General purpose use really, web surfing, email, and some programming occasionally.

Let me put it this way ... is there any compelling reason (such as a large performance differential) to choose xfs over ext3, given that I have been using ext3 trouble-free for the last year and a half.

Thanks.
- Chinmay.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Depends what you are doing, for general purpose use of the laptop like
an end-user sort of thing, ext3 should be good enough.

On Sun, 2003-03-30 at 11:40, Chinmay Nadkarni wrote:


I wanted to get some opinions on XFS versus ext3. I am currently running ext3 (RH 7.2), but I was wondering whether it might make sense to run xfs on a laptop I am going to be installing RH 8.0 on, since it seems to have better performane characteristics. Any opinions, gotchas, ...

Thanks in advance.
- Chinmay.



--
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://shopnow.netscape.com/





-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to