On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:26:26PM -0500, Wartnick, James wrote:
>
> It appears that this is a bug. Bug number: 91480 (bugzilla.redhat.com).
Sorry for the late reply but I haven't been following the thread.
What is the output of "fdisk -l /dev/sdc" ?
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsub
Hi James,
> It appears that this is a bug. Bug number: 91480 (bugzilla.redhat.com).
>
> Thanks for everyone's help. No workaround as of yet.
Really? Did you try using /dev/sda1 as I suggested? Thanks.
Bye,
Leonard.
--
How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste?
Stop the use of d
gest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. newgroup message not updated, why? (Nicholas)
>2. RE: /etc/resolv.conf search domains? (Thomas E. Dukes)
>3. spec file for apache httpd (Beast)
> 4. How to install a parallel port scanner in Linux? (Didier Casse)
Hi A.,
> Redhat sets it up as the 4th partition by default because that's the
> default on Windoze. I suppose the assumption is a lot of linux users
> will be reading Winders disks, or that they'll just reformat the drive
> as-is instead of fixing it for their own use.
Right. The disk and dri
On Sat July 12 2003 06:15 am, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> > /home>mount /zip
> > mount: /dev/sdc4 is not a valid block device
>
> If the zip drive indeed is the third (pseudo) scsi device (/dev/sdc)
> try changing /dev/sdc4 to /dev/sdc1 in /etc/fst
Hi James,
> /home>mount /zip
> mount: /dev/sdc4 is not a valid block device
If the zip drive indeed is the third (pseudo) scsi device (/dev/sdc) try
changing /dev/sdc4 to /dev/sdc1 in /etc/fstab. I don't know why Red Hat
automatically wants to use partition #4. Maybe it
Hi Shawn,
> I need SCSI-emulation to burn a CD with a burner don't I? How can I check if I
> have that?
Indeed you need scsi emulation. That is why the symbolic link /dev/cdrom
should be pointing to something like /dev/scd0, not to /dev/hdc.
To make sure the ide-scsi module is loaded at boot
to mount the /zip drive I get the following message:
/home>mount /zip
mount: /dev/sdc4 is not a valid block device
When the machine boots, it does recognize that /zip drive (see below)
Jul 6 07:20:44 www kernel: SCSI device sdc: 196608 512-byte hdwr sectors (101 M
B)
Jul 6 07:20:44
Hello,
In reference to the "driver not present" message I get in the output of
dmesg,
I need SCSI-emulation to burn a CD with a burner don't I? How can I check
if I have that?
(somewhat of a newby, haven't ever complied a kernel)
I am guessing from the following and the info below that for s
Have you checked to see if /dev/cdrom is a dead symbolic link?
well um (Newby here) clicking it brings me to /dev/hdc (ok brings me to a
message that nautilus can't display that file), so I believe it to be alive
or is my method of checking faulty?
if I run:
dmesg | less
I find:
hdc: SONY C
I plop in a cd to make a backup, my system no longer
> > recognizes the cdrom drive.
> >
> > mount /mnt/cdrom
> > mount: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
> >
> > (used to be automatic anyway...)
> >
> > I am hoping that it's just a configurat
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 16:28, Shawn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reason when I plop in a cd to make a backup, my system no longer
> recognizes the cdrom drive.
>
> mount /mnt/cdrom
> mount: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
>
> (used to be automatic anyway...)
Hello,
For some reason when I plop in a cd to make a backup, my system no longer
recognizes the cdrom drive.
mount /mnt/cdrom
mount: /dev/cdrom is not a valid block device
(used to be automatic anyway...)
I am hoping that it's just a configuration file matter.
Anytips on what file I shou
w to linux, could you please explain this issue a bit
> more?thanks
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 11:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Valid Block
>
&
Sorry, I'm very new to linux, could you please explain this issue a bit
more?thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: Valid Block
> To what is /
get an error message,"mount /dev/cdrom is not a
>valid block device"..any suggestions would be great
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
--
redhat-list mail
Help...I just got my Red Hat Linux Version 7.2
going...and now when i try to access the Cd dirve..I get an error
message,"mount /dev/cdrom is not a valid block
device"..any suggestions would be great
rect this?
when trying to mount the cd-rom drive RH7.2 tells me
it is 'not a valid block device'
--- Glenn Bursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all
think i may have asked for help on this before.
have forgetten..old age and brain overload...
how can i make my cd-rom a valid
On Sunday 22 December 2002 06:27 pm, Glenn Bursell wrote:
> Ummm so can anyone tell me how to correct this?
> when trying to mount the cd-rom drive RH7.2 tells me
> it is 'not a valid block device'
Not unless you give us a lot more information.
What command are you typing i
Ummm so can anyone tell me how to correct this?
when trying to mount the cd-rom drive RH7.2 tells me
it is 'not a valid block device'
--- Glenn Bursell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all
>
> think i may have asked for help on this before.
> have forgetten..old age an
Not a single error. Well, my laptop does not have a good sound system,
so I don't load music CDs on it, but I have been installing software
from various CDs, and everything is working fine.
-Manuel.
jmraz wrote:
> * After the successful mount, and reboot, did you come across this
> error ?
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Manuel Camacho wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I solved the issue with depmod -ae. But, for the records, the first
> possible solution I got was:
>
> mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom AND
> mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
>
> solved the error initially, BUT, after I reinstalle
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Manuel Camacho wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I solved the issue with depmod -ae. But, for the records, the first
> possible solution I got was:
>
> mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom AND
* issuing 'depmod -ae' then 'mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom'
gave me "mount: block devi
Thanks!
I solved the issue with depmod -ae. But, for the records, the first
possible solution I got was:
mount -t iso9660 /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom AND
mount -t iso9660 /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
solved the error initially, BUT, after I reinstalled everything, it did
not work (???, I installed the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 28 February 2002 03:59 pm, jmraz wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Manuel Camacho wrote:
> > When I issue mount /dev/cdrom, I am getting a "/dev/cdrom is not a
> > valid block device error".
>
> * I've
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 14:46, Manuel Camacho wrote:
> Dear friends:
>
> I just installed RH 7.2 on my Laptop.
>
> When I issue mount /dev/cdrom, I am getting a "/dev/cdrom is not a valid
> block device error".
>
> Any idea how can I fix this?
>
> TIA,
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manuel Camacho wrote:
>When I issue mount /dev/cdrom, I am getting a "/dev/cdrom is not a valid
>block device error".
I don't know about the rest of y'all, but personally, I just change
/etc/fstab such that /mnt/cdrom
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Manuel Camacho wrote:
> When I issue mount /dev/cdrom, I am getting a "/dev/cdrom is not a valid
> block device error".
* I've also encountered that problem on my cpaq1200xl125; cdrom won't
mount AFTER rh7.2 (enigma) is installed. I've i
Dear friends:
I just installed RH 7.2 on my Laptop.
When I issue mount /dev/cdrom, I am getting a "/dev/cdrom is not a valid
block device error".
Any idea how can I fix this?
TIA,
-Manuel.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTEC
29 matches
Mail list logo
