http://ltp.sourceforge.net/tooltable.php
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 16:28, nishu bhutani wrote:
> hi,
>
> what are the tools available to run stress/performance tests
> for memory, disk and ethernet?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> __
> Do you
Robert Denton wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to set up a system in linux. One area in which I am
> having difficulty is performance monitoring. What I would like to do is
> collect perf counters at 15 sec intervals throughout the day and then have
> them emailed to me in a log in the evenings. A
Hi,
If you like the result format of sar, why don't you use it ?
You can automate the reports easily with the cron and one or two perl
scripts.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Veeraraju_Mareddi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Su
Placed At :
Please help me to find out how to find out the version og NFS on my system..!!
RCPathak
--
> Sun has stopped supporting solaris on intel...
Ahhh, I guess I missed the point that your Solaris box wasn't a Sun.
> Spe
Here is another open-source tool that might be interesting: RRDtool
It's a Round Robin Database that stores and displays time-series data
for network bandwidth etc..
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/index.html
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Werner Puschitz wrote:
>
> Try netsaint at
> ht
Try netsaint at
http://netsaint.sourceforge.net/
or Multi Router Traffic Grapher (MRTG) at
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/
Here are some pictures
http://www.stat.ee.ethz.ch/mrtg/
Or you could use Tivoli. At my work, we have Tivoli running everywhere and
it's extremely powerful.
Try Netsaint at...
netsaint.sourceforge.net
You can use it to monitor al of your systems. I even use it to monitor my
NT and 2000 boxes.
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:45 AM
To: RedHat List
Subject: Performance monitori
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Having a look at hdparm definitely might give your system a boost. Probably
> just enabling (U)DMA helps a lot (hdparm -d /dev/hda). (On my system it
> increases the speed of disk reads from 4 MB/s to 35 MB/s!) I have noticed that
> when using DMA other options do
Sticking to the parts I know about ... Swap for a small system running "x"
probably best at a minimum of 128m. can be in multiple partitions or one.
(or try a file for swap,, especially if testing or running out of memory
and no time for repartitioning... can even be added without rebooting, b
Hi du,
> I know that I should have a look at "hdparm", but before I start fooling
> around with this I request you for other (maybe less critical) solution
> to my problem.
Having a look at hdparm definitely might give your system a boost. Probably
just enabling (U)DMA helps a
ce addition.
Mike
hello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@redhat.com on 11/27/2000
01:08:38 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Performance
brian davison schrieb:
> More details will be needed for a diagnosis.
> What t
brian davison schrieb:
> More details will be needed for a diagnosis.
> What type of install was done? (workstation, server, custom? )
I choosed the "workstation" option.
>
> what are the partition sizes, and arrangement.? One big partition, or
> several.
Filesystem 1k-blocks U
More details will be needed for a diagnosis.
What type of install was done? (workstation, server, custom? )
what are the partition sizes, and arrangement.? One big partition, or
several. How big is the swap partition?
to what are you comparing the speed of this operating system?
The
Hi Edward,
I know this doesn't directly answer your question... but...
Have you thought of using samba? If you are looking for Win/Linux
connectivity, there is no equal. You may even get performance increases over
NT (I did) and it allows for printer sharing as well.
If you are only after NFS a
Robert Fausey wrote:
> > Telnet it, and run "top". Press "shift+M", and top will resort
> > processes by memory use, big processes on top, on its next refresh. Now
> > that you can monitor memory use... Log in to X. Do your thing, but
> > keep an eye on that telnet terminal, and look for somet
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> Robert Fausey wrote:
>> I have a quad pentium with 4 gigs of ram with 2 gigs of swap space
>> running 6.1 with a kernel patch to recognize the 4G. I don't know
>> what patch was made, I didn't do it. When you log onto the console X
>> runs REALLY
post your "free" results.
did you tune proc (buffermem, etc) any?
how many different swap partitions did you make?
and if you can find out that patch's name that would really help.
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Robert Fausey wrote:
> I have a quad pentium with 4 gigs of ram with 2 gigs of swap spac
My understanding is that the current KDE is NOT multi-thread aware.
This, of course, means that you can have 64 processors but only one will
be used. The next MAJOR number release should fix this...
DL
--
The Linux C Mailing Lists Have Moved
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe
The Linu
I sent this from the wrong machine yesterday, and it didn't make it
through...
Robert Fausey wrote:
> I have a quad pentium with 4 gigs of ram with 2 gigs of swap space
> running 6.1 with a kernel patch to recognize the 4G. I don't know
> what patch was made, I didn't do it. When you log onto t
Try swapoff'ing it and running xterm. If the problem still exists, it's most
likely network lag. If it fixes the problem, try deleting the partition, making two
1GB ones in its place, and mkswap'ing and swapon'ing them. Don't forget to change the
/etc/fstab entries to reflect the change.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Isaiah Weiner wrote:
> > I have a quad pentium with 4 gigs of ram with 2 gigs of swap space
> > running 6.1 with a kernel patch to recognize the 4G. I don't know
> > what patch was made, I didn't do it. When you log onto the console X runs
> > REALLY slow ( 5 seconds to clo
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 04:12:08PM -0500, Robert Fausey wrote:
> I have a quad pentium with 4 gigs of ram with 2 gigs of swap space
> running 6.1 with a kernel patch to recognize the 4G. I don't know
> what patch was made, I didn't do it. When you log onto the console X runs
> REALLY slow ( 5 se
> I have a quad pentium with 4 gigs of ram with 2 gigs of swap space
> running 6.1 with a kernel patch to recognize the 4G. I don't know
> what patch was made, I didn't do it. When you log onto the console X runs
I don't know the answer but with hardware like that you don't deserve one :)
I'm
* Paul Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> A couple of questions and an FYI:
>
> Does anyone know of a web site (not www.specbench.org) or other
> information source that can help me evaluate the performance
> differences between Linux 2.2.14 and FreeBSD 3.4?
>
> Dates when Intel-bas
24 matches
Mail list logo
