could what's happening in Pine.
Then this: I do not have any problems to write, send and receive
non-newsgroups emails with my current Pine-version (4.33) ... Pine saves
all my non-
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> How do I get gnupg back into pine again -- I had it before connected to
> pine simply (at least AFAICS) by having installed pine-4.31-2.i386.rpm:
> but after having uninstalled this pine-rpm, the newly *compiled* pine
> doesn't se
I compiled and installed PINE 4.33 on redhat 6.1.
And I have gnupg on the machine.
How do I get gnupg back into pine again -- I had it before connected to
pine simply (at least AFAICS) by having installed pine-4.31-2.i386.rpm:
but after having uninstalled this pine-rpm, the newly *compiled
Reply to message from Mikkel L. Ellertson on Mon, 8 Jan 2001, 20:23 <-0600>:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> >
> > I have gpg on the machine .. and PINE should be able to use it ... still
> > 'lnp' ... or 'slx' ??
> >
&
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Use lpn - Redhat uses PAM for authentication.
>
He's right. Use lpn.
-- Generated Signature --
Sorry. Nice try.
-- End Sig --
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.c
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> I have gpg on the machine .. and PINE should be able to use it ... still
> 'lnp' ... or 'slx' ??
>
> or perhaps even better: isn't there a way to find out which port my (by
> rpm installed) currently
Reply to message from Statux on Mon, 8 Jan 2001, 18:50 <-0500>:
> that's lnp, not lpn :)
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I want to compile a new Pine on Red
that's lnp, not lpn :)
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> >
> > I want to compile a new Pine on RedHat6.1
> > But I have to know the correct Pine port to do this.
> > This new Pine-version o
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
