PROTECTED]
Subject: Needing help with eth0
Well, I'm not even sure what to say. I've been using Linux for over a year
now, used 4 distros, and installed it dozen of time, but I can't get my
eth0 to work at all on Red hat 6.2
It's a linksys, I belive, and it was auto-dete
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> I also noticed I have no /etc/modules.conf - thought I know some distros
> don't - is that normal with red hat?
>
>
It's /etc/conf.modules in Red Hat. You may want to create a symlink if
you're used to the other nomenclature.
---
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Ok I made a symlink in /lib/modules (2.2.14 -> 2.2.14-5.0), but now it
> claims there's a modules mismatch between kernel numbers! What the heck?
> I"ve never seen such a blasted set up. How in the world is it that this
> didn't happen to other peo
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> Howdy,
> to anyone who was following my "Needing help with eth0" saga, I reinstalled
> from scratch (this time doing a "gnome workstation" install, in stead of
> custom,
>
> And everything is fine - includi
Howdy,
to anyone who was following my "Needing help with eth0" saga, I reinstalled
from scratch (this time doing a "gnome workstation" install, in stead of
custom,
And everything is fine - including eth0.
So I'm wondering,
What went wrong with the custom install?
** Reply to message from Jonathan Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri,
25 Aug 2000 18:23:58 -0500
> I also noticed I have no /etc/modules.conf - thought I know some distros
> don't - is that normal with red hat?
conf.modules has been deprecated and its use is discouraged.
/etc/modules.conf is no
** Reply to message from Jonathan Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri,
25 Aug 2000 18:07:04 -0500
> Well, I'm not even sure what to say. I've been using Linux for over a year
> now, used 4 distros, and installed it dozen of time, but I can't get my
> eth0 to work at all on Red hat 6.2
>
> It's
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> I also noticed I have no /etc/modules.conf - thought I know some distros
> don't - is that normal with red hat?
>
RH6.2 it's known as conf.modules. In reading the RH Beta
list (Pinstripe list) I noticed that the author has moved
to calling it modules
I also noticed I have no /etc/modules.conf - thought I know some distros
don't - is that normal with red hat?
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
ifup, both at boot time, and when called manually, prints:
"Delaying eth0 initialization"
At 06:17 PM 8/25/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Ok I made a symlink in /lib/modules (2.2.14 -> 2.2.14-5.0), but now it
>claims there's a modules mismatch between kernel numbers! What the heck?
>I"ve never seen s
Ok I made a symlink in /lib/modules (2.2.14 -> 2.2.14-5.0), but now it
claims there's a modules mismatch between kernel numbers! What the heck?
I"ve never seen such a blasted set up. How in the world is it that this
didn't happen to other people? Did I forget to install something? I did a
cust
Well, I'm not even sure what to say. I've been using Linux for over a year
now, used 4 distros, and installed it dozen of time, but I can't get my
eth0 to work at all on Red hat 6.2
It's a linksys, I belive, and it was auto-detected as a "rtl8139" (I can
see that in both linuxconf and if I cat
12 matches
Mail list logo
