John Hinton wrote:
I'm finding a bit more, but still am at a loss. It seems that ld is
either also upgraded during my mess session. (this has been a few
weeks ago and I forgot exactly what all I did) This was when I
upgraded to glibc 2.3 i386 instead of glibc 2.3 i686 and have since
gone back
I'm finding a bit more, but still am at a loss. It seems that ld is
either also upgraded during my mess session. (this has been a few weeks
ago and I forgot exactly what all I did) This was when I upgraded to
glibc 2.3 i386 instead of glibc 2.3 i686 and have since gone back to
glibc 2.2 i686 an
What did you do to fix it? Cause I think I did the same thing :-P
Thanks
--
Joe Giles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AOL: mcigiles
---
Registered Linux User #264910 http://counter.li.org
---
Greg Bell said:
>
>>Hello, I know this is an easy question, not much of a challenge, but...I
>>am going to up
Aeryn wrote:
Hello, I know this is an easy question, not much of a challenge, but...I am
going to update on my linux server the Glibc from 2.2 to 2.3. Does anybody
know of any issues I may face with this upgrade? I am using the Glibc 2.3
rpm to do the upgrade.
Don't try to use the i386 rpm if you
console if I was to go to the
building where the server is ?
many thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Bartlett
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: glibc compilation--Help needed!
>
you upgrading from?
Jon
>
> Thanks
> LISa
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Bartlett
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: glibc compilation
>
>
> Is
.
Thanks
LISa
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Bartlett
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: glibc compilation
Is there a reason you are compiling glibc? I've always put that on my
official &
Hi Lisa,
> I'm doing it as a last resort as I'm having problems with java threads using up
> a lot of memory. The glib that I had didn't have the linuxthreads added onto
> it, so I downloaded a newer glibc with the linuxthreads add-on and that's why
> I'm trying to recompile it .
Note that glib
;s why I'm trying to recompile it .
thanks for your help
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jonathan Bartlett
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: glibc compilation
Is there a reason you are compiling glibc? I
Is there a reason you are compiling glibc? I've always put that on my
official "bad idea" list because of how intrusive it is.
It looks like the file is missing an #include statement.
Jon
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa Ryan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am configuring glibc-2.2. When I do a mak, I get the fol
Updating glibc*-2.3.2-27.9.i386.rpm on an i686 or Athlon system seems to
be a common way of killing a system... and by some reports it may even
happen if you're using up2date.
Here are some interesting threads on the topic:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/archive/5/2003/05/4/57607
http:/
epkgs --replacefiles
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/9/en/os/i686/glibc-2.3.2-27.9.i686.rpm
That's all!!!
- Original Message -
From: "Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:46 PM
s.
Pradeep
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Glibc update & dead redhat - HLLLPPP !!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:20:18 +0300, Alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:20:18 +0300, Alex wrote:
> Preparing...###
> [100%]
>1:glibc-common ### [
> 17%]
>2:glibc ###
)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Glibc update & dead redhat - HLLLPPP !!!
> start from redhat-cdrom into rescue-mode and install the last working
> version you got.
> maybe you have to use chroot to get
start from redhat-cdrom into rescue-mode and install the last working
version you got.
maybe you have to use chroot to get the paths right (i think --root is
the option).
yours josef
On Fri, 2003-07-11 at 14:20, Alex wrote:
> Preparing...###
Download your old rpm package and "rpm -ivh --force --allfiles x.rpm"
it should work.
Leo
Alex wrote:
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:glibc-common ### [
17%]
2:glibc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:54:14, Lancer wrote:
> I have a new install of AS 2.1 which I understand is based on RH 8.0 for RPM
> purposes. I have new RPMs which are dependent on libc.so.6 so I am trying to
> upgrade glibc. As shown below this seems to be
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 00:18, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:03:05AM +, David Holden wrote:
> > ok i'll try this. With regard to glibc updates from redhat network, I
> > think this should be in default list of things (i.e. with kernel) not to
> > automatically update.
>
> I disagr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 March 2003 07:18 pm, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:03:05AM +, David Holden wrote:
> > ok i'll try this. With regard to glibc updates from redhat network, I
> > think this should be in default list of things (i.e. with ke
On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:03:05AM +, David Holden wrote:
> ok i'll try this. With regard to glibc updates from redhat network, I
> think this should be in default list of things (i.e. with kernel) not to
> automatically update.
I disagree. When used with Red Hat applications, it does not cau
On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 02:56, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Edward Dekkers wrote:
> >>
> >>Well I can't do that now because it seems to have left my machine in a
> >>state where it has *two* glibc's and everything is now failing, can't
> >>even boot!
> >>
> >> Dave.
> >
> >
> > Bugger - I was going to t
Edward Dekkers wrote:
Well I can't do that now because it seems to have left my machine in a
state where it has *two* glibc's and everything is now failing, can't
even boot!
Dave.
Bugger - I was going to tell you after your original post not to mess with
this. Glibc is so vital to system operatio
> > What happens when you try to do an update with Ximian RedCarpet? Same
> > thing?
>
>
> Well I can't do that now because it seems to have left my machine in a
> state where it has *two* glibc's and everything is now failing, can't
> even boot!
>
> Dave.
Bugger - I was going to tell you after y
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 12:00, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 22:54, David Holden wrote:
> > Hi, trying to "up2date" a RH7.2 system glibc and I get the following
> > failure
> > up2date glibc
> > /usr/bin/python: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version `GLIBC_PRIVATE' not found
> > (required by /lib
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 22:54, David Holden wrote:
> Hi, trying to "up2date" a RH7.2 system glibc and I get the following
> failure
> up2date glibc
> /usr/bin/python: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: version `GLIBC_PRIVATE' not found
> (required by /lib/i686/libc.so.6)
> anyone know what this is about.
>
> Dave
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ashe
> Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 8:32 AM
> To: Robert Canary
> Subject: Re: Glibc updates killing MySql
>
>
> Hello Robert,
>
> Saturday, December 7, 2002, 11:18:32 AM, you textually ora
Hello Robert,
Saturday, December 7, 2002, 11:18:32 AM, you textually orated:
RC> The last Glibc updates killed connections to MySql.
Actually, the "last" glibc updates were specifically released to fix that
problem. ;)
RC> Anyone know yet if the new updates have the same issues? Or will we
R
It has been standard practice with Red Hat as long as I have been using
linux (MKLinux DR3 was my first distro - and that was Red Hat 5.1 except
with the Mach 3 mikrokernel and ppc binaries) to create a package
containing just the stuff the user needs to use the software (binary,
config files, docu
Hi,
The reason the program didn't compile had something to do with
bzip2. If I installed the rpm bzip2-development it worked like
a charm... same thing if I downloaded the bzip2 source code
and compiled that. I think it's stupid that the bzip2-development
package wasn't installed in the first plac
Hi,
My problems are now addressed to the source code of the
software I tried to compile, so I guess it's not really glibc's
fault. But I'll keep my eyes open! :-)
Thanks for all your answers.
/dahonk
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https:/
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:31:40 +0100, Rikard Bostrom wrote:
>
>> I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages
>> there is to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I
>> try to compile certain
>> programs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:31:40 +0100, Rikard Bostrom wrote:
> I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages
> there is to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I
> try to compile certain
> programs. I used to run
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 15:31, Rikard Bostrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages there is
> to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I try to compile
> certain
> programs. I used to run Slackware 8.1, and all programs compiled fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:04:06 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
> I can't get glibc-devel to install because of missing dependencies.
>
> The problem is that it complains about kernel-headers package
> required, but there is no kernel-headers in the 7.3 dis
Hello Martín,
Thursday, November 7, 2002, 3:04:06 PM, you textually orated:
MM> I can't get glibc-devel to install because of missing dependencies.
MM> The problem is that it complains about kernel-headers package required, but
MM> there is no kernel-headers in the 7.3 distribution.
MM> How do
On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 23:09, Mike Burger wrote:
> Is anyone else noticing problems with threaded, internet related programs
> crashing, lately?
Yep. It's related to this:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75128
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-req
Ernest E. Vogelsinger wrote:
>on my box (RH 7.2 SMP), rpm -q --whatrequires glibc returns:
>timeconfig-3.2.2-1
>authconfig-4.1.19.2-1
>ppp-2.4.1-3
>kdenetwork-2.2.2-1
>glibc-devel-2.2.4-30
>There doesn't seem to be a kernel-live-module that requires glibc.
>That also makes sense, IMHO. As it se
Dave Warchol,
On Friday March 01, 2002 03:39, you said something about:
> Brian:
> Yes, I did download glibc-common. When I try to install glic-common first,
> I get conflicts.
>
> > [root@hclxtstest01 rh70_errata]# rpm -Fvh glibc*.rpm
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > glibc-common = 2
Brian:
Yes, I did download glibc-common. When I try to install glic-common first, I get
conflicts.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/01/02 03:27PM >>>
Dave Warchol,
On Friday March 01, 2002 03:16, you said something about:
> Hello:
> I am trying to apply glibc errata
> (glibc-2.2.4-18.7.
Dave Warchol,
On Friday March 01, 2002 03:16, you said something about:
> Hello:
> I am trying to apply glibc errata
> (glibc-2.2.4-18.7.0.3.i386.rpm and
> glibc-devel-2.2.4-18.7.0.3.i386.rpmglibc-2.1.92-14), when I do
> I get:
>
> [root@hclxtstest01 rh70_errata]# rpm -Fvh glibc*.rp
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dominic Mitchell wrote:
>
> >I am running RH6.2 with all updates applied. I have just updated
> >the new glibc packages. Since then I have seen Netscape crash
> >with a bus error very frequently. Am I the only one to have
> >observe this pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
>I am running RH6.2 with all updates applied. I have just updated
>the new glibc packages. Since then I have seen Netscape crash with
>a bus error very frequently. Am I the only one to have observe
>this problem?
No, you'r
"Ken Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I need to install MySQL, latest version 3.23.36.
> > >
> > > MySQL server installs ok but MySQL client fails with
> > > dependancies for glibc.so.6 and libpthread.so.0
> >
> > Where did you get it? Bear in mind that if it's compiled on
> > Red Hat Li
> > I need to install MySQL, latest version 3.23.36.
> >
> > MySQL server installs ok but MySQL client fails with
> > dependancies for glibc.so.6 and libpthread.so.0
>
> Where did you get it? Bear in mind that if it's compiled on
> Red Hat Linux 6.x or 7.x, it won't run on 5.x.
sourceforge, sta
"Ken Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello All,
>
> I have a production server RH 5.2, standard kernel, 2.0.36.
> This unfortunately cannot change (at least for now).
>
> I need to install MySQL, latest version 3.23.36.
>
> MySQL server installs ok but MySQL client fails with
> dependanci
Jeffrey A Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Trond Eivind Glomsr?d ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Jeffrey A Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Hi, I've run into a bit of a problem. I'm trying to make an NFS server
> > > on a RH 6.2 box running a 2.4.x kernel. Problem is
* Trond Eivind Glomsr?d ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Jeffrey A Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi, I've run into a bit of a problem. I'm trying to make an NFS server
> > on a RH 6.2 box running a 2.4.x kernel. Problem is I can't move > 2GB
> > files over NFS. I think I've tracked
Jeffrey A Schoolcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I've run into a bit of a problem. I'm trying to make an NFS server
> on a RH 6.2 box running a 2.4.x kernel. Problem is I can't move > 2GB
> files over NFS. I think I've tracked the problem down to being glibc.
>
> If this is the case, h
Michael George wrote:
> >
> > It's very strange! When i use the command rpm -q
> > glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM to see if its really installed,
> > the message say NO.
>
> That's because the package is "glibc" not "glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM". The *file*
> is "glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM", the *package* is "glibc
I sure like that favorite of yours 'rpm -qa | sort | less'..
That is neat!
Thanks for passing that along. I made a note of it in my book and hope to
compile a listing of all the 'neat' favourite commands that people use..
Thanks again..
On Thursday 01 February 2001 00:32, you wrote:
> Mich
Ted Gervais wrote:
> I sure like that favorite of yours 'rpm -qa | sort | less'..
> That is neat!
>
> Thanks for passing that along. I made a note of it in my book and hope to
> compile a listing of all the 'neat' favourite commands that people use..
>
Glad you liked it. I supect that I got it
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:04:01PM +0100, Joel Cordonnier wrote:
> OK ! it seems to work, ONLY when you use the command
> rpm -Uvh glibc-* which reference 2 packages
> glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM AND
> glibc-common-2.2-12.i386.RPM.
>
> BUT BUT BUT
>
> It's very strange! When i use the command rpm
OK ! it seems to work, ONLY when you use the command
rpm -Uvh glibc-* which reference 2 packages
glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM AND
glibc-common-2.2-12.i386.RPM.
BUT BUT BUT
It's very strange! When i use the command rpm -q
glibc-2.2-12.i686.RPM to see if its really installed,
the message say NO.
Bu
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Joel Cordonnier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm a newbie with Linux. I just install RedHat 7.0,
> and I want to do some development with java and..!?
>
> It appear that I can't use any JDK tool because of a
> bug in the library glibc-2.1..
>
> I try to replace my RPM package glibc-2
On 17 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > linux:~#rpm -U glibc-2.2-12.i386.rpm
> > error: failed dependencies:
> > glibc-common = 2.2 is needed by glibc-2.2-12
> > /usr/bin/getent is needed by stunnel-3.10-2
> >
> > linux:~#rpm -
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Burger
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: glibc update?
On 17 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can anyone explain the following to me? I was
Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 17 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> > Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Can anyone explain the following to me? I was able to update glibc-devel,
> > > with no problems, using up2date...but up2date won't update glibc
> > > i
On 17 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Can anyone explain the following to me? I was able to update glibc-devel,
> > with no problems, using up2date...but up2date won't update glibc
> > itself,
>
> It asks whether it should skip them or not..
Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone explain the following to me? I was able to update glibc-devel,
> with no problems, using up2date...but up2date won't update glibc
> itself,
It asks whether it should skip them or not... just don't skip them,
and it will do this update.
> so
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 08:34:12PM -0400, Statux wrote:
[...]
>
> I've heard nothing but complaints about RH7 (therefore, I'm sticking with
> RH6.2).
The usual policy: Go for the RH x.2 releases... ;-)
Cheerio,
Thomas
--
"Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"
> > What version of glibc comes with redhat 7?
glibc-2.1.92
> I've heard nothing but complaints about RH7 (therefore, I'm sticking with
> RH6.2).
I think it is the best release I've ever used. I've been using it for
two months on a couple dozen machines without problems. I was evaluating
rawhi
> What version of glibc comes with redhat 7?
To be completely honest, checking the ftp servers yourself would probably
be much faster than asking a mailing list.. well it would be :)
No, I don't know which version comes with it, sorry :)
I've heard nothing but complaints about RH7 (therefore, I
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:55:52PM -0400, Thomas Porter wrote:
> I just did the security upgrade to glibc 2.1.3 and all my threaded java apps are
>cratering with thread related exceptions or going into loops and sucking up 98% of
>the cpu. These include Bluej, ArgoUML, and TogetherJ Whiteboard
try http://rpmfind.net or ftp://ftp.redhat.com
Hello Michael McLeod (On 07/22/00,7:11pm,you wrote Re: glibc: 2.1.2)
MM> I want to up grade glibc: 2.1.1 to glibc: 2.1.2 so I can use Wine on RH
MM> 6.0. I can't seem to find the RPM can someone please point me to a site
MM> wh
I am curious when I read these kinds of messages. "I've got this really
old thing, that I want to use with the latest whatever. But I don't want
to upgrade my old thing, just screw on some sort of adapter so it will work
with the new gadget." And I always wonder, why? A full system upgrade is
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Adv. Systems Design wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I have a redhat 4.2 system and don't really want to
> upgrade to 6.2 if I can help it, but wish to install
> MySQL (latest, which reportedly requires Linux 2.0+
> with LinuxThreads 0.7.1 or glibc 2.0.7). Does anybody
> know if I can just
>I have check the file that causes problem:
>/usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/America/Tijuana
>a listing ofthe directory gives :
>...
>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 758 Apr 18 19:03 Thunder_Bay
>br-S-wsr-- 2 3962210500133, 120 Feb 3 2035 Tijuana
>-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
I have check the file that causes problem:
/usr/share/zoneinfo/posix/America/Tijuana
a listing ofthe directory gives :
...
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 758 Apr 18 19:03 Thunder_Bay
br-S-wsr-- 2 3962210500133, 120 Feb 3 2035 Tijuana
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 73 Ap
I'd guess that the problem is either permissions -- as others have
suggested -- or possibly disk space. Are you running low on space?
-Original Message-
From: ryo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, April 23, 1998 10:01
Subject
According to Richard Belanger:
>
> check your file permissions. One or more of the files may be read only.
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:47:10 +0100 (BST) ryo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> >On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Eric Wood wrote:
> >
> >> ryo wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I am despairatly trying to ins
check your file permissions. One or more of the files may be read only.
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:47:10 +0100 (BST) ryo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Eric Wood wrote:
>
>> ryo wrote:
>> >
>> > I am despairatly trying to install glibc-2.0.7, I have updated all
>the rpm
>> > me
On 23-Apr-98 ryo wrote:
> I am despairatly trying to install glibc-2.0.7, I have updated all the
> rpm
> mentionned on the redhat's general errata page.
>
> I have managed to install the glibc-devel-2.0.7-7 package but the other
> one tells me:
>
> [root@pcpl55 rpm]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.0.7-7.i386
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Eric Wood wrote:
> ryo wrote:
> >
> > I am despairatly trying to install glibc-2.0.7, I have updated all the rpm
> > mentionned on the redhat's general errata page.
> >
> > I have managed to install the glibc-devel-2.0.7-7 package but the other
> > one tells me:
> >
> > [r
ryo wrote:
>
> I am despairatly trying to install glibc-2.0.7, I have updated all the rpm
> mentionned on the redhat's general errata page.
>
> I have managed to install the glibc-devel-2.0.7-7 package but the other
> one tells me:
>
> [root@pcpl55 rpm]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.0.7-7.i386.rpm
> glibc
On 9 Apr 1998 09:55:25 -0700, Ed Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Running glibc-2.0.6-9 on an RH 5 system with errata installed. When
>upgrading to any of the new errata rpm's (glibc) including using the
>texinfo upgrade I am
>unable to login without reverting to 2.0.6-9 and texinfo-3.9.7. Error
76 matches
Mail list logo
