On Fri, 24 Dec 1999, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> > Also, the kernel in Rawhide does not patch the Makefiles to compile with
> > -mpentiumpro -march=i686 when arch == i686 (stability is more important
> > than speed for releases).
>
> If I get the source for it, can I make it do that...?
Sure - edit
On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Hmmm... thanks, but do your modules compile OK? Mine seem to do so (ie. no
> error messages during compile time) but at boot-up, I get the dreaded
> "unresolved symbols" errors.
I haven't built many modules lately (just the ones I'm using myself - need
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> Talking about Rawhide, I noticed the ftp server has kernel 2.2.13 now, the
> i686 version as well. Is it different from the version on your site
Yes, it has some more patches and it's closer to what will actually get
into 6.2.
I've removed the kernel p
>How is wine?
Alpha. Not ready for end users. If you're a developer and can write your
own bug fixes in C, go for it. There's a wine developer newsgroup you can
check out at:
comp.emulators.ms-windows.wine
Glen
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
> IMO this is nonsense.
> Rawhide is on the cutting edge, the release versions are relatively
> current, but include the latest *stable* versions, not the latest
> development versions (with few exceptions where it makes sense).
>
> Very often, being on the cutting edge and being stable are the sa
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 03:16:30PM -0700, patrick wrote:
[about Corel Linux]
> It may contain some older, less secure versions
> of some programs but...it is still more secure and
> stable than windoze95/98.
[...]
Ahem... At least for the "secure" part that's nonsense. If Corel Linux
contains p
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Frank Rocco wrote:
> I was also told that because Red Hat was on the cutting edge, it would not
> be as stable.
IMO this is nonsense.
Rawhide is on the cutting edge, the release versions are relatively
current, but include the latest *stable* versions, not the latest
develo
Frank
If i were you, I would go with the distribution that you feel you can get
the most support from other users of that distribution.
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Frank Rocco wrote:
> I guess you talked me into going with Red Hat. Being a newbie and seeing so
> many distributions to choose from, make
Sparc.
fred
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:18:19 -0500
> From: Frank Rocco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone try Corel Linux
> I'm a newbie, so please forgive my statements if they are incorrect. I was
> told
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Frank Rocco wrote:
>
> > Interested in feedback from Red Hat users that have tried Corel Linex
>
> Corel Linux contains numerous completely outdated packages. Some of them
> (proftpd 1.2.0pre1, bind 8.1, ...) even ha
99 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: recipient.list.not.shown
Subject: Re: Anyone try Corel Linux
I was also told that because Red Hat was on the cutting edge, it would
not
be as stable.
I guess you talked me into going with Red Hat. Being a newbie and
seeing so
many distributions to choose from, makes
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Frank Rocco said:
FR>I was also told that because Red Hat was on the cutting edge, it would not
FR>be as stable.
FR>
FR>I guess you talked me into going with Red Hat. Being a newbie and seeing so
FR>many distributions to choose from, makes my head spin.
FR>Life was easier w
I was also told that because Red Hat was on the cutting edge, it would not
be as stable.
I guess you talked me into going with Red Hat. Being a newbie and seeing so
many distributions to choose from, makes my head spin.
Life was easier when there was only windows.
However I got the Linux bug a
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Frank Rocco wrote:
> I'm a newbie, so please forgive my statements if they are incorrect. I was
> told that the Debian package was more stable and that their package
> management was better that RPM.
That's an over-generalization of things, and it's not quite valid in that
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Rocco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 1:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone try Corel Linux
>
>
> I'm a newbie, so please forgive my statements if they are
> incorrec
I'm a newbie, so please forgive my statements if they are incorrect. I was
told that the Debian package was more stable and that their package
management was better that RPM.
Not sure what problem any outdated packages would cause. Can you clairify?
CNET gave Corel Linux a best choice for Home
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Frank Rocco wrote:
> Interested in feedback from Red Hat users that have tried Corel Linex
Here's what I think of it...
Note: I am a Red Hat developer. I'm trying to be neutral, but you should
know I might be biased without realizing it:
Corel Linux contains numerous compl
17 matches
Mail list logo
