Yep, ver 2.2 on a NEC ProServa which has 2 scsi controllers, one for
hardrives and externals, one for CDROM. Couldn't recognize the 2nd
scsi controller for the CDROM, therefore couldn't install. 2 weeks on
fone with Corel brought no results. (NEC is a PCclone box). However,
on another, generic PCclone with a single processor, the 2.2
installed and worked OK, though I didn't spend much time with it.
To impatient to wait for RH 6.1 for Sparc to be released, I'm
downloading Debian for SparcStation 1 as I heard there may
be some memory leaks in the RHL 6.1 for Sparc.
fred
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:18:19 -0500
> From: Frank Rocco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Anyone try Corel Linux
> I'm a newbie, so please forgive my statements if they are incorrect. I was
> told that the Debian package was more stable and that their package
> management was better that RPM.
>
> Not sure what problem any outdated packages would cause. Can you clairify?
>
> CNET gave Corel Linux a best choice for Home and Red Hat for Business.
> If they did that only because Corel was eaiser to install, I don't think
> that was a good discision.
>
> Thanks
> Frank
>
>
==============================================
Fred Lenk
Recumbents: The Linux of bicycles
website->www.lenk.net
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
