gregory mott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >You wouldn't still have the *.mc file that produced that would you?
>
> my machine's doing the same.. here's mine.. make appropriate
> subsitiutions between the +plusses+ (i do it with sed)..
> divert(-1)
[...]
Oh thanks Gregory,
I just now saw th
> >You wouldn't still have the *.mc file that produced that would you?
my machine's doing the same.. here's mine.. make appropriate subsitiutions
between the +plusses+ (i do it with sed)..
divert(-1)
dnl /etc/mail/sendmail.mc is read by /etc/cook, which writes /etc/sendmail.cf
include(`/usr/sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
>You wouldn't still have the *.mc file that produced that would you?
No, I'm afraid I don't, I'm sorry. Once I switched to qmail, I purged
all that ugliness from my life, saving only the useful snippets for
future use.
I do rec
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Attempting to send mail from machine 192.168.0.7 with mail client
> aimed at the above machine with the edited sendmail.cf, for smtp server.
>
> Gives me this error on the (Win 98) client:
> Error reported by server 550 5.7.1
> Relayi
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>In my setup I have a static IP address but I relay my outgoing mail
>>thru my isps smtp machine. I do this by giving that host name as
>>answer to Smart relay host: in Sendmail.cf
>>
>>Now I'll still be doing that but other f
On 16 Mar 02, at 11:16, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Now what about the harder part of getting sendmail to be the outgoing smtp
> host?
>
> In my setup I have a static IP address but I relay my outgoing mail
> thru my isps smtp machine. I do this by giving that host name as
> answer to Smart relay hos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
>In my setup I have a static IP address but I relay my outgoing mail
>thru my isps smtp machine. I do this by giving that host name as
>answer to Smart relay host: in Sendmail.cf
>
>Now I'll still be doing that but other feeder m
"Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am thinking of using ipopd instead of imapd. But ipopd and imapd is
> started
>> from xinetd in my system (default RH 7.2). If that's the case for you too,
>> would not just adding the some line in hosts.allow and hosts.deny solve
> this
>> problem? Is
> I am thinking of using ipopd instead of imapd. But ipopd and imapd is
started
> from xinetd in my system (default RH 7.2). If that's the case for you too,
> would not just adding the some line in hosts.allow and hosts.deny solve
this
> problem? Is it almost the same case with other services as t
On Friday 15 March 2002 05:40 pm, you wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:23:37PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Did you make and adjustments to disallow any traffic from the internet
> > on 143? (Or I guess 110 in your case) I wondered how to make it so
> > only 192.XXX.XXX is allowed to connect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>So, with imapd running and accounts with mail in them in
>/var/spool/mail/$USER. A network computer with a setting of popserver
>aimed at the linux box would press send/recieve or something and her
>software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>Show none of this to the internet.
Use ipchains to disallow incoming connection attempts (TCP SYN packets)
from outside your subnet:
mylan='192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0'
ipchains --append input --protocol tcp
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 02:23:37PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Did you make and adjustments to disallow any traffic from the internet
> on 143? (Or I guess 110 in your case) I wondered how to make it so
> only 192.XXX.XXX is allowed to connect to it. Or even so that it
> isn't even seen from
Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> All the tools are provided by Red Hat out of the box. What I do is to first
> create each user on my Linux system that I want to provide mail for (all 2
> of us :-)). In that user account, create a .fetchmailrc that goes and gets
> the mail. Here'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>[NOTE: Somehow this reply got attached to a different message on
>redhat-list: Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from
>internal windoze Not sure what caused it, probably some bumbling of
>mine, but it was supposed
[NOTE: Somehow this reply got attached to a different message on
redhat-list: Subject: Re: Slow POP3 / SMTP / FTP connection from
internal windoze Not sure what caused it, probably some bumbling of
mine, but it was supposed to be a reply to David. So here it is]
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>Instead of having each machine retreive its mail from the internet, I
>>want to have one machine do all retreival and the others to be aimed
>>at it as there pop server.
>
>They sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Harry Putnam wrote:
>Instead of having each machine retreive its mail from the internet, I
>want to have one machine do all retreival and the others to be aimed
>at it as there pop server.
They should probably use it as their out
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:34:11AM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Setup: RH 7.1
>Single user home machine
>DSL connected
>Mail retrieval thru fetchmail from POP3
>2 other houshold machines running one or another MS platform.
>
>All are setup behind a hardw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
>Instead of having each machine retreive its mail from the internet, I
>want to have one machine do all retreival and the others to be aimed
>at it as there pop server.
Sure, you're already on the right track ... you just need fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
