Words by Rhugga [Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:24:45AM -0700]:
>
> What is the latest and greatest USENET news server software out there?
> (free and open source orf course)
>
> Thx
> -Chuck
>
Diablo:
http://www.openusenet.org/diablo/
--
Jose Celestino | http://xpto.org/~japc/files/japc-pgpkey.as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:24:45 -0700, Rhugga wrote:
> What is the latest and greatest USENET news server software out there?
> (free and open source orf course)
Questions like that don't make much sense. You could search a
directory like http://freshm
Just to butt in with something that might be worth considering:
I use RocketMail (http://www.rocketmail.com) for my "public face" in the
email world with exactly the setup that Eric describes (filtering to
different mailboxes with spam filtering added) ... works a treat,
although a web-based emai
Roger Hockney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with Tom, overloading my mail system with unwanted threads is
> more of a problem than spam ever has been.
Any halfway-decent MUA should be able to both sort your email so that
your mailing lists end up in separate mailboxes, and show them to you
Roger Hockney on Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 10:38:23AM +0100:
> I agree with Tom, overloading my mail system with unwanted threads is
> more of a problem than spam ever has been.
This is what thread-aware news and mail clients are for. Use them.
Slrn, or mutt, respectively, are examples.
> It's obvio
Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD wrote:
>
>> This list has been awesome, but the volume is great and thought it would more
>efficient to access in Usenet form.
>>
>> Is this forum echoed in a Usenet newsgroup as well ?
>
I agree with Tom, overlo
>We don't have Spamford anymore; haven't you heard about the lawsuits? :)
Just over two weeks ago I quit all vger.rutgers.edu lists because of spam
messages coming in from that site. Toward the end I was getting as many as
three or four at a time. I found it interesting that of all the spam mai
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Larry Lade wrote:
>
>
> Tom Diehl wrote:
>
> > of SPAM. We used to get alot more when the lists were open, now I rarely see
> > that junk on the lists. The Linux lists at vger.rutgers.edu went through
> > this discussion a while back and once they ceased being gated the Sp
Tom Diehl wrote:
> of SPAM. We used to get alot more when the lists were open, now I rarely see
> that junk on the lists. The Linux lists at vger.rutgers.edu went through
> this discussion a while back and once they ceased being gated the Spam
> went to near ZERO. As long as we have Spamford an
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, grt wrote:
> On 26 Apr 98, at 23:04, Tom Diehl wrote:
> > NO!! I hope it never does. If they do here comes yet even MORE Spam. At
> > least now the spam comes from list members. Get Procmail and set it up or
> > subscribe to the digest version if it is too much. Redhat does h
On 26 Apr 98, at 23:04, Tom Diehl wrote:
> NO!! I hope it never does. If they do here comes yet even MORE Spam. At
> least now the spam comes from list members. Get Procmail and set it up or
> subscribe to the digest version if it is too much. Redhat does have a news
> server but I have been assur
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD wrote:
> This list has been awesome, but the volume is great and thought it would more
>efficient to access in Usenet form.
>
> Is this forum echoed in a Usenet newsgroup as well ?
NO!! I hope it never does. If they do here comes yet even MORE Spam
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Michael Hatzakis, Jr MD wrote:
> This list has been awesome, but the volume is great and thought it would more
>efficient to access in Usenet form.
>
> Is this forum echoed in a Usenet newsgroup as well ?
>
> Mike
I don't know about that, but check at www.findmail.com, w
13 matches
Mail list logo
