I have the stock apache 1.3.27-2 RPM installed, and I'm trying to
get suEXEC to work without success. In the virtual host file I have the
DocumentRoot set to /home/rash/www and I have User and Group set. The
configtest passes without a problem. However whenever I try to execute
anything u
Thanks cris... for ur ..nice and easy reply...
i just needed ..it..
thanks again.
==
> i need help on wget...
> pls let me know the basic commands...
> also inform me the default directory
> where it stores the file..
here is the most basic way to use it.
say you have a
Roberto Dohnert wrote:
I use an Apple Pro Keyboard with my Athlon XP machine and I have a
problem with Grub, it will not allow me to press Enter or any of the
keyboard fuctions, once the system is booted it allows me to use the
keyboard properly. Any suggestions ?
I'm assuming it's USB? If
Quoting Ivo Tijhaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| I'm using sendmail, i already tried disk quota's but in that case procmail
| fails with a temp_fail so this isn't the solution. i already read many faq's
If you use system's quota features and sendmail, then you have to run a script
in cron that will no
I use an Apple Pro Keyboard with my Athlon XP machine and I have a
problem with Grub, it will not allow me to press Enter or any of the
keyboard fuctions, once the system is booted it allows me to use the
keyboard properly. Any suggestions ?
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EM
Thanks for replying. I typed mount /mnt/cdrom The directory does
exist.
- Jason
-Original Message-
From: Bill Tangren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Having Problems Mounting CDROM
Vorpahl, Jason Stephen wrote:
> -
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 21:30, John P Verel wrote:
>
> On 06/17/03 16:23 -0400, Michael Kalus wrote:
> >
> > Try telnetting to your mailserver on port 25, you can send the message
> > directly, no server on your end involved. It's all plain Text.
> I get this in response to telnet localhost 25:
>
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 21:30, John P Verel wrote:
> On 06/17/03 16:23 -0400, Michael Kalus wrote:
> >
> > Try telnetting to your mailserver on port 25, you can send the message
> > directly, no server on your end involved. It's all plain Text.
> I get this in response to telnet localhost 25:
>
> 2
Pretty much.
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of John P Verel
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:31 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May
Be OT]
On 06/17/03 16:23 -0400, Michae
On 06/17/03 16:23 -0400, Michael Kalus wrote:
>
> Try telnetting to your mailserver on port 25, you can send the message
> directly, no server on your end involved. It's all plain Text.
I get this in response to telnet localhost 25:
220 John.optonline.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.12.8/8.12.8; Tue, 17 Ju
Hello redhat-list,
I sent this to the Linux on ThinkPads list and the Psyche list about a
week ago, and haven't seen any response. Trying a wider audience now.
Does anyone have a suggestion on how I can proceed? Thanks!
Ron.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello linux-thinkpad,
I
Please check out LARTC - http://www.lartc.org/. The HOW-TO has examples
dealing with the situation. You will have to apply some patches (
http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes) to your kernel and recompile if you want
dead gateway detection in addition to plain load balancing. I have done
it and it wor
Daryl Hunt wrote:
Sounds like you may need a better provider if one is available. It seems
the areas that are abused the most are from areas that offer the least
services.
There are two other ISP's in town, both are more expensive for their
basic broad band service
--
Wielder of the mighty +1
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph A Nagy Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May Be
OT]
> Daryl Hunt wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Michael Kalus" <[E
Bret Hughes wrote:
Looking through my spam folder to which procmail sends all stuff tagged
by spamassassin I see a lot of stuff from various names but niether the
the originating machine or the first server if it did not go straight to
verio (my webhosting co) have nothing to do with yahoo bigfo
On 06/18/03 06:05 +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> > I am a home user, running stock Red Hat 9, using Sendmail. The only
> > "server" software I run on this box is MySQL, for local use only. I do
> > not run any DHCP sofware on this machine. My ISP, Cablevision, does.
> > So, this AOL policy blocks A
Hello!
I've searched the archives, but the last time that I can find that this
issue was addressed was back in 2001, so I thought I'd check for updates.
I'm looking for a (hopefully easy) way to set up an AES encrypted
partition on my RedHat 9 system. I have a clean drive to use, and I do
not
> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
> Among other things (on my RH8 system). I have no idea how well this
> works or how much PITA.
It works very well and is simple to setup. But it only works for
ethernet and requires a corresponding configuration on the switch.
It has to be a
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:47, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
> Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> > It is analogous to spending 30 minutes in a security line at an airport
> > and having to check your pocket knife because of the terrorist activity
> > in our current environment.
> >
> > Bret
> >
> >
>
> Sorry,
Hi Brett,
> what about the mail command? Doesn't it send directly to smtp servers?
> It is only running for the time it takes to send the mail.
OK granted, but you are sending emails to your relatives on AOL using the
mail command?
What a masochist :)
> Now that I look at it it appears to call
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:32:59PM -0400, Jeff Bearer wrote:
>
> Does something like this exist and I simply didn't look in the right
> place?
$locate bonding
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
[...]
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/bonding.c
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/bonding.o
[.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 22:08, Tom wrote:
> So I changed SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16"
> to SYSFONT="fixed" just to see if it would make any difference.
>
> It worked! Text looks good now, but I do get a failure on boot when
> it
> try's to set DEFAULT FONT. Says cannot find font "fixed".
>
> Si
John Nichel wrote:
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Daryl Hunt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kalus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wouldn't mind having my own fixed IP but they are hard to come by
these
days.
I bought mine.
They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP
Peter Kiem wrote:
Hi John,
(my account has one static and 5 dynamic ip's). I use the static for my
business website, my mail server is on one of the dynamic ip's, and a
Why don't you run your mailserver on the same IP as your website? They can
co-exist happily you know :)
Regards,
+--
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Daryl Hunt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kalus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wouldn't mind having my own fixed IP but they are hard to come by
these
days.
I bought mine.
They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
current ISP wo
Daryl Hunt wrote:
No gray area at all. You are running a Dynamic IP which will not pass the
Reverse DNS lookup many email servers (including mine) will do when you
attempt to send it.
My mail server does have reverse DNS. At least that is what DynDNS.org
states...DNS isn't my strong point.
-
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:18:06AM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> OK that is fine but a large majority of spam is sent from dynamic IP
> addresses which are NOT open relays but just used to spew out millions of
> emails to the rest of us poor suckers.
>
In other words, ALL the ISP's you peer with are
Greetings Rober ,
Robert Jones wrote:
On Monday 16 June 2003 01:45 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 28
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 02:44:44 +0300
From: Kostas Sfakiotakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail Conversion
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All i want to ask is , if the
Bret Hughes wrote:
It is analogous to spending 30 minutes in a security line at an airport
and having to check your pocket knife because of the terrorist activity
in our current environment.
Bret
Sorry, that's BS. Had those passengers eigher A) been more ballsy or B)
been allowed to have wea
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:00, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Joseph,
>
> > You awesome too much. For one thing, I don't run an MTA (nor a web
> > server anymore due to the high CPU demand of RH9). But I do have
> > relatives I might possibly be unable to email because of AOL's shit
> > policy. I think it's ve
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:10, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:05:33AM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> > > I am a home user, running stock Red Hat 9, using Sendmail. The only
> > > "server" software I run on this box is MySQL, for local use only. I do
> > > not run any DHCP sofware on this
Peter Kiem wrote:
Hi Joseph,
It's very safe to assume that, but it's not always the case. On occasion
I've been known to pop open pine and send an email from there.
And pine does direct to remote SMTP email? Doubt it. Surely you had to
configure a POP3 and SMTP server in Pine so it knew how t
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:18, Michael Kalus wrote:
> AOL is NOT doing a reverse lookup all they are doing is seeing that the IP
> address belongs to an upstream provider and is not part of their "declared"
> mail servers and drops the message.
>
if you do a reverse lookup on your ip address,
does
I can't find an application that will allow me to equalize traffic
across two DSL lines such as this router does.
http://www.nexland.com/turbo.cfm
I understand why it's tricky and it wouldn't work with the normal
networking stack. But I'm surprised that nobody has some kernel module
or that can h
Hi Joseph,
> Completely agreed, and your second option is very nice indeed.
>
> I just wish I could buy a static IP for less then $300/month!
Yeah I hear ya :(
Regards,
+-+-+
| Peter Kiem.^. | E-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Jeff,
> > Sorry John, no it doesn't. If you are on a DHCP assigned address then
you
> > should be relaying email through your ISP not directly out.
>
> Can you explain why a DHCP address shoud not do a direct SMTP connect
please?
>
> After all a direct smtp connect is faster and and the protoc
Hi Joseph,
> It's very safe to assume that, but it's not always the case. On occasion
> I've been known to pop open pine and send an email from there.
And pine does direct to remote SMTP email? Doubt it. Surely you had to
configure a POP3 and SMTP server in Pine so it knew how to send/receive?
Bret Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:11, rm wrote:
It's of course their right to block whatever they want, but I too believe it to
be both poor business and ineffective spam control. Aol lost 1 million subscribers in the
last 6 months, and are projected to lose another 1 million in the ne
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:38, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Michael, Michael, Michael,
>
> > Try telnetting to your mailserver on port 25, you can send the message
> > directly, no server on your end involved. It's all plain Text.
> >
> > All an SMTP Server does is follow the protocol but any human being can
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:10:52AM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> > (my account has one static and 5 dynamic ip's). I use the static for my
> > business website, my mail server is on one of the dynamic ip's, and a
>
> Why don't you run your mailserver on the same IP as your website? Th
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:08:10AM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> > "server" being forbidden certainly appears in my TOS, but just being
> > smtp capable, incoming or outgoing does not a server make.
> >
> > Don't confuse the use of certain protocols with running servers. They
> > are not t
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:57, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > While they may be running MAPS or SPEWS also, what they are doing here
> > is different. They are blocking (as explained to me) ALL IP's that
> > they've defined as "residential." My IP doesn't show up in MAPS or
> > SPEWS, but my mail
That was the solution. I did not realize that you
needed to recreate the initrd-xxx since there was
one there already. Thanks for reiterating the
proper procedure.
paulw
Message: 21
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:34:02 +0200
From: Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
Peter Kiem wrote:
Because eventually I want to run a web hosting/design business and I
think it's cheaper to re-invent the wheel (you learn a helluva lot mroe
too) then pay $300+ month for decent, reliable hosting (I say
$300+/month because my company is also going to be hosting an extremely
high b
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:05:33AM +1000, Peter Kiem wrote:
> > I am a home user, running stock Red Hat 9, using Sendmail. The only
> > "server" software I run on this box is MySQL, for local use only. I do
> > not run any DHCP sofware on this machine. My ISP, Cablevision, does.
> > So, this AOL
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:25:06PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Unfortunately I am without funds to do so. The cheapest DSL access
(offered by local telco co-op) is approx. $30 more a month then our
cable modem, otherwise I would (and be hap
Peter Kiem wrote:
Joseph,
You awesome too much. For one thing, I don't run an MTA (nor a web
server anymore due to the high CPU demand of RH9). But I do have
relatives I might possibly be unable to email because of AOL's shit
policy. I think it's very relevant.
If you don't run an MTA then how
Hi Brett,
> and if AOL can work with other ISPs to take an aggressive stance to
> eliminate as much of it as possible I say more power to them. Perhaps
The problem is they are controlling the spam coming IN to them, not OUT from
them!
We need all the large ISPs to tackle the problem BOTH ways!
> Because eventually I want to run a web hosting/design business and I
> think it's cheaper to re-invent the wheel (you learn a helluva lot mroe
> too) then pay $300+ month for decent, reliable hosting (I say
> $300+/month because my company is also going to be hosting an extremely
> high band widt
Joseph,
> You awesome too much. For one thing, I don't run an MTA (nor a web
> server anymore due to the high CPU demand of RH9). But I do have
> relatives I might possibly be unable to email because of AOL's shit
> policy. I think it's very relevant.
If you don't run an MTA then how do you email
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:11, rm wrote:
> It's of course their right to block whatever they want, but I too believe it to
> be both poor business and ineffective spam control. Aol lost 1 million subscribers
> in the
> last 6 months, and are projected to lose another 1 million in the next 6 months
Drew Weaver wrote:
Unfortunately I am without funds to do so. The cheapest DSL access
(offered by local telco co-op) is approx. $30 more a month then our
cable modem, otherwise I would (and be happily running websites off my
box, or not, RH9 sucks up a shit load of resources)
In these scenari
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Not always possible. Only have the cable company, Co-op telco (Baby Bell
called Ben Lomand Rural Telephone Co-Op (although they now also operate
in the city (to compete with Citizens/Frontier I imagine))), and
Frontier (a Citizens Communications Company). From BLomand, a
Hi Michael,
> > OK that is fine but a large majority of spam is sent from
> > dynamic IP addresses which are NOT open relays but just used
> > to spew out millions of emails to the rest of us poor suckers.
>
> So we have tons of people out there who have their windows machines wide
> open and are
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:25:06PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Unfortunately I am without funds to do so. The cheapest DSL access
(offered by local telco co-op) is approx. $30 more a month then our
cable modem, otherwise I would (and be happily running websites off
> So we have tons of people out there who have their windows machines wide
> open and are getting infected by worms, maybe we should just completely
shut
> those people off the net?
Sounds ok to me.
> My ISP has names associated with all the IP addresses, those names are in
> return my customer I
Peter Kiem wrote:
They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
current ISP would cost me $300+ a MONTH.
Then by god get a new ISP.
Not always possible I guess.
FWIW, 8 static IPs on my DSL service cost $100 a YEAR!
Damn
It is worth shopping around.
Not always possible. O
Figured you may find our stats interesting:
these are messages we have rejected since 00:00 (EST) here.
1 SMTP Exceeded Hard Error Limit after HELO
1 SMTP invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 SMTP Exceeded Hard Error Limit after CONNECT
4 ACL mta_clients_relay
6 SMTP Exceeded Hard Error Limit after MAIL
6
Michael, Michael, Michael,
> Try telnetting to your mailserver on port 25, you can send the message
> directly, no server on your end involved. It's all plain Text.
>
> All an SMTP Server does is follow the protocol but any human being can do
> the same thing, it's all plain text.
You miss my poi
Drew Weaver wrote:
I have created users who are in the users group on a Red Hat 8.0 server.
They have bash shell login. How do I restrict users to their home
folders? I don't want them to be able to leave their home folders.
Thanks
You may want to be careful how exactly you manage this because
> Chucks servers at moongroup.com were the first ones to bite me on this
> well over a year ago. I ended up routing everything through my isp
> (SBC) because IIUC my mailserver at the office on a machine called
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and masqueraded behind the static ip address
> of our firewall wou
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:25:06PM -0500, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
:
> >>They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
> >>current ISP would cost me $300+ a MONTH.
> >Then by god get a new ISP.
> >-Drew
> Unfortunately I am without funds to do so. The cheapest DS
> Unfortunately I am without funds to do so. The cheapest DSL access
> (offered by local telco co-op) is approx. $30 more a month then our
> cable modem, otherwise I would (and be happily running websites off my
> box, or not, RH9 sucks up a shit load of resources)
>
In these scenarios I alway
Is anyone else having problems updating their systems via RedCarpet? I'm
trying to update only three packages at a time (because I'm being
limited to 5KB/sec on RC's end) and right now, I'm not able to even
start the process of retrieving those files (whether I run it as root or
a priviledged R
> > I do run my own mailserver, it does NOT relay and if you try it you
> > get dropped with an error code, I had people try to use it
> as a relay
> > but even my own ISP only probes it and then went away when they
> > realized it was closed.
>
> OK that is fine but a large majority of spam i
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:21:35PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > I don't think they check for the reverse lookup matching the forward.
> > If they do, it will break way too many legitimate servers. They may
> > be bouncing mail with NO reverse lookup (I do that myself)
> Technically it is not legi
> Add to that the people on dynamic addresses who THINK they know how to set
> up mailservers but don't have a clue about proper configuration and
> security. This makes open relays and adds even more problems.
You'd be surprised what a MCSE does for people.
> Those of us that have to process TH
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 04:14:16PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Yeah, lets play the symantics game. If your computer is acting as a MTA,
> then you're running a SMTP server, thus violating the ToS of your ISP(in
> your case).
Ok... Let's play the semantics game. Your workstation can
> Jeff,
>
> > "server" being forbidden certainly appears in my TOS, but just being
> > smtp capable, incoming or outgoing does not a server make.
> >
> > Don't confuse the use of certain protocols with running servers. They
> > are not the same thing.
>
> What protocol is used to send email? SMTP
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:22, Daryl Hunt wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Drew Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:02 PM
> Subject: Re: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May Be
> OT]
>
>
> > Thats not true rea
Drew Weaver wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kalus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wouldn't mind having my own fixed IP but they are hard to come by
these
days.
I bought mine.
They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
current ISP would cost me $300+ a MONTH.
> While they may be running MAPS or SPEWS also, what they are doing here
> is different. They are blocking (as explained to me) ALL IP's that
> they've defined as "residential." My IP doesn't show up in MAPS or
> SPEWS, but my mail is still rejected from aol.
>
I feverently advise against using S
> > They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
> > current ISP would cost me $300+ a MONTH.
>
> Then by god get a new ISP.
Not always possible I guess.
FWIW, 8 static IPs on my DSL service cost $100 a YEAR!
It is worth shopping around.
Regards,
+---
> I have created users who are in the users group on a Red Hat 8.0 server.
> They have bash shell login. How do I restrict users to their home
> folders? I don't want them to be able to leave their home folders.
>
> Thanks
You may want to be careful how exactly you manage this because in the p
> I don't think they check for the reverse lookup matching the forward.
> If they do, it will break way too many legitimate servers. They may
> be bouncing mail with NO reverse lookup (I do that myself)
Technically it is not legitimate unless the A matches the PTR record. No 2
ways about it.
> So
> For you to be sending out SMTP traffic directly to AOL you
> have to be running some sort of mailserver so yes you are
> running a server and in violation of your TOS.
Try telnetting to your mailserver on port 25, you can send the message
directly, no server on your end involved. It's all plai
> >
> > What AOL should do is (if they really want to prevent spam)
> to go out
> > to
> the
> > mailserver that makes the connection and see if they can relay to
> > themselves, if they can then block it, if not let the mail
> go through.
>
> They use Reverse DNS Lookup just like the rest of
Hi Michael,
> I do run my own mailserver, it does NOT relay and if you try it you get
> dropped with an error code, I had people try to use it as a relay but even
> my own ISP only probes it and then went away when they realized it was
> closed.
OK that is fine but a large majority of spam is sen
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Michael Kalus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >>I wouldn't mind having my own fixed IP but they are hard to come by
these
> >>days.
> >
> >
> > I bought mine.
>
> They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
> current ISP would cost me $3
> > Thats not true really, I am employed at an ISP and our Forwards and
> reverses
> > all match, and we have a /19.
>
> Let's not compare credentials here. It would be just a pissing match. You
> may think I am wrong but if you send your message to any of my servers and
> it bounced from AOL, it
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:42:53PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > actually, alot of ISPs including one we resell dont allow you to even
make
> > outgoing smtp connections unless you're going to there servers, and I
know
> > that MOST if not all of the Broadband providers in the US for
residential
Hi John,
> (my account has one static and 5 dynamic ip's). I use the static for my
> business website, my mail server is on one of the dynamic ip's, and a
Why don't you run your mailserver on the same IP as your website? They can
co-exist happily you know :)
Regards,
+-
HP LaserJet Series II connected directly to a RedHat 7.2 server. There is a
significant delay for each page to print. I must have misconfigured
something but what?
TIA!
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Cent
Jeff,
> "server" being forbidden certainly appears in my TOS, but just being
> smtp capable, incoming or outgoing does not a server make.
>
> Don't confuse the use of certain protocols with running servers. They
> are not the same thing.
What protocol is used to send email? SMTP!
Where does you
Steve,
Your instructions were superb and my backup mail exchanger is in place and
working. Thanks again!
...Jake
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza Two
> I am a home user, running stock Red Hat 9, using Sendmail. The only
> "server" software I run on this box is MySQL, for local use only. I do
> not run any DHCP sofware on this machine. My ISP, Cablevision, does.
> So, this AOL policy blocks ALL Optonline subscribers from sending to any
> AOL c
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:44:48PM -0500, rm wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:23, Ray Abbitt wrote:
> > Sounds like they may be using the MAPS (Mail Abuse Prevention System)
> > DUL (Dial Up Listing). Most of the addresses on this list were
> > reported to the list by the ISP's responsible for t
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 14:23, Ray Abbitt wrote:
> Sounds like they may be using the MAPS (Mail Abuse Prevention System)
> DUL (Dial Up Listing). Most of the addresses on this list were
> reported to the list by the ISP's responsible for them. And lots of
> systems other than AOL use this list.
>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 12:58:14PM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Hi Daryl - please fix your email client: use one line for the
attribution, not four. (I know, MS-Outlook is a pain isn't it?)
>
> From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > John is quite correct here. AOl and many other large ISP's have
check the following man pages:
man chmod
man chown
man newgrp
and search TLDP for user permissions, file permissions. Basically, what
you have to di is the following: you change the permissions of
everything you don't want them to access using CHMOD. NOTE: this is
highly dangerous... since you mi
On 17 Jun 2003, rm wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 13:47, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> >
> > I run statics that match the DNS MX records. When a reverse DNS lookup
> > happens, it all matches. AOL checks this as well as do I. Too many servers
I don't think they check for the reverse lookup matching the
Daryl Hunt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kalus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wouldn't mind having my own fixed IP but they are hard to come by these
days.
I bought mine.
They aren't exactly cheap though. For me to get a static IP from my
current ISP would cost me $300+ a MONTH.
-
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas, Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May Be
OT]
> I'm sorry to say I tossed the early posts on this topic. They only
started
> to
- Original Message -
From: "Drew Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May Be
OT]
> Thats not true really, I am employed at an ISP and our Forwards and
reverses
> all ma
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Kalus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:52 PM
Subject: RE: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May Be
OT]
> > When a reverse DNS lookup happens, it compares the dns with
> > the IP number. I
I recently upgraded a redhat system from 7.1 to 7.2
and unfortunately must have missed the opportunity
to convert from ext2 to ext3 during the upgrade.
Later I happened to notice that it still was using
ext2 so went through the steps to convert to ext3
that I found on the internet. There seemded t
I am a home user, running stock Red Hat 9, using Sendmail. The only
"server" software I run on this box is MySQL, for local use only. I do
not run any DHCP sofware on this machine. My ISP, Cablevision, does.
So, this AOL policy blocks ALL Optonline subscribers from sending to any
AOL customer.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:42:53PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> actually, alot of ISPs including one we resell dont allow you to even make
> outgoing smtp connections unless you're going to there servers, and I know
> that MOST if not all of the Broadband providers in the US for residential
> servic
Ehrhart, Jay wrote:
I have created users who are in the users group on a Red Hat 8.0 server.
They have bash shell login. How do I restrict users to their home
folders? I don't want them to be able to leave their home folders.
Thanks
Sorry if this a dupe.
Check out TLDP's[0] archives for a chro
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:02:43PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Thats not true really, I am employed at an ISP and our Forwards and reverses
> all match, and we have a /19.
Drew - If you're going to post in this thread (or any thread), please don't
top post. Use the standard email convention so we
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
