Re: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

e first line. Noop didn't work! Thanks Dali --- "Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09-Oct-2003/13:32 -0700, Dali Islam > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >the sendmail was corrupted after reloading the > daemon > >it was fixed. > >

Re: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is d own)

On 09-Oct-2003/15:17 -0700, Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [re: email notification that sendmail is not running] >You are wrong.. You can send mail w/o the sendmail daemon running. Your mail >client calls sendmail to deliver the mail, it doesn't need to connect to a >daemon.. The problem wi

Re: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

On 09-Oct-2003/13:32 -0700, Dali Islam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >the sendmail was corrupted after reloading the daemon >it was fixed. > >Anyway, anyone knows how to send/relay a message only >on the root login session when a service/daemon is >down. Like in this case my

Re: sending message to syslog

> but how can I send a message to syslog to included in a log handled by the > syslog daemon? > Larry, Try /usr/sbin/logger. From the man page: logger - a shell command interface to the syslog(3) system log module Hope it helps, Earl -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscri

Re: sending message to syslog

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 19:58, Larry Brown wrote: > I know how to tag comments to a file and so can create a log file by simply > sending messages to the document I want to use as a log... > > echo "hello" >>/var/log/customlog > > but how can I send a message to s

sending message to syslog

I know how to tag comments to a file and so can create a log file by simply sending messages to the document I want to use as a log... echo "hello" >>/var/log/customlog but how can I send a message to syslog to included in a log handled by the syslog daemon? Larry S. Brown Di

Re: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

es Herein\n\ Subject: Init Status Report\n\ Date: `date`\n\ From: `basename [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s`\n\ Message-Id: <`date '+%s'[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n\n\n\ Status Report\n\n" cat_or_some_other_cmd_goes_here_to_flesh_out_the_bod ) \ |procmail -d $mailto_dude # < d

RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

Mark Cohen on Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:17 PM said: > Actually, You are wrong.. You can send mail w/o the sendmail > daemon running. [snip] thanks for setting me straight. chris. -- Don't like reformatting your Outlook replies? Now there's relief! http://hom

RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Cohen Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 6:17 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down) Actually, You are wrong.. You can send ma

RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris W. Parker > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 6:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message > when daemon is > dow

RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is d own)

Title: RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down) Actually, You are wrong.. You can send mail w/o the sendmail daemon running. Your mail client calls sendmail to deliver the mail, it doesn't need to connect to a daemon.. You run the daemon to accept inc

RE: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

Dali Islam <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:33 PM said: > Anyway, anyone knows how to send/relay a message only > on the root login session when a service/daemon is > down. Like in this case my sendmail was down. Can a car be driven if the motor is

Re: Mail is not working (any way to send message when daemon is down)

the sendmail was corrupted after reloading the daemon it was fixed. Anyway, anyone knows how to send/relay a message only on the root login session when a service/daemon is down. Like in this case my sendmail was down. or is there a way that when root login, then it will see the message. Any

log message for HD crash, is this hardware failure?

e HD again, better just replace it, since the server is our development database server. Here is the log from /var/log/message. I asked help to interpret this. Thanks for your help. RDB Sep 18 04:08:36 voyager kernel: hdd: dma_intr: status=0x60 { DriveReady DeviceFault } Sep 18 04:08:36 voyager ke

Re: the "system activity" message

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:09:14 -0500 Dana Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm still getting these from cron: > > Invalid system activity file: /var/log/sa/sa13 > > I can't seem to find anything on google to help with this. Has anyone > seen this before? > Hi Dana, This file and the other

the "system activity" message

I'm still getting these from cron: Invalid system activity file: /var/log/sa/sa13 I can't seem to find anything on google to help with this. Has anyone seen this before? -- Dana Holland[EMAIL PROTECTED] 903-875-7355 Navarro Colle

Re: Weird Message posting to Redhat-List

On Friday 12 September 2003 10:43 am, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > Looks like a reverse lookup failure: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve > Maybe the list server lost the DNS, I just did a lookup and dig -x both > came back fine. Okay thanks. Apparently it's redhat problem. All my posts from las

RE: Weird Message posting to Redhat-List

Looks like a reverse lookup failure: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not resolve Maybe the list server lost the DNS, I just did a lookup and dig -x both came back fine. -Original Message- From: Reuben D. Budiardja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 7:35 AM To: [EMAIL

Weird Message posting to Redhat-List

low is the message from redhat-list. Could anyone tell me why it didn't make it? My hostname voyager.phys.utk.edu *should* resolve. -- The original message was received at Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:20:14 -0400 from voyager.phys.utk.edu [160.36.28.203] - The followin

Re: RES: Displaying message after SSH login

On Thursday 11 September 2003 05:58 pm, Cleber P. de Souza wrote: > In /etc/ssh/ssd_config do you can change the Banner parameter: > Banner /etc/ssh/message > The text in /etc/ssh/message will be displayed after ssh login. > Thanks, that works. RDB -- redhat-list mailing list

RES: Displaying message after SSH login

In /etc/ssh/ssd_config do you can change the Banner parameter: Banner /etc/ssh/message The text in /etc/ssh/message will be displayed after ssh login. *** Cleber P. de Souza Cia. Metalgraphica Paulista -Mensagem original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Reuben

Re: Displaying message after SSH login

try /etc/issue* (afaik, there is a network version as well to separate out logins locally and logins across a network) -- Steve. At 17:18 11/09/2003 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: Hello, Sorry if this is trivial, I've tried Google but haven't found it. I need to display a (stati

Displaying message after SSH login

Hello, Sorry if this is trivial, I've tried Google but haven't found it. I need to display a (static) message after user login through SSH. How do I do that? I changed /etc/motd but it does not get displayed. I looked /etc/ssh/sshd_config but nothing seem obvious. I am runn

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 01:09, Gordon Messmer wrote: > lists wrote: > > One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in > > the sshd pam configuration. > > > > #%PAM-1.0 > > #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth > > auth required pam_nologin.so >

Re: sshd authentication failure message

lists wrote: One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in the sshd pam configuration. #%PAM-1.0 #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required pam_nologin.so accountrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth password required

[Fwd: Re: sshd authentication failure message]

Meant to send this to the list : Be interesting to see what forwarding does to the threading. On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 18:09, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > On 05 Sep 2003 17:58:37 -0500 > Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't know what the recourse would be if I were to really raise h

Re: sshd authentication failure message

Sean Estabrooks wrote: On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:05:24 -0400 lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in the sshd pam configuration. #%PAM-1.0 #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required pam_nologi

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 15:39, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > No, it pisses me off, as well. I just haven't had the time to complain to > RedHat that they've royally messed up all of my logs. I'm also hoping and > praying that RH 10 will fix this problem... Me as well. When these frigging "NON BUGS

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:05:24 -0400 lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in > the sshd pam configuration. > > #%PAM-1.0 > #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth > auth required pam_nologin.so > account

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On 05 Sep 2003 17:58:37 -0500 Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know what the recourse would be if I were to really raise hell. > It appears that the maintainer of RH packages has the power to declare > issues NOTABUG and I do not know the procedure to go over them. > > I pleaded

Re: sshd authentication failure message

One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in the sshd pam configuration. #%PAM-1.0 #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required pam_nologin.so accountrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth password required pam_stack.s

Re: sshd authentication failure message

Ignore the previous post. The system ignores it.. Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in normally with n

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 16:51, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > On 05 Sep 2003 16:30:03 -0500 > Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:10, Peter Fleck wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm > > > wondering about the 'au

Re: sshd authentication failure message

To fix the logging crap change your /etc/ssh/sshd_config to match this. # Logging #obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging SyslogFacility AUTH #SyslogFacility AUTHPRIV #LogLevel INFO Comment AUTHPRIV and uncomment AUTH for the SyslogFacility. Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: Following are two entries fro

Re: sshd authentication failure message

> > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm > > wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to > > happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in > > normally with no problem. Can we change some setting to make this go > > away? >

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On 05 Sep 2003 16:30:03 -0500 Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:10, Peter Fleck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm > > wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to > > happen with every log

Re: sshd authentication failure message

On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:10, Peter Fleck wrote: > Hi, > > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm > wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to > happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in > normally with no problem. Can we

sshd authentication failure message

Hi, Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in normally with no problem. Can we change some setting to make this go away? Thanks. Sep 3

Dreaded Installer Message: "Machine Not Supported" -- Any Hope?

I got the dreaded, infamous message today: "You are trying to install on a machine that isn't supported by this version of Red Hat Linux." This was while doing an install of Red Hat 9 on a Dell 1750. Works fine on 1650s and 2650s, so who could've predicted?! The most exas

Re: /var/log/message error question

for inactivity (something wicked). Mark On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, cajun wrote: > Hi all, > > Was wondering if anyone has ever seen something like this in there > message log file: > > *Aug 31 05:28:56 localhost pppoe[7106]: Inactivity timeout... something > wicked happened on sessi

/var/log/message error question

Hi all, Was wondering if anyone has ever seen something like this in there message log file: *Aug 31 05:28:56 localhost pppoe[7106]: Inactivity timeout... something wicked happened on session 40919* I am running RH9 with all of the latest updates. I have a DSL connection setup and have 2

RE: message of logwatch

Nabin Limbu wrote: > Hi everybody, > > My logwatch reports me the following message everyday. What does this > mean? Is my mail server trying to relay mail to rapti.mos.com.np or is > rapti.mos.com.np trying to relay mails via my mailserver. > Also how can I stop these junk m

message of logwatch

Hi everybody, My logwatch reports me the following message everyday. What does this mean? Is my mail server trying to relay mail to rapti.mos.com.np or is rapti.mos.com.np trying to relay mails via my mailserver. Also how can I stop these junk mails. ruleset=check_mail, arg1=<[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Remote message domain resolution??

> Some of you display astonishing ingenuity at finding solutions to the > most arcane problems. > > Our RT314 log is routed to one machine and prints to "messages" with the > "r"option. Using a tail I can get an idea of what's going on. It would > really help if I could get domain name resolution.

Re: Remote message domain resolution??

On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 08:36, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 08:05:03AM -0400, David Hart wrote: > > Some of you display astonishing ingenuity at finding solutions to the > > most arcane problems. > > > > Our RT314 log is routed to one machine and prints to "messages" with the > > "r"op

Re: Remote message domain resolution??

On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 08:05:03AM -0400, David Hart wrote: > Some of you display astonishing ingenuity at finding solutions to the > most arcane problems. > > Our RT314 log is routed to one machine and prints to "messages" with the > "r"option. Using a tail I can get an idea of what's going on.

Remote message domain resolution??

Some of you display astonishing ingenuity at finding solutions to the most arcane problems. Our RT314 log is routed to one machine and prints to "messages" with the "r"option. Using a tail I can get an idea of what's going on. It would really help if I could get domain name resolution. Before I

What does this error message mean?

kernel: svc: bad direction 65536 We got this on boot-up on a client machine this AM. Reboot was uneventful. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Problem with ldconfig ("not Sym link" message)

the directory down so it only contains one > version of each library or make sure all of the versions have a trailing > version number after the .so (eg. .so.0.1 ). Thanks. The directory does contain several version of the lib. Is it allright if i just ignore the message? Does that me

Re: What does this error message mean?

I don't know for sure, but it could be a miss-formatted RPC request (or some random packages interpreted as an RPC request ?). I was just looking to the svc_process function from /usr/src/linux/net/sunrpc/svc.c . Cheers, -Iulian David Hart wrote: kernel: svc: bad direction 65536 We got this on

Re: Problem with ldconfig ("not Sym link" message)

version number after the .so (eg. .so.0.1 ). > > Thanks. The directory does contain several version of the lib. Is it allright > if i just ignore the message? Does that mean that all the libs already > "loaded"? I am not comfortable with renaming or playing around with di

Re: Problem with ldconfig ("not Sym link" message)

> > /sbin/ldconfig: /home2/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib/libagtsh.so is not a symbolic > link > > Reuben, ldconfig uses the .so ending (with no trailing version numbers) to link to one of multiple libraries.This error is saying that the directory contains multiple versions of this library.

Problem with ldconfig ("not Sym link" message)

Hello, I was doing up2date, when I notice the following message: /sbin/ldconfig: /home2/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib/libnk59.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /home2/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib/libnrad9.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /home2/oracle/product/9.2.0/lib/libagtsh.so is

Re: vsftpd warning message???

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Ian Mortimer wrote: > > I just installed vsftpd and it seems to be working ok except that I'm > > seeing these warning messages in the syslog. Any idea what's causing > > these? I'm just logging on from the same host as the ftp server. > > > > Aug 1 19:31:51 tiger vsftpd:

Re: Strange message

On Sunday 03 August 2003 17:25, Alex wrote: > Does anybody know what is this and what would be the cause+fix for > something like this? > > Forged DCC command from 192.168.254.26: 82.xxx.xxx.xxx:1799 > > Thanks Will this fit the circumstances? If not, I'm not going to be much more help but it ma

Re: vsftpd warning message???

> I just installed vsftpd and it seems to be working ok except that I'm > seeing these warning messages in the syslog. Any idea what's causing > these? I'm just logging on from the same host as the ftp server. > > Aug 1 19:31:51 tiger vsftpd: warning: can't get client address: > Bad file des

Strange message

Does anybody know what is this and what would be the cause+fix for something like this? Forged DCC command from 192.168.254.26: 82.xxx.xxx.xxx:1799 Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

vsftpd warning message???

I just installed vsftpd and it seems to be working ok except that I'm seeing these warning messages in the syslog. Any idea what's causing these? I'm just logging on from the same host as the ftp server. Aug 1 19:31:51 tiger vsftpd: warning: can't get client address: Bad file descriptor --

Re: Kernel panic message.

ystem fails giving the kernel panic message that it > was not able find the init level, use init=option. Does the SCSI disk contain a boot loader that might have accidently been loaded? How is your BIOS setup? Does your machine boot from IDE or SCSI first? If the SCSI disk does not cont

Kernel panic message.

Hello Exverybody, I am running REDHAT linux 8 (linux 2.4.18-14) on Intel i686 platfrom. The root partition is on the IDE disk from which is getting booted. Now I want to connect a SCSI disk on this system. But when I connect the SCSI disk, the system fails giving the kernel panic message that it

RE: symantec spam message

Yes - I have already switched it over - we use Microsoft stuff in-house and I forgot it was set to HTML - already fixed - again sorry for the inconvenience - we were having major issues with the Server 2003 stuff!! Alan Rizzuto -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: symantec spam message

"Rizzuto, Alan" wrote: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > --_=_NextPart_001_01C3552A.C765E8B5 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="us-ascii" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Sorry for all of the issues - I

RE: Symantec stupid error message when posting to RH list

Thankyou - I just turned off the response mechanism - it should be gone from now on! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cowles, Steve Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:06 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Symantec stupid err

symantec spam message

Sorry for all of the issues – I just turned off the return message when it thinks it has spam problems – this has been a pain – I HATE SPAM!   Alan Rizzuto IS Administration Sturman Industries Inc. One Innovation Way Woodland Park, Co. 80863 (719) 686-6269  

RE: Symantec stupid error message when posting to RH list

Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:58:30AM -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: >> Does anyone else get this message below when posting to the list? >> This is so darn annoying. > > Yes, I just added that address to access.db ... > >> Return-Path: <[E

RE: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containin g prohibited content

Actually - no we just set up a brand new Symantec connection that is causing all of this problem. I have been on this list for a long time and never had a problem before the WONDERFUL NEW EXCHANGE AND SYMANTEC applications. Alan Rizzuto -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

Re: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containin g prohibited content

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:03:42AM -0400, David Hart wrote: > On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 09:54, MKlinke wrote: > > On Monday 28 July 2003 07:40, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666) > > > > > > > > > Sturman is apparently a

Re: Symantec stupid error message when posting to RH list

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:58:30AM -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: > Does anyone else get this message below when posting to the list? > This is so darn annoying. Yes, I just added that address to access.db ... > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Hal Burgiss -- redh

Re: [Alerts@SturmanIndustries.com: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:33731228931617092356)]

till not fixed as I am still getting the message. Darn it, can't you unsub from the list until you get it fixed? grr. RDB > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Mike Pelley > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:07 AM >

RE: [Alerts@SturmanIndustries.com: Symantec Mail Security detecte d that you sent a message containing prohibited content

Cowles, Steve wrote: > detecte d that you sent a message containing prohibited content > > > Rizzuto, Alan wrote: >> (SYM:33731228931617092356)] >> >> >> My apologies - our new EXCHANGE email server had a new version of >> Symantec loaded that was

RE: [Alerts@SturmanIndustries.com: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content

Rizzuto, Alan wrote: > (SYM:33731228931617092356)] > > > My apologies - our new EXCHANGE email server had a new version of > Symantec loaded that was blocking all redhat-list messages as spam - > we have it resolved now - sorry for the unrequested responses. Alan > Rizzuto > Thank you for your

RE: [Alerts@SturmanIndustries.com: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:33731228931617092356)]

My apologies - our new EXCHANGE email server had a new version of Symantec loaded that was blocking all redhat-list messages as spam - we have it resolved now - sorry for the unrequested responses. Alan Rizzuto -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [Alerts@SturmanIndustries.com: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:33731228931617092356)]

Maybe SturmanIndustries.com has taken SCO's FUD to heart and is blocking anything Red Hat and/or Linux related :-S Mike > Help! Can someone please explain the message below? I have gotten at > least 2 of these regarding the last 2 messages I sent to the list, and > these m

[Alerts@SturmanIndustries.com: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content (SYM:33731228931617092356)]

Help! Can someone please explain the message below? I have gotten at least 2 of these regarding the last 2 messages I sent to the list, and these messages didn't contain any prohibited content that I am aware of. If this one bounces back to me with the same response, I think I am goi

Re: Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containin g prohibited content

On Monday 28 July 2003 07:40, Cowles, Steve wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666) > > > > > > Subject of the message: RE: getting dns ip automatically > > Recipient of the message: "'[EMAIL PROTECTE

Symantec stupid error message when posting to RH list

Does anyone else get this message below when posting to the list? This is so darn annoying. RDB - Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Symantec Mail Secu

Symantec Mail Security detected that you sent a message containing prohibited content

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > containing prohibited content (SYM:23953231121286250666) > > > Subject of the message: RE: getting dns ip automatically > Recipient of the message: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You've got to be kidding!!!

Test. Disregard Message

Sorry, I think Im having trouble with the list! _ Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=174&referral=Hotmail_taglines_plain&URL=http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania

newgroup message not updated, why?

I am in the gated.redhat-list after i subscribed to the group i only can download the messages until 5/10/03 ( 10 of may 2003 ). i did in every PC also the same, anybody can tell me where i missed when doing subscribing? you all must be curious y i can still use the newgroup i am using the webbase

RE: message in console (scsi0:A:1:0) : Locking max tag count at 64

t; I have recived many times a "(scsi0:A:0:0): Locking max tag count at 64" > message on the console, it?s daily on /var/log/messages too. That is common (unfortunately) but also harmless. Upgrade your kernel to 2.4.18-5 or higher via RHN. It won't stop the messages, but it will let you

message in console (scsi0:A:1:0) : Locking max tag count at 64

Hi. Sometimes appears in the console the message (scsi0:A:1:0) : Locking max tag count at 64 I use RedHat 9 in a dual machine Pentium III 1000 GHz with kernel 2.4.20-18.9smp. Also I have three SCSI disks, the last two in RAID-0. Any idea? Iago Sineiro. -- redhat-list mailing list

Strange message using parted in RedHat 9

appears the next message: md: parted(pid 9269) used obsolete MD ioctl, upgrade your software to use new ioctls Any idea? Note: I use parted version 1.6.3 relase 11 included in Red Hat 9. The previous /dev/md0 raid partition was created in Gentoo 1.4. Iago -- redhat-list mailing list

Re: Display message onto another computer

On 06-Jun-2003/11:14 -0700, jeff allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In the past working on a Irix machine there was a simple way of displaying a >message onto another computer by using the xmessage command. > >Now I'm using RH7.3. Is there a way of displaying a message on

Re: kernel panic still but a diffrent message

Hi Jeremy Configure the kernel again and this time remember to compile into it RAMDISK i.e select Y, I believe in either the file system section or the device section. enjoy! >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/06/03 09:25:46 >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06

Re: kernel panic still but a diffrent message

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06 Jun 2003 21:45:35 -0400, Jeremy Petzold wrote: > What does Redhat do with their set up? sheesh...I love the polish but > what is diffrent in the kernel set up proccess from debian to redhat? > > I am getting a new kernel panic

Re: kernel panic still but a diffrent message

assing "init=" option to kernel > > > > > > I changed to lilo hoping I was just Grub but it is not...it is something > > > with how RH sets up the system that I am not privy to. > > > > > > here is my lilo.conf: > >

Re: kernel panic still but a diffrent message

it is not...it is something > > with how RH sets up the system that I am not privy to. > > > > here is my lilo.conf: > > > > prompt > > timeout=50 > > default=linux > > boot=/dev/hda > > map=/boot/map > > install=/boot/boot.b > >

Re: kernel panic still but a diffrent message

panic: no init found. try passing "init=" option to kernel I changed to lilo hoping I was just Grub but it is not...it is something with how RH sets up the system that I am not privy to. here is my lilo.conf: prompt timeout=50 default=linux boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot

kernel panic still but a diffrent message

. try passing "init=" option to kernel I changed to lilo hoping I was just Grub but it is not...it is something with how RH sets up the system that I am not privy to. here is my lilo.conf: prompt timeout=50 default=linux boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b message=/bo

Display message onto another computer

Hey one and all, In the past working on a Irix machine there was a simple way of displaying a message onto another computer by using the xmessage command. Now I'm using RH7.3. Is there a way of displaying a message on one or all computers. Thanks for you thoughts in advance.

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On 05-Apr-2003/09:14 -0500, William Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:02:00PM -0500, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: >> You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs /windblows >> setup. > >Please provide more information on this: my Windows 98 SE box shows

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:02:00PM -0500, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: > You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs /windblows > setup. Please provide more information on this: my Windows 98 SE box shows winpopup as installed, and messages sent to it seem to be accepted, but

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:13:36AM -0500, Neumann, Shannon M wrote: > I just tried it, and it popped up on my WinXP Pro box just as > expected... > > Shannon Neumann > CIS Coordinator > Indiana Institute of Technology > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (260) 422-556 ext. 2231 > > > > FWIW I was told that XP

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:02:00 -0500 Jason Staudenmayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs > /windblows setup. > > > -Original Message- > From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday,

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

It's all Bob's fault that I have a limited knowledge of Windows. When I find him, I'm kicking his ass. Rigler, Steve wrote: Unless they happen to be running winpopup. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

You have to install the winpopup service through add/remove progs /windblows setup. -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? And to the best of my

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

Unless they happen to be running winpopup. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Nichel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: message pop-up onto a windows box? And to the best of my knowledge, neither does 95, 98, and ME

Re: message pop-up onto a windows box?

And to the best of my knowledge, neither does 95, 98, and ME Bret Hughes wrote: FWIW I was told that XP no longer has this functionality Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 10:13, Neumann, Shannon M wrote: > I just tried it, and it popped up on my WinXP Pro box just as > expected... > Good info thanks. Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: message pop-up onto a windows box?

I just tried it, and it popped up on my WinXP Pro box just as expected... Shannon Neumann CIS Coordinator Indiana Institute of Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] (260) 422-556 ext. 2231 FWIW I was told that XP no longer has this functionality -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL

  1   2   3   4   5   >