On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:24:04PM -0500, Me wrote: > Ah! Perhaps it's the CONFIG_JBD=y. It works! Happy day!!! > > Thank you to everyone for your help. With that out of the way, do most of > you guys use loadable module support? I've avoided it because it seemed > like an unneeded security risk. What does everyone think? >
Note that none other than Alan Cox is lobbying for only having loadable modules in the kernel and doing away with static builds. Who am I to argue with the Wizard? -- Jack Bowling mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
