Thanks it helps ;)
-Message d'origine-
De : Kevin MacNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 21 octobre 2003 12:30
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: ext2 or ext3 ?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:46:24AM +0100, Mohamed Kerbachi wrote:
> How to know if a server has ext2 or ext3
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:46:24AM +0100, Mohamed Kerbachi wrote:
> How to know if a server has ext2 or ext3 ???
df -T
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hello,
How to
know if a server has ext2 or ext3 ???
can
any one help?
Thx
I am running RH9 with kernel 2.4.20-20.9. I am getting these errors when trying to mount an LVM snapshot:
EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem.
EXT3-fs: write access unavailable, cannot proceed.
I saw in an earlier thread that a kernel patch is needed. My question is where
On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:42:34 -0400
Johnathan Bailes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /home partition in writeback mode with no issues. However, I have been
> unable to mount the root partition in anything else than ordered data
> mode.
>
> If you google this issue you see a couple of people report
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 20:12, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:30:57 +0200
> Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > >Remember you can always check for yourself; what does
> > >"man tune2fs" tell you is correct? Is your file
Sean Estabrooks pravi:
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:30:57 +0200
Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remember you can always check for yourself; what does
"man tune2fs" tell you is correct? Is your filesystem actually
ext3 ? Are you using the correct partition in place of the
/
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 22:30:57 +0200
Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Remember you can always check for yourself; what does
> >"man tune2fs" tell you is correct? Is your filesystem actually
> >ext3 ? Are you using the correct partition in place of th
me and I get back nothing - wrong
switch "-o". Then I have changed it to "-O" and I get back "wrong
filesystem option set".
I will try with compiling the kernel.
Remember you can always check for yourself; what does
"man tune2fs" tell you is correct?
the command you gave me and I get back nothing - wrong
> switch "-o". Then I have changed it to "-O" and I get back "wrong
> filesystem option set".
> I will try with compiling the kernel.
>
Remember you can always check for yourself; what does
"man
Sean Estabrooks pravi:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 19:35:42 +0200
Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I have been trying all day to change ext3 mode from ORDERED to WRITEBACK
and so far no success. Let me say what I have been trying:
-adding a parameter to /etc/fstab data=writeback n
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 19:35:42 +0200
Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have been trying all day to change ext3 mode from ORDERED to WRITEBACK
> and so far no success. Let me say what I have been trying:
> -adding a parameter to /etc/fstab data=writeback
Sean Estabrooks pravi:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:41:13 +0200
Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have currently installed RH8 with ext3 fs. I have read that the
default settings for that fs is data=ordered. I would like to change it
to data=writeback. How do I do that?
Hi!
I have been trying all day to change ext3 mode from ORDERED to WRITEBACK
and so far no success. Let me say what I have been trying:
-adding a parameter to /etc/fstab data=writeback next to the defaults
for the root and /boot partition eg.
LABEL=// ext3defaults
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 11:41:13 +0200
Sasa Stupar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have currently installed RH8 with ext3 fs. I have read that the
> default settings for that fs is data=ordered. I would like to change it
> to data=writeback. How do I do that?
>
Hi,
I have currently installed RH8 with ext3 fs. I have read that the
default settings for that fs is data=ordered. I would like to change it
to data=writeback. How do I do that?
Sasa
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On Sunday 31 August 2003 18:31, HoytDuff wrote:
> On Sunday 31 August 2003 04:01 am, Andre Speelmans wrote:
> > > i want to convert my ext3 / and /home partition to an ext2 filesystem,
> > > that i can move it with partition magic, how can i do that?
> >
> > tu
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Simon Tischer wrote:
> i want to convert my ext3 / and /home partition to an ext2 filesystem, that i
> can move it with partition magic, how can i do that?
tune2fs -O ^has_journal
--
Regards,
Andre
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On Sunday 31 August 2003 04:01 am, Andre Speelmans wrote:
> > i want to convert my ext3 / and /home partition to an ext2 filesystem,
> > that i can move it with partition magic, how can i do that?
>
> tune2fs -O ^has_journal
Doesn't Partition Magic detect it as an ext2 part
Go, Jeffrey wrote:
I believe you can also run the tune2fs command...
Side note: Yes you can but this does not change your /etc/fstab
automatically. If you use tune2fs to convert the jounalled ext3 back to
non-journalled ext2, you need to change your /etc/fstab to reflect such.
Regards,
Ed
I believe you can also run the tune2fs command...
-Original Message-
From: Marcos de Souza Trazzini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ext3 to ext2
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 09:26, Simon Tischer wrote:
> hi
>
>
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 09:26, Simon Tischer wrote:
> hi
>
> i want to convert my ext3 / and /home partition to an ext2 filesystem, that i
> can move it with partition magic, how can i do that?
>
> thx for help
> --
> ---
>
>
>
> S
hi
i want to convert my ext3 / and /home partition to an ext2 filesystem, that i
can move it with partition magic, how can i do that?
thx for help
--
---
Simon
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Aug 2003 17:42:02 -0600, Earl Eiland wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 07:45, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:26, Earl wrote:
> > > I'm using RH9 with ext3 partitions. I want to add another ext3
> &g
On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 19:42, Earl Eiland wrote:
> So where do I find tunefs? It doesn't appear to be included with the
> RH9 distro, nor has a search online uncovered anyplace to download it...
Sorry, that should've been tune2fs (/sbin/tune2fs).
--
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http:/
So where do I find tunefs? It doesn't appear to be included with the
RH9 distro, nor has a search online uncovered anyplace to download it...
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 07:45, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:26, Earl wrote:
> > I'm using RH9 with ext3 partitions. I
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:26, Earl wrote:
I'm using RH9 with ext3 partitions. I want to add another ext3
partition. How can I do this? Parted, for instance can edit ext3
partitions, but not create new ones.
If you have free space on the drive use fdisk. Rememb
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:26, Earl wrote:
> I'm using RH9 with ext3 partitions. I want to add another ext3
> partition. How can I do this? Parted, for instance can edit ext3
> partitions, but not create new ones.
Ext3 is simply ext2 with a journal. Create your ext2 filesys
I'm using RH9 with ext3 partitions. I want to add another ext3
partition. How can I do this? Parted, for instance can edit ext3
partitions, but not create new ones.
Earl Eiland
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/r
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:19:36 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know that when Ive loaded a new RH distribution Ive been given
> the option of converting my ext2 fs to ext3. I didnt do it
> then, but Im ready now.
>
> However, scanning /sbin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /usr/bin for somethi
I know that when Ive loaded a new RH distribution Ive been given
the option of converting my ext2 fs to ext3. I didnt do it
then, but Im ready now.
However, scanning /sbin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /usr/bin for something
with 'ext3' in its name didnt turn up anything appropriate...
So Whats t
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 21:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know that when Ive loaded a new RH distribution Ive been given
> the option of converting my ext2 fs to ext3. I didnt do it
> then, but Im ready now.
>
> However, scanning /sbin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /usr/bin for something
&
Hi, I was hoping that someone could help me with this question. I have a
redhat box as a fileserver I was just wondering something about the EXT3
filesystem (or maybe them all in general). After a power outage, the machine
started up with the following error
### Start Message ###
Your
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 03:14:05PM +0200, Pablo Rodriguez Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I want to resize an ext3 partition, and I don't find how to do it.
>
> GNU Parted doesn't work. Yes, I know that for ext3 the start of the partition must
> stay fixed, but doe
Hi guys,
I want to resize an ext3 partition, and I don't find how to do it.
GNU Parted doesn't work. Yes, I know that for ext3 the start of the partition must
stay fixed, but doesn't work ;-)
Any other app?
Regards,
--
Pablo Rodriguez Gonzalez
Director General
[EMAIL PROTEC
RH 9 on a Thinkpad 600
There were some kppp processes that refused to die, couldn't even be killed by root
after user logout, so a reboot seemed prudent. On the reboot, It asked about a
filesystem integrity check, which failed and told me to fsck manually, which I did. I
got a few "short read"
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:43:01PM +0800, Kevin - KD Micro Software spoke
thusly:
>Everything I've read today says that ext3 zeros the inodes as soon as they
>are deleted, rather than just marking them as deleted but leaving them
>alone. If this was ext2 it would be a lot simpler
Hello all,
I've spent the last few hours reading articles and various links from Google
on undeleting files from an ext3 filesystem. Someone ran rm -rf on a
directory ( thankfully not / ) this morning which wiped out the last 2
months of that person's work. Obviously they aren't
I have setup a box running RH 7.3. It has two harddrives. The first drive is
running fine, with an ext3 file system (mounted as /).
The second drive is having problems being setup with an ext3 file system. I
tried setting it initially from the install menu. It would not mount after
the system
ubject: Re: Unable to convert root file system to ext3
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:19:02 -0500, Paul F. Williams wrote:
> I recently upgraded a redhat system from 7.1 to 7.2
> and unfortunately must have missed the oppo
I recently upgraded a redhat system from 7.1 to 7.2
and unfortunately must have missed the opportunity
to convert from ext2 to ext3 during the upgrade.
Later I happened to notice that it still was using
ext2 so went through the steps to convert to ext3
that I found on the internet. There seemded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:19:02 -0500, Paul F. Williams wrote:
> I recently upgraded a redhat system from 7.1 to 7.2
> and unfortunately must have missed the opportunity
> to convert from ext2 to ext3 during the upgrade.
>
> Later I hap
I am a chinese user of RH8 !
and I copy some file name in chinese for a fat partition
to a ext3 partition. but it can't read the file name
correctly! The iocharset or codepage parm can only work
for the vfat partition. So what should i do!
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe m
To put it briefly:
If it don't need breakin', don't fix it.
There's no compelling reason to go to XFS, or JFS, or Reiserfs. If ext3
works for you, use it.
I've found problems with each of the other fs types, on "some" machines.
ext3 is stable.
JMHO-YMMV
Ric
General purpose use really, web surfing, email, and some programming
occasionally.
Let me put it this way ... is there any compelling reason (such as a
large performance differential) to choose xfs over ext3, given that I
have been using ext3 trouble-free for the last year and a half.
Thanks
Depends what you are doing, for general purpose use of the laptop like
an end-user sort of thing, ext3 should be good enough.
On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 11:40, Chinmay Nadkarni wrote:
> I wanted to get some opinions on XFS versus ext3. I am currently running
> ext3 (RH 7.2), but I was won
I wanted to get some opinions on XFS versus ext3. I am currently running
ext3 (RH 7.2), but I was wondering whether it might make sense to run
xfs on a laptop I am going to be installing RH 8.0 on, since it seems to
have better performane characteristics. Any opinions, gotchas, ...
Thanks in
ext3 is journaling FS but ext2 is not ..
Cheers
RCP
- Original Message -
From: Josef Oduwo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:32 AM
Subject: Ext2 & Ext3
> Could someone let me know the the difference between Ext2 and Ext3?
>
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 21:02, Josef Oduwo wrote:
> Could someone let me know the the difference between Ext2 and Ext3?
The only real difference is that ext3 is a journaled filesystem, ext2 is
not. What does that mean? For joe-user, it mostly just means less wait
time at bootup after, say
Could someone let me know the the difference between Ext2 and Ext3?
Josef Oduwo
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
redhat
Journaling!?
- Original Message -
From:
Josef Oduwo
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003
16:24
Subject: RE: Linux vs Windows (Ext2 &
Ext3)
"linus was funded by the communists and the drug lords and also the
satanists who hope
Windows doesn't even ariseon a more progressive note, could someone mention the major differences between ext2 and ext3?
Original Message Follows
From: "Richard Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Li
Hello,
I'm using redhat 7.3 with ext3
partition.
After tring to reboot the machine hang. here are
the last lines on the screen:
Red Hat nash version 3.3.10 startingLoading jbd
moduleJournalled Block Device driver loadedLoading ext3
moduleMounting /proc filesystemCreating
Hello,
I'm using redhat 7.3 with ext3
partition.
After tring to reboot the machine hang. here are
the last lines on the screen:
Red Hat nash version 3.3.10 startingLoading jbd
moduleJournalled Block Device driver loadedLoading ext3
moduleMounting /proc filesystemCreating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10 Mar 2003 17:48:21 +0100, Molnar Peter wrote:
> What do you need the ramdisk for?
Software-RAID and SCSI, unless you build these into the kernel, too.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+b9od0iMVcrivHF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 March 2003 10:58 am, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > p.s. of course, i could always just "RTFM". right, michael? :-P
>
> Do we need you for anything, Mr.Day? *lol*
No, _we_ decided we didn't need him for anything. Didn't we?
Hey I stay
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 14:38, Jack Bowling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Me wrote:
> > Ah! Perhaps it's the CONFIG_JBD=y. It works! Happy day!!!
> >
> > Thank you to everyone for your help. With that out of the way, do most of
> > you guys use loadable module support? I've
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Me wrote:
> Ah! Perhaps it's the CONFIG_JBD=y. It works! Happy day!!!
>
> Thank you to everyone for your help. With that out of the way, do most of
> you guys use loadable module support? I've avoided it because it seemed
> like an unneeded security r
Am Mon, 2003-03-10 um 16.31 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > When I build ext3 not as a module (CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y, CONFIG_JBD=y),
> > I can boot the kernel fine without a RAM-disk. "LABEL=" has never
> > worked for me
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 16:31, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> one of the things i'm pretty sure i recall is that you can build
> ext3 support as a module, then totally *forget* to build a ramdisk
> and everything will still boot properly since (again, from memory),
> the root FS will fi
an annoyance.
>> >
>> > I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat
>> 8.0 box. After some research I found the culprit to be ext3. It
>> seems that ext3 support HAS to be built as a module and not be built
>> directly into the kernel.
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:31, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i *know* there was something regarding building ext3 support either
> > into the kernel directly or leaving it as a module that affected
> > whether or not you could use &qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:31:47 -0500 (EST), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i *know* there was something regarding building ext3 support either
> into the kernel directly or leaving it as a module that affected
> whether or not you could use "L
I forgot to mention that I am using Grub. Also I was using the /dev/hda1
instead of the LABEL...
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:41:12 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> It also seems that you MUST use a RAM disk to load the ext3
&g
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Me wrote:
>
>> Okay, this really isn't a problem. It's just an annoyance.
>>
>> I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat
>> 8.0 box. After some research I found the culprit to be ext3. It
>> seems
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:31, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > When I build ext3 not as a module (CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y, CONFIG_JBD=y),
> > I can boot the kernel fine without a RAM-disk. "LABEL=" has never
> > worked for me
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> When I build ext3 not as a module (CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y, CONFIG_JBD=y),
> I can boot the kernel fine without a RAM-disk. "LABEL=" has never
> worked for me in GRUB boot menu. But it works in fstab in both
> cases. Whether or not ext
gt; > I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat 8.0
> > box. After some research I found the culprit to be ext3. It seems that
> > ext3 support HAS to be built as a module and not be built directly into
> > the kernel.
>
> not true.
>
>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:41:12 -0500 (EST), "Robert P. J. Day"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It also seems that you MUST use a RAM disk to load the ext3
>> module. That was the only way I could get it to work.
>
>also not true. what kind of errors were you g
Am Mon, 2003-03-10 um 14.41 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Me wrote:
>
> > Okay, this really isn't a problem. It's just an annoyance.
> >
> > I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat 8.0
> > box. After some
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Me wrote:
> Okay, this really isn't a problem. It's just an annoyance.
>
> I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat 8.0
> box. After some research I found the culprit to be ext3. It seems that
> ext3 support HAS to be
Okay, this really isn't a problem. It's just an annoyance.
I had the hardest time installing a custom built kernel on my Redhat 8.0
box. After some research I found the culprit to be ext3. It seems that
ext3 support HAS to be built as a module and not be built directly into
the k
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:28:37AM +1100, Darryl Harvey wrote:
> I have found that if you edit the entries in /etc/fstab and change from ext3
> to ext2, two things are still apparent.
>
> 1/. The journal file still resides on each partition.
> 2/. The journal module is still loa
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:44:25AM -0500, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> Is it possible to go from ext3 to ext2?
>
> Or, better yet, I installed 7.2 and converted to ext3 however the kernel
> does not support ext3. How can I get back into the linux box to rebuild a
> kernel?
I d
I have found that if you edit the entries in /etc/fstab and change from ext3
to ext2, two things are still apparent.
1/. The journal file still resides on each partition.
2/. The journal module is still loaded and running
So maybe tune2fs will stop these from occurring ?? Dunno...
IE: Taken
> But if you want your ext3 filesystems to be used as ext2 filesystems
> you don't have to change the kernel. Just modify your /etc/fstab
> file and set the file system type to ext2.
I know you need to run tune2fs to set from ext2 to ext3.
Quick question: You don't need to
It is easy, ext3 is ext2 filesystem with a journal. Complete backwards
compatiblity.
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 11:59, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> Haha. I never would have thought of something so easy.
>
> Thank you for your help.
> --
> Michael S. Dunsavage
> - Original Me
Haha. I never would have thought of something so easy.
Thank you for your help.
--
Michael S. Dunsavage
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: ext3 to ext2
> On T
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:44:25AM -0500, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> Is it possible to go from ext3 to ext2?
>
> Or, better yet, I installed 7.2 and converted to ext3 however the kernel
> does not support ext3. How can I get back into the linux box to rebuild a
> kernel?
Hi
Is it possible to go from ext3 to ext2?
Or, better yet, I installed 7.2 and converted to ext3 however the kernel
does not support ext3. How can I get back into the linux box to rebuild a
kernel?
I don't have a boot disk or kernel disk handy.
--
Michael S. Dunsavage
--
redhat-list ma
ges i read this statement:"Recovery of deleted files is
> > only available on ext2 file systems".
> > Is it not possible to recover ext3fs ? is there any chance still left?
> >
> > Otherwise i will forget this topic as 'nate' suggested.
> >
&
of deleted
files is only available on ext2 file systems". Is it not possible to
recover ext3fs ? is there any chance still left?
Otherwise i will forget this topic as 'nate' suggested.
ext3 is just ext2 with a journaling feature. You should be able to
simply use an ext3 filesystem as
ecovery of deleted
> > files is only available on ext2 file systems". Is it not possible to
> > recover ext3fs ? is there any chance still left?
> >
> > Otherwise i will forget this topic as 'nate' suggested.
> >
> ext3 is just ext2 with a journalin
vailable on ext2 file systems".
> Is it not possible to recover ext3fs ? is there any chance still left?
>
> Otherwise i will forget this topic as 'nate' suggested.
>
> Thanks,
> anil kumar.
>
>
>
ext3 is just ext2 with a journaling feature. You shoul
Hi,
I fallowed suggestions of "list" to recover deleted files using
debugfs and 'mc' tool,but those are working for ext2 file system
only.
And in info pages i read this statement:"Recovery of deleted files
is only available on ext2 file systems".
Is it not possible to recover ext3fs ? is ther
no experience with Soft-raid 1, but I've been using LVM in HP-UX
and now Linux for years.
>Very happy with it.
>Using with ext3 in RH8 and RH7.3 no problems to report, except in 7.3 I
had to issue:
>vgchange -a y
>in /etc/rc.d/rc.local to keep mount -a from barking during boot.
>
I have no experience with Soft-raid 1, but I've been using LVM in HP-UX and now Linux
for years.
Very happy with it.
Using with ext3 in RH8 and RH7.3 no problems to report, except in 7.3 I had to issue:
vgchange -a y
in /etc/rc.d/rc.local to keep mount -a from barking during boot.
wBmXo-wJDN-4YMM-nrBW-26BK-rrlO-p22SI5
#
... created some logical volumes and move stuff onto them...
# mount | grep vg_sys
/dev/vg_sys/lv_usr on /usr type ext3 (rw)
/dev/vg_sys/lv_var on /var type ext3 (rw)
/dev/vg_sys/lv_log on /var/log type ext3 (rw)
/dev/vg_sys/lv_home on /home type ext3 (rw
Does it run smooth? Haven't used LVM up to now. Is the handling
really as easy as people want to make us think? Don't need a detailed
explanation (although a short introduction would be quite helpful)
but mainly report on your experiences.
Greetingz
Stefan
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsu
Hi list,
I'm having trouble implementing quota on a Red Hat 8.0 machine running
ext3. Can anyone point me to a good document? The mini-HOWTO on tldp is
a little outdated.
TIA
Harish
--
--
Har
make sure linuxrc in
> your initrd is using the right options. If you are using a kernel with
> ext3 compiled in you need to give the rooflags option.
OK. Thank you. I do understand now. So, do I want to edit my current
linuxrc (within my initrd), or do I want to make another (with
mkinitr
Michael Schwendt wrote:
I need only to be able to add the data=writeback option to the fstab.
Feel free to add it there, then reboot because you cannot
change the journaling mode with remounting.
Actually as I remember just adding the writeback option is really bad.
I seem to remembe
John Joseph Roets wrote:
I am not remounting the partition with a different journal type.
It is already ext3.
There are 3 journal types/modes ordered (the default), writeback
(fastest), and journal (don't use).
I need only to be able to add the data=writeback option to the
; > uses the right options. You should be able to edit your fstab and
> > put the right options there and then create an initrd using
> > mkinitrd.
>
> I am not remounting the partition with a different journal type.
> It is already ext3.
Then why do you use options "remou
I am not remounting the partition with a different journal type.
It is already ext3.
I need only to be able to add the data=writeback option to the fstab.
Alternatively, I would even remount the partition in rc.local if need be
(if module load order is a problem), if only it would accept it
John Joseph Roets wrote:
Hello guys.
Has anyone successfully used the 'data=writeback' option on an ext3
partition [on Redhat 8.0]?
I've perused the newsgroups and google, yet have only found a few
references to this problem, with no answers/resolutions.
When I try to mount the
Hello guys.
Has anyone successfully used the 'data=writeback' option on an ext3
partition [on Redhat 8.0]?
I've perused the newsgroups and google, yet have only found a few
references to this problem, with no answers/resolutions.
When I try to mount the partition with the data=w
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 10:16:48AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 18:29 09 Jan 2003, Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | My OS is RedHat linux 7.3. I have read the mount manpage, but I'm unclear
> | about one thing:
> |
> | If I mount an ext3 filesystem
On 18:29 09 Jan 2003, Anand Buddhdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| My OS is RedHat linux 7.3. I have read the mount manpage, but I'm unclear
| about one thing:
|
| If I mount an ext3 filesystem with the 'defaults' option, I get
| rw,suid,dev,exec,auto,nouser,async.
|
| No
My OS is RedHat linux 7.3. I have read the mount manpage, but I'm unclear
about one thing:
If I mount an ext3 filesystem with the 'defaults' option, I get
rw,suid,dev,exec,auto,nouser,async.
Now, I want to mount it with the noatime option. Do I remove the
word 'defaults&
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
