The only dependable way I've found to make messages from Outlook
and Exchange truly plain text is, in the Message window, pull
down the File menu and click Properties, then Send Options.
Under Attachment Format, select UUEncode.
No, of course it doesn't make sense, but it works, one message at
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Barry Alexander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 1:45 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: HTML email
>Well, that didn't work either. I have followed the instructions on the
referenced website to set
>Outlook 2
Title: HTML email
If you
are using Exchange as your mail server, you may need to contact your exchange
admin. There is a setting in Exchange that forces mail to be sent as HTML
regardless of what the client is set as.. He may need to turn that off as it is
probably not a good idea anyway
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:58:00PM -0400, Barry Alexander wrote:
> That's the first thing I did, noted below as "Well, that didn't work either.
> I have followed the instructions on the referenced website to set Outlook
> 2000 to use plain text email, not using Word as email editor (double checked
Title: HTML email
That's
the first thing I did, noted below as "Well, that didn't work either. I have followed the
instructions on the referenced website to set Outlook 2000 to use plain text
email, not using Word as email editor (double checked to make sure setti
Title: HTML email
Goto
Tools-->Options-->Select the Mail Format Tab-->Change the drop down to
Plain Text.
That's
what did it for me.
Eric
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Barry
AlexanderSent: Monday, June
Title: HTML email
Well, that didn't work either. I have followed the instructions on the referenced website to set Outlook 2000 to use plain text email, not using Word as email editor (double checked to make sure settings were saved).
Based on the warning, I figured I also had to s
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:48:42AM -0500, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> >latest Mozilla has an option, and text-only mailers would of course
> >not interpret html (or...?)
> http://www.mutt.org/
Mutt can use something like lynx or w3m (my choice) to convert html
mail on the fly.
--
Hal Burgiss
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 09:04, Jan wrote:
Which mail-clients allow one to NOT interpret and show html-mail? The
latest Mozilla has an option, and text-only mailers would of course
not interpret html (or...?)
Power email users who are comfortable using the keyboard should try mutt.
In addition to the
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 09:04, Jan wrote:
> This is strictly speaking irrelevant - but this subject reminds me of
> too many SPAM mails I have received recently. They all come with a
> subject like 'Re: ...' or some claim that I requested something (a
> report, pictures, ...). Or the classic: 'Hi, w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002 08:46:50 -0500, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> > >>A lot of us just won't read it.
> > >>
> > >>Why?
> >
> > Because it can contain "harmful content"?
>
> Or, because we simply choose not to read it. ;)
>
> $ grep -A1 -B 1 html .procmai
Cassandra wrote:
Hi again!
Is this message in HTML or just plain text?
Thanks
Cassandra
You are in plain text.
Fortunately for myself, though, when I hit the reply button, my e-mail client removes ALL HTML and
converts to plain text. :-D
--
Joseph A Nagy Jr Purgatory is w
Hi again!
Is this message in HTML or just plain text?
Thanks
Cassandra
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
; >>Subject: Once again, please do *NOT* post html email
> >>
> >>
> >>A lot of us just won't read it.
> >>
> >>Why?
>
> Because it can contain "harmful content"?
Or, because we simply choose not to read it.
>>-Original Message-
>>From: mark [mailto:whitroth@;enteract.com]
>>Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 5:01 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Once again, please do *NOT* post html email
>>
>>
>>A lot of us just won't read i
A lot of us just won't read it.
Why?
A lot of us get the digest. It's text. You understand text? It "content", and
has no style, whatever, and no purpose other than conveying a message.
What do we see, that we bitch and moan about html mail?
I've just done a global search and replace of all <,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-Oct-2002/13:38 -0500, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[a civil defense of his original post in this thread]
Mark did the kind of thing that needs to be done in order to keep the list
functioning well. I think he did it in a civil manner. No offe
On Thursday 24 October 2002 01:15 pm, Daniel Goldin is done writ:
> David Wheeler is a self-professed Linux newbie, attempting to
> install Redhat for the first time. Singling him out--however
I did *not* single him out. I *said* that his was there, and I didn't, in
fact, mention that it was t
*I'm**so**confused**by**all**of**this*
Josh
-Original Message-
From: mark [mailto:whitroth@;enteract.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: html email
On Thursday 24 October 2002 01:15 pm, Daniel Goldin is done
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 14:36, Joshua P. Metcalf wrote:
> *I'm**so**confused**by**all**of**this*
>
> Josh
>
Don't worry about it. post in text only and stick around. Like any
healthy community where people are encouraged to speak up if they have
some thing to say, you will get disagreements occa
Ron Jones wrote:
> I for one see a great deal of humor in it. :)
>
>
> As a relatively new linux user, what does this thread teach me about
> the
> installation, configuration and optimization of Red Hat Linux?
The lesson in this thread *should* be that there are two groups of
people who are
21 matches
Mail list logo
