El Jue 11 Sep 2003 09:50, Peram's List escribió:
> Hi,
> Im looking to setup a mail server. I'd appreciate if you can let me know
> what are all the software that I need to know to set up an IMAP/POP
> server. I have the option of setting up Exchange but I dont want to do
> that, I'm looking for a
etc...
Great Stuff.
Gavin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Kuhn
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 16:29, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> &g
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 16:29, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> >From memory you can just type IMAP instead of POP3 there? Or am I
> misunderstanding your question?
> ---
> Edward Dekkers (Director)
Depends on the version of Outlook Express - most versions allow you to
choose an IMAP server along with heaps
alf Of Edward Dekkers
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3
> With regards IMAP, I did consider it, but how do I set up my outlook
> express clients to receive there mail using IMAP ?
> Under my clients O/Express-&
> With regards IMAP, I did consider it, but how do I set up my outlook
> express clients to receive there mail using IMAP ?
> Under my clients O/Express->Account settings->Connection->server
> types->incoming server: only "POP3" (PORT 110) option is availible
> Does IMAP also use port 110 ??
>From
n
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Russo
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail Server - Sendmail + IPOP3
Gavin Mellors wrote:
>Hi All
>
>I am managing a mail server (midterm newbie)
Gavin Mellors wrote:
Hi All
I am managing a mail server (midterm newbie).
Server is an Intel Brownsville m/board, 256K Ram.
Clients all using O/Express to get mail of POP server.
Previous version of Redhat 5.2 and 7.0; had a special user group "popuser".
When running userconf I could create my us
I like Postfix. Postfix is:
super-easy to configure
very secure (Wietse Venema is one of the security gurus)
supported by IBM
very, very fast
compatible with Sendmail alias files and command-line
Jon
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Christian Campbell wrote:
> I have intermediate experience with Linux
sendmail is great. it's what handles most of the world's mail and there's a
reason for it. configurability and security used to be issues with it, but
it's been solid for a long time now.
On February 28, 2003 01:55 pm, Christian Campbell wrote:
> I have intermediate experience with Linux. Eve
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:55:20PM -0500, Christian Campbell wrote:
> I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers.
> I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as
> our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or
>
> Christian Campbell wrote:
> | I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers.
> | I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world
as
> | our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use
> postfix or
> | sendmail (or something else).
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 12:55, Christian Campbell wrote:
> I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as
> our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or
> sendmail (or something else). Anyone have any pros/cons to either of these?
Either/or
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 01:55:20PM -0500, Christian Campbell wrote:
> I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers.
> I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as
> our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix or
>
You'll get lots of advise. I like sendmail. It's easy to configure too.
You can use Webmin also to make it even easier. You can cut down on spam
by using rbl's and/or add SpamAssassin.
<>
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 13:55, Christian Campbell wrote:
> I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even les
Christian Campbell said:
> I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers.
> I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as
> our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use postfix
> or sendmail (or something else). Anyone have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Campbell wrote:
| I have intermediate experience with Linux. Even less with mail servers.
| I'm running a RedHat 8 server that needs to accept mail from the world as
| our primary mailserver. I'm debating as to whether I should use
postfix o
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:58, tugsuu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need a mail server virus scanning software. We use a SIMS(Sun
> Internet Mail Server) on Solaris 7 on Intel platform. I have tryed
> several virus scanning software for Solaris 7. But all of them are for
> Solaris on sparc paltform.
On Monday 13 January 2003 07:00 am, you wrote:
>
> In short, yes you should install and use them all. They compliment each
> other.
>
> Gerry
Thank you. Since installing MailScanner less than 24 hours ago, it has
already been working hard.
I will install Razor and Spamassassin.
Irwin
--
> RH7.2, kernel-2.4.18-19.7, sendmail-8.11.6-3
>
> I installed MailScanner and F-Prot from the rpm's, and it seemed to go
> without any problem. Here is what I don't understand.
>
> Razor, spamsassassin, and MailScanner all seem to check for spam. Are
> they different and should all be used? If
On Sunday 12 January 2003 12:33 pm, you wrote:
~
> I suggest that you make sure you have your mail server working properly.
> Next install razor and then spamsassassin. Those should go in very easily.
> This will take care of flagging spam. Next you should check out
> MailScanner.
>
> Mai
Mailscanner - www.mailscanner.info You need your own Antivirus (e.g.,
Sophos, McAfee, F-Prot, etc). It also does SPAM.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Michael George
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
I have found that using Exiscan with Exim as well as the Sophie/Sophos
Antivirus combination on the relays has been a wonderful tool to stop
this virus menance. As well as using Spamassassin as a tool is wonderful
but I don't know how well Razor works anymore it used to be a big thing
but its now s
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Michael George wrote:
> I have a friend who has asked me to help them replace the Windoze2000 server
> in their office with a Linux system. While they aren't using 2000 as a mail
> server, they will be with Linux. They asked me about virus scanning incoming
> email on the se
EW> - fetchmail on the Linux system gets the mail from the ISP. I
EW> schedule
EW> this via cron.
EW> - MTA (sendmail in my case)
EW> - Fetchmail can automatically kick things over to sendmail
EW> - Sendmail automatically runs procmail
EW> - Procmail does my filter
> I'm not set on how to achieve dial on demand functionality. Might pick up
on advice from Edward Dekkers to use a combination of wvdial and pppd,
although diald looks good in principle.
Like I said, don't get me wrong - I LOVE diald.
Just haven't been able to get it working on recent versions of
From: Gary [mailto:gary-list-redhat@;mygirlfriday.info]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 6:24 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote:
> Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeab
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote:
> Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to
>those of us who are trying to get up to speed.
>
> Now for the implementation phase.
Well, what did you finally select ?
Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to
those of us who are trying to get up to speed.
Now for the implementation phase.
Regards,
Roland Hill
#
This e-mail me
Do you have a static IP with your dial-up connection? You need a static
so that you can point the MX record for your domain to your Linux box.
(unless you are queing the mail somewhere else and sucking it downstream)
Once past this hurdle, it is pretty straight forward: Configure your MTA
to a
> -Diald to have dial on demand functionality with the modem
OK, every man and his dog has tackled your main problems, I'll tackle this
one.
I used diald way back on 5.2 and loved it. Upgraded to 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 and it
broke at every step and I had to change heaps of configuration. I haven't
manage
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote:
>
> Being a new user, I would appreciate if you could kick me in the right direction on
>the following issue.
> I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to
>receive email, filter the c
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote:
> My simple peer to peer network consists of 1 x RH7.3 box and 2 x Win98 boxes. SAMBA
>is configured and operational.
>
> I have a dial up, single account with my ISP. Simplistically, I would like to
>receive email, filter the content,
[Oops, in my first attempt at sending this I didn't use my subscribed
address. Second try...]
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:45:06AM +1300, Roland Hill wrote:
> -MTA (sendmail, postfix, qmail etc) to deliver
> [...]
> If some applications are more new user friendly than others then
> please advise.
senthil wrote:
Read the HOWtos of Fetchmail and Sendmail before u start off then it will be
easy !!
try also "man fetchmail", and look inside there for info on
fetchmailconf, a handy configuration utility.
Alan
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.co
what kind of mail box do u have ? looks like a IMAP box. If it is then based
in the message to header the mails can be parsed and delivered to local
mailboxes. The admin account you are mentioning is it having the access to
the entire IMAP account ? then this should be possible. Local parsing wil
If the suggestions below do not give you what you need, you can also do this
with sendmail.
http://www.sendmail.net/smfaq_virthost_b.shtml
On 10/24/02 6:24 AM, "aljuhani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it is possible. What you are doing is called a catch-all mail account
> that accept all ema
Yes it is possible. What you are doing is called a catch-all mail account
that accept all emails and forward them to one account "admin in your case".
You will need a software that access the admin account and download messages
and copy according to user to users folder. Fetchmail is a good s
> Is it possible?
> How?
look for fetchmail
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
trying to configure Gotmail so that I can pop my hotmail account.
thanks Daniel
regards
Krishna
Krishna Shekhar
Network Administrator
Wiplash.com
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 3:43 PM
Subje
u can try setting hostname in /etc/host and did you create the user on that
server?
is sendmail daemon active?
do a ps -ef | grep sendmail*
if no, then run sendmail -bd
- Original Message -
From: "Krishna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:06 PM
S
The original message was sent by daniel -
This message was intercepted by the Lee Enterprises e-mail filter software.
Lee Enterprises prohibits the use of its e-mail system for transmission of
SPAM. It is also the policy of Lee Enterprises that all electronic
communication shall exhibit the h
I concur with what Gordon has to say. I think that you may want to look into
that. I also feel that you would indeed find it easier to configure, aka minimal
work with another mail software such as Exim, Postfix or Qmail. They are much
easier to configure less work to maintain and great support
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 12:02, daniel wrote:
> | Why didn't you just install Redhat's pop3 server rpm (actually it's the
> | imap rpm). It the UW pop3 package and would have saved you the trouble of
> | building it and perhaps not including something needed?
>
> 'cause i'm "practicing" for a linux
dmail).
_
daniel a. g. quinn
starving programmer
understand that legal and illegal are political, and often arbitrary,
categorizations; use and abuse are medical, or clinical, distinctions.
- abbie hoffman
- Original Message -
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:30 PM
Subject: Re:
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 18:10, Gerry Doris wrote:
>
> I continue to see these claims that sendmail is insecure. However, I've
> yet to see anyone actually back this up. Would you please give me the
> details of why sendmail is insecure.
It's install SUID root (may not be true in future versions,
Greetings Brian,
I hope that you are well.
>
> Sendmail has NOTHING to do with mbx, maildirs or whatever you want to use.
> Sendmail is an MTA. That's a Mail Transfer Agent. All it does is get mail
> from server to server. If it has happened to arrive at the right one, then
> it passes
As I mentioned then you want to look at Uni of Washington's Imap server. You can
look thru' and the best way to compile it would be to compile it as RedHat
Linux 7.2 I don't think that 7.3 is that invariably different so as to choke the
compilation.
As I also mentioned that Sendmail is a sys
On 30 Jul 2002, Andy Schuler wrote:
> Since you're building your mail server from source why not look at qmail
> instead of sendmail? It has many advantages over sendmail, one of the
> major ones being security. There are some great step-by-step toasters
> out there for building qmail on a linux s
More power to you. Sendmail is a good product, but Postfix is much easier to set up,
and to be the admin of.
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:36:29 -0700
From: "daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: mail server from source saga continues
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 July 2002 05:24 pm, daniel wrote:
> these are my options for the build:
>
> lnx Linux with traditional passwords and crypt()
> lnp Linux with PAM
> lrh Redhat Linux 7.2
> lsu SuSE Linux
> s14 Linux using -lshadow to get the cr
jefferson
- Original Message -
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: mail server from source saga continues
| Well if we are building from scratch I would put in my vote for Exim,
having
| used it for a couple of large projects, I have found that its widely
maintained
|
Well if we are building from scratch I would put in my vote for Exim, having
used it for a couple of large projects, I have found that its widely maintained
and isn't sorry to say stagnant like Qmail is, there hasn't been a release of
Qmail past 1.03 I would say and that Exim has matured to 4.x
| Well, you might want to install the imap rpm and then turn on the pop3
| server just to see if it works. This is pretty simple and you can easily
| remove the package after testing.
|
| This should show you whether the problem is with the client config or
| whether you have a problem with the p
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 12:02, daniel wrote:
> 'cause i'm "practicing" for a linux build on a machine that won't be big
> enough for a redhat install. besides, i want to learn how to do things from
> source and not be dependant of pre-made packages. it breeds problems just
> like this one where i
> | Why didn't you just install Redhat's pop3 server rpm (actually it's
> the | imap rpm). It the UW pop3 package and would have saved you the
> trouble of | building it and perhaps not including something needed?
>
> 'cause i'm "practicing" for a linux build on a machine that won't be big
> eno
| Why didn't you just install Redhat's pop3 server rpm (actually it's the
| imap rpm). It the UW pop3 package and would have saved you the trouble of
| building it and perhaps not including something needed?
'cause i'm "practicing" for a linux build on a machine that won't be big
enough for a re
> so i managed to install sendmail
> and configure it properly (i hope)
> and then i went searching for pop3/imap daemons
> and decided on the university of washington's ipop3 server
> built it,
> installed it
>
> and here's the good news:
> i _can_ connect to the linux box from a windows box v
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000 12:38:43 Fred Edmister wrote:
>Just curious, I'm about to build a system that is going to be used
>for a
>mail server only. Is there any part of the setup that I can change that
>will make it so I don't have to go back into the config and take things
>back out? Also, what
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Fred Edmister wrote:
> Just curious, I'm about to build a system that is going to be used for a
> mail server only. Is there any part of the setup that I can change that
> will make it so I don't have to go back into the config and take things
> back out? Also, what would
-Original Message-
From: Fred Edmister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 11:51 AM
Subject: Mail server only...
> Just curious, I'm about to build a system that is going to be used for a
>mail server only. Is there any part
thanks sir you really give me an idea...
i hope i could make it work
--
> From: Eddie Strohmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mail server upgrade( sendmail 8.8.7 to 8.9.3 )...pls
help
> Date: Thursday, February 24, 2000 9:30 PM
>
www.bonwell.com
- Original Message -
From: Eddie Strohmier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: mail server upgrade( sendmail 8.8.7 to 8.9.3 )...pls help
> I assume your using sendmail 8.9.3 and was using
> i upgraded my mail server to version 6.1 from 5.2 (linux)
> i tried the same sendmail config ( sendmail.cf ) from my old server to the
> new one...
>
> we could send messages and our new mail server can receive and store
> incoming messages.
>
> but taking messages from the server gets
I assume your using sendmail 8.9.3 and was using 8.8.7 before? I would
venture to guess that your problem is that you have not included the names
of your machine in /etc/sendmail.cw. Add your domain name and any virtual
domains you may be running. This seems to be the most like cause for
sendmail
> But if they have an account on your machine, then they will not use
> aol and friends, they will use your server. And then they are
> supposed to use your server's name in their sender's address and not
> aol. What kind of relay problem do you forsee?
I could see this not being a problem if
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 03:38:40PM -0500, George Lenzer wrote:
> I just finished setting up a mail server for the first time. I am using
> POP3 and have disabled IMAP since I won't be using that. I have a domain
> name that is in the DNS system on the Internet. I have entered one of my
> hos
Portsentry isn't just for portscanning. The old-time method of
hacking into a machine involved/involves port surfing. Rather than
simply running a scanner, someone may simply try to telnet into a
series of specific ports. One reason one may wish to use your port 25
could be for email spoofing -
67 matches
Mail list logo
