On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:42:24AM -0700, Thomas Frayne wrote:
> Is there a way to use up2date on RH9 to install individual packages from
> Rawhide? Is there another GUI package manager that can resolve
> dependencies and install all needed packages?
No. I don't expect that Red
Is there a way to use up2date on RH9 to install individual packages from
Rawhide? Is there another GUI package manager that can resolve
dependencies and install all needed packages?
Can I activate as Rawhide channel on RH9? I want to upgrade Evolution,
and am using the rpm command, and
Anyone tried this?
--
Hart's PGP Key: 0x7BFF655E - http://TQMcube.com/hart_pgp.txt
Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
Email acceptance
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 17:35, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> Rawhide packages are usually nowhere near stable and are likely to
> crash your machine.
"Likely" is perhaps overstating it a bit. "Might" would have been a
better choice of words. I run a lot of rawhide packag
the latter)?
> >
> >I would expect rawhide to be the bleeding edge version of severn which
> >is the beta of the consumer release. taroon is the beta of Enterprise
> >Linux.
>
> Incorrect.
>
> Taroon is the beta for a new release of Red Hat Linux (I don't re
At 7/30/2003 08:30 -0500, you wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:24:53AM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> Does anyone know the difference between these two releases (other than
> the availability of ISOs for the latter)?
I would expect rawhide to be the bleeding edge version of severn which
is th
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 09:30, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:24:53AM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> > Does anyone know the difference between these two releases (other than
> > the availability of ISOs for the latter)?
>
> I would expect rawhide to be the bleeding e
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:24:53AM -0400, David Hart wrote:
> Does anyone know the difference between these two releases (other than
> the availability of ISOs for the latter)?
I would expect rawhide to be the bleeding edge version of severn which
is the beta of the consumer release. tar
Does anyone know the difference between these two releases (other than
the availability of ISOs for the latter)?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 Jul 2003 09:31:16 +0200, Stéphane Jourdan wrote:
> I was wondering wether I didn't find the rawhide/devel mailing lists or
> they didn't exist at all ?
>
> I've been used to the cooker/devel stuff at Mandrake, the si
Hello,
I was wondering wether I didn't find the rawhide/devel mailing lists or
they didn't exist at all ?
I've been used to the cooker/devel stuff at Mandrake, the sid/devel
stuff with Debian, but didn't found a similar one with Redhat : does it
exist ? If not ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 16:43:03 +0100, billd wrote:
> I'm having problems with rpm and trying to upgrade
> to an apache >2.0.43 which I apparently need to run
> an application under.
>
> RH9 has 2.0.40-21. So I downloaded httpd-2.0.45 and
> did
>
> rp
Hi,
I'm having problems with rpm and trying to upgrade
to an apache >2.0.43 which I apparently need to run
an application under.
RH9 has 2.0.40-21. So I downloaded httpd-2.0.45 and
did
rpm -ivF httpd-2.0.45-10.i386.rpm
warning: httpd-2.0.45-10.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 897da07a
er
> The rawhide directory on Red Hat's web site has an excellent README.
> I'll repost it below. It's relevant even though it's about 4 years old.
Thank's Ed.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 10:44:31PM -0500, Michel Donais wrote:
> What is rawhide?
The rawhide directory on Red Hat's web site has an excellent README.
I'll repost it below. It's relevant even though it's about 4 years old.
> and the RPM's under it are they usables
What is rawhide?
and the RPM's under it are they usables without problems?
Michel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Is this the right place to report bugs etc for rawhide?
The latest Mozilla (1.2.1-20), and maybe previous as well, use a tiny font
size for the various system messages - 6 pixels high c/f my terminal etc
that is 9 pixels high (letter E). No where can I find a control for this.
Versions from
>Hi all,
>
> What is rawhide, it seems that, it is something related to RedHat,
right??
>
>Can anyone tell me something about "rawhide"?
>
>Thanks,
>Lau
==
A less than fully stable, development version being worked on at Redhat.
Mike
--
I thought Rawhide was Buckaroo Banzai's right hand man? Until the Red
Lectroids killed him, that is.
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 15:27, Kent Perrier wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:13, Lau wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me something about "rawhide"?
>
> Rawhide is
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 04:39:44PM -0700, Joe Giles wrote:
>
> So what you are saying is that Rawhide software is Unfinished software.
The usability of the software in Rawhide varies greatly.
It will range from quite stable (just before a new distribution is
released) to uncompilable (just
So what you are saying is that Rawhide software is Unfinished software. So
we should avoid software from this "Rawhide" category?
Thanks
Kent Perrier said:
> On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:13, Lau wrote:
>> Can anyone tell me something about "rawhide"?
>
> Rawhi
On Monday 20 January 2003 07:27 pm, Kent Perrier wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:13, Lau wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me something about "rawhide"?
>
> Rawhide is the untanned skin of a bovine creature. Once the skin is
> tanned, it is considered l
From ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README:
Rolling, Rolling, Rolling
In an effort to improve communications with the development community,
enable Linux users to test bleeding-edge technology, speed development,
and improve the quality of future Red Hat Linux releases (as
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 14:13, Lau wrote:
> Can anyone tell me something about "rawhide"?
Rawhide is the untanned skin of a bovine creature. Once the skin is
tanned, it is considered leather.
Kent
--
Kent Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubs
Hi all,
What is rawhide, it seems that, it is something related to RedHat, right??
Can anyone tell me something about "rawhide"?
Thanks,
Lau
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi,
Sorry if I am on the wrong list, I can't find a RawHide Discussion list.
I am running evolution, and trying to sync with my palm. But redhat is
missing the gnome-pilot-conduits for Evolution.
I have checked everywhere on the distro cd's and also with the new
RawHide packages.
Hi there,
The Intel web site says my video card (i830MG) is supported from XFree
4.2 and Kernel 2.4.11 and later. These packages are on Rawhide. Which
other packages should I install to get this working, ie, Xfree 4.2 and
kernel 2.4.11 dependencies?
[]s, Fernando Lozano
vary.
Linda Hanigan
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Alfredo Yunes wrote:
> Will I run into any problems if I install the the Rawhide XFree 4.2 rpms
> under 7.2? I'm thinking about purchasing a Radeon 8500; although I
> realize that it will not have any 3D support for now. I guess 2
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 10:29, Alfredo Yunes wrote:
> Will I run into any problems if I install the the Rawhide XFree 4.2 rpms
> under 7.2? I'm thinking about purchasing a Radeon 8500; although I
> realize that it will not have any 3D support for now. I guess 2D will
> do for
Potentially, YES. rawhide is *alpha* software
- any rawhide package any person here has installed is not a guarantee that
a package you install tomorrow will even install, pretend to work, or not cause
serious stability issues. Yes, I can be blunt, but if you have to ask if
you'l
Will I run into any problems if I install the the Rawhide XFree 4.2 rpms under 7.2? I'm thinking about purchasing a Radeon 8500; although I realize that it will not have any 3D support for now. I guess 2D will do for now.
Thanks,
Al
place to find information about rawhide packages
> > bugzilla?
> >
> > The reason I'm asking is that I saw the Amanda package in rawhide.
> > (2.42p2-5) and the latest production rpm from RH is 2.4.2p2-4. I want to
> > know what has been changed in the last revi
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:01:59AM -0500, Jeff Bearer wrote:
> What is the best place to find information about rawhide packages
> bugzilla?
>
> The reason I'm asking is that I saw the Amanda package in rawhide.
> (2.42p2-5) and the latest production rpm from RH is 2.4.2p2
What is the best place to find information about rawhide packages
bugzilla?
The reason I'm asking is that I saw the Amanda package in rawhide.
(2.42p2-5) and the latest production rpm from RH is 2.4.2p2-4. I want to
know what has been changed in the last revision, but from bugzilla I
> And after rebuilding the Rawhide kernel rpms I surprisingly noticed that
> kernel-headers is gone. There is no kernel-headers produced by the
> kernel source rpm from Rawhide. So I have just installed (not updated)
> the binary packages kernel and kernel-source.
>
iirc, ker
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 04:37:55 -0600
ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 08:16:09 -0200
> José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
>
>
>
> > And after rebuilding the Rawhide kernel rpms I surprisingly noticed
> > that ker
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 08:16:09 -0200
José Romildo Malaquias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> And after rebuilding the Rawhide kernel rpms I surprisingly noticed
> that kernel-headers is gone. There is no kernel-headers produced by
> the kernel source rpm from Rawhide. So I have just
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:31:04PM -0500, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 07:03:47PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I am going to rebuild and install the binary RPM packages of the Linux
> > kernel from Rawhide in my RedHat L
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 07:03:47PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am going to rebuild and install the binary RPM packages of the Linux
> kernel from Rawhide in my RedHat Linux 7.2 box. I am not sure what
> packages can be safely installed while trying to
Hello.
I am going to rebuild and install the binary RPM packages of the Linux
kernel from Rawhide in my RedHat Linux 7.2 box. I am not sure what
packages can be safely installed while trying to keep the system
well integrated. In particular, it seems that the glibc and the
kernel-headers
Rawhide is like the next release of Redhat that they're working
on, from what I gather, and it's not supported.
I'm sure that I've seen the phrase "Use at your own risk"
used to describe it. Hence the lack of support.
Supporting it (and I suppose this in
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 20:46, Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Steve Lee wrote:
>
> > what is the linux rawhide. i see it on rpmfind.net
> > is is able to install on redhat linux too if i download this. ?
> >
IIRC rawhide is used for testin
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Steve Lee wrote:
> what is the linux rawhide. i see it on rpmfind.net
> is is able to install on redhat linux too if i download this. ?
>
Not sure, and I'd love to see one of the Red Hat employees who is usually
hanging around this list to reply and tell u
what is the linux rawhide. i see it on rpmfind.net
is is able to install on redhat linux too if i download this. ?
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Needham, Douglas wrote:
> Is this the correct forum for asking questions about the latest rawhide
> kernel?
>
>
Thanks, I will look there.
-Original Message-
From: Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rawhide questions
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Needham, Douglas wrote:
> Is this the correct forum
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Needham, Douglas wrote:
> Is this the correct forum for asking questions about the latest rawhide
> kernel?
>
> Doug Needham
>
>
Doug,
I suppose the redhat-devel list is a better forum for it. At least that's
where I see most Rawhide related q
Is this the correct forum for asking questions about the latest rawhide
kernel?
Doug Needham
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Where could I find out more information about the latest/current rawhide
kernel?
Specifically I am curious about :
1) performance testing results
2) cerebrus results
3) what patches are applied against it
4) is anyone using it for non-testing purposes and if so what type of
workload
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:07:18PM +, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
: The 1.0.1 branch of vsftpd is stable; in fact, remarkably so. Is there a
: reason why it's put in Rawhide? Was it, perhaps, a case of "we had nowhere
: else to put it"?
I'd guess it's because Rawhide w
Good morning,
The 1.0.1 branch of vsftpd is stable; in fact, remarkably so. Is there a
reason why it's put in Rawhide? Was it, perhaps, a case of "we had nowhere
else to put it"?
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
... and being pounding head against nearest hard object in an attempt to
soften hard head!!!"
Gawd this is easy... with a script this could mean more bzflag time for
ich!
- --
csm
Dmitry is free!
Boycott Adobe!
Repeal the DMCA!
Stop the SSSCA!
---
Would anyone know if the kernel that comes with wolverine has any of the IDE bugs?
Mitchell Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 03:53:17PM -0500, Warren Melnick wrote:
> That's it! I also just found the list :)
>
> OK - Next question - What DO they all mean?
>
> My guesses:
> - 4.x are the names of colleges.
> - 5.x are all names of drinks.
> - I would also guess that 6.x are names of favorite fi
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> Had anyone heard of Harry Potter in mid-1999? :)
>
Umm...Yeah, but not in the US, I don't think. :-) IIRC, the Harry Potter series
was a "sleaper" series here in the US until the first book was republished last
year. How do ya think they got three books published
: rawhide
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> That's it! I also just found the list :)
>
> OK - Next question - What DO they all mean?
>
> My guesses:
> - 4.x are the names of colleges.
> - 5.x are all names of drinks.
> - I would also guess that 6.x are names of favorite
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> That's it! I also just found the list :)
>
> OK - Next question - What DO they all mean?
>
> My guesses:
> - 4.x are the names of colleges.
> - 5.x are all names of drinks.
> - I would also guess that 6.x are names of favorite fiction characters,
> Cartman bein
ay, February 27, 2001 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: rawhide
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
7.1 Not named (Wolverine is beta)
7.0 Guinness
6.2 Zoot
6.1 Cartman
6.0 Hedwig
5.2 Apollo
5.1 Manhattan
5.0 Hurricane
4.2 Biltmore
4.1 Vanderbilt
4.0 Co
;7.1 will be Wolverine
> >7.0 is Guinness
> >6.2 was zoot (I think)
> >6.1 was Cartman
> >5.2 was Apollo
> >
> >Rawhide is the current unreleased build, whatever it might be.
> >Anyone remember the 5.1, 5.0, 4.x and 3.x releas
At 12:32 PM 27/02/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>7.1 will be Wolverine
>7.0 is Guinness
>6.2 was zoot (I think)
>6.1 was Cartman
>5.2 was Apollo
>
>Rawhide is the current unreleased build, whatever it might be.
>Anyone remember the 5.1, 5.0, 4.x and 3.x releases? I think 3.0.3 w
Mensaje citado por: Warren Melnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 7.1 will be Wolverine
> 7.0 is Guinness
> 6.2 was zoot (I think)
> 6.1 was Cartman
> 5.2 was Apollo
>
> Rawhide is the current unreleased build, whatever it might be.
> Anyone remember the 5.1, 5.0, 4.x an
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Warren Melnick wrote:
> 7.1 will be Wolverine
> 7.0 is Guinness
> 6.2 was zoot (I think)
> 6.1 was Cartman
and 6.0 was Hedwig
> 5.2 was Apollo
>
> Rawhide is the current unreleased build, whatever it might be.
> Anyone remember the 5.1, 5.0, 4.x an
No...that was Cartman.
Rawhide is the release point for packages that should work, but are still in
the process of being tested, and aren't, yet, part of a distribution.
"Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Wasn't "rawhide" the name foe r
--
> From: Warren Melnick [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 12:33 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: rawhide
>
> 7.1 will be Wolverine
> 7.0 is Guinness
> 6.2 was zoot (I think)
> 6.1 was Cartman
> 5.2 was Apollo
>
>
7.1 will be Wolverine
7.0 is Guinness
6.2 was zoot (I think)
6.1 was Cartman
5.2 was Apollo
Rawhide is the current unreleased build, whatever it might be.
Anyone remember the 5.1, 5.0, 4.x and 3.x releases? I think 3.0.3 was the
first one with a name.
Warren Melnick
Director
At 12:04 PM 27/02/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Wasn't "rawhide" the name foe releas 6.1?
I don't know. But that sounds like a good question..
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ted Gervais [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 27,
Wasn't "rawhide" the name foe releas 6.1?
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Gervais [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: rawhide
>
> When a file or site is identified as
When a file or site is identified as 'rawhide', does that mean the latest
files are there, or this is for beta upgrades or maybe just for the daring?
---
Ted Gervais
1-902-679-2253
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia Canada.
***
Be alert, the world
Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> >
> > In all fairness to RedHat, given the rapid development cycle, to expect
> > them to package up a full distribution, perhaps even creating an ISO
> > image, each tim
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> In all fairness to RedHat, given the rapid development cycle, to expect
> them to package up a full distribution, perhaps even creating an ISO
> image, each time a something changes in the rawhide repository, is unfair
> and, IMN
27;s development packages - they may or may not work for you (of
> > > > course, if they don't we would like to know :)
> > >
> > > By the way, Trond. Is it possible to download an ISO image of Rawhide at
> > > any given time?
> >
> > No. Y
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Nitebirdz wrote:
> By the way, did Red Hat ever consider to make it easier for the Red Hat users
> to download and install the development or unstable branch (Rawhide)? Did you
> guys ever consider creating a stable and unstable branch of a source code
> repos
, if they don't we would like to know :)
> >
> > By the way, Trond. Is it possible to download an ISO image of Rawhide at
> > any given time?
>
> No. You can try to make one. It may or may not fit ;)
>
> > Is there a CVS repository perhaps?
>
> No.
>
Nitebirdz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> >
> > It's development packages - they may or may not work for you (of
> > course, if they don't we would like to know :)
>
> By the way, Trond. Is it possibl
On 28 Jan 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
>
> It's development packages - they may or may not work for you (of
> course, if they don't we would like to know :)
>
By the way, Trond. Is it possible to download an ISO image of Rawhide at
any given time? Is there a CVS
Bob Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I keep seeing references to Rawhide. I see a Rawhide directory on the
> RedHat site but is this supposed to be the "official source" of any new
> RPMs
It's development packages - they may or may not work for you (of
cours
OkaY all, stupid newbie question.
I keep seeing references to Rawhide. I see a Rawhide directory on the
RedHat site but is this supposed to be the "official source" of any new
RPMs that are setup as compatible with the RedHat file locations as
compared to RPMs from rpmfind.net that ar
What is the best way to stay informed about RawHide?
Granted, I could mirror ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide and watch actual file
changes. But is there some kind of mailing list, CVS, or other way that I
can learn more?
Thanks for any leads, info, etc.
Dan Browning
Network & Data
On Sat, 09 Sep 2000, Peter (XTRA) wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have downloaded twice now the Xfre and Kernel files from the Rawhide
> directory once from RedHat and once from VA mirror site and both times
> rpm has seem them as broken and won't open them never mind installing
&
Hi Pete,
> I have downloaded twice now the Xfre and Kernel files from the Rawhide
> directory once from RedHat and once from VA mirror site and both times
> rpm has seem them as broken and won't open them never mind installing
> them. I get and error something like:
> only f
at. As the file I got was able to burn and does
> run up and installI figure it's not a corrupt CD and other
> rpms do install it's just the Rawhide stuffI find I'm
> having problems with. I don't need the kernel so much I
> don't think but I have to have Xfre
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Peter (XTRA) wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have downloaded twice now the Xfre and Kernel files from the Rawhide
> directory once from RedHat and once from VA mirror site and both times
> rpm has seem them as broken and won't open them never mind installing
>
Hi
I have downloaded twice now the Xfre and Kernel
files from the Rawhide
directory once from RedHat and once from VA mirror
site and both times
rpm has seem them as broken and won't open them
never mind installing
them. I get and error something
like:
only files <=3 are ab
You are on it. Until they actually release a beta, then they usually
make one for whatever they call the beta.
"Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
>
> Evening:
>
> Is there a mailing list for people who are running and beta testing the
> 6.9 beta release of Red Hat. I'd like to give my feedback.
>
Evening:
Is there a mailing list for people who are running and beta testing the
6.9 beta release of Red Hat. I'd like to give my feedback.
- Mike
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Evening:
I just downloaded and installed the Red Hat 6.9 beta distribution from the
rawhide ftp site. So far I'm quite impressed with some of the things I
see were cleaned up and added for the upcoming 7.0 release. Nice job Red
Hat.
I have a few issues that appear to be bugs and/or ch
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Michael J. McGillick wrote:
> Evening:
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but rawhide is Red Hat's (staging/testing) area
> for the next release? It incorporates the latest fixes, patches,
> etc. that Red Hat is thinking of including in the next relea
Evening:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but rawhide is Red Hat's (staging/testing) area
for the next release? It incorporates the latest fixes, patches,
etc. that Red Hat is thinking of including in the next release? If so,
I'd like to play around with this. Where can I download it
At 04:01 PM 11/07/2000, Simons wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Is there any rawhide mirror ftp site?
>
>Thx.
There are plenty, S'pose it depends where you are, one near me is;
ftp.aarnet.edu.au:/pub/redhat/rawhide/
Darryl
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Hello,
Is there any rawhide mirror ftp site?
Thx.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Could someone please provide me with some information about installing
Rawhide? Can I find an ISO image anywhere? I certainly did not manage to
see it in the FTP site. Is it possible to do a simple FTP
install? Perhaps that is the only way to do it
is rawhide updating every 2 weeks now instead of every week? also i was
wondering if the stage2.img is really supposed to 89 megs?
--
-
Steve Dixon
Dpn, Incorporated
System Administrator
Phone - 702.873.3282
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
--
To
I found it easiest to download the emu10k1 package from the
opensource.creative.com, extract the package, and then run:
./.confiure
make
make install
I added 'alias sound emu10k1' to my conf.modules, ran depmod -a all
then
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> BTW, the OSS driver from www.opensound.com works, but it costs $30 and
> will cost more when the official release comes out.
>
I bought OSS 3-4 years ago, when it was $20... best money I ever spent.
Everytime I upgrade the kernel or distro, I get the new patch with
This sounds similar to what happened to me. Granted, I haven't been working
with the Rawhide, but the errors you're seeing match what I saw.
a) Had 6.0 - downloaded emu10k and compiled. Ran fine.
b) Upgraded to 6.1 - sound no longer worked.
So, I went and grabbed emu10k again and com
I was looking for support for my new SBLive, and I found that the
latest kernel in the Rawhide tree (kernel-2.2.14-1.5.0) included
the emu10k1 module. So I downloaded the kernel SRPM and rebuilt it
for my current, vanilla RH6.1 installation. I also grabbed the
other kernel-relevant SRPMS and
s I'd be VERY interested. I'm in the
> > process of updating my libraries to glibc 2.1.2 anyway. If it fixes the
> > problem I'll let you guys know ;D
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > www.xmission.com/~dmacleod
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
pciutils-devel
Matthew Saltzman writes:
> "David S Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I've seen similar messages when I've used newer compilers. Does your 6.1
> >system use the same compiler version as what comes in RawHide?
>
>
"David S Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I've seen similar messages when I've used newer compilers. Does your 6.1
>system use the same compiler version as what comes in RawHide?
Oops. I used "su" instead of "su -", so I got my CodeFusion c
I've seen similar messages when I've used newer compilers. Does your 6.1
system use the same compiler version as what comes in RawHide?
David
At 12:34 PM 2/20/00 -0500, you wrote:
>So far, I've received no reply regarding my problem building the RPM
>for sndc
So far, I've received no reply regarding my problem building the RPM
for sndconfig in Rawhide, but that's OK for now, because I can't build
the kernel-2.2.14-.15.0RPM under RH6.1 either.
"rpm --rebuild --target i586 kernel-2.2.14-.15.0.src.rpm" runs for a
while, then
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
