On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, you'll need it if you're running an IRC client.
> >
>
>
> Not really. It'll just take longer to connect to the IRC servers and they
> will report that they couldn't obt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 02:33:05PM -0500, Brenden Walker wrote:
> I put linux on my 677mhz and put Win98 on a 266 with 64megs of ram. Now
> it's such a pain to use windows I was forced to find replacement apps on
> linux ;-). Mostly done now, the only thing on the Win box is Turbo Tax.
TurboTax
At 1/22/2002 10:37 AM -0600, you wrote:
>does anybody know how to open up all ports using IPTables?? I want to do
>this just for testing purposes, i have done it using IPF in FreeBSD, with
>a simple command telling it to default to accept.
Should be the simplest thing in the world. You can tel
At 1/22/2002 12:56 PM -0600, you wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> > Actually, you'll need it if you're running an IRC client.
> >
>
>Not really. It'll just take longer to connect to the IRC servers and they
>will report that they couldn't obtain any information about your ide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* and then Brenden Walker blurted
> If you're trying to ween yourself off windoze, it's not gonna happen if you
> still have access to an emulator...
Yeah, in at the deepend is better. Once that learning curve starts to
turn there's no looking b
just my 2cents
If you're trying to ween yourself off windoze, it's not gonna happen if you
still have access to an emulator...
I put linux on my 677mhz and put Win98 on a 266 with 64megs of ram. Now
it's such a pain to use windows I was forced to find replacement apps on
linux ;-). Mostly done
Ed, Dave and Bret,
Thanks for your replies and for setting me straight! Your posts are
keepers and helped clarify what I had been wondering about for awhile. The
options you mentioned will make this linux newbie's life easier in
eventually weaning myself off of windows.
I love this list.
Cheers
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> Actually, you'll need it if you're running an IRC client.
>
Not really. It'll just take longer to connect to the IRC servers and they
will report that they couldn't obtain any information about your identity.
That's all.
I've been running it that
David Talkington wrote:
>
> Now, on the other hand, if you really want to impress your friends,
> make it coexist peacefully in a 3-way multi-boot with Red Hat and a
> Microsoft OS on a laptop.
If you really really want to impress your friends, install a couple of
guest machines in VMware on a l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
>> Not the installation of software but the installation of FreeBSD itself.
>> It's very easy for a newbie to screw it up (the installation). After
>> using redhat these last few years I admit I'm spoiled :-)
>[...]
>
>Hm -
On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 10:37, Oscar Castaneda V. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know how to open up all ports using IPTables?? I want to do this just
>for testing purposes, i have done it using IPF in FreeBSD, with a simple command
>telling it to default to accept.
>
> Any help = appreciated
ho
On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 11:19, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:35:08AM -0600, Chris Montgomery wrote:
> > I suspect that most of the aforementioned products require having Linux
> > and Windows running on two systems at the same time, but I could be wrong.
>
> I'm afraid you are wron
Hello Frank,
Tuesday, January 22, 2002, 12:49:59 PM, you textually orated:
FC> Are you sure? I haven't used it personally but I've been told it was.
When in doubt, visit the website. ;)
http://www.netraverse.com/products/win4lin30/?PHPSESSID=e4139ee5468c1cb9ba3df8b631401606
>>Win4Lin is most
Are you sure? I haven't used it personally but I've been told it was.
>Win4Lin is most definitely *not* a free product.
>
>On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Frank Carreiro wrote:
>
>> Also win4lin works. I believe that is a free product. If you plan on
>> using 95/98 within linux then give it a shot.
>>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:35:08AM -0600, Chris Montgomery wrote:
> I suspect that most of the aforementioned products require having Linux
> and Windows running on two systems at the same time, but I could be wrong.
I'm afraid you are wrong.
There are two approaches involved. One is to interce
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 10:35:08AM -0600, Chris Montgomery wrote:
> I suspect that most of the aforementioned products require having Linux
> and Windows running on two systems at the same time, but I could be wrong.
Yup, you're wrong. VMware is a virtual system and allows you to run your
guest
Is there a way to set things up so that every new user that you create
has the same quota amount? For example, everyone could have 40MB to
start.
--
Janyne Kizer
CNE-3, CNE-4, CNE-5
Systems Programmer Administrator I
NC State University, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences
Extension and Admi
Hi all,
I need to roll out a VPN solution within the next few months, as we are
ditching our MS-based PPTP solution (hooray!). Basically, our main site
will have a Linux firewall box with two nics with a static ip on the
external side, and will be doing masquerading on the inside. Our
b
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> > What could be the meaning of the next messages in my log file?
> > Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: Connection from clic3.clic.net
> > Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570
Hi,
does anybody know how to open up all ports using IPTables?? I want to do this just for
testing purposes, i have done it using IPF in FreeBSD, with a simple command telling
it to default to accept.
Any help = appreciated
greetings,
oscar
--
PGP Key fingerprint = 87 83 5F D3 8D D4 B9 DC
I suspect that most of the aforementioned products require having Linux
and Windows running on two systems at the same time, but I could be wrong.
My question, is, does a product exist that will reliably allow running
windows software while using linux on a dual-boot system? As much as I
would lik
Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 7.0 and 7.1 came with 2.2.x kernels.
Just RHL 7.0.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
> Hello!
> What could be the meaning of the next messages in my log file?
> Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: Connection from clic3.clic.net
> Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: from: 199.45.69.4 ( clic3.clic.net
> ) for: 63199, 25
> Jan 21 22:48:0
I'm not aware of any IRC client that gives you this functionality...*nix,
Windows, or otherwise.
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Jesus Ortega (a.k.a. Nitebirdz) wrote:
> This should hopefully be a simple question. When using XChat I need to see
> the list of chat rooms on a given server, so I go ahead an
Win4Lin is most definitely *not* a free product.
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> Also win4lin works. I believe that is a free product. If you plan on
> using 95/98 within linux then give it a shot.
>
> Personally I'm running vmware. It's VERY flexable and you can run 95 /
> 98
This should hopefully be a simple question. When using XChat I need to see
the list of chat rooms on a given server, so I go ahead and try the "/list"
command. However, this command normally returns lots of information. Is
there any way to use regular expressions? If I try something like
"/li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 16:50
* Frank Carreiro said
> You must have confused the original posters message with someone else.
>
> I thought it was gently put (as much as possible). Offensive?
> considering the below posting I'd say the original post
Well.. it may feel slower and more complicated than the BSD distros but
considering that almost anyone can setup a linux server/workstation as
easily as they can setup a windoze box... I'd say RedHat has made some
good progress.
I started with RedHat 4.x way back when. Most windoze users woul
Thanks for the info. It works now.
Jake
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Thierry ITTY wrote:
> at the first glance if you specify :
>
>
> ...
>
> it means you have a
> UserDir public_html
>
> somewhere
>
> thus the "virtual" root directories for the users are
> /home//public_html and the directory c
At 1/22/2002 12:55 PM +0100, you wrote:
>We are using updated 6.2 with 2.2.20 which works superbly.
>If it's for a server I would stick with 6.2, a desktop user
>might want the newer UI stuff etc that comes with 7.2.
Not as an argument but as a further data point, I've had my 7.0 server with
the
You must have confused the original posters message with someone else.
I thought it was gently put (as much as possible). Offensive?
considering the below posting I'd say the original post was much more
appropriate than this.
>
>... It is rude and offensive here, no different than
>proposi
Also win4lin works. I believe that is a free product. If you plan on
using 95/98 within linux then give it a shot.
Personally I'm running vmware. It's VERY flexable and you can run 95 /
98 / ME / 2000 / XP / BSD / Solaris.
Not a bad product :-)
Is it possiable to install and or operate
That the system clic3.clic.net is probing your ident server...
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
> Hello!
> What could be the meaning of the next messages in my log file?
> Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: Connection from clic3.clic.net
> Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: from:
On 21 Jan 2002, mike wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 19:36, Hidong Kim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I still can't start Samba. I just compiled Samba 2.2.2 to upgrade from
> > 2.2.1a. I'm going through the DIAGNOSIS.txt file. So far, I can run
> > testparm without errors, ping the Linux Samba server
at the first glance if you specify :
...
it means you have a
UserDir public_html
somewhere
thus the "virtual" root directories for the users are
/home//public_html and the directory cgi-bin inside (ie
/home//public_html/cgi-bin) has the url http://server/~user/cgi-bin
and not http://server/~
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:20:41PM +1000, Matthew Melvin said:
> I don't know if it 100% fits what you want.. but I like to use root-tail to
> do this... it tails a file and writes it on the X root window... so no shell
> or borders or anything.
>
Unfortunately, last time I tried root-tail, it do
I guess I'm in minority here in someways. I don't blame AOL for looking for
another OS to run on, its hard to sell cars when your competitor builds your
engine. Don't understand why any 3rd party today would want to run on a MS
platform with the threat of either being copied or bought out or bugg
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 03:00:47PM +1000, Matthew Melvin wrote:
> I think just leave off the second {} so you give it the target dir and the
> target name is infered. So...
>
> find /mnt/cdrom -type f -exec cp {} /home/BigDog/files/source/ \;
I will point out that there are two potential probl
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Tracker wrote:
> well it is installed, I just have to configure and it doesnt have the
> correct module or something like that to configure..here is what I got
>
> copy and paste doesnt work.. sorry
>
>
Can you please paste here more information? I'm particularly refer
Hello everyone. I had my server set up before to
make it so specified users can have their own cgi-bin. I can't seem to remember
how I did it before. And stupid me, I didn't write it down. Here's what I have
so far...
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks Includes MultiViews AllowOverride
Non
Howzit,
What I do is setup the .fetchmail for root with everyone in it
defaults
proto pop3
poll
proto pop3
user
pass ""
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fetchall
poll
proto pop3
user
pass ""
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fet
Yes, you are ofcourse right.
All versions has enough stuff to make them work for anything.
I was thining along the line that some setups on some versions
require more work(updates/tuning etc).
Like it was for us setting up required server environ on 7.2.
I was much easier with 6.2 and also fewer
i think i know the problem,
when i login from x to my server y, /dev/mixer, audio
will be owned by me, if the other user want to use audio
the permission of audio device will deny that.
i think i will change group permission of all of my users which want to using
audio in my server.
On Tue, Jan
That depends entirely on your requirements from the version. I'm
happily running a server with RH 5.2 and kernel 2.2.5 as well as a desktop
with RH 7 and kernel 2.2.16.
steve
-Original Message-
From: OLA SAMUELSON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2002 11:55
To: [EMAI
Hello!
What could be the meaning of the next messages in my log file?
Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: Connection from clic3.clic.net
Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: from: 199.45.69.4 ( clic3.clic.net
) for: 63199, 25
Jan 21 22:48:07 brutus identd[4570]: Returned: 63199 , 25 : NO-USER
Jan
We are using updated 6.2 with 2.2.20 which works superbly.
If it's for a server I would stick with 6.2, a desktop user
might want the newer UI stuff etc that comes with 7.2.
- Original Message -
From: David Krovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:32:26 +0800
"gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> Dear all,
>
> I just created a .fetchmailrc in individual home, to fetch mail from
> mail server, it work fine, but is there a way to do it in root with
> one.fetchmailrc file to fetch for all users, instead of doing it for
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:36:29PM -0700, Frank Carreiro wrote:
> Not the installation of software but the installation of FreeBSD itself.
> It's very easy for a newbie to screw it up (the installation). After
> using redhat these last few years I admit I'm spoiled :-)
[...]
Hm - I have no exp
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 23:06:51 -0600
"Manuel A. Camacho Q." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
> I bought FreeBSD 3.2 in 1999. Still have not found any hardware
> capable of running it. It was really frustrating...
>
> -Manuel.
I tried it, sam version, and it failed midstream. I tried more recently
wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* gary said
> Dear all,
>
> I just started to explore to fetchmail
> Any good/advise where can I get started from
I think the official site is www.tuxedo.org/~esr/fetchmail/
man fetchmail
and check /usr/share/do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* David Talkington said
>
> This is silly, folks. I will agree that the tone of some posts to
> this thread has been quite rude, and that much of the bleating was of
I disagree, maybe i've missed some but I think that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 22-01-02 at 09:17
* Julian Opificius said
> Forgive the bandwidth, but I was cleaning out my attach directory (OK, I
> admit it, I use Eudora on Win98 for mail, for now), and I found this from
> back in '99, so I thought I'd share it. Ho
Dear all,
I just created a .fetchmailrc in individual home, to fetch mail from mail
server, it work fine, but is there a way to do it in root with one
.fetchmailrc file to fetch for all users, instead of doing it for all
users...
Please help to advise
thanks,
gary
___
Hi
I am using Red hat linux as o/s and running application of sco box
on linux through direct telnet or by terminal emulator9xterm/gnome )
facing following problem.
1) printing is not proper(it print junk when bold/underline is given in
report)
2)
Function key is not working properly
pl suggest
R
54 matches
Mail list logo
