t really DSL routers. Most of them take an
Ethernet in and give you 1 or more Ethernet outs. They don't plug into
your DSL line. I believe he's looking for a router that connects
directly to his phone line.
> -- Original Message ---
> From: "Noah" <[EMA
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:04:25 -0800
Subject: DSL router recommendation
> can somebody please recommend a good DSL router with telephone and 100MB
> interface? something adequate will do.
>
> - Noah
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailt
can somebody please recommend a good DSL router with telephone and 100MB
interface? something adequate will do.
- Noah
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Please do a port redirection in your router such that whenever a request
comes for xxx.xxx.x.x on port 22 it is directed to the server. Thats how I
do it.
- Original Message -
From: "Didier Casse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, Sept
You might also setup a DMZ on the router to allow open access to the box
you want. It isn't recommended though.
I believe I had to tell my router to open a couple of ports to a
specific internal ip address to work.
Of course, all kinds of problems complicate matters if your ISP is also
At 02:45 9/23/2003, you wrote:
That solution does it , but what if you just wanna forward all connections
from My Host ( real IP) to the box behind the router which has a non rfc
ip say 192.* , so i cant just port forward everything , do i put an acl
that permits any to any from me , or NAT
That solution does it , but what if you just wanna forward all
connections from My Host ( real IP) to the box behind the router which
has a non rfc ip say 192.* , so i cant just port forward everything , do
i put an acl that permits any to any from me , or NAT , say is a cisco
router .
Didier
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 00:44 9/23/2003, you wrote:
>
> >How do you let's say ssh/ftp a Linux box which is behind a router?
> >
> >Let's say the WAN Is xxx.xxx.x.x and the Linux box's ip is given by the
> >router to be 192.16
At 00:44 9/23/2003, you wrote:
How do you let's say ssh/ftp a Linux box which is behind a router?
Let's say the WAN Is xxx.xxx.x.x and the Linux box's ip is given by the
router to be 192.168.2.34
How do I ssh to it from outside the LAN? Thanks for any help provided.
It's ca
How do you let's say ssh/ftp a Linux box which is behind a router?
Let's say the WAN Is xxx.xxx.x.x and the Linux box's ip is given by the
router to be 192.168.2.34
How do I ssh to it from outside the LAN? Thanks for any help provided.
With kind regards,
Didier
---
PhD stu
At 22:53 9/13/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Can you elaborate on this a little more? Very interesting... Why not
just have a closed port?
Some SOHO hardware (albeit only a few devices) are too stupid to close the
port, so you make 100% sure that no one can reach its admin website from
the outside by re
Can you elaborate on this a little more? Very interesting... Why not
just have a closed port?
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 17:57, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:52:46AM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> > I want to configure my Linksys router to allow ssh connections. One and
> >
Linux on the laptop
route -n
On the laptop should give you the route table with the default route being
the router.
Win on the laptop
>From command propmt:
ipconfig /all (for win2k/xp/nt)
winipcfg (98 and I think me)
-Original Message-
From: Trey Sizemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
My Linux laptop connects to the internet via a Linksys router (it's a
cable connection). Long story short, I converted my iPAQ OS to Linux
and am trying to share the internet connection via the laptop and the
USB sync cradle. I need to know what the IP number of the router is.
By the wa
At 22:04 9/8/2003 -1000, you wrote:
Ok. I will try to digest what you have written above and follow your
advice.
Most of it is very simple; but it will help you to ask very pointed and
focused questions so you understand the answers clearly.
Static addresses never change, either because you told
static IP address for (obviously fake) MAC address
> 12-34-56-78-90-ab. That way, whenever I am messing around with the DHCP
> server functions, I will be reminded NOT to use that address.
>
> >As for making routers accessible from the outside, do you mean typing my
> >non-loca
reminded NOT to use that address.
As for making routers accessible from the outside, do you mean typing my
non-local (global?) IP address (68.203. something) into the browser and
configuring my router from somewhere outside my network? Is that what
the danger with leaving port 80 open is?
Yes.
this was off by default (i'm pretty sure) on my linksys router. And i've
left it off.
ian
At 07:22 AM 9/8/2003, you wrote:
I believe the Linksys allows you to shut off remote admin capability.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <
I went ahead and forwarded port 80 to 192.168.1.222, which isn't
either of the two computers I've got on my network (192.168.1.100 and
192.168.1.101). Is that ok?
As for making routers accessible from the outside, do you mean typing my
non-local (global?) IP address (68.203. something) i
You need to forward port 22 (SSH port) to the IP address of then internal PC
that is running SSHD.
(example) 22 to 192.168.1.2
-Me
-Original Message-
From: Marc Adler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linksys router and
=
20 to 25 (ftp ports pop, ssh, smtp), protocol tcp (check that)put in
the last digit for the forwared IP (it forces the ip range depending on
the network (I assume no NAT)...then check enable and hit apply.
That should do the trick for you. I'm behind another router...my
DSL modem/r
I believe the Linksys allows you to shut off remote admin capability.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:27:45 -0600
Subject: Re: Linksys router and ssh connection
> At
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:10:29AM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > Yes, it's vital. Unless you forward port 80 to somewhere, I can point
> > my browser (or application) at your Linksys firewall and start guessing
> > passwords. After you forward port 80 to a non-existent IP address, I
> > won
> > > Marc, you did change the password and forward port 80 to your real
> > > webserver or some non-existent host, right?
> >
> > I changed the password, but didn't touch port 80, only port 22. I don't
> > have a webserver. Is it vital to change port 80? Will changing it affect
> > anything on my
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 06:41, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:42:38PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 19:57 9/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> > >And, you should *always* forward port 80 to something, even a
> > >non-existent host, to disallow any hopes that somebody that somebody can
>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:38:45PM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> * Rodolfo J. Paiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 21:29]:
> > At 21:03 9/7/2003 -1000, you wrote:
> >
> > Marc, you did change the password and forward port 80 to your real
> > webserver or some non-existent host, right?
>
> I changed
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 11:42:38PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 19:57 9/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >And, you should *always* forward port 80 to something, even a
> >non-existent host, to disallow any hopes that somebody that somebody can
> >talk to it from the outside.
>
> Perhaps that shoul
* Rodolfo J. Paiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 21:29]:
> At 21:03 9/7/2003 -1000, you wrote:
> >Great! This worked. There wasn't a button or box to indicate the
> >protocol, so maybe it's automatically set for both protocols. Either
> >way, it works, so thanks!
>
> Marc, you did change the pass
At 21:03 9/7/2003 -1000, you wrote:
Great! This worked. There wasn't a button or box to indicate the
protocol, so maybe it's automatically set for both protocols. Either
way, it works, so thanks!
Marc, you did change the password and forward port 80 to your real
webserver or some non-existent host
* ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 11:22]:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:52:46 -1000
> Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I want to configure my Linksys router to allow ssh connections. One
> > and a half seconds of Googling showed me how to change the d
At 19:57 9/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
And, you should *always* forward port 80 to something, even a
non-existent host, to disallow any hopes that somebody that somebody can
talk to it from the outside.
Perhaps that should be "...especially if possible to a non-existent host..."?
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:52:46AM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> I want to configure my Linksys router to allow ssh connections. One and
> a half seconds of Googling showed me how to change the default password
> on it, and it makes me wonder whether more people shouldn't know tha
At 16:17 9/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
You don't say what version of router you have. There's no guarantee they
all have the same setup. But on mine:
1. Login to the outer.
2. At the opening page, click "Advanced".
3. Click on "Forwarding".
4. Fill in both blocks fo
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:52:46 -1000
Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to configure my Linksys router to allow ssh connections. One
> and a half seconds of Googling showed me how to change the default
> password on it, and it makes me wonder whether more people should
Look at the port forwarding. You need to forward port 22 to the private
address of the linux box.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Adler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linksys router and ssh connection
I want to configure
I want to configure my Linksys router to allow ssh connections. One and
a half seconds of Googling showed me how to change the default password
on it, and it makes me wonder whether more people shouldn't know that
there is a default password that is the *same* for all Linksys routers,
but t
> > One question I have that came out of this discussion is
> why are systems
> > behind routers safer? What kind of security does a
router provide?
>
> A router by itself does not provide any inherent
security. However:
>
> A standard router, such as a cisco 25
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:05:52AM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
> behind routers safer?
They aren't. They are just simpler to admin. So if you don't know what
you are doing, or don't have the time to tend to business, they can
> One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
> behind routers safer? What kind of security does a router provide?
A router by itself does not provide any inherent security. However:
A standard router, such as a cisco 2501, can do port blocking, which can ad
One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
behind routers safer? What kind of security does a router provide?
By the way, the first line in /etc/resolv.conf has not been added back
in, and my system is back to normal. Thanks!
--
Marc Adler
--
redhat-list mailing
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:32, Jonathan Michael Nowacki wrote:
> Please Help Me set up a RH8 router
>
> My current setup
> cable modem -> eth1--rh8--eth0 ->win xp
Setup no gateway on the eth0 (you can directly edit the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and remov
Please Help Me set up a RH8 router
My current setup
cable modem -> eth1--rh8--eth0 ->win xp
Windows XP and RH8 can ping each other, but when eth0 is active on RH8 I
can not surf the internet with either RH8 or XP. When eth0 is inactive I
CAN surf the internet with RH8, but of
On Friday 29 August 2003 00:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a
> --
> cable modem
> Windows XP Machine
> Redhat Linux 8 machine with 2 ethernet cards
>
> The linux machine is fully functioning and can surf the internet
> The Windows XP machine is connected via a crossover ethernet
What I can't get is the Windows XP machine to surf the internet.
How do I do this while using the Linux box as a router? Do I setup Linux as a
DHCP server, and if I do what settings/masks/ip ranges to I choose. Can I use
masquerading and forwarding to give the windows machine a static ip
I'm in the process of switching ISPs. One that I'm considering offers a
Cisco 687 DSL router. When I went to the Cisco site, I saw that this
router is unsupported and past "end of life." Is this a bad choice based
on being past end of life or is this router a solid produ
At 7/15/2003 22:17 -0500, you wrote:
I would set up the linux box and get the dialup access working and then
do the masq'ing of the 192.168 network. The pap or chap will depend on
the requirements of your isp of course.
Using Shorewall (http://www.shorewall.net) to do the firewall and
masqueradin
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 21:23, Kirby Clements wrote:
> I have a question with using linux as a router. Is it possible to have
> the router/firewall linux box connected to an actual phone line, where
> a 56K connection would be established, having the linux router dialout,
> establish
Kirby Clements wrote:
I presume using diald, pppd, and either PAP or CHAP, both configured?
Secondly, do windows boxes have any issues communicating with a linux
router/firewall? The linux box used for this possible scenario is a
mighty 200 MHZ with 64 RAM. There would be no X on the box
Hi,
You shouldn't have any issues with dialup as opposed to a better line, as
it is treated all the same. The only issue is you will need some PPP
client to establish the connection with your modem.
Once that is done, simply setup linux as a router as you would
normally. It doesn
I have a question with using linux as a router. Is it possible to have
the router/firewall linux box connected to an actual phone line, where
a 56K connection would be established, having the linux router dialout,
establish a connection, and then provide that connect via a switch on
the other
router. Both the laptop and the server
get IP addresses through that router.
Printing has worked perfectly up until recently, and I'm wondering if it
has to do with the dynamic assignment of IP and hostname, which occurs
periodically when the DHCP lease renews.
I configured printing as fo
router. Both the laptop and the server
get IP addresses through that router.
Printing has worked perfectly up until recently, and I'm wondering if it
has to do with the dynamic assignment of IP and hostname, which occurs
periodically when the DHCP lease renews.
I configured printing as fo
Hello!
Is somebody using MRTA?
I installed it but it doesn't work!
Need help.
Thanks!begin:vcard
n:Szemerédy;Gábor
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.srce.net
org:Zavod za informatiku i AOP Subotica;HW-SW
adr:;;Adolfa Singera 12;Subotica;Vojvodina;24000;Yugoslavia
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL
check you have dns servers set up in your redhat box... otherwise you can only
ping computers that you know the ip of!!
Anton
On Wednesday 11 Jun 2003 10:23 am, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> Jeff Lawlor wrote:
> > This router has assigned my RH9 box a DHCP address, I can ping my ISP, I
>
Jeff Lawlor wrote:
This router has assigned my RH9 box a DHCP address, I can ping my ISP, I
can ping the other pc's on my network, but I cannot get to the internet.
The router doesn't even show the linux box as being attached to it.
Anyone been able to successfully set this route
This router has assigned my RH9 box a DHCP address, I can ping my ISP, I
can ping the other pc's on my network, but I cannot get to the internet.
The router doesn't even show the linux box as being attached to it.
Anyone been able to successfully set this router up?
--
JL
--
r
Kowalski | Staesis Network | www.staesis.net
-- Internetworking Consultant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Scott Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, 3 June 2003 2:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Router-Internet Sharing-Monitor Network Traffic
Hello all,
I recently retired my Netgear RT314 Cable/DSL router and set up a
Windows 2000 server with internet connection sharing to be my router.
The machine I put this on is a little P200 machine, and was easy to set
up (we're talking 5 clicks). The network monitoring tool I use is
Cyber
Just for kicks, does that machines bios support wake-on-lan? That could
help, however, it also sometimes makes bad things [tm] happen... so YMMV...
Morgan Doocy wrote:
I'd love for it to be able to sleep and still wake up when it receives
a request -- but I can't find any software that will
Morgan Doocy wrote:
I recently installed RH 8.0 on a Compaq Deskpro 2000 5166MMX to use as a
firewall/router/caching DNS server, and I'm having difficulty getting it
to wake up when it's needed.
I'm not sure how sophisticated the power management is on this machine
(I know very
I recently installed RH 8.0 on a Compaq Deskpro 2000 5166MMX to use as
a firewall/router/caching DNS server, and I'm having difficulty getting
it to wake up when it's needed.
I'm not sure how sophisticated the power management is on this machine
(I know very little about it,
lo,
> I am looking for a home router/firewall that will pass IPSEC. Does anyone
> have any ideas or use one that works?
> I do not have time to build one. I just need to direct one of my users to
> purchase the correct one so that our vpn wi
nksys makes.
>
> <>
>
> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 09:57, Jim Crippen wrote:
> > Check out the Linksys BEFVP41.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:53 AM
>
oug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:53 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: ipsec passthru router
>
>
> Hello,
> I am looking for a home router/firewall that will pass IPSEC. Does anyone
> have any ideas or use one that works?
> I do no
Check out the Linksys BEFVP41.
-Original Message-
From: Simpson, Doug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: ipsec passthru router
Hello,
I am looking for a home router/firewall that will pass IPSEC. Does anyone
have
Hello,
I am looking for a home router/firewall that will pass IPSEC. Does anyone
have any ideas or use one that works?
I do not have time to build one. I just need to direct one of my users to
purchase the correct one so that our vpn will reach her.
Thanks,
Doug
as wondering if anyones had experience in installing a Linksys wireless-G
router/wireless access point along with RH8?
I am looking at networking my new RH8 machine with a second PC running same
and wondered what I'm getting myself into. See the usual disclaimers on the
manufacturers web site
Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco one.
I've got a Cisco 801 configured to dial-on-demand to a fleet management
clearing house. If I telnet to the cisco and use the 'connect' command to
pull down a web page it dials out, connects and then returns
80 32 60 43
> Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 11:35
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laurent didier
> Objet : Re: Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
>
>
> On Monday 24 Febr
]; Laurent didier
Objet : Re: Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
On Monday 24 February 2003 9:41 am, Laurent didier wrote:
qq> have you an DNS resolution
No, but that shouldn't matter as I'm using IP address notation, i.e.
wget http://10.10.1.100/index.html
which relates to the followi
)
> FORLAN (http://www.forlan.com)
> tél : 03 84 21 00 10
> Gsm : 06 80 32 60 43
> Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 10:36
> À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Linux Fir
21 00 10
Gsm : 06 80 32 60 43
Fax : 03 84 54 35 50
-Message d'origine-
De : Gary Stainburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 24 février 2003 10:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Linux Firewall and Cisco Router
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco
Hi folks,
I don't know if this is a linux problem or a Cisco one.
I've got a Cisco 801 configured to dial-on-demand to a fleet management
clearing house. If I telnet to the cisco and use the 'connect' command to
pull down a web page it dials out, connects and then returns the web page.
I've g
nough
static IP's from your ISP to create an additional subnet that the third
machine is on. In that respect it could communicate on the net using the
directly connected machine as a router but much more troublesome than
necessary with simple masquerading in place you don't have to use
net as the internal nic on machine 1 (192.168.0.0 variety :) The
reason is that if you send a packet to the subnet of the nic the kernel
will not send it to the router but simply dump it on the wire with the
ipaddress of the final destination machine as the destination.For
the sake of disc
Edward Dekkers wrote:
In this case, there's no firewall (don't need one). So iptables is not
running. So that's out.
The nics both work, although only one has an address.
By all rights all the things you listed should make it work.
The link lights are definately on on all connected points?
> In this case, there's no firewall (don't need one). So iptables is not
> running. So that's out.
> The nics both work, although only one has an address.
By all rights all the things you listed should make it work.
The link lights are definately on on all connected points?
For the sake of sanit
/tcpdump | grep -v 'arp'
* = matches IPs of DAoC servers
This produced no output. This establishes a baseline for what is going
through eth0 (ext ifc) on the router -- just DAoC stuff and arp chatter
on the cable segment.
Then I restarted the tcpdump log, and from a machine on th
Warren Johnson wrote:
Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
I've been doing this with both Redhat & Mandrake for years.
But now.. with RH 8.0, it doesn't work.
Ric, I'm using RH 8.0 and doing the exact same thing. I use the RH8.0
box as a router for a mixed Windows/Linux network. It
Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
I've been doing this with both Redhat & Mandrake for years.
But now.. with RH 8.0, it doesn't work.
Ric, I'm using RH 8.0 and doing the exact same thing. I use the RH8.0
box as a router for a mixed Windows/Linux network. It also has
iptabl
Warren Johnson wrote:
Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
Then on the "client" pc, I set it to route through the primary IP of
the "sever".
shouldn't it route through the inside interface or eth1 on the server?
I used the term "server" really loosely.
I have 3 boxes and two network drops in my offic
Tibbetts, Ric wrote:
Then on the "client" pc, I set it to route through the primary IP of the
"sever".
shouldn't it route through the inside interface or eth1 on the server?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mai
Anyone?
This is easy! I KNOW it's easy. I have one running at home, and it works
great. I've just missed something really dumb.
The setup:
A RH 8.0 box with 2 NICs. 1 with a real address connected to the
network, the second with a dummy IP (192.168.100.1) that runs a
crossover to another box.
outing table
-Original Message-
From: Tibbetts, Ric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Redhat List
Subject: Simple router
All;
I need a simple way to just "pass packets". I have 3 devices, and two
network drops. (yeah, same old story). My R
Just activate the IP_Forwarding and update your routing table
-Original Message-
From: Tibbetts, Ric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 2:56 PM
To: Redhat List
Subject: Simple router
All;
I need a simple way to just "pass packets". I have 3 device
All;
I need a simple way to just "pass packets". I have 3 devices, and two
network drops. (yeah, same old story). My RH 8.0 box has two nics in it,
so I thought I could set one up to just play "dumb hub", and pass
packets to one of the the other boxes. Both boxes have, and need, static
IPs. (th
either the order has hosts only and/or
the resolver points to itself or can not reach it.
hope this helps
raymundo
Kevin Krumwiede wrote:
I upgraded my home network router/firewall to RH8. NAT is working
perfectly and hosts on the LAN can connect to the Internet. However,
programs on the
Kevin Krumwiede said:
> But *routing* of packets continues to work just fine! So it can't be a
> problem with the routing table, right?
I assume your workin with this machine from the console? if you can
get on the real console(e.g. keyboard, not serial) login on 2 terminals,
disconnect the inte
I upgraded my home network router/firewall to RH8. NAT is working
perfectly and hosts on the LAN can connect to the Internet. However,
programs on the router itself cannot connect to anything. If I use a
hostname that's not in /etc/hosts, it *instantly* says the hostname
lookup failed. I
Hi,
On my network i have a server redhat 8.0 and an
ISDN router.
My router is always online cause of my server. why
can i do to stop this.
Please help me, because the bill is very
high.
Regards.
Ok - guess that one slipped through the cracks, so I'll try this again:
Have RH 7.3 and a DYNALINK ALE070 ADSL USB modem...
Have a client with the above stated unit - has anyone either gotten this
device to work under RH 7.3 (or better) or know of any particular
drivers that may work with this un
Have a client with the above stated unit - has anyone either gotten this
device to work under RH 7.3 (or better) or know of any particular
drivers that may work with this unit?
TIA
--
OzIT Support * http://www.ozitsupport.com.au
Stephen Kuhn | Help Des
Thanks to ALL that replied...
the ntpdate works like a charm...
Thanks again
Dave
At 11:24 AM 1/25/2003 -0800, you wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dave Lewis wrote:
> it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
rdate != ntp. If your cisco router is already using ntp, a
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dave Lewis wrote:
> it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
rdate != ntp. If your cisco router is already using ntp, and isn't
blocking queries, use ntpdate or run ntpd instead.
--
"Of course I'm in shape! Round's a shape, i
Try ntpdate instead of rdate. I am pretty sure rdate will not work,
however I am sure that ntpdate and ntp sync'ing does.
Dave Lewis wrote:
Has anyone tried syncing their clocks with a local cisco device
providing NTP.
it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
Has anyone got
Has anyone tried syncing their clocks with a local cisco device providing NTP.
it seems that rdate doesn't work with the cisco protocol..
Has anyone gotten another program to work in this type of configuration ??
I've tried several including chrony and I can't get anything to work.
However my wi
Richard Worwood wrote:
> I'm not certain about the 827 but on all the 800 series routers I've ever
> used the ethernet ports on the rear of the router were shared media so you
> wouldn't be able to nat the private addressing and route the public
> addressing you would
I'm not certain about the 827 but on all the 800 series routers I've ever
used the ethernet ports on the rear of the router were shared media so you
wouldn't be able to nat the private addressing and route the public
addressing you would have to just configure one ip address
Hello,
Do you know how to config "Cisco 827 ADSL Router" as the same with this
setting of this diagram ( http://www.ita.org.mo/~edward/Router.gif ) ?
Thank for your help !
Edward.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubsc
On 12/19/02 10:04 AM, "Will Mc Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tapped the
keys:
> From: "Jeff Stillwall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> There are some other optimizations you can make.
>>
>> Where can I learn more about the whole /proc filesystem?
>
> There's some starter info here:
>
> http://www.redhat.
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
