On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 02:26:03PM -0400, Chris Purcell wrote:
>
> Turn ntpd off by using "service ntpd stop". Then issue the "ntpdate
> clock.redhat.com" command. This will sync your clock with that time
> server. Now turn NTPd back on with "service ntdp start".
Red Hat's init script syncs wit
You can also try tick.utoronto.ca or tock.utoronto.ca and these are also
good ntp servers, there is the U of L one timeserver.uleth.ca but I have
no clue if this is open to the world.
Cheers,
Aly.
--
Aly S.P Dharshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Southern Alberta Digital Library Project
Turn ntpd off by using "service ntpd stop". Then issue the "ntpdate
clock.redhat.com" command. This will sync your clock with that time
server. Now turn NTPd back on with "service ntdp start".
--
Chris Purcell, RHCE
>> > Check your log messages again. Your post showed that you're getting
>> a
> > Check your log messages again. Your post showed that you're getting
> > an "invalid host" error when trying to find time.nist.gov. You can
> > either try their ip, which is 192.43.244.18, or you can use a linux
> > timeserver, such as ntp.tuxfamily.net.
>
>
> yeah that is a strange error:
>
>
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:59:58 -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote
> > looks like ntpd is starting fine. okay from /var/log/messages
> >
> > Sep 17 09:27:57 tsunami ntpd[22727]: ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 31 18:27:29
> EDT 2
> > 002 (1)
> > Sep 17 09:27:57 tsunami ntpd: ntpd startup succeeded
> > Sep
Noah wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:36:22 -0500, Leonard Miller wrote
In /etc/ntp.conf set the server to whatever you want to use.
server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
or
server time.nist.gov
and set the drift file to
driftfile /etc/ntp/drift
Then "service ntpd start"
That should be all you need.
looks li
> looks like ntpd is starting fine. okay from /var/log/messages
>
> Sep 17 09:27:57 tsunami ntpd[22727]: ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 31 18:27:29
EDT 2
> 002 (1)
> Sep 17 09:27:57 tsunami ntpd: ntpd startup succeeded
> Sep 17 09:27:57 tsunami ntpd[22727]: precision = 13 usec
> Sep 17 09:27:57 ts
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:36:22 -0500, Leonard Miller wrote
> In /etc/ntp.conf set the server to whatever you want to use.
> server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> or
> server time.nist.gov
>
> and set the drift file to
> driftfile /etc/ntp/drift
>
> Then "service ntpd start"
>
> That should be all you need.
> In /etc/ntp.conf set the server to whatever you want to use.
> server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> or
> server time.nist.gov
>
> and set the drift file to
> driftfile /etc/ntp/drift
>
> Then "service ntpd start"
>
> That should be all you need.
Or, to do it from the gui:
Go to the "Red Hat button" (what t
In /etc/ntp.conf set the server to whatever you want to use.
server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
or
server time.nist.gov
and set the drift file to
driftfile /etc/ntp/drift
Then "service ntpd start"
That should be all you need.
Leonard
Automatically inserted lawyer supplied confidentiality blurb follows
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:38:12 -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote
> > okay its Been a while since I fiddled with ntp on a redhat machine.
> > my clock is way off. is there are good admin tutorial for setting up ntp?
> >
> > thanks in advance,
>
> What version of RedHat are you running?
>
8.0
> Ben
> okay its Been a while since I fiddled with ntp on a redhat machine.
> my clock is way off. is there are good admin tutorial for setting up ntp?
>
> thanks in advance,
What version of RedHat are you running?
Ben
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.red
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:34, Shaw, Marco wrote:
> (Sorry receiving emails currently so can't reply, but will change that now.)
>
> [root@]# uname -a
> Linux 2.4.18-18.7.xbigmem #1 SMP Wed Nov 13 18:24:15 EST 2002 i686 unknown
> [root@]# rpm -q ntp ntp-4.1.1-1
>
> [root@]# cat /etc/ntp.conf|grep
Shaw, Marco wrote:
[root@]# uname -a
Linux 2.4.18-18.7.xbigmem #1 SMP Wed Nov 13 18:24:15 EST 2002 i686
unknown
[root@]# rpm -q ntp
ntp-4.1.1-1
I have a system where these commands work:
ntptrace stratum_IP
ntpq -p statum_IP
but, when I startup the NTP service I see *no traffic* during a tcpdump,
What does your /etc/ntp.conf look like?
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:27, Shaw, Marco wrote:
> [root@]# uname -a
> Linux 2.4.18-18.7.xbigmem #1 SMP Wed Nov 13 18:24:15 EST 2002 i686
> unknown
> [root@]# rpm -q ntp
> ntp-4.1.1-1
>
> I have a system where these commands work:
> ntptrace stratum_IP
> nt
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 11:18, David Barkman wrote:
> Hi, I found the following error in my /var/log/messages file for NTP:
>
> Jun 19 08:28:21 jupiter ntpd[8552]: can't open /etc/ntp.drft.TEMP:
> Permission denied
>
> Why is it looking for /etc/ntp.drft.TEMP? In my ntp.conf file I only have
> /et
On 7 Feb 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Do you know whether this has been submitted to Bugzilla, such that it's
> changed in the next update to the dhclient program?
Somneone else submitted a similar (but not identical) patch. His patch
adds specific exception lines; mine is more minimalist. Eit
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:49, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
> > So, if we apply that patch to all 8.0 machines running dhclient, and
> > then their individual NTP daemons will automatically sync to the
> > ntp-servers specified by the DHCP server? That would be _ve
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Patrick Nelson wrote:
> What is step-tickers? I just put the time server on a line all by
> itself, but don't really know how to check this.
/etc/ntp/step-tickers contains nothing but server names, one per line. The
file is parsed by /etc/init.d/ntpd when the service starts,
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
-
The asterisk means the clock has been declared a system peer--in other
words, you are synchronized to that server. See
/usr/share/doc/ntp-4.1.1/ntpq.htm for more info.
I can't find any reference to an = sign, though, so I'm guessing that it
means your
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Patrick Nelson wrote:
> Not sure what the "=" and "*" are.
The asterisk means the clock has been declared a system peer--in other
words, you are synchronized to that server. See
/usr/share/doc/ntp-4.1.1/ntpq.htm for more info.
I can't find any reference to an = sign, though
On 4 Feb 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> So, if we apply that patch to all 8.0 machines running dhclient, and
> then their individual NTP daemons will automatically sync to the
> ntp-servers specified by the DHCP server? That would be _very_ nice.
Yes indeedy.
> Silly question, but having looked
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 14:00, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> > I don;t have an 8.0 machine to look at. Has redhat modified network
> > startup scripts to slurp ntp servers from dhcp information?
>
> Yup. [...]
>
> Basically, all my patch does is change "defaul
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Kent Borg wrote:
> I looked more carefully at Red Hat's /etc/ntp.conf file and commented
> out the line that read "restrict default ignore". That seems to have
> fixed it, but I am wondering whether I have just opened up a security
> hole.
"restrict default ignore" will ignor
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 09:30:05PM -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Kent Borg wrote:
>
> > I have an 8.0 client on which ntpd can't get the time. I have an ntpd
> > running on my basement server (RH 7.0) and it used to supply time just
>
> dhclient breaks NTP in Red Hat 8.0. P
Brett,
Do you know if SWAT comes with samba when you download it from samba.org?
- Original Message -
From: "Bret Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: NTP Problem
> On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 14
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 14:00, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> > I don;t have an 8.0 machine to look at. Has redhat modified network
> > startup scripts to slurp ntp servers from dhcp information?
>
> Yup. And the default configuration is now to ignore everything
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I don;t have an 8.0 machine to look at. Has redhat modified network
> startup scripts to slurp ntp servers from dhcp information?
Yup. And the default configuration is now to ignore everything except
localhost, so every time dhclient runs, it picks up the
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 23:30, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Kent Borg wrote:
>
> > I have an 8.0 client on which ntpd can't get the time. I have an ntpd
> > running on my basement server (RH 7.0) and it used to supply time just
>
> dhclient breaks NTP in Red Hat 8.0. Patch it with:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Kent Borg wrote:
> I have an 8.0 client on which ntpd can't get the time. I have an ntpd
> running on my basement server (RH 7.0) and it used to supply time just
dhclient breaks NTP in Red Hat 8.0. Patch it with:
http://www.codegnome.org/patches/dhclient-script.patc
trysaran wrote:
Hi,
My server is running on RH8.0 but my client is RH7.2. The NTP version in
Server is higher than client. I changed the firewall configuration to
allow ntp. Still I am unable to synchronise the time.
I used setup-firewall configuration-customize and added ntp in the
others co
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:05:21AM -0800, Patrick Nelson wrote:
>
> However, now I realize that what I thought I new about ntp is off a bit. So
> I plead for anyone to set me straight. How do I check that my clients are
> getting time correctly from . The config file, ntp.conf is a
> non complex
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 13:05, Patrick Nelson wrote:
> RH 62, RH72, and RH73 all up to date.
>
> Have a ntp server which queries internet time serves, this is a RH62 system,
> that serves as a time server to the private network. I'm upgrading this
> system to RH80 so I am moving services to other s
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 21:09, Scott Foley wrote:
> I am running 7.3 and enabled ntp from the dateconfig GUI.
>
> I notice in the /var/log/ntp.log that I get hourly entries like
> this:
>
> 22 Nov 20:59:42 ntpd[2198]: can't open /etc/ntp.drift.TEMP: Permission
> denied
>
This looks like a config
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene
> Subject: Re: ntp behind firewalls (need to open ports?)
>
> >
> >What program do you use so that Windows syncs to Linux?
>
> If you have Win2k or older, you can put a batch file in the
> Startup folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-Oct-2002/15:42 -0600, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:46:11PM -0600 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
>> The short answer is no. I've got my Linu
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> > ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i setup
> > ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
> > clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/step-tickers. then i just had the service
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:42:00PM -0600, Gary wrote:
>
> What program do you use so that Windows syncs to Linux?
http://nettime.sourceforge.net/
With XP, there's a built-in time sync. It's accessed through the
date/time control panel.
.../Ed
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 02:46:11PM -0600 or thereabouts, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> The short answer is no. I've got my Linux server behind a Linksys
> firewall and have no ports open. The Linux system initiates the
> connection to t
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:44:12PM -0600, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i setup
> ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
> clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/step-tickers. then i just had the service startup
On Thursday 31 October 2002 01:55 pm, Cowles, Steve wrote:
> I really have not followed this thread, but based on the above, it sounds
> like ntpd is not synchronizing with your defined stratum server.
>
> Couple of things to try:
>
> 1) Have you run "ntpq" to see if ntpd is synchronizing with your
> -Original Message-
> From: christopher j bottaro
> Subject: Re: ntp behind firewalls (need to open ports?)
>
>
> thanks for your help, guys. i guess how i'm doing is it
> fine. i have 2 computers behind my firewall/router that
> are running ntp, but he
On Thursday 31 October 2002 08:21 am, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> Generally, each network has one box that syncs with an external source
> and all other local boxes sync from that one. The minimizes the load on
> public time servers and makes for a flexible system. *nix boxes can sync
> to the local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-Oct-2002/22:44 -0600, christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>ok, i got a couple computers behind a linksys cable router. the way i
>setup ntp is really simple. on each computer, i set the step-ticker to
>clock.via.net in /etc/ntp/ste
require a port
to be forwarded. Ports can only be forwarded to a single host, however.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Chad & Doria Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:17:01 -0600
Subject: RE: ntp behind firewalls (need to ope
You computer should make its connection to port 123 on the server. I am not
that familiar with the linksys routers, but I don't believe you should have
to open any ports since the router will nat the outgoing request.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:redhat-list-admin@;re
Kent Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > [root@mail etc]# ntptrace
>> > localhost.localdomain: stratum 16, offset 0.33, synch distance
>> > 0.5
>> > 0.0.0.0:*Not Synchronized*
>> >
>> > Does it work? or not work?
>> > How do I know it?
>
> Recently I have fired up a new RH 7.3 m
Hello!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I added the ntp servcer in the /etc/ntp.conf
> and ntpdate server.gov
> After restart the ntp service
> and it showed
>
> [root@mail etc]# ntptrace
> localhost.localdomain: stratum 16, offset 0.33, synch distance
> 0.5
> 0.0.0.0:*Not Synchronize
---
From: Romain Kang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 22:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTP Server/Client Configuration
If your local NTP master is actually connected to the Internet,
then you can use one of the public open servers as your master.
See
http://www.eecis.udel.e
If your local NTP master is actually connected to the Internet,
then you can use one of the public open servers as your master.
See
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.htm
If you don't have continual Internet access, you set give your local
master's NTP stratum with the lines
t: 23 May 2002 18:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTP Server/Client Configuration
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:30:18PM +0100, Siller Gonzalez Pico, Mario A
wrote:
>
> Something I didn't mention in my last email is that for the Linux box NTP
> Server I want to have its internal c
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 06:30:18PM +0100, Siller Gonzalez Pico, Mario A wrote:
>
> Something I didn't mention in my last email is that for the Linux box NTP
> Server I want to have its internal clock as the time reference. That's why I
> used the 127.127.1.0 on the ntp.conf file as the server add
0
authenticate no
The configuration I have on the clients ntp.conf file is:
server 20.0.0.1
authenticate no
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Seyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 May 2002 18:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTP Server/Client Configuration
On Thu, May 23
On Thu, 23 May 2002 17:22:59 +0100
"Siller Gonzalez Pico, Mario A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Monte,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback. I checked the HOWTO document. However,
> in my network scenario I'm not planning to make the synchronization
> with any NTP real server (stratum 1, stra
EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 May 2002 17:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTP Server/Client Configuration
On Thu, 23 May 2002 14:53:59 +0100
"Siller Gonzalez Pico, Mario A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure NTP on several Red Hat Linu
On Thu, 23 May 2002 14:53:59 +0100
"Siller Gonzalez Pico, Mario A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to configure NTP on several Red Hat Linux boxes without any
> success. I'm including some information about the configurations I'm
> working on. Does anyone has any idea of what m
Are you sure that the server you are connecting to is an NTP server?
The fact that ntptrace reports that the localhost is a stratum 1 server
indicates that ntp thinks the localhost is the main time server. I have
a system setup at work here where my computer connects to an ntp server
on our loca
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 05:11, James Pifer wrote:
> I have a couple installations of Linux that I'm running as Guest OSes with
> VMWare on Windows 2000. For some reason I cannot get ntpd to sync time with
> my Linux machine that is a time server. Several people have tried to help
> on this forum,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 02 February 2002 06:11 am, James Pifer wrote:
> What does work is if I stop ntpd and run "ntpdate 192.168.1.2". I know
> this isn't pretty, but is there a way I can schedule that process to
> run every so often? Every 5 minutes, 60 minute
That worked! Thanks!
-Scott
Gerry Doris wrote:
>
> Try commenting out the multiclassclient line in /etc/ntp.conf and
> restarting ntpd. You may be able to get the ntp host to supply time to
> your second box.
>
> Gerry
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Scott Sharkey wrote:
>
> > I've got 7.2 worki
Try commenting out the multiclassclient line in /etc/ntp.conf and
restarting ntpd. You may be able to get the ntp host to supply time to
your second box.
Gerry
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Scott Sharkey wrote:
> I've got 7.2 working just the way you described. I had to open up
> UDP port 123 throu
-
> From: Scott Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ntp on 7.2
>
>
> Bret Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 07:47, Scott Sharkey wrote:
> > > I've got 7.2 wo
IS the daemon actually running? :>)
I got the same before I kicked off the daemon.
j
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntp on 7.2
Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002
Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 07:47, Scott Sharkey wrote:
> > I've got 7.2 working just the way you described. I had to open up
> > UDP port 123 throught the firewall, and it just works.
> >
> > My problem is that I can't then have my other linux boxen get the
> > time from the nt
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 07:47, Scott Sharkey wrote:
> I've got 7.2 working just the way you described. I had to open up
> UDP port 123 throught the firewall, and it just works.
>
> My problem is that I can't then have my other linux boxen get the
> time from the ntp server. ntpdate gives somethin
I've got 7.2 working just the way you described. I had to open up
UDP port 123 throught the firewall, and it just works.
My problem is that I can't then have my other linux boxen get the
time from the ntp server. ntpdate gives something about
"no suitable servers found".
Any ideas, anyone?
On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 13:20, Gordon Charrick wrote:
> I'm starting to use 7.2 on some servers and I'm having trouble getting ntp
> working. I'm trying to make one of these new servers the main server for
> the subnet and I have the following in /etc/ntp.conf
>
> server ntp.ourconcord.net
> serv
Mike wrote:
> I use ntp from a CRON command line every 6 hours. It leaves a trail in
> /var/spool/mail/root
>
It is a little puzzling what you are doing here. NTP is a daemon, and
should remain running once started, unless there is a problem.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Hug
Try 'ntptrace' or 'ntptrace FQDN' or 'ntptrace 192.168.1.1'
On Sunday 18 November 2001 01:36 am, you wrote:
> Hi Bret
>
> I use ntp from a CRON command line every 6 hours. It leaves a trail in
> /var/spool/mail/root
>
>
> Mike
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Mike wrote:
> I use ntp from a CRON command line every 6 hours. It leaves a trail in
> /var/spool/mail/root
>
It is a little puzzling what you are doing here. NTP is a daemon, and
should remain running once started, unless there is a problem.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Hug
Hi Bret
I use ntp from a CRON command line every 6 hours. It leaves a trail in
/var/spool/mail/root
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Bret Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 18 November 2001 21:55
To: redhat-list
Subject: ntp status
Is there anyway to determine whether or no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 25 November 2001 01:43 am, Matthew Simpson wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I really need this for standalone, off site
> Win2k machines. Heres the scenario:
>
>
> User dials into there ISP (using Win98 or 2k)
> Sets time via NT
Hi Matt:
Try Dimension 4 (http://www.thinkman.com/dimension4/index.html) its free
and it seems to work well for me on Win95 & WinNT.
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Simpson Sent: Saturday, Novem
Hi Tony,
Thanks for your reply. I really need this for standalone, off site
Win2k machines. Heres the scenario:
User dials into there ISP (using Win98 or 2k)
Sets time via NTP server
Rsync runs pulling data from our server
Logs out
Setting the time is very important for rsync use and it is a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Matthew Simpson wrote:
>We really require a command line ntp tool that we can simply use in a
>DOS batch file much like the "ntpdate" program in the unix ntpd
>package. Any clues?
Does is really *have* to be NTP? If you have a
Hi,
We really require a command line ntp tool that we can simply use in a
DOS batch file much like the "ntpdate" program in the unix ntpd
package. Any clues?
Matt
>Matthew Simpson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can anyone recommend a good ntp client for Windows? Nothing fancy,
>> just commandline w
Matt,
I had trouble with Atomic Timesync hitting my Linux 7.0 NTP server, but it
sounds like others have it working ok. Someone else on this forum told me
about Automachron. It works great and can be found here:
http://www.oneguycoding.com/
HTH,
James
At 10:01 AM 11/21/2001 +1100, you wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Matthew Simpson wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good ntp client for Windows? Nothing fancy,
> just commandline would be great?
You may already know this, but Windows includes a command line utility
that can set the time from any other Windows machine or from a Samba
server
Matthew Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone recommend a good ntp client for Windows? Nothing fancy,
> just commandline would be great?
>
> Thx
We use Tardis or it's variant K9
Bret
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redh
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Matthew Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone recommend a good ntp client for Windows? Nothing fancy,
> just commandline would be great?
You haven't said which version of Windows. 2K server has a built in client,
Atomic Timesync from AnalogX.com works well as a GUI one..
Hi Keith,
> I just got an odd request and haven't been able to come up with a link
> yet. I'm trying to find a rpm based package for ntp that would work with
> RH 5.0. Hopefully somebody will know of or have an archive of said
> application. Many thanks if you can help.
Have
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Keith Morse wrote:
>
> I just got an odd request and haven't been able to come up with a link
> yet. I'm trying to find a rpm based package for ntp that would work with
> RH 5.0. Hopefully somebody will know of or have an archive of said
> application. Many thanks if you
Devon wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 18 November 2001 07:33 am, Devon wrote:
>
> > I believe /sbin/ntpq -p will do the trick.
> >
> > [root@enigma root]# ntpq -p
> > remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
> > jitter ==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 November 2001 07:33 am, Devon wrote:
> I believe /sbin/ntpq -p will do the trick.
>
> [root@enigma root]# ntpq -p
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
> jitter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 18 November 2001 03:55 am, Bret Hughes wrote:
> Is there anyway to determine whether or not a redhat7.1 box is synced
> to a timeserver via ntp? I can see the daemon running via ps of course
> but I can't find a way to tell if it is current
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Does the Denver clock have an IP address , so I can set my router to
> it?
>
> Brian
Not a good idea. or at least bad etiquite. Find a close stratum 2
server and sync to it. in the /usr/doc/xntp... directory the docs
describe why. Also take a look at.
http:/
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, David Talkington wrote:
> Can anyone shed light on this? This is a freshly compiled version of
> NTP from ntp.org. The "bind()" error is the one of interest; I get
> the same thing with the stock Red Hat xntpd. Netstat confirms that
> port 123 is clear, so that's not the pr
87 matches
Mail list logo
