Thanks, that worked perfectly.
James
>
> We're having trouble getting machine name resolution from an DNS server.
If
> we try to ping, for example, a machine named Mach1, we get an "unknown
host
> Mach1" error. If we ping the FQDN, Mach1.domainname.com, we get
resolut
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:09:58AM -0700, James D. Parra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're having trouble getting machine name resolution from an DNS server. If
> we try to ping, for example, a machine named Mach1, we get an "unknown host
> Mach1" error. If we ping the FQDN
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:09:58 -0700
"James D. Parra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're having trouble getting machine name resolution from an DNS server.
> If
> we try to ping, for example, a machine named Mach1, we get an "unknown
> hos
Hello,
We're having trouble getting machine name resolution from an DNS server. If
we try to ping, for example, a machine named Mach1, we get an "unknown host
Mach1" error. If we ping the FQDN, Mach1.domainname.com, we get resolution.
Oddly, windows boxes can resolve the machine n
On 11-Jun-2003/14:04 +0100, "Hill, Benjamin W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a Linux box that I'd like people to be able to access via it's
>machine name. However, to do this I have to add the IP address of the
>machine to the "hosts" file on a Windows machine. I guess this is something
>to do
I have a Linux box that I'd like people to be able to access via it's
machine name. However, to do this I have to add the IP address of the
machine to the "hosts" file on a Windows machine. I guess this is something
to do with WINS, or DNS servers...
Is there any way to allow Windows machines to c
Hi -
I have tried posting this issue on a mailman and sendmail
board but have not received a fix for it yet.
Here is what I have:
RH8.0 with Sendmail and Mailman 2.0 - This server is
inside my network and is resolved to a subdomain like lists.domain.com
Here is my proble
,
I'm having problems with name resolution. We have several machines on
an NIS network. The NIS server is Red Hat 7.2, and the rest of the
machines are all Red Hat 8.0. Each machine has been assigned a local
static IP address. /etc/NIS/hosts on the NIS server looks like this:
192.168.23
> Does /etc/resolv.conf have the proper name server references? How are
your
> routes setup? Do traceroute and/or ping return the expected results?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Tim Kehres
I second the route thing Tim said.
Any bet your default gateway isn't getting set. Show us 'route -n'.
Regards,
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:07 AM
Subject: Name Resolution Errors
> Hello,
>
> I have installed RH 8.0 on an older system for testing purposes. I set up
an internet connection using an external modem to connect to my ISP.
Hello,
I have installed RH 8.0 on an older system for testing purposes. I set up an internet
connection using an external modem to connect to my ISP. I can connect to my ISP, but
I cannot veiw web pages due to name reolution errors. I have checked my modem hardware
"properties" and the ISP's DN
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:name resolution
Hi,
I'm having problems with name resolution. We have several machines on
an NIS network. The NIS server is Red Hat 7.2, and the rest of the
machines are all Re
problems with name resolution. We have several machines on
> an NIS network. The NIS server is Red Hat 7.2, and the rest of the
> machines are all Red Hat 8.0. Each machine has been assigned a local
> static IP address. /etc/NIS/hosts on the NIS server looks like thi
Hi,
I'm having problems with name resolution. We have several machines on
an NIS network. The NIS server is Red Hat 7.2, and the rest of the
machines are all Red Hat 8.0. Each machine has been assigned a local
static IP address. /etc/NIS/hosts on the NIS server looks like
Maybe someone has an idea?
Recently started having a problem where
"host $SHORTNAME" works,
"nslookup $SHORTNAME" works,
but ping/ssh/ftp/rsync don't?
It works for some short hostnames consistently, but for other
hosts does not work.
Stopping nscd seems to fix the problem compl
Dynamic IP Hack
I have an RH7 Linux box into a large WinNT LAN.
All that WinNT servers gives me is a dynamic IP
address.
Before you can do anything else please save your
original /etc/hosts file.
This is how you can hack that IP and put it in your
/etc/hosts file.
The testip.c p
can you send me the script you have written.
RaghuNath L wrote:
> Try fetchmail.
>
> Bubulac Angela Tatiana wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I finally setup my RH7 linux box onto
> > a large WinNT LAN. They just give me a dynamic IP
> > address.
> > Now I can ping and connect by name the WinNT computers
Try fetchmail.
Bubulac Angela Tatiana wrote:
> Hello,
> I finally setup my RH7 linux box onto
> a large WinNT LAN. They just give me a dynamic IP
> address.
> Now I can ping and connect by name the WinNT computers
> and they can also do the same thing to my computer
> (samba & nss_wins).
> I wr
Hello,
I finally setup my RH7 linux box onto
a large WinNT LAN. They just give me a dynamic IP
address.
Now I can ping and connect by name the WinNT computers
and they can also do the same thing to my computer
(samba & nss_wins).
I wrote a simple C program that hack the IP address
and put it into
; >
> > Dyamically assigined ip address client named client1.
> > Another dynamically assigned address client named client2.
> > from client1 :
> >
> > ping client2
> >
> > Since both clients have dynamically assigned IP addresses, how does one
>
P deal, its the resolving some other way that I
> am wondering about. Take for instance, this scenario.
>
> Dyamically assigined ip address client named client1.
> Another dynamically assigned address client named client2.
> from client1 :
>
> ping client2
>
> Since
client1 :
ping client2
Since both clients have dynamically assigned IP addresses, how does one
get name resolution to work? I can't put it into a host file since I
don't know the ipaddress and it is likly to change. Same with dns. Am
I missing a tool that talks to DNS server somehow
22 matches
Mail list logo
