read something about a couple fellas who were working on
5250 emu's a couple of weeks ago. I think the 5250 specs are "public" so it
shouldn't be too hard to crank out something decent. You might do a Deja
News search on "linux and 5250," I'm sure this w
-- Begin source to tcflush.c
( compile as cc -O2 tcflush.c -o /usr/local/bin/tcflush )
#include
#include
main()
{
if(tcflush(0, TCIOFLUSH)) {
perror("tcflush");
}
exit(0);
}
--- End source
end quoted Deja News article
--
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PR
;t change to ." when started and I'm getting IPV4
checksum errors on ppp0, but I think these are probably unrelated.
Hopefully this information will be of some use to someone else who
encounters this problem in the future.
--
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat
glibc2 FAQ but found nothing
of any use.
Is there a definitive and comprehensive HOWTO or FAQ online that will
instruct this poor newbie on how to straighten this libc thing out and keep
it that way?
tia
David
--
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David Wollmann |
[EMAIL
? I suspect I'm experiencing yet more of the
libc6/glibc2 wierdness, and I've looked at the glibc2 FAQ but found nothing
of any use.
Is there a definitive and comprehensive HOWTO or FAQ online that will
instruct this poor newbie on how to straighten this libc thing out and keep
it that way?
ti
prescribed upgrades that I
haven't been able to find in the form of RPMs. I'm assuming I should 'rpm
-e ' before installing from the tarball?
At any rate, is there a doc online somewhere that explains the fine points
and any 'gotchas' for RH 5.0 devel kernel upgra
e the
product with shrouded source. That way, the ISV could release patches,
RPMs, etc. to allow users to compile for different distributions, and they
wouldn't have to worry too much about people modifying their code.
just my 2 cents
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red
at I changed. I think that the partition
> utilities like fips are meant for DOS FAT-16 filesystems.
>
FWIW, I think there's a FAT32 version of 'fips' on the FAT Support page:
http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/people/chaffee/fat32.html
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
that it takes a geek to be interested in
>distributed computing, but still...
>
>Oh, and the Netscape/MSIE percentage split goes 77/20.
Any idea how many of the Mac/Win folk are just using them because they have
no choice at work?
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE rea
fdown ppp0' to take
the ppp xface down. I'm not sure if this will work on a system where
'netcfg' has been used to set up ppp and none of the scripts or config
files have been edited. One of the gurus can probably answer that, but give
it a try and see what happens.
Thank you,
D
At 07:52 PM 3/9/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Anyone have any experience (good or bad) with the Iomega internal SCSI
>Zip drive? I need a zip drive and since I only have one more IDE
>device I can fit into my computer I want to go the SCSI way rather
>than fill up my last IDE slot. I realize this means
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
Thank you,
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DST ibmhelp.com Technical Support
http://www.ibmhelp.com/
--
Support for legacy IBM products.
Data, document and file conversion for legacy
IBM file and media formats.
--
PLEA
a and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
Thank you,
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
D
collaborative knowledge base built from interactive Q&A? I'm
sure tools are available that would make this a relatively painless project
for two or three reasonably competent web hackers. One or two part time
admins could keep the back end db updated with the latest HOWTOs and FAQs.
Dare I s
At 09:24 AM 3/7/98 -0600, you wrote:
Is the following a typo from CompUSA?
Applixware Office Suite for Linux for Win,Win95, & NT on CD 50807
$79.94
Does this version Applixware really contain Windows95 and NT
executables as well as Linux?
Is this the same version that you offer for $9
e vfat, like msdos, uses 16-bit cluster numbers. Another
>> difference is that fat32 support is not available in stock 2.0.x
>> kernels (or Win95 versions other than OSR2).
>>
>> Does that make it clearer?
David Wollmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat
16 matches
Mail list logo
