At 8/23/2003 00:42 -0600, you wrote:
Just out of curiosity, have you tried actually -playing- those
files? Are they even still valid and not corrupted?
Thanks, Ashley... I hadn't thought of that.
I just played two of my 1GB songs (Kansas, to keep the example consistent)
and they sound OK; c
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
And as a third follow-up (just keeping y'all up to date), I have
attempted to "cp --sparse=always x.wav y.wav" as well as "rsync
--sparse x.wav y.wav" and both of the resulting destination files
exhibit the same behavior.
This is getting very frustrating.
Just out of
At 8/23/2003 00:28 -0600, you wrote:
At 8/22/2003 10:08 -0600, you wrote:
I have all my music recorded as WAV files on my hard drive, currently
taking up slightly over 63GB (and correctly reported as such by "du -ms
/music/wav". The size of each file averages 45MB, although of course
there are a
soo 200MB monsters. Also, sharing the files via Samba to a
Windows 2000 computer was working fine.
Something happened recently (can't think what, but something) and now file
sizes are incorrectly reporte as being HUGE. For example, correct, then
incorrect results reported by different inca
At 8/22/2003 18:17 +0100, Goncalo wrote:
Actually I was kidding with my reply and just trying to put a bit
of humour.
No problem...
> Think of an MP3 as a cassette of old times: portable, convenient,
> wonderful, but of lower quality.
I may be wrong but allow me to disagree with you.
With a .wav
>
> Anything I can do to restore sanity here?
>
Yes ! Convert the files to MP3 !
;-)
Cheers
Goncalo
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
via Samba to a
Windows 2000 computer was working fine.
Something happened recently (can't think what, but something) and now file
sizes are incorrectly reporte as being HUGE. For example, correct, then
incorrect results reported by different incantations of "ls":
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 05:18, Allan Duncan wrote:
> I was looking at the recent files on rawhide, and found this
>
> 52725654 Jun 13 18:30 XFree86-4.3.0-15.1.i386.rpm
> 46353377 Jun 13 18:30 XFree86-devel-4.3.0-15.1.i386.rpm
This is because these packages are built for debugging purposes, i.e.
the
I was looking at the recent files on rawhide, and found this
52725654 Jun 13 18:30 XFree86-4.3.0-15.1.i386.rpm
46353377 Jun 13 18:30 XFree86-devel-4.3.0-15.1.i386.rpm
For comparison, 9.0 (Shrike):
13118193 Feb 28 04:15 XFree86-4.3.0-2.i386.rpm
5365111 Feb 28 04:16 XFree86-devel-4.3.0-2.i386.rpm
D
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 04:10, IS Department wrote:
> I would like to get a listing of the 100 or 500 or 1000 largest files on my system.
>Does anyone know of a command or script to do this? I would want file name/location
>and size in bytes.
>
> Thanks
Try :
find . -size +2000 -size -400
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Randy Franklin wrote:
> On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 04:10 AM, IS Department wrote:
>> I would like to get a listing of the 100 or 500 or 1000 largest files
>> on my system. Does anyone know of a command or script to do this? I
>> would want file name/location and size i
If you have enough RAM and patience, this will work:
bash# find / -type f -size +1024k -print
That will list all files larger than 1MB. To get a listing of all,
sorted by size, do this (again, with lots of RAM and patience):
bash# find / -type f -print | xargs -i ls -l {} | awk '{print $5, $9}
I would like to get a listing of the 100 or 500 or
1000 largest files on my system. Does anyone know of a command or script to do
this? I would want file name/location and size in bytes.
Thanks
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:24:12 -0800
Rich Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> We have RH8.0 along with various other flavors of RH going back to
> 7.0. Here's my problem: I am having problems with WinNT '/mnt' 'ed
> servers that have very large files on them (In excess of 10GB). When
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:24:12AM -0800, Rich Parker wrote:
> We have RH8.0 along with various other flavors of RH going back to 7.0.
> Here's my problem: I am having problems with WinNT '/mnt' 'ed servers
> that have very large files on them (In excess of 10GB). When I run my
Large file suppo
Hi everyone.
We have RH8.0 along with various other flavors of RH going back to 7.0.
Here's my problem: I am having problems with WinNT '/mnt' 'ed servers
that have very large files on them (In excess of 10GB). When I run my
Perl programs to do some sort of 'Processing' be that a read of the
fi
16 matches
Mail list logo
