Re: Kernel Modules

The modules are kept in: /lib/modules depending on what is given in the "EXTRAVERSION" label in the kernel "Makefile", will depend on what directory it's located under in /lib/modules. Once determining that, check under /lib/modules/2.4.1?-??? for the compiled modules. Michael From: [EMAIL

RE: kernel modules problem (bit long)

Try this. Make VFAT modular (not built-in) and then:- # make dep; make clean; make bzImage # make modules; make modules_install # cp /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2 (or something like that) Edit lilo.conf to point to vmlinuz-2.4.2 # lilo Reboot. Choose vmlinuz-2.4.2 at boot-t

RE: kernel modules

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: kernel modules I see your point. I kept the sound stuff in the kernel just in case I was going to add a sound card to the box. Since this is a server and there's no need for sound I might as well go ahead and remove the sound modules in question. I'd like to r

Re: kernel modules

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:04:17 -0700, you wrote: >Can anyone tell me how to correct the following error: >depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.16-3/misc/emu10k1.o >I compiled and installed a new kernel (2.2.16-3) using the following I built the 2.2.16-3 kernel by rebuilding the Red H

RE: kernel modules

Well, I was hoping I wouldn't have to recompile the kernel again, but oh well, here we go... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Juha Saarinen Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 8:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: kernel mo

RE: kernel modules

ing modules, wouldn't that make the kernel huge? Aren't there restrictions on how big your kernel can be? Thanks for your advice, BW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Statux Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 7:53 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: kernel modules

loader. -- Juha %-> -Original Message- %-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] %-> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Balazs Wellisch %-> Sent: Wednesday, 27 September 2000 2:36 p.m. %-> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] %-> Subject: RE: kernel modules %-> %-> %-> I meant there is no sound card

RE: kernel modules

> I meant there is no sound card in the box. But I'm not sure what that has to > do with my original question. I guess, I just don't understand what "depmod: > *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.16-3/misc/emu10k1.o" means. Could > you elaborate? Also what about the modules-info problem? Sh

RE: kernel modules

old kernel before I recompiled it. But I can't find a module-info-2.2.16-3 anywhere on my system. Should there be one? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] S

RE: kernel modules

On 27-Sep-2000 Balazs Wellisch wrote: > There's no sound card in this system so, no, there are no sound modules > loaded. Do you have a sound card in your box ?\ If you do then are you implying kernel 2.2.12-16 has no sound modules ? Larry<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

RE: kernel modules

There's no sound card in this system so, no, there are no sound modules loaded. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Statux Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Red Hat Development List Subject: Re: k

RE: kernel modules

You could try to make again following this order: make modules make install make modules_install > -Original Message- > From: Balazs Wellisch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Red Hat Development List > Subje

Re: kernel modules

Are the sound_core and sound modules loaded? On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Balazs Wellisch wrote: > Can anyone tell me how to correct the following error: > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.16-3/misc/emu10k1.o > > I compiled and installed a new kernel (2.2.16-3) using the following